TheoremBase

An integral over [a,t] is the integral over [a,b] of the integrand cut off after t, which gives a predicative description of it; the functions are then formed by replacement, currying and the pointwise-map helpers.

Proof

Under the axiom of dependent choice, ([a,b],B[a,b],λ[a,b])([a,b],\mathcal{B}_{[a,b]},\lambda_{[a,b]}) is a measure space (Measurable Functions and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation (vii)).

Integrals over [a,t][a,t] as integrals over [a,b][a,b]. Let t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] and f∈L1([a,b])f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]). As [a,t]∈B[a,b][a,t]\in\mathcal{B}_{[a,b]} (Integrals over Subintervals of a Closed Interval: Notation (iii)), Integrals over Measurable Subsets (vi), applied to μ=λ[a,b]\mu=\lambda_{[a,b]} and A=[a,t]A=[a,t], shows that ff is integrable on [a,t][a,t]. Since λ[a,t]\lambda_{[a,t]} is the restriction of λ[a,b]\lambda_{[a,b]} to [a,t][a,t] (Integrals over Subintervals of a Closed Interval: Notation (iii)), this means f∣[a,t]∈L1(λ[a,t])f|_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda_{[a,t]}) (Integrals of Functions over a Measurable Subset (iii)), and the integral of ff over [a,t][a,t] with respect to λ[a,b]\lambda_{[a,b]} is ∫f∣[a,t] dλ[a,t]=∫[a,t]f dλ\int f|_{[a,t]}\,d\lambda_{[a,t]}=\int_{[a,t]}f\,d\lambda (Integrals of Functions over a Measurable Subset (iv)). By Integrals over Measurable Subsets (ii), the function f1[a,t]f\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]}, which equals ff on [a,t][a,t] and 00 on [a,b]∖[a,t][a,b]\setminus[a,t] (Indicator Function of a Subset (i)), lies in L1([a,b])\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]), and

∫[a,t]f dλ=∫f1[a,t] dλ[a,b].(1)\int_{[a,t]}f\,d\lambda=\int f\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]}\,d\lambda_{[a,b]}.\tag{1}

Thus f∣[a,t]∈L1(λ[a,t])f|_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda_{[a,t]}) and f1[a,t]∈L1([a,b])f\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]), so both sides of (1) are defined. Let g∈L1([a,b];Rn)g\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}), and let gt:[a,b]→Rng^{t}:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be the function with gt(r)=g(r)g^{t}(r)=g(r) for r≤tr\le t and gt(r)=0g^{t}(r)=0 for r>tr>t (Maps Defined by Cases (i)). As the origin of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} has all components 00 (Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (v)), the components of gtg^{t} are (gt)k=gk1[a,t](g^{t})_{k}=g_{k}\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]} for k∈[n]k\in[n]. Since gk∈L1([a,b])g_{k}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]) (Integrable Vector- and Matrix-Valued Functions and Their Integrals (i)), the scalar case gives gk∣[a,t]∈L1(λ[a,t])g_{k}|_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda_{[a,t]}) and gk1[a,t]∈L1([a,b])g_{k}\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]). The restriction g∣[a,t]g|_{[a,t]} is measurable (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (viii)) and has the components gk∣[a,t]g_{k}|_{[a,t]}, and every component of gtg^{t} is measurable, so gtg^{t} is measurable (Vector- and Matrix-Valued Measurable Maps: Components, Entries and Continuous Images (i)); hence g∣[a,t]∈L1(λ[a,t];Rn)g|_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda_{[a,t]};\mathbb{R}^{n}) and gt∈L1([a,b];Rn)g^{t}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Integrable Vector- and Matrix-Valued Functions and Their Integrals (i)). By Integrable Vector- and Matrix-Valued Functions and Their Integrals (ii), taken in both measure spaces, and (1), the kk-th component of ∫gt dλ[a,b]\int g^{t}\,d\lambda_{[a,b]} is

∫gk1[a,t] dλ[a,b]=∫gk∣[a,t] dλ[a,t],\int g_{k}\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]}\,d\lambda_{[a,b]}=\int g_{k}|_{[a,t]}\,d\lambda_{[a,t]},

the kk-th component of ∫g∣[a,t] dλ[a,t]=∫[a,t]g dλ\int g|_{[a,t]}\,d\lambda_{[a,t]}=\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda; hence (Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n: n-Tuples of Real Numbers with Their Componentwise Operations (iii))

∫[a,t]g dλ=∫gt dλ[a,b].(2)\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda=\int g^{t}\,d\lambda_{[a,b]}.\tag{2}

Thus g∣[a,t]∈L1(λ[a,t];Rn)g|_{[a,t]}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda_{[a,t]};\mathbb{R}^{n}) and gt∈L1([a,b];Rn)g^{t}\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}), so both sides of (2) are defined.

A predicative description. Let I:L1([a,b])→RI:\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b])\to\mathbb{R} and J:L1([a,b];Rn)→RnJ:\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n})\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be the integrals with respect to λ[a,b]\lambda_{[a,b]} (Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (iii) and Integrable Vector- and Matrix-Valued Functions and Their Integrals (ii)). With [a,b][a,b], the order of R\mathbb{R}, the origin 00 of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, L1([a,b];Rn)\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) and JJ as parameters, let θ(y,g,t)\theta(y,g,t) be the formula

∃h (h∈L1([a,b];Rn)∧∀r (r∈[a,b]⇒((r≤t⇒(r,g(r))∈h)∧(t<r⇒(r,0)∈h)))∧(h,y)∈J),\exists h\,\Bigl(h\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n})\wedge\forall r\,\bigl(r\in[a,b]\Rightarrow\bigl((r\le t\Rightarrow(r,g(r))\in h)\wedge(t<r\Rightarrow(r,0)\in h)\bigr)\bigr)\wedge(h,y)\in J\Bigr),

predicative under the guard "g∈L1([a,b];Rn)g\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) and t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]". Under this guard, the only hh satisfying the first two conjuncts is gtg^{t}, which lies in L1([a,b];Rn)\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}); so, by (2), θ(y,g,t)\theta(y,g,t) holds exactly for y=J(gt)=∫[a,t]g dλy=J(g^{t})=\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda. The same formula with L1([a,b])\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]), II and 0∈R0\in\mathbb{R} in place of L1([a,b];Rn)\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}), JJ and the origin holds, for f∈L1([a,b])f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]) and t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], exactly for y=I(f1[a,t])=∫[a,t]f dλy=I(f\mathbf{1}_{[a,t]})=\int_{[a,t]}f\,d\lambda, by (1). By Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols (ii), ∫[a,t]f dλ\int_{[a,t]}f\,d\lambda and ∫[a,t]g dλ\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda may therefore be written in expressions as defined set symbols in f,tf,t and in g,tg,t, used properly for f∈L1([a,b])f\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]), g∈L1([a,b];Rn)g\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) and t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], with values in R\mathbb{R} and in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Proof of (i) and (ii). The expressions ∫[a,t]f dλ∈R\int_{[a,t]}f\,d\lambda\in\mathbb{R} and ∫[a,t]g dλ∈Rn\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda\in\mathbb{R}^{n} in t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] give exactly one such function XX each, by Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i).

Proof of (iii). By Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (ii) there is a function Φ:L1([a,b];Rn)×[a,b]→Rn\Phi:\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n})\times[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{n} with Φ(g,t)=∫[a,t]g dλ\Phi(g,t)=\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda, and by Projection, Evaluation and Currying Maps (iii) there is exactly one function J:L1([a,b];Rn)→(Rn)[a,b]\mathcal{J}:\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n})\to(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{[a,b]} with J(g)(t)=Φ(g,t)\mathcal{J}(g)(t)=\Phi(g,t) for all gg and tt.

Proof of (iv). For z∈(Rn)[a,b]z\in(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{[a,b]} and r∈[a,b]r\in[a,b] we have (r,z(r))∈[a,b]×Rn(r,z(r))\in[a,b]\times\mathbb{R}^{n}, so F(r,z(r))∈RnF(r,z(r))\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (ii) gives a function G:(Rn)[a,b]×[a,b]→RnG:(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{[a,b]}\times[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{n} with G(z,r)=F(r,z(r))G(z,r)=F(r,z(r)). By Maps Formed Pointwise: Constant Maps, Pairs of Values, Maps Applied to Values, and Families of Maps (iv) there is exactly one function Θ:(Rn)[a,b]→(Rn)[a,b]\Theta:(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{[a,b]}\to(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{[a,b]} with Θ(z)(r)=G(z,r)\Theta(z)(r)=G(z,r) for all zz and rr.

Proof of (v). By Maps Formed Pointwise: Constant Maps, Pairs of Values, Maps Applied to Values, and Families of Maps (iv) there is a function H:[a,b]→(Rn)[a,b]H:[a,b]\to(\mathbb{R}^{n})^{[a,b]} with H(t)=h(t,⋅)H(t)=h(t,\cdot) for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], and ∫[a,t]h(t,s) ds=∫[a,t]H(t) dλ\int_{[a,t]}h(t,s)\,ds=\int_{[a,t]}H(t)\,d\lambda by Integrals over Subintervals of a Closed Interval: Notation (iii). As H(t)∈L1([a,b];Rn)H(t)\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] by hypothesis, the expression ∫[a,t]H(t) dλ∈Rn\int_{[a,t]}H(t)\,d\lambda\in\mathbb{R}^{n} in t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] gives exactly one such function YY, by Maps and Relations Given by Formulas (i).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…