Throughout, claim numbers for H refer to The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Vector-Valued Functions is a Real Inner Product Space: by claim 4 the pairing is symmetric and linear in each argument, ⟨v,v⟩L2=∥v∥L22, and ∥v∥L2=0 holds only for v=0.
Uniqueness. Suppose η and η′ both represent Λ. Then ⟨η−η′,v⟩L2=Λ(v)−Λ(v)=0 for every v∈H by linearity of the pairing. Taking v=η−η′ gives ∥η−η′∥L22=0, hence η=η′.
The trivial case. If Λ(v)=0 for every v∈H, then η=0 represents Λ, and ∥0∥L2=0≤C.
The kernel. Assume from now on that Λ(u0)=0 for some u0∈H, and put N={v∈H:Λ(v)=0}.
N is nonempty and closed under linear combinations. Hypothesis (i) with s=s′=0 gives Λ(0)=0, so 0∈N. If v,v′∈N and s,s′ are real, then Λ(sv+s′v′)=sΛ(v)+s′Λ(v′)=0, so sv+s′v′∈N. In particular N is convex, taking s′=1−s with 0≤s≤1.
N is closed. The metric open subsets determined by dL2 form a topology by Metric Open Sets Form a Topology. Let v belong to the closure of N and let ε>0 be real. By Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space by Open Balls there is v′∈N with dL2(v,v′)<ε, so by (i) and (ii),
∣Λ(v)∣=∣Λ(v)−Λ(v′)∣=∣Λ(v−v′)∣≤C∥v−v′∥L2<Cε.
If C=0 then Λ(v)=0 by (ii). If C>0 and ∣Λ(v)∣>0, then choosing ε=∣Λ(v)∣C−1>0 gives ∣Λ(v)∣<∣Λ(v)∣, which is false; so Λ(v)=0 in either case, and v∈N. Thus the closure of N is contained in N; as it also contains N and is closed, the set N equals its closure and is closed.
A vector orthogonal to the kernel. By claim 1 of Nearest-Point Projection onto a Nonempty Closed Convex Subset of the Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Vector-Valued Functions, applied to the nonempty closed convex set N, the projection p=πN(u0) exists; put z=u0−p. If z=0 then u0=p∈N, contradicting Λ(u0)=0; so z=0 and ∥z∥L2>0.
Let w∈N. Both p+w and p−w lie in N, so claim 2 of that theorem gives
⟨z,(p+w)−p⟩L2≤0and⟨z,(p−w)−p⟩L2≤0,
that is ⟨z,w⟩L2≤0 and −⟨z,w⟩L2≤0, using linearity of the pairing. Hence ⟨z,w⟩L2=0 for every w∈N.
Moreover Λ(z)=0: otherwise z∈N, whence ∥z∥L22=⟨z,z⟩L2=0 and z=0.
Representation. Put
η=∥z∥L22Λ(z)z∈H.
Let v∈H and set w=v−Λ(z)Λ(v)z. By (i), Λ(w)=Λ(v)−Λ(z)Λ(v)Λ(z)=0, so w∈N and therefore ⟨z,w⟩L2=0. Expanding by linearity of the pairing in the second argument,
0=⟨z,v⟩L2−Λ(z)Λ(v)⟨z,z⟩L2=⟨z,v⟩L2−Λ(z)Λ(v)∥z∥L22,
so that
Λ(v)=∥z∥L22Λ(z)⟨z,v⟩L2=⟨η,v⟩L2,
the last step by linearity of the pairing in the first argument.
The norm bound. Using the representation with v=η and hypothesis (ii),
∥η∥L22=⟨η,η⟩L2=Λ(η)≤∣Λ(η)∣≤C∥η∥L2.
If η=0 then ∥η∥L2=0≤C. Otherwise ∥η∥L2>0, and multiplying the inequality by ∥η∥L2−1>0 gives ∥η∥L2≤C.