TheoremBase

The noise terms are the rescaled basis vectors, whose norms in the order -s space are the inverse powers of the Fourier weights, so square-summability is the summability lemma for the weights; infinite-dimensionality comes from the orthonormal basis; the zero map and minus the identity are checked against the definitions; and the drift identities are the Laplacian and coefficient descriptions of the form operator combined with the orthonormal expansion.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the Sobolev triple (H,V,A)(H,V,A) of order ss and the enumeration κ\kappa fixed in the statement. The clauses of The Negative-Order Sobolev Spaces of the Torus are Hilbert Spaces: the Embedding of the Square-Integrable Classes, the Rescaled Trigonometric Basis, the Series Form of the Inner Product and the Inclusion of the Scale are applied with its mm equal to ss or to s+1s+1, as indicated. By The Negative-Order Sobolev Triple of the Torus: a Diagonal Hilbert Triple whose Form Operator Is One Minus the Laplacian (i), (ζs+1,κ(j))j∈N(\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} is an orthonormal basis of HH, which is in particular an orthonormal sequence in HH.

Claim 1. Let j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N} and put k=κ(j)k=\kappa(j). By The Negative-Order Sobolev Triple of the Torus: a Diagonal Hilbert Triple whose Form Operator Is One Minus the Laplacian (iii), fj=E^k=ρks+1ζs+1,kf_{j}=\hat{E}_{k}=\rho_{k}^{s+1}\zeta_{s+1,k}, and by The Negative-Order Sobolev Spaces of the Torus are Hilbert Spaces: the Embedding of the Square-Integrable Classes, the Rescaled Trigonometric Basis, the Series Form of the Inner Product and the Inclusion of the Scale (iii) with m=sm=s, E^k∈H−s(Tn)=V\hat{E}_{k}\in H^{-s}(\mathbb{T}^{n})=V with ∣E^k∣H−s=ρks|\hat{E}_{k}|_{H^{-s}}=\rho_{k}^{s}; so ∣fj∣V2=(ρks)2=1μks|f_{j}|_{V}^{2}=(\rho_{k}^{s})^{2}=\tfrac{1}{\mu_{k}^{s}} by The Negative-Order Sobolev Spaces of the Torus are Hilbert Spaces: the Embedding of the Square-Integrable Classes, the Rescaled Trigonometric Basis, the Series Form of the Inner Product and the Inclusion of the Scale (i) with m=sm=s.

Since κ\kappa is a bijection, by Bijection of Sets each element of Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} is the value of κ\kappa at exactly one natural number; in particular κ(j)=κ(j′)\kappa(j)=\kappa(j') implies j=j′j=j'. As n≤sn\le s, Summability of the Negative Powers of the Fourier Weights of the Torus (ii) applies to κ\kappa and gives that the series ∑j=1∞1μκ(j)s\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\tfrac{1}{\mu_{\kappa(j)}^{s}} converges with sum at most (1+1π2)n(1+\tfrac{1}{\pi^{2}})^{n}. Its terms are the numbers ∣fj∣V2|f_{j}|_{V}^{2}, so by Square-Summable Sequences in the Form Space of a Hilbert Triple and the Trace of a Form along Them (i) the sequence ff is square-summable in VV with σ(f)\sigma(f) equal to that sum.

Claim 2. Since HH contains the orthonormal sequence (ζs+1,κ(j))j∈N(\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)})_{j\in\mathbb{N}}, A Real Hilbert Space Containing an Orthonormal Sequence Is Not Finite-Dimensional (i) gives the assertion.

Claim 3. We verify the three conditions of Monotone, AA-Monotone and Locally Bounded Nonlinearities on a Hilbert Triple (iv).

Monotonicity. Let x,y∈Vx,y\in V. By claims 1 and 2 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space the additive inverse of 0H0_{H} is 0H0_{H}, so B(x)−B(y)=0H−0H=0HB(x)-B(y)=0_{H}-0_{H}=0_{H}; and ⟨0H,x−y⟩H=0\langle 0_{H},x-y\rangle_{H}=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii). Since 0≤00\le 0, the condition of Monotone, AA-Monotone and Locally Bounded Nonlinearities on a Hilbert Triple (i) holds.

AA-monotonicity. Let x∈D(A)x\in D(A); then Ax∈HAx\in H by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (iii), and ⟨B(x),Ax⟩H=⟨0H,Ax⟩H=0\langle B(x),Ax\rangle_{H}=\langle 0_{H},Ax\rangle_{H}=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii). Since 0≤00\le 0, the condition of Monotone, AA-Monotone and Locally Bounded Nonlinearities on a Hilbert Triple (ii) holds.

Boundedness on VV-bounded sets. Let R∈RR\in\mathbb{R} be positive and take β=0\beta=0. Every x∈Vx\in V satisfies ∣B(x)∣H=∣0H∣H=0|B(x)|_{H}=|0_{H}|_{H}=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii), hence ∣B(x)∣H≤β|B(x)|_{H}\le\beta; in particular this holds for every x∈Vx\in V with ∣x∣V≤R|x|_{V}\le R. So the condition of Monotone, AA-Monotone and Locally Bounded Nonlinearities on a Hilbert Triple (iii) holds, and BB is a monotone nonlinearity for (H,V,A)(H,V,A).

Claim 4. Let x,y∈Hx,y\in H. The vector (−x)+y(-x)+y satisfies (x−y)+((−x)+y)=0H(x-y)+\bigl((-x)+y\bigr)=0_{H}, by the commutativity and associativity of addition in the vector space HH, so it is the additive inverse of x−yx-y by the uniqueness in claim 2 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space; by that same uniqueness −(−y)=y-(-y)=y, so L(x)−L(y)=(−x)−(−y)=(−x)+y=−(x−y)L(x)-L(y)=(-x)-(-y)=(-x)+y=-(x-y). Therefore

dH(L(x),L(y))=∣L(x)−L(y)∣H=∣−(x−y)∣H=∣x−y∣H=dH(x,y),d_{H}\bigl(L(x),L(y)\bigr)=\bigl|L(x)-L(y)\bigr|_{H}=\bigl|-(x-y)\bigr|_{H}=|x-y|_{H}=d_{H}(x,y),

the outer equalities by Real Inner Product Spaces (iii) and the middle one by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv). Since 1 dH(x,y)=dH(x,y)1\,d_{H}(x,y)=d_{H}(x,y) and 0≤10\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, LL is Lipschitz with constant 11 in the sense of Lipschitz Map Between Metric Spaces.

Claim 5. Let u∈Cper2u\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}. By The Negative-Order Sobolev Triple of the Torus: a Diagonal Hilbert Triple whose Form Operator Is One Minus the Laplacian (iv), u∣Qu|_{Q} and (Δu)∣Q(\Delta u)|_{Q} lie in L2(Tn)\mathcal{L}^{2}(\mathbb{T}^{n}), so x=[ u∣Q ]^x=\widehat{[\,u|_{Q}\,]} and D^\hat{D} with D=[ (Δu)∣Q ]D=[\,(\Delta u)|_{Q}\,] are defined, and by the same clause x∈D(A)x\in D(A) and Ax=x−D^Ax=x-\hat{D}. Since B(x)=0HB(x)=0_{H} and L(x)=−xL(x)=-x, claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and the vector space conditions of Vector Space over a Field give

Ax+B(x)+L(x)=Ax+0H+(−x)=Ax−x=(x−D^)−x=−D^,Ax+B(x)+L(x)=Ax+0_{H}+(-x)=Ax-x=(x-\hat{D})-x=-\hat{D},

the last step because (x−D^)−x=(x+(−x))+(−D^)=0H+(−D^)=−D^(x-\hat{D})-x=(x+(-x))+(-\hat{D})=0_{H}+(-\hat{D})=-\hat{D} by commutativity and associativity of addition.

This proves claim 5.

Claim 6. Let w∈D(A)w\in D(A) and write wj=⟨w,ζs+1,κ(j)⟩Hw_{j}=\langle w,\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)}\rangle_{H}. By The Negative-Order Sobolev Triple of the Torus: a Diagonal Hilbert Triple whose Form Operator Is One Minus the Laplacian (ii) the series ∑j=1∞μκ(j)wjζs+1,κ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\mu_{\kappa(j)}w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)} converges in HH with sum AwAw. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space (iii), applied to the orthonormal basis (ζs+1,κ(j))j∈N(\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} of HH and to the vector ww, the series ∑j=1∞wjζs+1,κ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)} converges in HH with sum ww. By Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space (i), applied in HH with the scalar −1-1, the series ∑j=1∞(−1)wjζs+1,κ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}(-1)w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)} converges with sum (−1)w(-1)w, which is −w-w by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Applying Elementary Properties of Series in a Real Inner Product Space (i) again, now to the two convergent series ∑j=1∞μκ(j)wjζs+1,κ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\mu_{\kappa(j)}w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)} and ∑j=1∞(−1)wjζs+1,κ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}(-1)w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)}, the series whose jjth term is μκ(j)wjζs+1,κ(j)+(−1)wjζs+1,κ(j)\mu_{\kappa(j)}w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)}+(-1)w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)} converges in HH with sum Aw+(−w)=Aw−wAw+(-w)=Aw-w.

For each j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N} the vector space conditions of Vector Space over a Field give

μκ(j)wjζs+1,κ(j)+(−1)wjζs+1,κ(j)=((μκ(j)−1)wj)ζs+1,κ(j),\mu_{\kappa(j)}w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)}+(-1)w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)}=\bigl((\mu_{\kappa(j)}-1)w_{j}\bigr)\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)},

and μκ(j)−1=4π2∥κ(j)∥2\mu_{\kappa(j)}-1=4\pi^{2}\lVert\kappa(j)\rVert^{2} by the definition of the Fourier weights. The convergent series just obtained is therefore ∑j=1∞4π2∥κ(j)∥2wjζs+1,κ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{\infty}4\pi^{2}\lVert\kappa(j)\rVert^{2}w_{j}\zeta_{s+1,\kappa(j)}, with sum Aw−wAw-w; and Aw+B(w)+L(w)=Aw+0H+(−w)=Aw−wAw+B(w)+L(w)=Aw+0_{H}+(-w)=Aw-w by claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and claim 2 of that lemma. This proves claim 6.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…