TheoremBase

Each clause is proved directly from the epsilon-N definition of convergence in the real numbers, using the ordered-field inequalities, the maximum of finitely many indices and, for finite sums, induction along an enumeration of the finite index set. The two-sided clause passes between a bound on absolute values and an upper and a lower bound of the set of terms.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

We work in the setting of The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness; by its clause The Real Numbers, with the Natural Numbers, Integers and Rationals Identified with Subsets of the Reals, and Completeness §reals, R\mathbb{R} is an ordered field, so the notation of Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation applies to it and the rules of Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field are in force by Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation §ordered-fields. Throughout, convergence is that of Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers §converges, and N\mathbb{N} carries its order, a total order with strict relation << by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §partial-order and Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §trichotomy. Three facts are used repeatedly.

First, for r∈{2,3}r\in\{2,3\} (the only cases used below) and N1,…,Nr∈NN_{1},\dots,N_{r}\in\mathbb{N} the set {N1,…,Nr}\{N_{1},\dots,N_{r}\} is a nonempty finite subset of N\mathbb{N} by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §small and Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §union, so it has a greatest element max⁡{N1,…,Nr}\max\{N_{1},\dots,N_{r}\} by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §extremes; every n≥max⁡{N1,…,Nr}n\ge\max\{N_{1},\dots,N_{r}\} satisfies n≥Nin\ge N_{i} for each ii, by transitivity of the order.

Second, for x,y∈Rx,y\in\mathbb{R} we have y−x=−(x−y)y-x=-(x-y) by Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §signs, and ∣−z∣=∣z∣|-z|=|z| for every z∈Rz\in\mathbb{R} by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value; taking z=x−yz=x-y gives ∣x−y∣=∣−(x−y)∣=∣y−x∣|x-y|=|-(x-y)|=|y-x|.

Third, for x,y,ε∈Rx,y,\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R}, ∣x−y∣<ε|x-y|<\varepsilon holds if and only if −ε<x−y<ε-\varepsilon<x-y<\varepsilon, by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §absolute-strict, that is, adding yy by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum, if and only if y−ε<x<y+εy-\varepsilon<x<y+\varepsilon.

Clause constant. Every term of (λ)n∈N(\lambda)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is λ\lambda, and λ−λ=λ+(−λ)=0\lambda-\lambda=\lambda+(-\lambda)=0 by Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §negative, while ∣0∣=0|0|=0 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value. So for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 and every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} the nn-th term satisfies ∣λ−λ∣=0<ε|\lambda-\lambda|=0<\varepsilon, and N=1N=1 serves in Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers §converges.

Clause unique. Suppose cn→Lc_{n}\to L, cn→L′c_{n}\to L' and L≠L′L\neq L'. Then L−L′≠0L-L'\neq0, so 0<∣L−L′∣0<|L-L'| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, and ε=∣L−L′∣/2\varepsilon=|L-L'|/2 is positive with ε+ε=∣L−L′∣\varepsilon+\varepsilon=|L-L'| by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §halving. Choose N1N_{1} with ∣cn−L∣<ε|c_{n}-L|<\varepsilon for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} and N2N_{2} with ∣cn−L′∣<ε|c_{n}-L'|<\varepsilon for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁡{N1,N2}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2}\}. By Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §triangle-three-points, the second fact above and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §strict-sum,

∣L−L′∣≤∣L−cN∣+∣cN−L′∣=∣cN−L∣+∣cN−L′∣<ε+ε=∣L−L′∣,|L-L'|\le|L-c_{N}|+|c_{N}-L'|=|c_{N}-L|+|c_{N}-L'|<\varepsilon+\varepsilon=|L-L'|,

so ∣L−L′∣<∣L−L′∣|L-L'|<|L-L'| by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed, which Uniqueness of Least and Greatest Elements, Properties of the Strict Order, and Trichotomy for Total Orders §strict-irreflexive excludes. Hence L=L′L=L'.

Clause bounded. Let an→Aa_{n}\to A. Since 0<10<1 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares, there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with ∣an−A∣<1|a_{n}-A|<1 for n≥Nn\ge N; for such nn, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §triangle-three-points with x=anx=a_{n}, y=0y=0, z=Az=A and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum give ∣an∣≤∣an−A∣+∣A∣≤1+∣A∣=∣A∣+1|a_{n}|\le|a_{n}-A|+|A|\le1+|A|=|A|+1, using an−0=ana_{n}-0=a_{n} and A−0=AA-0=A: since 0+0=00+0=0 by Commutative Rings §ring, we have −0=0-0=0 by Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §negative, so x−0=x+0=xx-0=x+0=x for every x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}. The set [N]={1,…,N}[N]=\{1,\dots,N\} is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §naturals, so its image {∣ak∣:k∈[N]}\{|a_{k}|:k\in[N]\} under k↦∣ak∣k\mapsto|a_{k}| is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §image, and

S={∣ak∣:k∈[N]}∪{∣A∣+1}S=\{|a_{k}|:k\in[N]\}\cup\{|A|+1\}

is a nonempty finite subset of R\mathbb{R} by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §small and Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §union. The order of the ordered field R\mathbb{R} is total, so SS has a greatest element M=max⁡SM=\max S by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice §extremes. Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §trichotomy, n≤Nn\le N or N≤nN\le n. If n≤Nn\le N, then n∈[N]n\in[N], as 1≤n1\le n by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §least, so ∣an∣≤M|a_{n}|\le M; if N≤nN\le n, then ∣an∣≤∣A∣+1≤M|a_{n}|\le|A|+1\le M. Thus ∣an∣≤M|a_{n}|\le M for every nn, and (an)(a_{n}) is bounded.

Clause two-sided. Let (an)(a_{n}) be a sequence in R\mathbb{R} and S={an:n∈N}S=\{a_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\} the set of its terms. By Bounded Sequences of Real Numbers §bounded and Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order §bounded, (an)(a_{n}) is bounded above, respectively bounded below, if and only if SS has an upper bound, respectively a lower bound, in the sense of Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order §bounds. Suppose first that (an)(a_{n}) is bounded, with M∈RM\in\mathbb{R} such that ∣an∣≤M|a_{n}|\le M for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, −M≤an≤M-M\le a_{n}\le M for every nn, so MM is an upper bound and −M-M a lower bound of SS; thus (an)(a_{n}) is bounded above and bounded below.

Conversely, let (an)(a_{n}) be bounded above and bounded below, let UU be an upper bound and VV a lower bound of SS, and put M=∣U∣+∣V∣M=|U|+|V|. Since 0≤∣U∣0\le|U| and 0≤∣V∣0\le|V| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum gives ∣U∣≤M|U|\le M and ∣V∣≤M|V|\le M, hence −M≤−∣V∣-M\le-|V| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-negative. Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}; as an∈Sa_{n}\in S, we have V≤an≤UV\le a_{n}\le U by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order §bounds. Using U≤∣U∣U\le|U| and −∣V∣≤V-|V|\le V from Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value,

−M≤−∣V∣≤V≤an≤U≤∣U∣≤M,-M\le-|V|\le V\le a_{n}\le U\le|U|\le M,

so −M≤an≤M-M\le a_{n}\le M by transitivity of the order of R\mathbb{R}, that is ∣an∣≤M|a_{n}|\le M by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value. Hence (an)(a_{n}) is bounded.

Clause tails. Let cn=anc_{n}=a_{n} for n≥Kn\ge K. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N1N_{1} with ∣an−A∣<ε|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} and put N=max⁡{N1,K}N=\max\{N_{1},K\}; for n≥Nn\ge N, ∣cn−A∣=∣an−A∣<ε|c_{n}-A|=|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon. Finally let p∈Np\in\mathbb{N}. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose NN with ∣an−A∣<ε|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. For n≥Nn\ge N we have n<n+pn<n+p by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §difference, hence n+p≥Nn+p\ge N and ∣an+p−A∣<ε|a_{n+p}-A|<\varepsilon. So (an+p)n∈N(a_{n+p})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to AA.

Clause arithmetic. Sums. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, the element ε/2\varepsilon/2 is positive with ε/2+ε/2=ε\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §halving. Choose N1N_{1} with ∣an−A∣<ε/2|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon/2 for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} and N2N_{2} with ∣bn−B∣<ε/2|b_{n}-B|<\varepsilon/2 for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁡{N1,N2}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2}\}. For n≥Nn\ge N, since (an+bn)−(A+B)=(an−A)+(bn−B)(a_{n}+b_{n})-(A+B)=(a_{n}-A)+(b_{n}-B) by Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §signs and the commutative ring laws, the triangle inequality Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §triangle, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §strict-sum and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed give

∣(an+bn)−(A+B)∣≤∣an−A∣+∣bn−B∣<ε/2+ε/2=ε.|(a_{n}+b_{n})-(A+B)|\le|a_{n}-A|+|b_{n}-B|<\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon.

Scalar multiples. If λ=0\lambda=0, then λan=0=λA\lambda a_{n}=0=\lambda A for every nn by Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §zero, and the claim is the clause constant for the constant sequence 00. Let λ≠0\lambda\neq0, so 0<∣λ∣0<|\lambda| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, the element δ=ε ∣λ∣−1\delta=\varepsilon\,|\lambda|^{-1} is positive by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §positive-reciprocal and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §positive-product, and ∣λ∣ δ=ε|\lambda|\,\delta=\varepsilon. Choose NN with ∣an−A∣<δ|a_{n}-A|<\delta for n≥Nn\ge N. For n≥Nn\ge N, as λan−λA=λ(an−A)\lambda a_{n}-\lambda A=\lambda(a_{n}-A) by Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §signs and the commutative ring laws, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product give ∣λan−λA∣=∣λ∣ ∣an−A∣<∣λ∣ δ=ε|\lambda a_{n}-\lambda A|=|\lambda|\,|a_{n}-A|<|\lambda|\,\delta=\varepsilon.

Negatives and differences. By Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §signs, −an=(−1)an-a_{n}=(-1)a_{n} and −A=(−1)A-A=(-1)A, so −an→−A-a_{n}\to-A is the case λ=−1\lambda=-1. Then an−bn=an+(−bn)a_{n}-b_{n}=a_{n}+(-b_{n}) by Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §negative, and the case of sums, applied to (an)(a_{n}) and (−bn)(-b_{n}), gives an−bn→A+(−B)=A−Ba_{n}-b_{n}\to A+(-B)=A-B.

Products. By clause bounded there is M∈RM\in\mathbb{R} with ∣an∣≤M|a_{n}|\le M for every nn; then 0≤∣a1∣≤M0\le|a_{1}|\le M. Put C=M+∣B∣+1C=M+|B|+1. Since 0≤M0\le M and 0≤∣B∣0\le|B|, we have 0≤M+∣B∣0\le M+|B| by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum, hence 0<C0<C by 0<10<1 and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §strict-sum; and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum gives ∣an∣≤C|a_{n}|\le C for every nn and ∣B∣≤C|B|\le C. For every nn, the identity anbn−AB=an(bn−B)+B(an−A)a_{n}b_{n}-AB=a_{n}(b_{n}-B)+B(a_{n}-A), from Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §signs and the commutative ring laws, together with Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §triangle, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §nonnegative-scaling and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum, gives

∣anbn−AB∣≤∣an∣ ∣bn−B∣+∣B∣ ∣an−A∣≤C ∣bn−B∣+C ∣an−A∣.|a_{n}b_{n}-AB|\le|a_{n}|\,|b_{n}-B|+|B|\,|a_{n}-A|\le C\,|b_{n}-B|+C\,|a_{n}-A|.

Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, put δ=(ε/2) C−1\delta=(\varepsilon/2)\,C^{-1}, which is positive by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §halving, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §positive-reciprocal and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §positive-product, and satisfies Cδ=ε/2C\delta=\varepsilon/2. Choose N1N_{1} with ∣an−A∣<δ|a_{n}-A|<\delta for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} and N2N_{2} with ∣bn−B∣<δ|b_{n}-B|<\delta for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁡{N1,N2}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2}\}. For n≥Nn\ge N, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product gives C ∣bn−B∣<ε/2C\,|b_{n}-B|<\varepsilon/2 and C ∣an−A∣<ε/2C\,|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon/2, so ∣anbn−AB∣<ε/2+ε/2=ε|a_{n}b_{n}-AB|<\varepsilon/2+\varepsilon/2=\varepsilon by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §strict-sum, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §halving.

Clause quotient. Let B≠0B\neq0 and bn≠0b_{n}\neq0 for every nn. For x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R} with x≠0x\neq0 we have ∣x∣ ∣x−1∣=∣x x−1∣=∣1∣=1|x|\,|x^{-1}|=|x\,x^{-1}|=|1|=1 by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares, so ∣x−1∣=∣x∣−1|x^{-1}|=|x|^{-1} by Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §reciprocal. We first show bn−1→B−1b_{n}^{-1}\to B^{-1}. As 0<∣B∣0<|B|, the element β=∣B∣/2\beta=|B|/2 is positive with β+β=∣B∣\beta+\beta=|B| by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §halving. Choose N1N_{1} with ∣bn−B∣<β|b_{n}-B|<\beta for n≥N1n\ge N_{1}. For n≥N1n\ge N_{1}, Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §reverse-triangle and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed give ∣∣bn∣−∣B∣∣<β\big||b_{n}|-|B|\big|<\beta, so by the third fact above ∣B∣−β<∣bn∣|B|-\beta<|b_{n}|, that is 0<β<∣bn∣0<\beta<|b_{n}|, and therefore ∣bn∣−1<β−1|b_{n}|^{-1}<\beta^{-1} by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §positive-reciprocal. Put Γ=β−1∣B∣−1\Gamma=\beta^{-1}|B|^{-1}, which is positive by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §positive-reciprocal and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §positive-product. For every nn, bn−1−B−1=(B−bn) bn−1B−1b_{n}^{-1}-B^{-1}=(B-b_{n})\,b_{n}^{-1}B^{-1} by Rules of Arithmetic in a Commutative Ring: Zero, Signs and Squares, and No Zero Divisors in a Field §signs and Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §reciprocal; hence for n≥N1n\ge N_{1}, by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, the second fact above and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §nonnegative-scaling,

∣bn−1−B−1∣=∣bn−B∣ ∣bn∣−1 ∣B∣−1≤Γ ∣bn−B∣.|b_{n}^{-1}-B^{-1}|=|b_{n}-B|\,|b_{n}|^{-1}\,|B|^{-1}\le \Gamma\,|b_{n}-B|.

Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, the element εΓ−1\varepsilon \Gamma^{-1} is positive by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §positive-reciprocal and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §positive-product. Choose N2N_{2} with ∣bn−B∣<εΓ−1|b_{n}-B|<\varepsilon \Gamma^{-1} for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁡{N1,N2}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2}\}. For n≥Nn\ge N, Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed give ∣bn−1−B−1∣<Γ εΓ−1=ε|b_{n}^{-1}-B^{-1}|<\Gamma\,\varepsilon \Gamma^{-1}=\varepsilon. So bn−1→B−1b_{n}^{-1}\to B^{-1}, and the product case of clause arithmetic, applied to (an)(a_{n}) and (bn−1)(b_{n}^{-1}), gives an/bn=anbn−1→AB−1=A/Ba_{n}/b_{n}=a_{n}b_{n}^{-1}\to AB^{-1}=A/B, quotients being as in Negatives, Differences, Reciprocals and Quotients §reciprocal.

Clause absolute. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose NN with ∣an−A∣<ε|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. For n≥Nn\ge N, ∣∣an∣−∣A∣∣≤∣an−A∣<ε\big||a_{n}|-|A|\big|\le|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §reverse-triangle and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed.

Clause finite-sums. Here II is finite, D:I→RD:I\to\mathbb{R}, i↦Dii\mapsto D_{i}, is a map by hypothesis, and for each n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, i↦d(i,n)i\mapsto d(i,n) is a map from II to R\mathbb{R} by Sets and Maps: Ordinary Notation §maps. The addition of R\mathbb{R} is associative and commutative with neutral element 00, so, as Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation §rings records, the sums of these maps over II are those of Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval §operation and Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval §empty. If I=∅I=\emptyset, then ∑i∈Id(i,n)=0\sum_{i\in I}d(i,n)=0 for every nn and ∑i∈IDi=0\sum_{i\in I}D_{i}=0 by Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval §empty, and the claim is the clause constant for the constant sequence 00.

Let I≠∅I\neq\emptyset, let q=#I∈Nq=\#I\in\mathbb{N}, and let φ\varphi be a bijection from [q][q] onto II, as in Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval §operation. By that clause and Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval §intervals, for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}

∑i∈Id(i,n)=∑j=1qd(φ(j),n),∑i∈IDi=∑j=1qDφ(j).\sum_{i\in I}d(i,n)=\sum_{j=1}^{q}d(\varphi(j),n),\qquad\sum_{i\in I}D_{i}=\sum_{j=1}^{q}D_{\varphi(j)}.

We induct along the enumeration φ\varphi: by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §induction, applied to the set of those m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} for which m≤qm\le q implies that (∑j=1md(φ(j),n))n∈N\big(\sum_{j=1}^{m}d(\varphi(j),n)\big)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ∑j=1mDφ(j)\sum_{j=1}^{m}D_{\varphi(j)}, it suffices to treat m=1m=1 and the step from mm to m+1m+1. For m=1m=1, the interval {1,…,1}\{1,\dots,1\} is {1}\{1\} by antisymmetry of the order, so by Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals §singleton the claim reads d(φ(1),n)→Dφ(1)d(\varphi(1),n)\to D_{\varphi(1)}, which holds by hypothesis as φ(1)∈I\varphi(1)\in I. Suppose the claim for mm, and let m+1≤qm+1\le q; then m<m+1≤qm<m+1\le q by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §successor, so m≤qm\le q by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §partial-order and the claim for mm applies. As 1≤m+1≤q1\le m+1\le q, m+1∈[q]m+1\in[q], so φ(m+1)∈I\varphi(m+1)\in I. By Iterated Operations over Finite Sets: Singletons, Disjoint Unions, Reindexing, Products of Sets, Termwise Combination, Homomorphisms and Intervals §interval-recursion, with the interval sums of Sums and Products over a Finite Set and over an Interval §sums,

∑j=1m+1d(φ(j),n)=∑j=1md(φ(j),n)+d(φ(m+1),n),∑j=1m+1Dφ(j)=∑j=1mDφ(j)+Dφ(m+1),\sum_{j=1}^{m+1}d(\varphi(j),n)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}d(\varphi(j),n)+d(\varphi(m+1),n),\qquad\sum_{j=1}^{m+1}D_{\varphi(j)}=\sum_{j=1}^{m}D_{\varphi(j)}+D_{\varphi(m+1)},

and d(φ(m+1),n)→Dφ(m+1)d(\varphi(m+1),n)\to D_{\varphi(m+1)} by hypothesis; so the case of sums in clause arithmetic gives the claim for m+1m+1. Taking m=qm=q proves the clause.

Clause order. Let an≤bna_{n}\le b_{n} for every n≥Kn\ge K, and suppose that A≤BA\le B fails. Then B<AB<A by Uniqueness of Least and Greatest Elements, Properties of the Strict Order, and Trichotomy for Total Orders §total-negation, so 0<A−B0<A-B by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum, and ε=(A−B)/2\varepsilon=(A-B)/2 is positive with ε+ε=A−B\varepsilon+\varepsilon=A-B by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §halving; hence B+ε=A−εB+\varepsilon=A-\varepsilon. Choose N1N_{1} with ∣an−A∣<ε|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} and N2N_{2} with ∣bn−B∣<ε|b_{n}-B|<\varepsilon for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁡{N1,N2,K}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2},K\}. By the third fact above,

bN<B+ε=A−ε<aN,b_{N}<B+\varepsilon=A-\varepsilon<a_{N},

so bN<aNb_{N}<a_{N}, while aN≤bNa_{N}\le b_{N} as N≥KN\ge K; this contradicts Uniqueness of Least and Greatest Elements, Properties of the Strict Order, and Trichotomy for Total Orders §total-negation. Hence A≤BA\le B. The constant sequence λ\lambda converges to λ\lambda by the clause constant. If an≤λa_{n}\le\lambda for n≥Kn\ge K, the case just proved, with the constant sequence λ\lambda in place of (bn)(b_{n}), gives A≤λA\le\lambda; if λ≤an\lambda\le a_{n} for n≥Kn\ge K, it gives λ≤A\lambda\le A when applied with the constant sequence λ\lambda in place of the first sequence and (an)(a_{n}) in place of the second.

Clause squeeze. Let A=BA=B and an≤cn≤bna_{n}\le c_{n}\le b_{n} for every n≥Kn\ge K. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N1N_{1} with ∣an−A∣<ε|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥N1n\ge N_{1} and N2N_{2} with ∣bn−A∣<ε|b_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}, and put N=max⁡{N1,N2,K}N=\max\{N_{1},N_{2},K\}. For n≥Nn\ge N, the third fact above and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed give

A−ε<an≤cn≤bn<A+ε,A-\varepsilon<a_{n}\le c_{n}\le b_{n}<A+\varepsilon,

so A−ε<cn<A+εA-\varepsilon<c_{n}<A+\varepsilon, that is ∣cn−A∣<ε|c_{n}-A|<\varepsilon by the third fact again.

Clause domination. Let (bn)(b_{n}) be a null sequence and ∣cn−L∣≤bn|c_{n}-L|\le b_{n} for every n≥Kn\ge K. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose N1N_{1} with ∣bn−0∣<ε|b_{n}-0|<\varepsilon for n≥N1n\ge N_{1}, and put N=max⁡{N1,K}N=\max\{N_{1},K\}. For n≥Nn\ge N, using bn≤∣bn∣b_{n}\le|b_{n}| from Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, bn−0=bnb_{n}-0=b_{n} as in clause bounded, and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed,

∣cn−L∣≤bn≤∣bn∣=∣bn−0∣<ε.|c_{n}-L|\le b_{n}\le|b_{n}|=|b_{n}-0|<\varepsilon .

Clause subsequence. Let a∘σa\circ\sigma be a subsequence of (an)(a_{n}), with σ:N→N\sigma:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} strictly increasing. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose NN with ∣an−A∣<ε|a_{n}-A|<\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. For k≥Nk\ge N we have σ(k)≥k≥N\sigma(k)\ge k\ge N by Monotone Sequences and Subsequences: Comparison of All Terms, Growth of the Indices, and Subsequences of Subsequences §index, so ∣aσ(k)−A∣<ε|a_{\sigma(k)}-A|<\varepsilon. Hence aσ(k)→Aa_{\sigma(k)}\to A.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…