TheoremBase

The coordinate identities unfold the concatenation map; the pairing claim is the definition of a push-forward together with change of variables; and the gluing is built atom by atom as a finite combination of product measures over the atoms of the middle marginal.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named in the statement above.

Claim 1. The projections pr1d,d\mathrm{pr}^{d,d}_{1}, pr2d,d\mathrm{pr}^{d,d}_{2} and pr1d+d,d\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}, pr2d+d,d\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2} are Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), so each qi\mathrm{q}_{i} is Borel, a composition of Borel maps being Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii); the three pairings are then Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii).

Let x,y,z∈Rdx,y,z\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i) applied to the splitting (d+d)+d(d+d)+d,

pr1d+d,d(ι3(x,y,z))=ιd,d(x,y),pr2d+d,d(ι3(x,y,z))=z,\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}\bigl(\iota_{3}(x,y,z)\bigr)=\iota^{d,d}(x,y),\qquad\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2}\bigl(\iota_{3}(x,y,z)\bigr)=z ,

and by the same clause applied to the splitting d+dd+d, pr1d,d(ιd,d(x,y))=x\mathrm{pr}^{d,d}_{1}(\iota^{d,d}(x,y))=x and pr2d,d(ιd,d(x,y))=y\mathrm{pr}^{d,d}_{2}(\iota^{d,d}(x,y))=y. Composing gives q1(ι3(x,y,z))=x\mathrm{q}_{1}(\iota_{3}(x,y,z))=x, q2(ι3(x,y,z))=y\mathrm{q}_{2}(\iota_{3}(x,y,z))=y and q3(ι3(x,y,z))=z\mathrm{q}_{3}(\iota_{3}(x,y,z))=z.

Let w∈R3dw\in\mathbb{R}^{3d}. By Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i) for the splitting (d+d)+d(d+d)+d, w=ιd+d,d(pr1d+d,d(w),pr2d+d,d(w))w=\iota^{d+d,d}(\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}(w),\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2}(w)), and by the same clause for the splitting d+dd+d applied to the point pr1d+d,d(w)\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}(w) of Rd+d\mathbb{R}^{d+d},

pr1d+d,d(w)=ιd,d(q1(w),q2(w)).\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}(w)=\iota^{d,d}\bigl(\mathrm{q}_{1}(w),\mathrm{q}_{2}(w)\bigr).

Hence w=ι3(q1(w),q2(w),q3(w))w=\iota_{3}(\mathrm{q}_{1}(w),\mathrm{q}_{2}(w),\mathrm{q}_{3}(w)), so ι3\iota_{3} is surjective onto R3d\mathbb{R}^{3d}; and it is injective, because the preceding paragraph recovers each of x,y,zx,y,z from ι3(x,y,z)\iota_{3}(x,y,z). Thus ι3\iota_{3} is a bijection.

Claim 2. The pairing (S,T)(S,T) is Borel, as recorded in the statement. For Borel g:Rn+n→Rng:\mathbb{R}^{n+n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} and B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) one has, directly from the definition of a push-forward in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv) and the identity (g∘(S,T))−1(B)=(S,T)−1(g−1(B))(g\circ(S,T))^{-1}(B)=(S,T)^{-1}(g^{-1}(B)) for preimages,

g#((S,T)#λ)(B)=((S,T)#λ)(g−1(B))=λ((g∘(S,T))−1(B))=(g∘(S,T))#λ(B).g_{\#}\bigl((S,T)_{\#}\lambda\bigr)(B)=\bigl((S,T)_{\#}\lambda\bigr)\bigl(g^{-1}(B)\bigr)=\lambda\bigl((g\circ(S,T))^{-1}(B)\bigr)=\bigl(g\circ(S,T)\bigr)_{\#}\lambda(B).

Taking g=pr1n,ng=\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{1} and g=pr2n,ng=\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{2}, and using pr1n,n∘(S,T)=S\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{1}\circ(S,T)=S and pr2n,n∘(S,T)=T\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{2}\circ(S,T)=T from Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), gives

(pr1n,n)#((S,T)#λ)=S#λ,(pr2n,n)#((S,T)#λ)=T#λ,(\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{1})_{\#}\bigl((S,T)_{\#}\lambda\bigr)=S_{\#}\lambda,\qquad(\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{2})_{\#}\bigl((S,T)_{\#}\lambda\bigr)=T_{\#}\lambda,

which is exactly the condition of Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i) for (S,T)#λ(S,T)_{\#}\lambda to be a coupling of S#λS_{\#}\lambda and T#λT_{\#}\lambda; that it is a probability measure on Rn+n\mathbb{R}^{n+n} holds by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv).

For the cost, Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (ii) gives

I((S,T)#λ)=∫Rn+n∥pr1n,n(u)−pr2n,n(u)∥2 ((S,T)#λ)(du),I\bigl((S,T)_{\#}\lambda\bigr)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n+n}}\bigl\lVert\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{1}(u)-\mathrm{pr}^{n,n}_{2}(u)\bigr\rVert^{2}\,\bigl((S,T)_{\#}\lambda\bigr)(du),

and the change-of-variables formula of Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (iv), applied to the Borel map (S,T)(S,T) and to that nonnegative Borel integrand, turns the right-hand side into ∫Rm∥S−T∥2 dλ\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\lVert S-T\rVert^{2}\,d\lambda, since the integrand evaluated at (S,T)(s)(S,T)(s) is ∥S(s)−T(s)∥2\lVert S(s)-T(s)\rVert^{2} by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i).

Claim 3. Since ρ(Rd∖F)=0\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F)=0 and ρ(Rd)=1\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1, claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure gives ρ(F)=1\rho(F)=1; and FF being finite with its one-point subsets Borel and pairwise disjoint, claim 1 of Basic Properties of a Measure gives ρ(F)=∑a∈Fρ({a})\rho(F)=\sum_{a\in F}\rho(\{a\}). Let F′={a∈F:0<ρ({a})}F'=\{a\in F:0<\rho(\{a\})\}, a finite set; the terms of that sum indexed outside F′F' are 00, so by the same clause ρ(F′)=1\rho(F')=1, and F′F' is nonempty. For a∈F′a\in F' write wa=ρ({a})w_{a}=\rho(\{a\}), a positive real number.

The conditional measures. Fix a∈F′a\in F' and set

Ea=(pr2)−1({a})⊆Rd+d,Ga=(pr1)−1({a})⊆Rd+d,E_{a}=(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(\{a\})\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\qquad G_{a}=(\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(\{a\})\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{d+d},

Borel sets, being preimages of the Borel set {a}\{a\} under Borel maps. By Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i), π12(Ea)=ρ({a})=wa\pi_{12}(E_{a})=\rho(\{a\})=w_{a} and π23(Ga)=wa\pi_{23}(G_{a})=w_{a}.

By claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions, applied to the measure space (Rd+d,B(Rd+d),π12)(\mathbb{R}^{d+d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}),\pi_{12}) and the Borel set EaE_{a}, the trace σ\sigma-algebra B(Rd+d)∣Ea\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d})|_{E_{a}} and the restriction π12∣Ea\pi_{12}|_{E_{a}} form a measure space on EaE_{a}. The restriction of pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} to EaE_{a} is measurable from it to (Rd,B(Rd))(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d})): the preimage of A∈B(Rd)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) is (pr1)−1(A)∩Ea(\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(A)\cap E_{a}, a Borel subset of EaE_{a}. Let αa\alpha_{a} be wa−1w_{a}^{-1} times the image measure of π12∣Ea\pi_{12}|_{E_{a}} under that restriction, a measure by Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables and by Nonnegative Combinations of Two Finite Measures, and the Average of Two Couplings (i) applied with the nonnegative scalars s=wa−1s=w_{a}^{-1} and t=0t=0; explicitly

αa(A)=wa−1 π12((pr1)−1(A)∩Ea)(A∈B(Rd)).\alpha_{a}(A)=w_{a}^{-1}\,\pi_{12}\bigl((\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(A)\cap E_{a}\bigr)\qquad(A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d})).

Taking A=RdA=\mathbb{R}^{d} gives αa(Rd)=wa−1π12(Ea)=1\alpha_{a}(\mathbb{R}^{d})=w_{a}^{-1}\pi_{12}(E_{a})=1, so αa∈P(Rd)\alpha_{a}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). Symmetrically, using GaG_{a}, the restriction of pr2\mathrm{pr}_{2} and π23\pi_{23}, define βa∈P(Rd)\beta_{a}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) with

βa(B)=wa−1 π23(Ga∩(pr2)−1(B))(B∈B(Rd)).\beta_{a}(B)=w_{a}^{-1}\,\pi_{23}\bigl(G_{a}\cap(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(B)\bigr)\qquad(B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d})).

The candidate measure. For a∈F′a\in F' let Ψa:Rd+d→R3d\Psi_{a}:\mathbb{R}^{d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{3d} be the map u↦ι3(pr1(u),a,pr2(u))u\mapsto\iota_{3}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u),a,\mathrm{pr}_{2}(u)). It is Borel: the constant map with value aa is Borel, being continuous, so Ψa\Psi_{a} is a pairing of pairings of Borel maps, Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (ii). Let αa⊠βa∈P(Rd+d)\alpha_{a}\boxtimes\beta_{a}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) be the product measure of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii), and put

σ=∑a∈F′wa (Ψa)#(αa⊠βa),\sigma=\sum_{a\in F'}w_{a}\,(\Psi_{a})_{\#}(\alpha_{a}\boxtimes\beta_{a}),

a finite nonnegative combination of probability measures on (R3d,B(R3d))(\mathbb{R}^{3d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{3d})), which is a measure by Nonnegative Combinations of Two Finite Measures, and the Average of Two Couplings (i) applied repeatedly, once for each element of the finite set F′F' beyond the first. Its total mass is ∑a∈F′wa=ρ(F′)=1\sum_{a\in F'}w_{a}=\rho(F')=1, so σ∈P(R3d)\sigma\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{3d}).

The first pairwise marginal. Let C∈B(Rd+d)C\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d}) and let a∈F′a\in F'. For u∈Rd+du\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d}, claim 1 gives q1(Ψa(u))=pr1(u)\mathrm{q}_{1}(\Psi_{a}(u))=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u) and q2(Ψa(u))=a\mathrm{q}_{2}(\Psi_{a}(u))=a, so

(q1,q2)(Ψa(u))=ιd,d(pr1(u),a).(\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{2})\bigl(\Psi_{a}(u)\bigr)=\iota^{d,d}\bigl(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u),a\bigr).

Put Ca={x∈Rd:ιd,d(x,a)∈C}C_{a}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:\iota^{d,d}(x,a)\in C\}, the preimage of CC under the Borel map x↦ιd,d(x,a)x\mapsto\iota^{d,d}(x,a) and hence Borel. Then Ψa−1((q1,q2)−1(C))=(pr1)−1(Ca)\Psi_{a}^{-1}((\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{2})^{-1}(C))=(\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(C_{a}), and by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii), the image of αa⊠βa\alpha_{a}\boxtimes\beta_{a} under pr1\mathrm{pr}_{1} being αa\alpha_{a},

(αa⊠βa)(Ψa−1((q1,q2)−1(C)))=αa(Ca).(\alpha_{a}\boxtimes\beta_{a})\Bigl(\Psi_{a}^{-1}\bigl((\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{2})^{-1}(C)\bigr)\Bigr)=\alpha_{a}(C_{a}).

Now wa αa(Ca)=π12((pr1)−1(Ca)∩Ea)w_{a}\,\alpha_{a}(C_{a})=\pi_{12}((\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(C_{a})\cap E_{a}), and this set is C∩EaC\cap E_{a}: a point uu lies in it exactly when pr2(u)=a\mathrm{pr}_{2}(u)=a and ιd,d(pr1(u),a)∈C\iota^{d,d}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u),a)\in C, and for such a uu one has u=ιd,d(pr1(u),pr2(u))=ιd,d(pr1(u),a)u=\iota^{d,d}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(u))=\iota^{d,d}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(u),a) by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (i), so that the second condition reads u∈Cu\in C. Summing over a∈F′a\in F' and using the definition of σ\sigma and of a push-forward,

(q1,q2)#σ(C)=∑a∈F′π12(C∩Ea)=π12(C∩(pr2)−1(F′))=π12(C),(\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{2})_{\#}\sigma(C)=\sum_{a\in F'}\pi_{12}(C\cap E_{a})=\pi_{12}\Bigl(C\cap(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(F')\Bigr)=\pi_{12}(C),

the middle equality by claim 1 of Basic Properties of a Measure, the sets C∩EaC\cap E_{a} being pairwise disjoint with union C∩(pr2)−1(F′)C\cap(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(F'), and the last as follows. By Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost (i), π12((pr2)−1(Rd∖F′))=ρ(Rd∖F′)\pi_{12}((\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F'))=\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F'), which is 00 by claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure applied to the Borel set F′F' with ρ(F′)=1\rho(F')=1 and ρ(Rd)=1\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1. Since C∖(pr2)−1(F′)C\setminus(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(F') is contained in (pr2)−1(Rd∖F′)(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F'), it too is π12\pi_{12}-null by claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure, so claim 3 of that lemma gives π12(C∩(pr2)−1(F′))=π12(C)\pi_{12}(C\cap(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(F'))=\pi_{12}(C).

The second pairwise marginal. Symmetrically, q2(Ψa(u))=a\mathrm{q}_{2}(\Psi_{a}(u))=a and q3(Ψa(u))=pr2(u)\mathrm{q}_{3}(\Psi_{a}(u))=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(u), so (q2,q3)(Ψa(u))=ιd,d(a,pr2(u))(\mathrm{q}_{2},\mathrm{q}_{3})(\Psi_{a}(u))=\iota^{d,d}(a,\mathrm{pr}_{2}(u)). With Ca={y∈Rd:ιd,d(a,y)∈C}C^{a}=\{y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:\iota^{d,d}(a,y)\in C\} one gets Ψa−1((q2,q3)−1(C))=(pr2)−1(Ca)\Psi_{a}^{-1}((\mathrm{q}_{2},\mathrm{q}_{3})^{-1}(C))=(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(C^{a}), whose αa⊠βa\alpha_{a}\boxtimes\beta_{a}-measure is βa(Ca)\beta_{a}(C^{a}) by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets (iii); then waβa(Ca)=π23(Ga∩(pr2)−1(Ca))=π23(C∩Ga)w_{a}\beta_{a}(C^{a})=\pi_{23}(G_{a}\cap(\mathrm{pr}_{2})^{-1}(C^{a}))=\pi_{23}(C\cap G_{a}) by the same computation with the roles of the two coordinates exchanged, and summing over a∈F′a\in F' gives (q2,q3)#σ=π23(\mathrm{q}_{2},\mathrm{q}_{3})_{\#}\sigma=\pi_{23}, the passage from π23(C∩(pr1)−1(F′))\pi_{23}(C\cap(\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(F')) to π23(C)\pi_{23}(C) being justified exactly as in the previous paragraph, now from π23((pr1)−1(Rd∖F′))=ρ(Rd∖F′)=0\pi_{23}((\mathrm{pr}_{1})^{-1}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F'))=\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F')=0.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…