TheoremBase

Proof of The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space

theoremthm:wasserstein-metric-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 6,783 chars · 14 deps · depth 21 Reason: Goal 3A: proof that the quadratic Wasserstein distance is a metric - symmetry by the swap, separation by bounded Lipschitz test functions, and the triangle inequality by quantise, modify and glue.

Symmetry by the swap, separation by the diagonal coupling and by the Lipschitz bound together with the determination of a finite Borel measure by bounded Lipschitz test functions, and the triangle inequality by quantising the middle measure, modifying the two near-optimal couplings, and gluing over the finitely supported quantised measure.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, Π(,)\Pi(\cdot,\cdot) and II are the couplings and their quadratic cost; by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance, for α,βP2(Rd)\alpha,\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) the number W2(α,β)W_{2}(\alpha,\beta) is nonnegative, W2(α,β)2W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)^{2} is the greatest lower bound of J(α,β)={I(π):πΠ(α,β)}J(\alpha,\beta)=\{I(\pi):\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta)\}, a set of nonnegative real numbers by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §cost-finite, and W2(α,β)2I(π)W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)^{2}\le I(\pi) for every πΠ(α,β)\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta), so that W2(α,β)I(π)W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)\le\sqrt{I(\pi)} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. We use the following approximation: for α,βP2(Rd)\alpha,\beta\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is πΠ(α,β)\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta) with I(π)<W2(α,β)+ε\sqrt{I(\pi)}<W_{2}(\alpha,\beta)+\varepsilon. Indeed, with W=W2(α,β)W=W_{2}(\alpha,\beta) and η=2Wε+ε2\eta=2W\varepsilon+\varepsilon^{2}, which is positive because 02Wε0\le2W\varepsilon by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field (WW being nonnegative and 0<2ε0<2\varepsilon by claims 8 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), 0<ε20<\varepsilon^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and claim 3 there, claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} gives πΠ(α,β)\pi\in\Pi(\alpha,\beta) with I(π)<W2+η=(W+ε)2I(\pi)<W^{2}+\eta=(W+\varepsilon)^{2} (claim 5 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field), whence I(π)<W+ε\sqrt{I(\pi)}<W+\varepsilon by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Claim 1. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §swap, πσ#π\pi\mapsto\sigma_{\#}\pi is a bijection of Π(μ,ν)\Pi(\mu,\nu) onto Π(ν,μ)\Pi(\nu,\mu) with I(σ#π)=I(π)I(\sigma_{\#}\pi)=I(\pi); hence J(μ,ν)=J(ν,μ)J(\mu,\nu)=J(\nu,\mu), so the two sets have the same greatest lower bound, and W2(μ,ν)=W2(ν,μ)W_{2}(\mu,\nu)=W_{2}(\nu,\mu) by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance, the nonnegative square root being unique by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root.

Claim 2. If μ=ν\mu=\nu, then (id,id)#μΠ(μ,μ)(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\mu\in\Pi(\mu,\mu) has quadratic cost 00 by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §pushforward, so W2(μ,μ)20W_{2}(\mu,\mu)^{2}\le0; being nonnegative, W2(μ,μ)2=0W_{2}(\mu,\mu)^{2}=0, and W2(μ,μ)=0W_{2}(\mu,\mu)=0 by claim 3 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. Conversely suppose W2(μ,ν)=0W_{2}(\mu,\nu)=0, and let f:RdRf:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and Lipschitz with some constant L0L\ge0 from (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) to R\mathbb{R} with the absolute-value metric, the notion of Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound. Put Δ=fdμfdν\Delta=|\int f\,d\mu-\int f\,d\nu|, the integrals existing by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures since ff is bounded and Borel (continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous, hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps). For every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 the approximation gives πΠ(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) with I(π)<ε\sqrt{I(\pi)}<\varepsilon, and then ΔLI(π)Lε\Delta\le L\sqrt{I(\pi)}\le L\varepsilon by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. If L=0L=0 this gives Δ0\Delta\le0; if 0<L0<L and 0<Δ0<\Delta held, the choice ε=ΔL121\varepsilon=\Delta L^{-1}\cdot2^{-1}, positive by claims 7, 5 and 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, would give ΔΔ21<Δ\Delta\le\Delta\cdot2^{-1}<\Delta by claim 8 there, which is impossible. Hence Δ=0\Delta=0, that is, fdμ=fdν\int f\,d\mu=\int f\,d\nu for every bounded Lipschitz ff. Now (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}) is a nonempty metric space whose Borel σ\sigma-algebra is B(Rd)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §spaces, and μ,ν\mu,\nu are finite measures on it; so μ=ν\mu=\nu by claim 1 of Lipschitz Test Functions Determine a Finite Borel Measure, and Uniqueness of Weak Limits.

Claim 3. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<ε0<\varepsilon. By the approximation there are π12Π(μ,ν)\pi_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) and π23Π(ν,λ)\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\nu,\lambda) with

I(π12)<W2(μ,ν)+ε,I(π23)<W2(ν,λ)+ε,\sqrt{I(\pi_{12})}<W_{2}(\mu,\nu)+\varepsilon,\qquad\sqrt{I(\pi_{23})}<W_{2}(\nu,\lambda)+\varepsilon ,

both costs being finite. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §quantisation there is a Borel T:RdRdT:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} with finite image F=T(Rd)F=T(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and T(y)y2ν(dy)ε2\int\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)\le\varepsilon^{2}, so that T(y)y2ν(dy)ε\sqrt{\int\lVert T(y)-y\rVert^{2}\,\nu(dy)}\le\varepsilon by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; put ρ=T#νP(Rd)\rho=T_{\#}\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d}), which satisfies ρ(RdF)=0\rho(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus F)=0 by the same clause. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §modification, π12=(pr1,Tpr2)#π12Π(μ,ρ)\pi'_{12}=(\mathrm{pr}_{1},T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi_{12}\in\Pi(\mu,\rho) and π23=(Tpr1,pr2)#π23Π(ρ,λ)\pi'_{23}=(T\circ\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\pi_{23}\in\Pi(\rho,\lambda) have finite costs with

I(π12)I(π12)+ε,I(π23)I(π23)+ε,\sqrt{I(\pi'_{12})}\le\sqrt{I(\pi_{12})}+\varepsilon,\qquad\sqrt{I(\pi'_{23})}\le\sqrt{I(\pi_{23})}+\varepsilon ,

the second by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field applied to the bound on I(π23)I(\pi'_{23}) recorded there. By Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §gluing applied to ρ\rho, FF, π12\pi'_{12} and π23\pi'_{23}, there is π13Π(μ,λ)\pi_{13}\in\Pi(\mu,\lambda) with I(π13)I(π12)+I(π23)\sqrt{I(\pi_{13})}\le\sqrt{I(\pi'_{12})}+\sqrt{I(\pi'_{23})}. Combining these inequalities by claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

W2(μ,λ)I(π13)<W2(μ,ν)+W2(ν,λ)+ε+ε+ε+ε.W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)\le\sqrt{I(\pi_{13})}<W_{2}(\mu,\nu)+W_{2}(\nu,\lambda)+\varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon .

Write S=W2(μ,ν)+W2(ν,λ)S=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)+W_{2}(\nu,\lambda). If S<W2(μ,λ)S<W_{2}(\mu,\lambda) held, let γ=W2(μ,λ)S\gamma=W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)-S, positive by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and choose ε=γ212121\varepsilon=\gamma\cdot2^{-1}\cdot2^{-1}\cdot2^{-1}, positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; three applications of that claim give ε+ε+ε+ε=γ21<γ\varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon+\varepsilon=\gamma\cdot2^{-1}<\gamma, so the display yields W2(μ,λ)<S+γ=W2(μ,λ)W_{2}(\mu,\lambda)<S+\gamma=W_{2}(\mu,\lambda), which is impossible. Hence W2(μ,λ)SW_{2}(\mu,\lambda)\le S.

Claim 4. By Metric Space, a metric on P2(Rd)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) is a real-valued function of two arguments that is nonnegative, vanishes exactly on pairs of equal points, is symmetric, and satisfies the triangle inequality; W2W_{2} has these properties by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance and claims 2, 1 and 3. So (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}) is a metric space.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…