TheoremBase

For each kk the class of Borel sets squeezed between a closed and an open set up to ε\varepsilon for the finite measure A↦λn(A∩Wk)A\mapsto\lambda_n(A\cap W_k) is shown to be a σ\sigma-algebra containing the closed sets, hence all of B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n); the global statements follow by splitting Rn\mathbb{R}^n into bounded shells with budget ε2−k\varepsilon 2^{-k}.

Proof

Notation and two preliminaries. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put

Wk={x∈Rn:∣xl∣<k for every l},W‾k={x∈Rn:∣xl∣≤k for every l},W_{k}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:|x_{l}|<k\ \text{for every }l\},\qquad \overline{W}_{k}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:|x_{l}|\le k\ \text{for every }l\},

absolute values being those of Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Each WkW_{k} is open and each W‾k\overline{W}_{k} is closed and bounded, hence compact by The Heine-Borel Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and Compactness of Closed Balls and the Unit Sphere; both are Borel. The sequence (Wk)k∈N(W_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} is increasing and ⋃kWk=Rn\bigcup_{k}W_{k}=\mathbb{R}^{n}, because for x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n} the Archimedean property (The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers) supplies k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with ∥x∥<k\lVert x\rVert<k, and ∣xl∣≤∥x∥|x_{l}|\le\lVert x\rVert for every ll by Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. Since WkW_{k} is bounded, λn(Wk)<∞\lambda_{n}(W_{k})<\infty by Balls Have Positive Lebesgue Measure and Bounded Sets Have Finite Lebesgue Measure.

(P1) The measures μk\mu_{k}. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} define μk(A)=λn(A∩Wk)\mu_{k}(A)=\lambda_{n}(A\cap W_{k}) for A∈B(Rn)A\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). Then μk(∅)=0\mu_{k}(\varnothing)=0 and, since intersecting with WkW_{k} preserves disjointness and commutes with countable unions, μk\mu_{k} is countably additive; so μk\mu_{k} is a measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), and it is finite because μk(Rn)=λn(Wk)<∞\mu_{k}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=\lambda_{n}(W_{k})<\infty. Note also that λn(A)=μk(A)\lambda_{n}(A)=\mu_{k}(A) whenever A⊆WkA\subseteq W_{k}.

(P2) Continuity from above. Let μ\mu be a finite measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and let (Ap)p∈N(A_{p})_{p\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with Ap+1⊆ApA_{p+1}\subseteq A_{p} for every pp; put A=⋂pApA=\bigcap_{p}A_{p}. Then the sequence (μ(Ap))p∈N(\mu(A_{p}))_{p\in\mathbb{N}} converges to μ(A)\mu(A). Indeed, the sets Bp=A1∖ApB_{p}=A_{1}\setminus A_{p} increase with union A1∖AA_{1}\setminus A, and all values of μ\mu are real and bounded above by μ(Rn)\mu(\mathbb{R}^{n}), so claim 5 of Basic Properties of a Measure gives that (μ(Bp))p(\mu(B_{p}))_{p} converges to μ(A1∖A)\mu(A_{1}\setminus A). By claim 3 of the same lemma, μ(Bp)=μ(A1)−μ(Ap)\mu(B_{p})=\mu(A_{1})-\mu(A_{p}) and μ(A1∖A)=μ(A1)−μ(A)\mu(A_{1}\setminus A)=\mu(A_{1})-\mu(A), and the assertion follows.

(P3) A geometric bound. For every p∈Np\in\mathbb{N} one has ∑m=1p2−m=1−2−p≤1\sum_{m=1}^{p}2^{-m}=1-2^{-p}\le 1, by induction on pp (Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers). Let c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} with 0≤c0\le c. Every term of the sequence (c 2−m)m∈N(c\,2^{-m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is then real, and its partial sums c(1−2−p)c(1-2^{-p}) are bounded above by cc; by the convention for sums of sequences in [0,∞][0,\infty] fixed in Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure, the sum of a sequence whose terms are real with partial sums bounded above is the least upper bound of those partial sums. Hence ∑m∈Nc 2−m≤c\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}c\,2^{-m}\le c.

Step 1: an approximation class. Let A\mathcal{A} be the set of all B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with the property that for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there are a closed set FF and an open set VV with F⊆B⊆VF\subseteq B\subseteq V and μk(V∖F)≤ε\mu_{k}(V\setminus F)\le\varepsilon. We show A=B(Rn)\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}).

(a) Every closed set lies in A\mathcal{A}. Let C⊆RnC\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n} be closed and let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and ε>0\varepsilon>0 be given. If C=∅C=\varnothing take F=V=∅F=V=\varnothing. Otherwise take F=CF=C and, for p∈Np\in\mathbb{N}, put Vp={x∈Rn:dE(x,C)<1/p}V_{p}=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:d_{E}(x,C)<1/p\}, where dE( ⋅ ,C)d_{E}(\,\cdot\,,C) is the distance to CC; it is continuous, being nonexpansive by The Distance to a Set is Nonexpansive, so VpV_{p} is open, and clearly C⊆VpC\subseteq V_{p}. If x∉Cx\notin C then, Rn∖C\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus C being open, there is r>0r>0 with ∥y−x∥≥r\lVert y-x\rVert\ge r for every y∈Cy\in C, hence dE(x,C)≥rd_{E}(x,C)\ge r, and by the Archimedean property x∉Vpx\notin V_{p} for large pp. Therefore ⋂pVp=C\bigcap_{p}V_{p}=C, so the decreasing sets Vp∖CV_{p}\setminus C have empty intersection, and (P2) applied to the finite measure μk\mu_{k} gives pp with μk(Vp∖C)≤ε\mu_{k}(V_{p}\setminus C)\le\varepsilon. Take V=VpV=V_{p}.

(b) A\mathcal{A} is closed under complements. If F⊆B⊆VF\subseteq B\subseteq V with FF closed and VV open, then Rn∖V\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus V is closed, Rn∖F\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus F is open,

Rn∖V⊆Rn∖B⊆Rn∖F,(Rn∖F)∖(Rn∖V)=V∖F,\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus V\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus B\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus F,\qquad (\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus F)\setminus(\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus V)=V\setminus F,

so the same pair of estimates works for Rn∖B\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus B.

(c) A\mathcal{A} is closed under countable unions. Let (Bm)m∈N(B_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in A\mathcal{A} and B=⋃mBmB=\bigcup_{m}B_{m}; fix kk and ε>0\varepsilon>0. Choose closed FmF_{m} and open VmV_{m} with Fm⊆Bm⊆VmF_{m}\subseteq B_{m}\subseteq V_{m} and μk(Vm∖Fm)≤(ε/2)2−m\mu_{k}(V_{m}\setminus F_{m})\le(\varepsilon/2)2^{-m}. The set V=⋃mVmV=\bigcup_{m}V_{m} is open and contains BB. Put G=⋃mFmG=\bigcup_{m}F_{m} and Gp=⋃m≤pFmG_{p}=\bigcup_{m\le p}F_{m}; each GpG_{p} is closed, because Rn∖Gp=⋂m≤p(Rn∖Fm)\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus G_{p}=\bigcap_{m\le p}(\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus F_{m}) is a finite intersection of open sets and hence open by The Open Subsets of a Metric Space Form a Topology, a set being closed exactly when its complement is open, and Gp⊆G⊆BG_{p}\subseteq G\subseteq B. Since V∖G⊆⋃m(Vm∖Fm)V\setminus G\subseteq\bigcup_{m}(V_{m}\setminus F_{m}), countable subadditivity (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure) and (P3) give μk(V∖G)≤ε/2\mu_{k}(V\setminus G)\le\varepsilon/2. The sets G∖GpG\setminus G_{p} decrease with empty intersection, so (P2) gives pp with μk(G∖Gp)≤ε/2\mu_{k}(G\setminus G_{p})\le\varepsilon/2. Then V∖Gp⊆(V∖G)∪(G∖Gp)V\setminus G_{p}\subseteq(V\setminus G)\cup(G\setminus G_{p}) yields μk(V∖Gp)≤ε\mu_{k}(V\setminus G_{p})\le\varepsilon, and Gp⊆B⊆VG_{p}\subseteq B\subseteq V.

(d) Conclusion of Step 1. By (a) the set Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, being closed, lies in A\mathcal{A}; with (b) and (c), A\mathcal{A} is a σ\sigma-algebra on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} contained in B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). By (a) and (b) it contains every closed and every open subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. By The Borel σ\sigma-Algebras of Euclidean Space and of the Euclidean Metric Coincide, B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) is the σ\sigma-algebra generated by the open subsets of (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}), and by Closure Properties of σ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of σ-Algebras, and the Generated σ-Algebra that generated σ\sigma-algebra is contained in every σ\sigma-algebra containing the open sets. Hence B(Rn)⊆A\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\subseteq\mathcal{A}, so A=B(Rn)\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}).

Step 2: proof of claim 1. Let B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0. Put R1=W1R_{1}=W_{1} and Rk=Wk∖Wk−1R_{k}=W_{k}\setminus W_{k-1} for k≥2k\ge2; these are Borel, pairwise disjoint, Rk⊆WkR_{k}\subseteq W_{k}, and ⋃kRk=⋃kWk=Rn\bigcup_{k}R_{k}=\bigcup_{k}W_{k}=\mathbb{R}^{n}.

Fix kk. By Step 1, B∩Rk∈AB\cap R_{k}\in\mathcal{A}, so there is an open Vk′V_{k}' with B∩Rk⊆Vk′B\cap R_{k}\subseteq V_{k}' and μk+1(Vk′∖(B∩Rk))≤ε2−k\mu_{k+1}(V_{k}'\setminus(B\cap R_{k}))\le\varepsilon 2^{-k}; we may even ignore the closed set produced there. Put Vk=Vk′∩Wk+1V_{k}=V_{k}'\cap W_{k+1}, an open set which still contains B∩RkB\cap R_{k} because Rk⊆Wk⊆Wk+1R_{k}\subseteq W_{k}\subseteq W_{k+1}. Then Vk∖(B∩Rk)⊆Wk+1V_{k}\setminus(B\cap R_{k})\subseteq W_{k+1}, so by (P1)

λn(Vk∖(B∩Rk))=μk+1(Vk∖(B∩Rk))≤ε2−k.\lambda_{n}\bigl(V_{k}\setminus(B\cap R_{k})\bigr)=\mu_{k+1}\bigl(V_{k}\setminus(B\cap R_{k})\bigr)\le\varepsilon 2^{-k}.

Put U=⋃kVkU=\bigcup_{k}V_{k}, an open set containing B=⋃k(B∩Rk)B=\bigcup_{k}(B\cap R_{k}). If x∈U∖Bx\in U\setminus B then x∈Vkx\in V_{k} for some kk and x∉B∩Rkx\notin B\cap R_{k}, so

U∖B⊆⋃k∈N(Vk∖(B∩Rk)),U\setminus B\subseteq\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\bigl(V_{k}\setminus(B\cap R_{k})\bigr),

and countable subadditivity together with (P3) gives λn(U∖B)≤ε\lambda_{n}(U\setminus B)\le\varepsilon.

Step 3: proof of claim 2. Apply claim 1 to Rn∖B∈B(Rn)\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}): there is an open UU with Rn∖B⊆U\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus B\subseteq U and λn(U∖(Rn∖B))≤ε\lambda_{n}(U\setminus(\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus B))\le\varepsilon. Put F=Rn∖UF=\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus U, a closed set with F⊆BF\subseteq B, and note B∖F=B∩U=U∖(Rn∖B)B\setminus F=B\cap U=U\setminus(\mathbb{R}^{n}\setminus B), so λn(B∖F)≤ε\lambda_{n}(B\setminus F)\le\varepsilon.

Step 4: proof of claim 3. Let λn(B)<∞\lambda_{n}(B)<\infty and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By claim 2 there is a closed F⊆BF\subseteq B with λn(B∖F)≤ε/2\lambda_{n}(B\setminus F)\le\varepsilon/2. Put Kp=F∩W‾pK_{p}=F\cap\overline{W}_{p}: it is closed and bounded, hence compact by The Heine-Borel Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and Compactness of Closed Balls and the Unit Sphere, and Kp⊆F⊆BK_{p}\subseteq F\subseteq B. The sets KpK_{p} increase with union FF, and λn(F)≤λn(B)<∞\lambda_{n}(F)\le\lambda_{n}(B)<\infty, so all the values λn(Kp)\lambda_{n}(K_{p}) are real and bounded above by λn(F)\lambda_{n}(F); claim 5 of Basic Properties of a Measure gives that (λn(Kp))p(\lambda_{n}(K_{p}))_{p} converges to λn(F)\lambda_{n}(F). Choose pp with λn(F)−λn(Kp)≤ε/2\lambda_{n}(F)-\lambda_{n}(K_{p})\le\varepsilon/2; by claim 3 of that lemma this is λn(F∖Kp)\lambda_{n}(F\setminus K_{p}). Since B∖Kp⊆(B∖F)∪(F∖Kp)B\setminus K_{p}\subseteq(B\setminus F)\cup(F\setminus K_{p}), subadditivity gives λn(B∖Kp)≤ε\lambda_{n}(B\setminus K_{p})\le\varepsilon, and K=KpK=K_{p} is as required.

Step 5: proof of claim 4. Let E⊆RnE\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n}. Suppose first λn∗(E)=∞\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E)=\infty and let UU be open with E⊆UE\subseteq U. Then U∈B(Rn)U\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), so by monotonicity and agreement on Borel sets, ∞=λn∗(E)≤λn∗(U)=λn(U)\infty=\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E)\le\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(U)=\lambda_{n}(U), so λn(U)=∞\lambda_{n}(U)=\infty.

Suppose now λn∗(E)<∞\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E)<\infty and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By the Borel hull claim there is B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) with E⊆BE\subseteq B and λn(B)=λn∗(E)\lambda_{n}(B)=\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E). By claim 1 there is an open U⊇B⊇EU\supseteq B\supseteq E with λn(U∖B)≤ε\lambda_{n}(U\setminus B)\le\varepsilon. Since U⊆B∪(U∖B)U\subseteq B\cup(U\setminus B), subadditivity gives λn(U)≤λn(B)+ε=λn∗(E)+ε\lambda_{n}(U)\le\lambda_{n}(B)+\varepsilon=\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E)+\varepsilon.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…