The two-point inequality is the two-term instance of cyclical monotonicity in dimension one, and it orders the sections; countability follows because, for a fixed enumeration of the rationals, the abscissae whose section straddles a given rational form a set with at most one element, by the ordering of the sections.
Throughout, each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement and is applied to the data named here.
Step 1 (Claim 1). Let and write , , , . Apply Cyclically Monotone Subset of a Doubled Euclidean Space (i) with , and , so that , , , and . Since in dimension one by claim 1 of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative, the defining inequality reads
Since by claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and axiom 8 of Field give , so the left-hand side equals , again by claim 2 of that lemma and the distributive law of Field. Hence , and multiplying by , which reverses the inequality by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives
the last identity by claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and axiom 8 of Field. This is claim 1.
Step 2 (Claim 2). Let , and . By the definition of the sections there are with , , and , so claim 1 gives . Suppose . By claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field one has , and since , so ; likewise with , so . Hence by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and axiom 8 of Field, , so by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting . Hence is impossible. Since is a total order on by Ordered Field, either or ; in the latter case , because is excluded. In both cases .
Step 3 (Claim 3). The set of rational numbers is countable by claim 2 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable, and it is nonempty: and lie in , being the image of the natural number under the canonical map by claim 1 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, and exists by axioms 6 and 7 of Field, as ; so by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. Hence Countable Set itself supplies a sequence whose set of terms is . For put
Each has at most one element. Suppose with ; since is a total order on , either or , and as the two play symmetric roles we may assume . Choose with and with . By claim 2, applied to with and , one has . Then , so by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting the irreflexivity of the strict order. Hence .
is the union of the . Each is contained in . Conversely let , so has two distinct elements ; since is a total order on and , we may assume . By claim 1 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers there is a rational number with , and for some ; then .
Therefore is a countable union of sets each of which is countable, being finite with at most one element and hence countable by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets; so is countable by A Countable Union of Countable Sets is Countable.
Finally, let . Then does not have two distinct elements, so it is empty or has exactly one element.
Loading…