TheoremBase

The two-point inequality is the two-term instance of cyclical monotonicity in dimension one, and it orders the sections; countability follows because, for a fixed enumeration of the rationals, the abscissae whose section straddles a given rational form a set with at most one element, by the ordering of the sections.

Proof

Throughout, each result cited is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement and is applied to the data named here.

Step 1 (Claim 1). Let z,z′∈Γz,z'\in\Gamma and write x=pr1(z)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z), y=pr2(z)y=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z), x′=pr1(z′)x'=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z'), y′=pr2(z′)y'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z'). Apply Cyclically Monotone Subset of a Doubled Euclidean Space (i) with N=2N=2, z1=zz_{1}=z and z2=z′z_{2}=z', so that x1=xx_{1}=x, y1=yy_{1}=y, x2=x′x_{2}=x', y2=y′y_{2}=y' and x3=x1=xx_{3}=x_{1}=x. Since u⋅v=uvu\cdot v=uv in dimension one by claim 1 of One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative, the defining inequality reads

y(x′−x)+y′(x−x′)≤0.y(x'-x)+y'(x-x')\le0 .

Since x−x′=−(x′−x)x-x'=-(x'-x) by claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and axiom 8 of Field give y′(x−x′)=−y′(x′−x)y'(x-x')=-y'(x'-x), so the left-hand side equals (y−y′)(x′−x)(y-y')(x'-x), again by claim 2 of that lemma and the distributive law of Field. Hence (y−y′)(x′−x)≤0(y-y')(x'-x)\le0, and multiplying by −1-1, which reverses the inequality by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives

0≤−(y−y′)(x′−x)=(y−y′)(x−x′),0\le-(y-y')(x'-x)=(y-y')(x-x'),

the last identity by claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and axiom 8 of Field. This is claim 1.

Step 2 (Claim 2). Let x<x′x<x', y∈Γxy\in\Gamma_{x} and y′∈Γx′y'\in\Gamma_{x'}. By the definition of the sections there are z,z′∈Γz,z'\in\Gamma with pr1(z)=x\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)=x, pr2(z)=y\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)=y, pr1(z′)=x′\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z')=x' and pr2(z′)=y′\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z')=y', so claim 1 gives 0≤(y−y′)(x−x′)0\le(y-y')(x-x'). Suppose y′<yy'<y. By claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field one has 0≤y−y′0\le y-y', and y−y′≠0y-y'\ne0 since y′≠yy'\ne y, so 0<y−y′0<y-y'; likewise 0≤x′−x0\le x'-x with x′−x≠0x'-x\ne0, so 0<x′−x0<x'-x. Hence 0<(y−y′)(x′−x)0<(y-y')(x'-x) by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and axiom 8 of Field, (y−y′)(x−x′)=−((y−y′)(x′−x))(y-y')(x-x')=-\bigl((y-y')(x'-x)\bigr), so (y−y′)(x−x′)<0(y-y')(x-x')<0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting 0≤(y−y′)(x−x′)0\le(y-y')(x-x'). Hence y′<yy'<y is impossible. Since ≤\le is a total order on R\mathbb{R} by Ordered Field, either y≤y′y\le y' or y′≤yy'\le y; in the latter case y=y′y=y', because y′<yy'<y is excluded. In both cases y≤y′y\le y'.

Step 3 (Claim 3). The set Q\mathbb{Q} of rational numbers is countable by claim 2 of The Integers and the Rational Numbers are Countable, and it is nonempty: 00 and 11 lie in Z\mathbb{Z}, 11 being the image of the natural number 11 under the canonical map by claim 1 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, and 1−11^{-1} exists by axioms 6 and 7 of Field, as 1≠01\ne0; so 0=0⋅1−1∈Q0=0\cdot1^{-1}\in\mathbb{Q} by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. Hence Countable Set itself supplies a sequence (qk)k∈N(q_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} whose set of terms is Q\mathbb{Q}. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} put

Mk={x∈MΓ: there are u,v∈Γx with u<qk<v}.M_{k}=\{x\in M_{\Gamma}:\ \text{there are }u,v\in\Gamma_{x}\text{ with }u<q_{k}<v\}.

Each MkM_{k} has at most one element. Suppose x,x′∈Mkx,x'\in M_{k} with x≠x′x\ne x'; since ≤\le is a total order on R\mathbb{R}, either x<x′x<x' or x′<xx'<x, and as the two play symmetric roles we may assume x<x′x<x'. Choose u,v∈Γxu,v\in\Gamma_{x} with u<qk<vu<q_{k}<v and u′,v′∈Γx′u',v'\in\Gamma_{x'} with u′<qk<v′u'<q_{k}<v'. By claim 2, applied to x<x′x<x' with v∈Γxv\in\Gamma_{x} and u′∈Γx′u'\in\Gamma_{x'}, one has v≤u′v\le u'. Then qk<v≤u′<qkq_{k}<v\le u'<q_{k}, so qk<qkq_{k}<q_{k} by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, contradicting the irreflexivity of the strict order. Hence x=x′x=x'.

MΓM_{\Gamma} is the union of the MkM_{k}. Each MkM_{k} is contained in MΓM_{\Gamma}. Conversely let x∈MΓx\in M_{\Gamma}, so Γx\Gamma_{x} has two distinct elements y1,y2y_{1},y_{2}; since ≤\le is a total order on R\mathbb{R} and y1≠y2y_{1}\ne y_{2}, we may assume y1<y2y_{1}<y_{2}. By claim 1 of The Rational Numbers are Dense in the Real Numbers there is a rational number qq with y1<q<y2y_{1}<q<y_{2}, and q=qkq=q_{k} for some k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}; then x∈Mkx\in M_{k}.

Therefore MΓ=⋃k∈NMkM_{\Gamma}=\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}M_{k} is a countable union of sets each of which is countable, being finite with at most one element and hence countable by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets; so MΓM_{\Gamma} is countable by A Countable Union of Countable Sets is Countable.

Finally, let x∈R∖MΓx\in\mathbb{R}\setminus M_{\Gamma}. Then Γx\Gamma_{x} does not have two distinct elements, so it is empty or has exactly one element.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…