TheoremBase

The heat average of the gradient at the smoothed measure is a gradient field with tangent classes (synchronous couplings for differentiability, optimal couplings and uniform kernel-weight estimates for joint continuity), the divergence identity gives the Laplacian, and a Gaussian-shifted coupling with Jensen's inequality gives the vanishing-time convergence.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

For clauses 1 and 2 fix ss with 0<s≤120<s\le\tfrac12, write Θ=Θs\Theta=\Theta_{s} and pμ=pμsp_{\mu}=p^{s}_{\mu} for μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), and let cs,Csc_{s},C_{s} be the constants of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity and LsL_{s} that of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz. As in Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average, ∫Qf dλd\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} stands for ∫1Qf dλd\int\mathbf{1}_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d}; since λd(Q)=1\lambda_{d}(Q)=1 by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §cell, ∣∫Qf dλd∣≤M|\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d}|\le M whenever ff is Borel with ∣f∣≤M|f|\le M on QQ.

Step 0 (Kernel estimates). Let Ψ\Psi be one of the d+1d+1 functions Θ,∂1Θ,…,∂dΘ\Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta. By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity, Θ∈Cper2\Theta\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}, so Ψ\Psi is Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d}-periodic and of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative; by the same clause of the kernel lemma, ∣Ψ∣≤Cs|\Psi|\le C_{s} and every first partial derivative of Ψ\Psi (namely ∂kΘ\partial_{k}\Theta, respectively ∂k∂jΘ\partial_{k}\partial_{j}\Theta) is bounded by CsC_{s} in absolute value. The Lipschitz bound (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder, applied on the open set Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, therefore gives

∣Ψ(u)−Ψ(u′)∣≤d Cs ∥u−u′∥(u,u′∈Rd).(0.1)|\Psi(u)-\Psi(u')|\le\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}\,\lVert u-u'\rVert\qquad(u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.1}

For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density gives pμ∈Cper2p_{\mu}\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}}, cs≤pμ≤Csc_{s}\le p_{\mu}\le C_{s}, and ∣∂kpμ(y)∣=∣∫∂kΘ(y−x) μ(dx)∣≤Cs|\partial_{k}p_{\mu}(y)|=|\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x)\,\mu(dx)|\le C_{s}; the same Taylor bound gives

∣pμ(y)−pμ(y′)∣≤d Cs ∥y−y′∥(y,y′∈Rd).(0.2)|p_{\mu}(y)-p_{\mu}(y')|\le\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}\,\lVert y-y'\rVert\qquad(y,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.2}

Periodic reduction. If f:Rd→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} is Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d}-periodic and ∣f(u)−f(u′)∣≤M∥u−u′∥|f(u)-f(u')|\le M\lVert u-u'\rVert for all u,u′u,u', then ∣f(u)−f(u′)∣≤M dT(u,u′)|f(u)-f(u')|\le M\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(u,u') for all u,u′u,u'. Indeed k=u′−u−ϖ(u′−u)∈Zdk=u'-u-\varpi(u'-u)\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range, so f(u′)=f(u′−k)f(u')=f(u'-k), and ∥u−(u′−k)∥=∥ϖ(u′−u)∥=dT(u,u′)\lVert u-(u'-k)\rVert=\lVert\varpi(u'-u)\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(u,u') by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance.

Weights. For μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and Ψ\Psi as above put wμ,xΨ(y)=Ψ(y−x)/pμ(y)w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)=\Psi(y-x)/p_{\mu}(y). This function is continuous, Zd\mathbb{Z}^{d}-periodic (as Ψ\Psi and pμp_{\mu} are), hence Borel, and ∣wμ,xΨ∣≤Cs/cs|w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}|\le C_{s}/c_{s}. Writing

wμ,xΨ(y)−wμ,xΨ(y′)=Ψ(y−x)−Ψ(y′−x)pμ(y)+Ψ(y′−x) pμ(y′)−pμ(y)pμ(y) pμ(y′)w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y')=\frac{\Psi(y-x)-\Psi(y'-x)}{p_{\mu}(y)}+\Psi(y'-x)\,\frac{p_{\mu}(y')-p_{\mu}(y)}{p_{\mu}(y)\,p_{\mu}(y')}

and using (0.1), (0.2) and then the periodic reduction, we get, with Ms=d Cs/cs+d Cs2/cs2M_{s}=\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}/c_{s}+\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}^{2}/c_{s}^{2},

∣wμ,xΨ(y)−wμ,xΨ(y′)∣≤Ms dT(y,y′)(y,y′∈Rd).(0.3)|w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y')|\le M_{s}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(y,y')\qquad(y,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.3}

Similarly, for μ,μ′∈P(Td)\mu,\mu'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and x,x′∈Rdx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, splitting wμ′,x′Ψ(y)−wμ,xΨ(y)w^{\Psi}_{\mu',x'}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y) as (Ψ(y−x′)−Ψ(y−x))/pμ′(y)+Ψ(y−x)(pμ(y)−pμ′(y))/(pμ′(y)pμ(y))\bigl(\Psi(y-x')-\Psi(y-x)\bigr)/p_{\mu'}(y)+\Psi(y-x)\bigl(p_{\mu}(y)-p_{\mu'}(y)\bigr)/\bigl(p_{\mu'}(y)p_{\mu}(y)\bigr) and using (0.1) and the first inequality of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz,

sup⁡y∈Rd∣wμ′,x′Ψ(y)−wμ,xΨ(y)∣≤d Cscs∥x′−x∥+CsLscs2 WT(μ′,μ).(0.4)\sup_{y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}}|w^{\Psi}_{\mu',x'}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)|\le\frac{\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}}{c_{s}}\lVert x'-x\rVert+\frac{C_{s}L_{s}}{c_{s}^{2}}\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu',\mu).\tag{0.4}

Step 1 (The candidate field; condition (a) and tangency). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). By Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures, Ssμ∈Pac(Td)S_{s}\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), so by condition (b) of intrinsic test functions on Pac(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) the function φ\varphi is differentiable along couplings at SsμS_{s}\mu and ∇φ(Ssμ)∈TSsμ\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu)\in T_{S_{s}\mu}. Choose a Borel representative Fμ:Rd→RdF_{\mu}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} of ∇φ(Ssμ)\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu); then ∫∥Fμ∥2 d(Ssμ)<∞\int\lVert F_{\mu}\rVert^{2}\,d(S_{s}\mu)<\infty. Define g(μ,x)=AsμFμ(x)=∫QFμ(y) Θ(y−x) λd(dy)g(\mu,x)=A^{\mu}_{s}F_{\mu}(x)=\int_{Q}F_{\mu}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy). By Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average this does not depend on the representative, so g:P(Td)×Rd→Rdg:\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\times\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} is well defined and is the map (μ,x)↦Asμ∇φ(Ssμ)(x)(\mu,x)\mapsto A^{\mu}_{s}\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu)(x) of the statement. By the same clause each gi(μ,⋅)g_{i}(\mu,\cdot) belongs to Cper1C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}}, which is condition (a) of a gradient field, and for all x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d]

gi(μ,x)=∫QFμ,i(y) Θ(y−x) λd(dy),∂jgi(μ,x)=−∫QFμ,i(y) ∂jΘ(y−x) λd(dy).(1.1)g_{i}(\mu,x)=\int_{Q}F_{\mu,i}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy),\qquad\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x)=-\int_{Q}F_{\mu,i}(y)\,\partial_{j}\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy).\tag{1.1}

Since the class of FμF_{\mu} lies in TSsμT_{S_{s}\mu}, Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §tangent shows that the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot) in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) lies in TμT_{\mu}.

Step 2 (Condition (b): differentiability along couplings). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Step 1 and Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient, ∇φ(Ssμ)\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu) has the property of Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §differentiable at SsμS_{s}\mu; take the corresponding θ>0\theta>0 for this ε\varepsilon. Let ν∈P(Td)\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and γ∈Π(μ,ν)\gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) with IT(γ)<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2}, and let γs\gamma^{s} be the synchronous coupling of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §synchronous, formed with F=FμF=F_{\mu}. That clause gives γs∈Π(Ssμ,Ssν)\gamma^{s}\in\Pi(S_{s}\mu,S_{s}\nu), IT(γs)=IT(γ)<θ2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma^{s})=I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2} and JT(Fμ,γs)=JT(g(μ,⋅),γ)\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(F_{\mu},\gamma^{s})=\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma). Hence

∣φ(Ssν)−φ(Ssμ)−JT(g(μ,⋅),γ)∣=∣φ(Ssν)−φ(Ssμ)−JT(Fμ,γs)∣≤εIT(γs)=εIT(γ).\bigl|\varphi(S_{s}\nu)-\varphi(S_{s}\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma)\bigr|=\bigl|\varphi(S_{s}\nu)-\varphi(S_{s}\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(F_{\mu},\gamma^{s})\bigr|\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma^{s})}=\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}.

So φ∘Ss\varphi\circ S_{s} is differentiable along couplings at μ\mu with gradient the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot), and by the uniqueness in Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient, ∇(φ∘Ss)(μ)\nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s})(\mu) is the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot), that is Asμ∇φ(Ssμ)A^{\mu}_{s}\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu). This is condition (b) of a gradient field.

Step 3 (Condition (c): joint continuity). Let (μn)(\mu_{n}) converge to μ\mu in (P(Td),WT)(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) and (xn)(x_{n}) converge to xx in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, and fix i∈[d]i\in[d] and Ψ∈{Θ,∂1Θ,…,∂dΘ}\Psi\in\{\Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta\}. For μ′∈P(Td)\mu'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) and x′∈Rdx'\in\mathbb{R}^{d} put h(μ′,x′)=∫QFμ′,i(y) Ψ(y−x′) λd(dy)h(\mu',x')=\int_{Q}F_{\mu',i}(y)\,\Psi(y-x')\,\lambda_{d}(dy). By (1.1), gi=hg_{i}=h when Ψ=Θ\Psi=\Theta and ∂jgi=−h\partial_{j}g_{i}=-h when Ψ=∂jΘ\Psi=\partial_{j}\Theta, so it suffices to show that h(μn,xn)→h(μ,x)h(\mu_{n},x_{n})\to h(\mu,x).

Write νn=Ssμn\nu_{n}=S_{s}\mu_{n}, ν=Ssμ\nu=S_{s}\mu, Fn=FμnF_{n}=F_{\mu_{n}}, F=FμF=F_{\mu}, wn=wμn,xnΨw_{n}=w^{\Psi}_{\mu_{n},x_{n}} and w=wμ,xΨw=w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}. By Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §contraction, WT(νn,ν)≤WT(μn,μ)→0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\nu_{n},\nu)\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0. For each nn choose, by The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §optimal, an optimal coupling γn∈Π(νn,ν)\gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\nu), so that IT(γn)=WT(νn,ν)2→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\nu_{n},\nu)^{2}\to0 by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §optimal. All νn\nu_{n} and ν\nu lie in Pac(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures, so condition (c) of intrinsic test functions on Pac(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) gives

Dn=∫∥Fn(pr1(w′))−F(pr2(w′))∥2 γn(dw′)⟶0.D_{n}=\int\lVert F_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'))-F(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'))\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw')\longrightarrow0 .

Since ∣wn∣≤Cs/cs|w_{n}|\le C_{s}/c_{s} and ∫∣Fn,i∣ dνn≤∥Fn∥νn<∞\int|F_{n,i}|\,d\nu_{n}\le\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}<\infty (Cauchy–Schwarz, Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm), the function Fn,iwnF_{n,i}w_{n} is integrable with respect to νn\nu_{n}. As 1Qpμn\mathbf{1}_{Q}p_{\mu_{n}} is a density of νn\nu_{n} by The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density, claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives ∫Fn,iwn dνn=∫1QFn,i Ψ(⋅−xn) dλd=h(μn,xn)\int F_{n,i}w_{n}\,d\nu_{n}=\int\mathbf{1}_{Q}F_{n,i}\,\Psi(\cdot-x_{n})\,d\lambda_{d}=h(\mu_{n},x_{n}), and the change-of-variables formula with (pr1)#γn=νn(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu_{n} gives h(μn,xn)=∫Fn,i(pr1(w′)) wn(pr1(w′)) γn(dw′)h(\mu_{n},x_{n})=\int F_{n,i}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'))\,w_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'))\,\gamma_{n}(dw'). In the same way, with (pr2)#γn=ν(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu, h(μ,x)=∫Fi(pr2(w′)) w(pr2(w′)) γn(dw′)h(\mu,x)=\int F_{i}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'))\,w(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'))\,\gamma_{n}(dw'). Abbreviating y=pr1(w′)y=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'), y′=pr2(w′)y'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w') and splitting Fn,i(y)wn(y)−Fi(y′)w(y′)F_{n,i}(y)w_{n}(y)-F_{i}(y')w(y') as

(Fn,i(y)−Fi(y′))wn(y)+Fi(y′)(wn(y)−w(y))+Fi(y′)(w(y)−w(y′)),\bigl(F_{n,i}(y)-F_{i}(y')\bigr)w_{n}(y)+F_{i}(y')\bigl(w_{n}(y)-w(y)\bigr)+F_{i}(y')\bigl(w(y)-w(y')\bigr),

we bound the three integrals against γn\gamma_{n}. The first is at most (Cs/cs)∫∥Fn(y)−F(y′)∥ dγn≤(Cs/cs)Dn(C_{s}/c_{s})\int\lVert F_{n}(y)-F(y')\rVert\,d\gamma_{n}\le(C_{s}/c_{s})\sqrt{D_{n}} by Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm. The second is at most δn∫∣Fi(y′)∣ dγn=δn∫∣Fi∣ dν≤δn∥F∥ν\delta_{n}\int|F_{i}(y')|\,d\gamma_{n}=\delta_{n}\int|F_{i}|\,d\nu\le\delta_{n}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu} by Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm, where δn\delta_{n} is the right side of (0.4) with (μ′,x′)=(μn,xn)(\mu',x')=(\mu_{n},x_{n}). The third is at most Ms∫∣Fi(y′)∣ dT(y,y′) dγn≤Ms∥F∥νIT(γn)M_{s}\int|F_{i}(y')|\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(y,y')\,d\gamma_{n}\le M_{s}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})} by (0.3), Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm and Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost. Hence

∣h(μn,xn)−h(μ,x)∣≤CscsDn+δn∥F∥ν+Ms∥F∥νIT(γn),|h(\mu_{n},x_{n})-h(\mu,x)|\le\frac{C_{s}}{c_{s}}\sqrt{D_{n}}+\delta_{n}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu}+M_{s}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})},

and each term tends to 00, because Dn→0D_{n}\to0, IT(γn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0, ∥xn−x∥→0\lVert x_{n}-x\rVert\to0 and WT(μn,μ)→0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0. This is condition (c) of a gradient field.

Step 4 (Clause 1). By Steps 1–3, gg is a gradient field of φ∘Ss\varphi\circ S_{s}, and the class of g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot) lies in TμT_{\mu} for every μ\mu by Step 1. By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §criterion, φ∘Ss\varphi\circ S_{s} is a Laplacian test function; by Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §unique its gradient field is gg; and Step 2 gives ∇(φ∘Ss)(μ)=Asμ∇φ(Ssμ)\nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s})(\mu)=A^{\mu}_{s}\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu).

Step 5 (Clause 2). Let μ∈P(Td)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}). By The Laplacian of a Laplacian Test Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space §laplacian and Step 4, L(φ∘Ss)(μ)=∫∑i=1d∂igi(μ,x) μ(dx)\mathcal{L}(\varphi\circ S_{s})(\mu)=\int\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,x)\,\mu(dx). Since g(μ,⋅)g(\mu,\cdot) is the heat average aa of FμF_{\mu}, Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §divergence gives ∫∑i∂igi(μ,⋅) dμ=−⟨Fμ,ξSsμ⟩Ssμ=−⟨∇φ(Ssμ),ξSsμ⟩Ssμ\int\sum_{i}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,\cdot)\,d\mu=-\langle F_{\mu},\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rangle_{S_{s}\mu}=-\langle\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu),\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rangle_{S_{s}\mu}.

Step 6 (Clause 3). Let μ\mu, (μn)(\mu_{n}) and (sn)(s_{n}) be as in clause 3, and write Nn=NsnN_{n}=N_{s_{n}} for the Gaussian measure of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings at time sns_{n}. For each nn, Ssnμn∈Pac(Td)S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures; let FnF_{n} be a Borel representative of ∇φ(Ssnμn)\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}) and GG one of ∇φ(μ)\nabla\varphi(\mu), and let an(x)=∫QFn(y) Θsn(y−x) λd(dy)a_{n}(x)=\int_{Q}F_{n}(y)\,\Theta_{s_{n}}(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy), which represents Asnμn∇φ(Ssnμn)A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §heat-average. In this order: choose, by The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §optimal, an optimal coupling βn∈Π(μn,μ)\beta_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu), so IT(βn)=WT(μn,μ)2I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}; put Pn=βn⊠Nn∈P(Rd+d+d)P_{n}=\beta_{n}\boxtimes N_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d+d}), the product measure read with q=d+dq=d+d and p=dp=d; and let κn=σ#Pn\kappa_{n}=\sigma_{\#}P_{n}, where σ:Rd+d+d→Rd+d\sigma:\mathbb{R}^{d+d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d+d} is given by σ(ιd+d,d(w′,z))=ιd,d(π(pr1(w′)+z),pr2(w′))\sigma(\iota^{d+d,d}(w',z))=\iota^{d,d}\bigl(\pi(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w')+z),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w')\bigr). The map σ\sigma is Borel, being the pairing of the first component map π∘(pr1∘pr1d+d,d+pr2d+d,d)\pi\circ(\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}+\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2}) of the map τ\tau of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §synchronous with the Borel map pr2∘pr1d+d,d\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}.

κn\kappa_{n} is a coupling of SsnμnS_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} and μ\mu. Push-forwards compose, (T∘S)#ρ=T#(S#ρ)(T\circ S)_{\#}\rho=T_{\#}(S_{\#}\rho), directly from the definition in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward. With τ\tau the map of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §synchronous formed with γ=βn\gamma=\beta_{n} and time sns_{n}, we have pr1∘σ=pr1∘τ\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\sigma=\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\tau, so (pr1)#κn=(pr1)#(τ#Pn)=(pr1)#βnsn=Ssnμn(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\kappa_{n}=(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}(\tau_{\#}P_{n})=(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\beta_{n}^{s_{n}}=S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}, the last equality because βnsn∈Π(Ssnμn,Ssnμ)\beta_{n}^{s_{n}}\in\Pi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},S_{s_{n}}\mu) by that clause. Also pr2∘σ=pr2∘pr1d+d,d\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\sigma=\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}, and (pr1d+d,d)#Pn=βn(\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1})_{\#}P_{n}=\beta_{n} by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product, so (pr2)#κn=(pr2)#βn=μ(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\kappa_{n}=(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\beta_{n}=\mu. By Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling, κn∈Π(Ssnμn,μ)\kappa_{n}\in\Pi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},\mu).

Cost of κn\kappa_{n}. For a,b∈Rda,b\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, π(a)−a∈Zd\pi(a)-a\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap, so dT(π(a),b)=dT(a,b)d_{\mathbb{T}}(\pi(a),b)=d_{\mathbb{T}}(a,b) by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §symmetry. Hence, for x,x′,z∈Rdx,x',z\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §triangle, The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §symmetry and The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §minimal,

dT(π(x+z),x′)≤dT(x+z,x)+dT(x,x′)≤∥z∥+dT(x,x′),dT(π(x+z),x′)2≤2∥z∥2+2 dT(x,x′)2.d_{\mathbb{T}}(\pi(x+z),x')\le d_{\mathbb{T}}(x+z,x)+d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x')\le\lVert z\rVert+d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x'),\qquad d_{\mathbb{T}}(\pi(x+z),x')^{2}\le2\lVert z\rVert^{2}+2\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x')^{2}.

Integrating against PnP_{n} and using the change-of-variables formula, the marginals (pr1d+d,d)#Pn=βn(\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1})_{\#}P_{n}=\beta_{n} and (pr2d+d,d)#Pn=Nn(\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2})_{\#}P_{n}=N_{n} of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product, claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables for the density gsng_{s_{n}} of NnN_{n}, and The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §moments with q=dq=d (note sn≤1s_{n}\le1), we get

IT(κn)≤2∫∥z∥2 Nn(dz)+2 IT(βn)=2d sn+2 WT(μn,μ)2⟶0,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\kappa_{n})\le2\int\lVert z\rVert^{2}\,N_{n}(dz)+2\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})=2d\,s_{n}+2\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\longrightarrow0,

since sn→0s_{n}\to0 and WT(μn,μ)→0W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 by Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space. Also IT(βn)=WT(μn,μ)2→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\to0.

First sequence. The measures SsnμnS_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} and μ\mu lie in Pac(Td)\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}), κn∈Π(Ssnμn,μ)\kappa_{n}\in\Pi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},\mu) and IT(κn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\kappa_{n})\to0, so condition (c) of intrinsic test functions gives Dκn(Fn,G)→0D_{\kappa_{n}}(F_{n},G)\to0. By Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus §convergence, with the couplings κn\kappa_{n}, the sequence ((Ssnμn,∇φ(Ssnμn)))((S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}))) converges along couplings to (μ,∇φ(μ))(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)).

Second sequence. Let w′∈Rd+dw'\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d} with x=pr1(w′)x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'), x′=pr2(w′)x'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'). By Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average (at time sns_{n}), an(x)=∫Fn(π(x+z)) Nn(dz)a_{n}(x)=\int F_{n}(\pi(x+z))\,N_{n}(dz), so, NnN_{n} being a probability measure, an(x)−G(x′)=∫(Fn(π(x+z))−G(x′))Nn(dz)a_{n}(x)-G(x')=\int\bigl(F_{n}(\pi(x+z))-G(x')\bigr)N_{n}(dz). Applying Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm on the probability space (Rd,B(Rd),Nn)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),N_{n}) to each component and the constant 11, and summing over the components (the inequality is trivial if the right side is infinite),

∥an(x)−G(x′)∥2≤∫∥Fn(π(x+z))−G(x′)∥2Nn(dz).\lVert a_{n}(x)-G(x')\rVert^{2}\le\int\bigl\lVert F_{n}(\pi(x+z))-G(x')\bigr\rVert^{2}N_{n}(dz).

The integrand on the right is H(ιd+d,d(w′,z))H(\iota^{d+d,d}(w',z)) with H(v)=∥Fn(pr1(σ(v)))−G(pr2(σ(v)))∥2H(v)=\lVert F_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(\sigma(v)))-G(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(\sigma(v)))\rVert^{2}, a Borel [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued map. Integrating against βn\beta_{n} and using Tonelli's theorem (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems) together with the identity ∫H dPn=∫H∘ι d(βn⊗Nn)\int H\,dP_{n}=\int H\circ\iota\,d(\beta_{n}\otimes N_{n}) of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product, then the change-of-variables formula for κn=σ#Pn\kappa_{n}=\sigma_{\#}P_{n},

Dβn(an,G)≤∫H dPn=∫∥Fn(pr1(v′))−G(pr2(v′))∥2 κn(dv′)=Dκn(Fn,G)⟶0.D_{\beta_{n}}(a_{n},G)\le\int H\,dP_{n}=\int\lVert F_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(v'))-G(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(v'))\rVert^{2}\,\kappa_{n}(dv')=D_{\kappa_{n}}(F_{n},G)\longrightarrow0 .

Since also IT(βn)→0I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})\to0 and βn∈Π(μn,μ)\beta_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu), Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus §convergence shows that ((μn,Asnμn∇φ(Ssnμn)))((\mu_{n},A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}))) converges along couplings to (μ,∇φ(μ))(\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)). ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…