Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
For clauses 1 and 2 fix s s s with 0 < s ≤ 1 2 0<s\le\tfrac12 0 < s ≤ 2 1 , write Θ = Θ s \Theta=\Theta_{s} Θ = Θ s and p μ = p μ s p_{\mu}=p^{s}_{\mu} p μ = p μ s for μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , and let c s , C s c_{s},C_{s} c s , C s be the constants of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity and L s L_{s} L s that of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz . As in Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average , ∫ Q f d λ d \int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} ∫ Q f d λ d stands for ∫ 1 Q f d λ d \int\mathbf{1}_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d} ∫ 1 Q f d λ d ; since λ d ( Q ) = 1 \lambda_{d}(Q)=1 λ d ( Q ) = 1 by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §cell , ∣ ∫ Q f d λ d ∣ ≤ M |\int_{Q}f\,d\lambda_{d}|\le M ∣ ∫ Q f d λ d ∣ ≤ M whenever f f f is Borel with ∣ f ∣ ≤ M |f|\le M ∣ f ∣ ≤ M on Q Q Q .
Step 0 (Kernel estimates). Let Ψ \Psi Ψ be one of the d + 1 d+1 d + 1 functions Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ \Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ . By The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §regularity , Θ ∈ C p e r 2 \Theta\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} Θ ∈ C per 2 , so Ψ \Psi Ψ is Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d -periodic and of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d by Elementary Properties of Lattice-Periodic Functions §derivative ; by the same clause of the kernel lemma, ∣ Ψ ∣ ≤ C s |\Psi|\le C_{s} ∣Ψ∣ ≤ C s and every first partial derivative of Ψ \Psi Ψ (namely ∂ k Θ \partial_{k}\Theta ∂ k Θ , respectively ∂ k ∂ j Θ \partial_{k}\partial_{j}\Theta ∂ k ∂ j Θ ) is bounded by C s C_{s} C s in absolute value. The Lipschitz bound (i) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder , applied on the open set R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , therefore gives
∣ Ψ ( u ) − Ψ ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ d C s ∥ u − u ′ ∥ ( u , u ′ ∈ R d ) . (0.1) |\Psi(u)-\Psi(u')|\le\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}\,\lVert u-u'\rVert\qquad(u,u'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.1} ∣Ψ ( u ) − Ψ ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ d C s ∥ u − u ′ ∥ ( u , u ′ ∈ R d ) . ( 0.1 )
For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density gives p μ ∈ C p e r 2 p_{\mu}\in C^{2}_{\mathrm{per}} p μ ∈ C per 2 , c s ≤ p μ ≤ C s c_{s}\le p_{\mu}\le C_{s} c s ≤ p μ ≤ C s , and ∣ ∂ k p μ ( y ) ∣ = ∣ ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) μ ( d x ) ∣ ≤ C s |\partial_{k}p_{\mu}(y)|=|\int\partial_{k}\Theta(y-x)\,\mu(dx)|\le C_{s} ∣ ∂ k p μ ( y ) ∣ = ∣ ∫ ∂ k Θ ( y − x ) μ ( d x ) ∣ ≤ C s ; the same Taylor bound gives
∣ p μ ( y ) − p μ ( y ′ ) ∣ ≤ d C s ∥ y − y ′ ∥ ( y , y ′ ∈ R d ) . (0.2) |p_{\mu}(y)-p_{\mu}(y')|\le\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}\,\lVert y-y'\rVert\qquad(y,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.2} ∣ p μ ( y ) − p μ ( y ′ ) ∣ ≤ d C s ∥ y − y ′ ∥ ( y , y ′ ∈ R d ) . ( 0.2 )
Periodic reduction. If f : R d → R f:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} f : R d → R is Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d -periodic and ∣ f ( u ) − f ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ M ∥ u − u ′ ∥ |f(u)-f(u')|\le M\lVert u-u'\rVert ∣ f ( u ) − f ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ M ∥ u − u ′ ∥ for all u , u ′ u,u' u , u ′ , then ∣ f ( u ) − f ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ M d T ( u , u ′ ) |f(u)-f(u')|\le M\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(u,u') ∣ f ( u ) − f ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ M d T ( u , u ′ ) for all u , u ′ u,u' u , u ′ . Indeed k = u ′ − u − ϖ ( u ′ − u ) ∈ Z d k=u'-u-\varpi(u'-u)\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} k = u ′ − u − ϖ ( u ′ − u ) ∈ Z d by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §range , so f ( u ′ ) = f ( u ′ − k ) f(u')=f(u'-k) f ( u ′ ) = f ( u ′ − k ) , and ∥ u − ( u ′ − k ) ∥ = ∥ ϖ ( u ′ − u ) ∥ = d T ( u , u ′ ) \lVert u-(u'-k)\rVert=\lVert\varpi(u'-u)\rVert=d_{\mathbb{T}}(u,u') ∥ u − ( u ′ − k )∥ = ∥ ϖ ( u ′ − u )∥ = d T ( u , u ′ ) by The Wrapped Displacement and the Flat Torus Distance §distance .
Weights. For μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) , x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d and Ψ \Psi Ψ as above put w μ , x Ψ ( y ) = Ψ ( y − x ) / p μ ( y ) w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)=\Psi(y-x)/p_{\mu}(y) w μ , x Ψ ( y ) = Ψ ( y − x ) / p μ ( y ) . This function is continuous, Z d \mathbb{Z}^{d} Z d -periodic (as Ψ \Psi Ψ and p μ p_{\mu} p μ are), hence Borel, and ∣ w μ , x Ψ ∣ ≤ C s / c s |w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}|\le C_{s}/c_{s} ∣ w μ , x Ψ ∣ ≤ C s / c s . Writing
w μ , x Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ′ ) = Ψ ( y − x ) − Ψ ( y ′ − x ) p μ ( y ) + Ψ ( y ′ − x ) p μ ( y ′ ) − p μ ( y ) p μ ( y ) p μ ( y ′ ) w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y')=\frac{\Psi(y-x)-\Psi(y'-x)}{p_{\mu}(y)}+\Psi(y'-x)\,\frac{p_{\mu}(y')-p_{\mu}(y)}{p_{\mu}(y)\,p_{\mu}(y')} w μ , x Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ′ ) = p μ ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ) − Ψ ( y ′ − x ) + Ψ ( y ′ − x ) p μ ( y ) p μ ( y ′ ) p μ ( y ′ ) − p μ ( y )
and using (0.1), (0.2) and then the periodic reduction, we get, with M s = d C s / c s + d C s 2 / c s 2 M_{s}=\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}/c_{s}+\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}^{2}/c_{s}^{2} M s = d C s / c s + d C s 2 / c s 2 ,
∣ w μ , x Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ′ ) ∣ ≤ M s d T ( y , y ′ ) ( y , y ′ ∈ R d ) . (0.3) |w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y')|\le M_{s}\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(y,y')\qquad(y,y'\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{0.3} ∣ w μ , x Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ′ ) ∣ ≤ M s d T ( y , y ′ ) ( y , y ′ ∈ R d ) . ( 0.3 )
Similarly, for μ , μ ′ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu,\mu'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ , μ ′ ∈ P ( T d ) and x , x ′ ∈ R d x,x'\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , x ′ ∈ R d , splitting w μ ′ , x ′ Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ) w^{\Psi}_{\mu',x'}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y) w μ ′ , x ′ Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ) as ( Ψ ( y − x ′ ) − Ψ ( y − x ) ) / p μ ′ ( y ) + Ψ ( y − x ) ( p μ ( y ) − p μ ′ ( y ) ) / ( p μ ′ ( y ) p μ ( y ) ) \bigl(\Psi(y-x')-\Psi(y-x)\bigr)/p_{\mu'}(y)+\Psi(y-x)\bigl(p_{\mu}(y)-p_{\mu'}(y)\bigr)/\bigl(p_{\mu'}(y)p_{\mu}(y)\bigr) ( Ψ ( y − x ′ ) − Ψ ( y − x ) ) / p μ ′ ( y ) + Ψ ( y − x ) ( p μ ( y ) − p μ ′ ( y ) ) / ( p μ ′ ( y ) p μ ( y ) ) and using (0.1) and the first inequality of The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §lipschitz ,
sup y ∈ R d ∣ w μ ′ , x ′ Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ) ∣ ≤ d C s c s ∥ x ′ − x ∥ + C s L s c s 2 W T ( μ ′ , μ ) . (0.4) \sup_{y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}}|w^{\Psi}_{\mu',x'}(y)-w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x}(y)|\le\frac{\sqrt{d}\,C_{s}}{c_{s}}\lVert x'-x\rVert+\frac{C_{s}L_{s}}{c_{s}^{2}}\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu',\mu).\tag{0.4} y ∈ R d sup ∣ w μ ′ , x ′ Ψ ( y ) − w μ , x Ψ ( y ) ∣ ≤ c s d C s ∥ x ′ − x ∥ + c s 2 C s L s W T ( μ ′ , μ ) . ( 0.4 )
Step 1 (The candidate field; condition (a) and tangency). Let μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) . By Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures , S s μ ∈ P a c ( T d ) S_{s}\mu\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) S s μ ∈ P ac ( T d ) , so by condition (b) of intrinsic test functions on P a c ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ac ( T d ) the function φ \varphi φ is differentiable along couplings at S s μ S_{s}\mu S s μ and ∇ φ ( S s μ ) ∈ T S s μ \nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu)\in T_{S_{s}\mu} ∇ φ ( S s μ ) ∈ T S s μ . Choose a Borel representative F μ : R d → R d F_{\mu}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} F μ : R d → R d of ∇ φ ( S s μ ) \nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu) ∇ φ ( S s μ ) ; then ∫ ∥ F μ ∥ 2 d ( S s μ ) < ∞ \int\lVert F_{\mu}\rVert^{2}\,d(S_{s}\mu)<\infty ∫ ∥ F μ ∥ 2 d ( S s μ ) < ∞ . Define g ( μ , x ) = A s μ F μ ( x ) = ∫ Q F μ ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) g(\mu,x)=A^{\mu}_{s}F_{\mu}(x)=\int_{Q}F_{\mu}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy) g ( μ , x ) = A s μ F μ ( x ) = ∫ Q F μ ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) . By Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average this does not depend on the representative, so g : P ( T d ) × R d → R d g:\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d})\times\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} g : P ( T d ) × R d → R d is well defined and is the map ( μ , x ) ↦ A s μ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) ( x ) (\mu,x)\mapsto A^{\mu}_{s}\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu)(x) ( μ , x ) ↦ A s μ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) ( x ) of the statement. By the same clause each g i ( μ , ⋅ ) g_{i}(\mu,\cdot) g i ( μ , ⋅ ) belongs to C p e r 1 C^{1}_{\mathrm{per}} C per 1 , which is condition (a) of a gradient field , and for all x ∈ R d x\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ∈ R d and i , j ∈ [ d ] i,j\in[d] i , j ∈ [ d ]
g i ( μ , x ) = ∫ Q F μ , i ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) , ∂ j g i ( μ , x ) = − ∫ Q F μ , i ( y ) ∂ j Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) . (1.1) g_{i}(\mu,x)=\int_{Q}F_{\mu,i}(y)\,\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy),\qquad\partial_{j}g_{i}(\mu,x)=-\int_{Q}F_{\mu,i}(y)\,\partial_{j}\Theta(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy).\tag{1.1} g i ( μ , x ) = ∫ Q F μ , i ( y ) Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) , ∂ j g i ( μ , x ) = − ∫ Q F μ , i ( y ) ∂ j Θ ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) . ( 1.1 )
Since the class of F μ F_{\mu} F μ lies in T S s μ T_{S_{s}\mu} T S s μ , Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §tangent shows that the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) in L 2 ( μ ; R d ) L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( μ ; R d ) lies in T μ T_{\mu} T μ .
Step 2 (Condition (b): differentiability along couplings). Let μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) and ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 . By Step 1 and Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient , ∇ φ ( S s μ ) \nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu) ∇ φ ( S s μ ) has the property of Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §differentiable at S s μ S_{s}\mu S s μ ; take the corresponding θ > 0 \theta>0 θ > 0 for this ε \varepsilon ε . Let ν ∈ P ( T d ) \nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) ν ∈ P ( T d ) and γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \gamma\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) γ ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) with I T ( γ ) < θ 2 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2} I T ( γ ) < θ 2 , and let γ s \gamma^{s} γ s be the synchronous coupling of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §synchronous , formed with F = F μ F=F_{\mu} F = F μ . That clause gives γ s ∈ Π ( S s μ , S s ν ) \gamma^{s}\in\Pi(S_{s}\mu,S_{s}\nu) γ s ∈ Π ( S s μ , S s ν ) , I T ( γ s ) = I T ( γ ) < θ 2 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma^{s})=I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)<\theta^{2} I T ( γ s ) = I T ( γ ) < θ 2 and J T ( F μ , γ s ) = J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) \mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(F_{\mu},\gamma^{s})=\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma) J T ( F μ , γ s ) = J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) . Hence
∣ φ ( S s ν ) − φ ( S s μ ) − J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) ∣ = ∣ φ ( S s ν ) − φ ( S s μ ) − J T ( F μ , γ s ) ∣ ≤ ε I T ( γ s ) = ε I T ( γ ) . \bigl|\varphi(S_{s}\nu)-\varphi(S_{s}\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(g(\mu,\cdot),\gamma)\bigr|=\bigl|\varphi(S_{s}\nu)-\varphi(S_{s}\mu)-\mathcal{J}_{\mathbb{T}}(F_{\mu},\gamma^{s})\bigr|\le\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma^{s})}=\varepsilon\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma)}. φ ( S s ν ) − φ ( S s μ ) − J T ( g ( μ , ⋅ ) , γ ) = φ ( S s ν ) − φ ( S s μ ) − J T ( F μ , γ s ) ≤ ε I T ( γ s ) = ε I T ( γ ) .
So φ ∘ S s \varphi\circ S_{s} φ ∘ S s is differentiable along couplings at μ \mu μ with gradient the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) , and by the uniqueness in Differentiability Along Couplings of a Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space, and Its Gradient §gradient , ∇ ( φ ∘ S s ) ( μ ) \nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s})(\mu) ∇ ( φ ∘ S s ) ( μ ) is the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) , that is A s μ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) A^{\mu}_{s}\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu) A s μ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) . This is condition (b) of a gradient field .
Step 3 (Condition (c): joint continuity). Let ( μ n ) (\mu_{n}) ( μ n ) converge to μ \mu μ in ( P ( T d ) , W T ) (\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}),W_{\mathbb{T}}) ( P ( T d ) , W T ) and ( x n ) (x_{n}) ( x n ) converge to x x x in R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , and fix i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] and Ψ ∈ { Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ } \Psi\in\{\Theta,\partial_{1}\Theta,\dots,\partial_{d}\Theta\} Ψ ∈ { Θ , ∂ 1 Θ , … , ∂ d Θ } . For μ ′ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ′ ∈ P ( T d ) and x ′ ∈ R d x'\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x ′ ∈ R d put h ( μ ′ , x ′ ) = ∫ Q F μ ′ , i ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ′ ) λ d ( d y ) h(\mu',x')=\int_{Q}F_{\mu',i}(y)\,\Psi(y-x')\,\lambda_{d}(dy) h ( μ ′ , x ′ ) = ∫ Q F μ ′ , i ( y ) Ψ ( y − x ′ ) λ d ( d y ) . By (1.1), g i = h g_{i}=h g i = h when Ψ = Θ \Psi=\Theta Ψ = Θ and ∂ j g i = − h \partial_{j}g_{i}=-h ∂ j g i = − h when Ψ = ∂ j Θ \Psi=\partial_{j}\Theta Ψ = ∂ j Θ , so it suffices to show that h ( μ n , x n ) → h ( μ , x ) h(\mu_{n},x_{n})\to h(\mu,x) h ( μ n , x n ) → h ( μ , x ) .
Write ν n = S s μ n \nu_{n}=S_{s}\mu_{n} ν n = S s μ n , ν = S s μ \nu=S_{s}\mu ν = S s μ , F n = F μ n F_{n}=F_{\mu_{n}} F n = F μ n , F = F μ F=F_{\mu} F = F μ , w n = w μ n , x n Ψ w_{n}=w^{\Psi}_{\mu_{n},x_{n}} w n = w μ n , x n Ψ and w = w μ , x Ψ w=w^{\Psi}_{\mu,x} w = w μ , x Ψ . By Heat Smoothing on the Torus: Distance to the Identity, Contraction, a Smooth Positive Periodic Density, Finite Entropy, and Finite Fisher Information §contraction , W T ( ν n , ν ) ≤ W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 W_{\mathbb{T}}(\nu_{n},\nu)\le W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 W T ( ν n , ν ) ≤ W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 . For each n n n choose, by The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §optimal , an optimal coupling γ n ∈ Π ( ν n , ν ) \gamma_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\nu) γ n ∈ Π ( ν n , ν ) , so that I T ( γ n ) = W T ( ν n , ν ) 2 → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\nu_{n},\nu)^{2}\to0 I T ( γ n ) = W T ( ν n , ν ) 2 → 0 by Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §optimal . All ν n \nu_{n} ν n and ν \nu ν lie in P a c ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ac ( T d ) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures , so condition (c) of intrinsic test functions on P a c ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ac ( T d ) gives
D n = ∫ ∥ F n ( p r 1 ( w ′ ) ) − F ( p r 2 ( w ′ ) ) ∥ 2 γ n ( d w ′ ) ⟶ 0. D_{n}=\int\lVert F_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'))-F(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'))\rVert^{2}\,\gamma_{n}(dw')\longrightarrow0 . D n = ∫ ∥ F n ( pr 1 ( w ′ )) − F ( pr 2 ( w ′ )) ∥ 2 γ n ( d w ′ ) ⟶ 0.
Since ∣ w n ∣ ≤ C s / c s |w_{n}|\le C_{s}/c_{s} ∣ w n ∣ ≤ C s / c s and ∫ ∣ F n , i ∣ d ν n ≤ ∥ F n ∥ ν n < ∞ \int|F_{n,i}|\,d\nu_{n}\le\lVert F_{n}\rVert_{\nu_{n}}<\infty ∫ ∣ F n , i ∣ d ν n ≤ ∥ F n ∥ ν n < ∞ (Cauchy–Schwarz, Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm ), the function F n , i w n F_{n,i}w_{n} F n , i w n is integrable with respect to ν n \nu_{n} ν n . As 1 Q p μ n \mathbf{1}_{Q}p_{\mu_{n}} 1 Q p μ n is a density of ν n \nu_{n} ν n by The Torus Heat Kernel: Regularity and Bounds, the Density of a Heat-Smoothed Measure, and Its Lipschitz Dependence on the Measure §density , claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives ∫ F n , i w n d ν n = ∫ 1 Q F n , i Ψ ( ⋅ − x n ) d λ d = h ( μ n , x n ) \int F_{n,i}w_{n}\,d\nu_{n}=\int\mathbf{1}_{Q}F_{n,i}\,\Psi(\cdot-x_{n})\,d\lambda_{d}=h(\mu_{n},x_{n}) ∫ F n , i w n d ν n = ∫ 1 Q F n , i Ψ ( ⋅ − x n ) d λ d = h ( μ n , x n ) , and the change-of-variables formula with ( p r 1 ) # γ n = ν n (\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu_{n} ( pr 1 ) # γ n = ν n gives h ( μ n , x n ) = ∫ F n , i ( p r 1 ( w ′ ) ) w n ( p r 1 ( w ′ ) ) γ n ( d w ′ ) h(\mu_{n},x_{n})=\int F_{n,i}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'))\,w_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w'))\,\gamma_{n}(dw') h ( μ n , x n ) = ∫ F n , i ( pr 1 ( w ′ )) w n ( pr 1 ( w ′ )) γ n ( d w ′ ) . In the same way, with ( p r 2 ) # γ n = ν (\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\gamma_{n}=\nu ( pr 2 ) # γ n = ν , h ( μ , x ) = ∫ F i ( p r 2 ( w ′ ) ) w ( p r 2 ( w ′ ) ) γ n ( d w ′ ) h(\mu,x)=\int F_{i}(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'))\,w(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w'))\,\gamma_{n}(dw') h ( μ , x ) = ∫ F i ( pr 2 ( w ′ )) w ( pr 2 ( w ′ )) γ n ( d w ′ ) . Abbreviating y = p r 1 ( w ′ ) y=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w') y = pr 1 ( w ′ ) , y ′ = p r 2 ( w ′ ) y'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w') y ′ = pr 2 ( w ′ ) and splitting F n , i ( y ) w n ( y ) − F i ( y ′ ) w ( y ′ ) F_{n,i}(y)w_{n}(y)-F_{i}(y')w(y') F n , i ( y ) w n ( y ) − F i ( y ′ ) w ( y ′ ) as
( F n , i ( y ) − F i ( y ′ ) ) w n ( y ) + F i ( y ′ ) ( w n ( y ) − w ( y ) ) + F i ( y ′ ) ( w ( y ) − w ( y ′ ) ) , \bigl(F_{n,i}(y)-F_{i}(y')\bigr)w_{n}(y)+F_{i}(y')\bigl(w_{n}(y)-w(y)\bigr)+F_{i}(y')\bigl(w(y)-w(y')\bigr), ( F n , i ( y ) − F i ( y ′ ) ) w n ( y ) + F i ( y ′ ) ( w n ( y ) − w ( y ) ) + F i ( y ′ ) ( w ( y ) − w ( y ′ ) ) ,
we bound the three integrals against γ n \gamma_{n} γ n . The first is at most ( C s / c s ) ∫ ∥ F n ( y ) − F ( y ′ ) ∥ d γ n ≤ ( C s / c s ) D n (C_{s}/c_{s})\int\lVert F_{n}(y)-F(y')\rVert\,d\gamma_{n}\le(C_{s}/c_{s})\sqrt{D_{n}} ( C s / c s ) ∫ ∥ F n ( y ) − F ( y ′ )∥ d γ n ≤ ( C s / c s ) D n by Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm . The second is at most δ n ∫ ∣ F i ( y ′ ) ∣ d γ n = δ n ∫ ∣ F i ∣ d ν ≤ δ n ∥ F ∥ ν \delta_{n}\int|F_{i}(y')|\,d\gamma_{n}=\delta_{n}\int|F_{i}|\,d\nu\le\delta_{n}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu} δ n ∫ ∣ F i ( y ′ ) ∣ d γ n = δ n ∫ ∣ F i ∣ d ν ≤ δ n ∥ F ∥ ν by Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm , where δ n \delta_{n} δ n is the right side of (0.4) with ( μ ′ , x ′ ) = ( μ n , x n ) (\mu',x')=(\mu_{n},x_{n}) ( μ ′ , x ′ ) = ( μ n , x n ) . The third is at most M s ∫ ∣ F i ( y ′ ) ∣ d T ( y , y ′ ) d γ n ≤ M s ∥ F ∥ ν I T ( γ n ) M_{s}\int|F_{i}(y')|\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(y,y')\,d\gamma_{n}\le M_{s}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})} M s ∫ ∣ F i ( y ′ ) ∣ d T ( y , y ′ ) d γ n ≤ M s ∥ F ∥ ν I T ( γ n ) by (0.3), Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm and Probability Measures on the Flat Torus, the Torus Cost of a Coupling, the Torus Wasserstein Distance and Optimal Couplings §cost . Hence
∣ h ( μ n , x n ) − h ( μ , x ) ∣ ≤ C s c s D n + δ n ∥ F ∥ ν + M s ∥ F ∥ ν I T ( γ n ) , |h(\mu_{n},x_{n})-h(\mu,x)|\le\frac{C_{s}}{c_{s}}\sqrt{D_{n}}+\delta_{n}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu}+M_{s}\lVert F\rVert_{\nu}\sqrt{I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})}, ∣ h ( μ n , x n ) − h ( μ , x ) ∣ ≤ c s C s D n + δ n ∥ F ∥ ν + M s ∥ F ∥ ν I T ( γ n ) ,
and each term tends to 0 0 0 , because D n → 0 D_{n}\to0 D n → 0 , I T ( γ n ) → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\gamma_{n})\to0 I T ( γ n ) → 0 , ∥ x n − x ∥ → 0 \lVert x_{n}-x\rVert\to0 ∥ x n − x ∥ → 0 and W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 . This is condition (c) of a gradient field .
Step 4 (Clause 1). By Steps 1–3, g g g is a gradient field of φ ∘ S s \varphi\circ S_{s} φ ∘ S s , and the class of g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) lies in T μ T_{\mu} T μ for every μ \mu μ by Step 1. By Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §criterion , φ ∘ S s \varphi\circ S_{s} φ ∘ S s is a Laplacian test function; by Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus: Uniqueness of the Gradient Field, a Criterion, and Linearity of the Test Classes §unique its gradient field is g g g ; and Step 2 gives ∇ ( φ ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = A s μ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) \nabla(\varphi\circ S_{s})(\mu)=A^{\mu}_{s}\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu) ∇ ( φ ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = A s μ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) .
Step 5 (Clause 2). Let μ ∈ P ( T d ) \mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) μ ∈ P ( T d ) . By The Laplacian of a Laplacian Test Function on the Torus Wasserstein Space §laplacian and Step 4, L ( φ ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = ∫ ∑ i = 1 d ∂ i g i ( μ , x ) μ ( d x ) \mathcal{L}(\varphi\circ S_{s})(\mu)=\int\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,x)\,\mu(dx) L ( φ ∘ S s ) ( μ ) = ∫ ∑ i = 1 d ∂ i g i ( μ , x ) μ ( d x ) . Since g ( μ , ⋅ ) g(\mu,\cdot) g ( μ , ⋅ ) is the heat average a a a of F μ F_{\mu} F μ , Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §divergence gives ∫ ∑ i ∂ i g i ( μ , ⋅ ) d μ = − ⟨ F μ , ξ S s μ ⟩ S s μ = − ⟨ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) , ξ S s μ ⟩ S s μ \int\sum_{i}\partial_{i}g_{i}(\mu,\cdot)\,d\mu=-\langle F_{\mu},\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rangle_{S_{s}\mu}=-\langle\nabla\varphi(S_{s}\mu),\xi_{S_{s}\mu}\rangle_{S_{s}\mu} ∫ ∑ i ∂ i g i ( μ , ⋅ ) d μ = − ⟨ F μ , ξ S s μ ⟩ S s μ = − ⟨ ∇ φ ( S s μ ) , ξ S s μ ⟩ S s μ .
Step 6 (Clause 3). Let μ \mu μ , ( μ n ) (\mu_{n}) ( μ n ) and ( s n ) (s_{n}) ( s n ) be as in clause 3, and write N n = N s n N_{n}=N_{s_{n}} N n = N s n for the Gaussian measure of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings at time s n s_{n} s n . For each n n n , S s n μ n ∈ P a c ( T d ) S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) S s n μ n ∈ P ac ( T d ) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §measures ; let F n F_{n} F n be a Borel representative of ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ) \nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}) ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ) and G G G one of ∇ φ ( μ ) \nabla\varphi(\mu) ∇ φ ( μ ) , and let a n ( x ) = ∫ Q F n ( y ) Θ s n ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) a_{n}(x)=\int_{Q}F_{n}(y)\,\Theta_{s_{n}}(y-x)\,\lambda_{d}(dy) a n ( x ) = ∫ Q F n ( y ) Θ s n ( y − x ) λ d ( d y ) , which represents A s n μ n ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ) A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}) A s n μ n ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ) by Heat Smoothing, Entropy, Fisher Information and Laplacian Test Functions on the Torus Wasserstein Space: Standing Notation §heat-average . In this order: choose, by The Torus Wasserstein Space is a Sequentially Compact Metric Space in which Optimal Couplings Exist §optimal , an optimal coupling β n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) \beta_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) β n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) , so I T ( β n ) = W T ( μ n , μ ) 2 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2} I T ( β n ) = W T ( μ n , μ ) 2 ; put P n = β n ⊠ N n ∈ P ( R d + d + d ) P_{n}=\beta_{n}\boxtimes N_{n}\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{d+d+d}) P n = β n ⊠ N n ∈ P ( R d + d + d ) , the product measure read with q = d + d q=d+d q = d + d and p = d p=d p = d ; and let κ n = σ # P n \kappa_{n}=\sigma_{\#}P_{n} κ n = σ # P n , where σ : R d + d + d → R d + d \sigma:\mathbb{R}^{d+d+d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d+d} σ : R d + d + d → R d + d is given by σ ( ι d + d , d ( w ′ , z ) ) = ι d , d ( π ( p r 1 ( w ′ ) + z ) , p r 2 ( w ′ ) ) \sigma(\iota^{d+d,d}(w',z))=\iota^{d,d}\bigl(\pi(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w')+z),\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w')\bigr) σ ( ι d + d , d ( w ′ , z )) = ι d , d ( π ( pr 1 ( w ′ ) + z ) , pr 2 ( w ′ ) ) . The map σ \sigma σ is Borel, being the pairing of the first component map π ∘ ( p r 1 ∘ p r 1 d + d , d + p r 2 d + d , d ) \pi\circ(\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1}+\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2}) π ∘ ( pr 1 ∘ pr 1 d + d , d + pr 2 d + d , d ) of the map τ \tau τ of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §synchronous with the Borel map p r 2 ∘ p r 1 d + d , d \mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1} pr 2 ∘ pr 1 d + d , d .
κ n \kappa_{n} κ n is a coupling of S s n μ n S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} S s n μ n and μ \mu μ . Push-forwards compose, ( T ∘ S ) # ρ = T # ( S # ρ ) (T\circ S)_{\#}\rho=T_{\#}(S_{\#}\rho) ( T ∘ S ) # ρ = T # ( S # ρ ) , directly from the definition in Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward . With τ \tau τ the map of Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §synchronous formed with γ = β n \gamma=\beta_{n} γ = β n and time s n s_{n} s n , we have p r 1 ∘ σ = p r 1 ∘ τ \mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\sigma=\mathrm{pr}_{1}\circ\tau pr 1 ∘ σ = pr 1 ∘ τ , so ( p r 1 ) # κ n = ( p r 1 ) # ( τ # P n ) = ( p r 1 ) # β n s n = S s n μ n (\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\kappa_{n}=(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}(\tau_{\#}P_{n})=(\mathrm{pr}_{1})_{\#}\beta_{n}^{s_{n}}=S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} ( pr 1 ) # κ n = ( pr 1 ) # ( τ # P n ) = ( pr 1 ) # β n s n = S s n μ n , the last equality because β n s n ∈ Π ( S s n μ n , S s n μ ) \beta_{n}^{s_{n}}\in\Pi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},S_{s_{n}}\mu) β n s n ∈ Π ( S s n μ n , S s n μ ) by that clause. Also p r 2 ∘ σ = p r 2 ∘ p r 1 d + d , d \mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\sigma=\mathrm{pr}_{2}\circ\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1} pr 2 ∘ σ = pr 2 ∘ pr 1 d + d , d , and ( p r 1 d + d , d ) # P n = β n (\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1})_{\#}P_{n}=\beta_{n} ( pr 1 d + d , d ) # P n = β n by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product , so ( p r 2 ) # κ n = ( p r 2 ) # β n = μ (\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\kappa_{n}=(\mathrm{pr}_{2})_{\#}\beta_{n}=\mu ( pr 2 ) # κ n = ( pr 2 ) # β n = μ . By Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §coupling , κ n ∈ Π ( S s n μ n , μ ) \kappa_{n}\in\Pi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},\mu) κ n ∈ Π ( S s n μ n , μ ) .
Cost of κ n \kappa_{n} κ n . For a , b ∈ R d a,b\in\mathbb{R}^{d} a , b ∈ R d , π ( a ) − a ∈ Z d \pi(a)-a\in\mathbb{Z}^{d} π ( a ) − a ∈ Z d by The Half-Open Unit Cell Tiles Euclidean Space §wrap , so d T ( π ( a ) , b ) = d T ( a , b ) d_{\mathbb{T}}(\pi(a),b)=d_{\mathbb{T}}(a,b) d T ( π ( a ) , b ) = d T ( a , b ) by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §symmetry . Hence, for x , x ′ , z ∈ R d x,x',z\in\mathbb{R}^{d} x , x ′ , z ∈ R d , by The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §triangle , The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §symmetry and The Flat Torus Distance: Minimality of the Wrapped Displacement, Periodicity, the Metric on the Unit Cell and the Lipschitz Bound §minimal ,
d T ( π ( x + z ) , x ′ ) ≤ d T ( x + z , x ) + d T ( x , x ′ ) ≤ ∥ z ∥ + d T ( x , x ′ ) , d T ( π ( x + z ) , x ′ ) 2 ≤ 2 ∥ z ∥ 2 + 2 d T ( x , x ′ ) 2 . d_{\mathbb{T}}(\pi(x+z),x')\le d_{\mathbb{T}}(x+z,x)+d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x')\le\lVert z\rVert+d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x'),\qquad d_{\mathbb{T}}(\pi(x+z),x')^{2}\le2\lVert z\rVert^{2}+2\,d_{\mathbb{T}}(x,x')^{2}. d T ( π ( x + z ) , x ′ ) ≤ d T ( x + z , x ) + d T ( x , x ′ ) ≤ ∥ z ∥ + d T ( x , x ′ ) , d T ( π ( x + z ) , x ′ ) 2 ≤ 2 ∥ z ∥ 2 + 2 d T ( x , x ′ ) 2 .
Integrating against P n P_{n} P n and using the change-of-variables formula, the marginals ( p r 1 d + d , d ) # P n = β n (\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{1})_{\#}P_{n}=\beta_{n} ( pr 1 d + d , d ) # P n = β n and ( p r 2 d + d , d ) # P n = N n (\mathrm{pr}^{d+d,d}_{2})_{\#}P_{n}=N_{n} ( pr 2 d + d , d ) # P n = N n of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product , claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables for the density g s n g_{s_{n}} g s n of N n N_{n} N n , and The Gaussian Kernels on Euclidean Space: Scaling, Derivatives up to Order Three, the Convolution Identity, Moments and Tails §moments with q = d q=d q = d (note s n ≤ 1 s_{n}\le1 s n ≤ 1 ), we get
I T ( κ n ) ≤ 2 ∫ ∥ z ∥ 2 N n ( d z ) + 2 I T ( β n ) = 2 d s n + 2 W T ( μ n , μ ) 2 ⟶ 0 , I_{\mathbb{T}}(\kappa_{n})\le2\int\lVert z\rVert^{2}\,N_{n}(dz)+2\,I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})=2d\,s_{n}+2\,W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\longrightarrow0, I T ( κ n ) ≤ 2 ∫ ∥ z ∥ 2 N n ( d z ) + 2 I T ( β n ) = 2 d s n + 2 W T ( μ n , μ ) 2 ⟶ 0 ,
since s n → 0 s_{n}\to0 s n → 0 and W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 W T ( μ n , μ ) → 0 by Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space . Also I T ( β n ) = W T ( μ n , μ ) 2 → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})=W_{\mathbb{T}}(\mu_{n},\mu)^{2}\to0 I T ( β n ) = W T ( μ n , μ ) 2 → 0 .
First sequence. The measures S s n μ n S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n} S s n μ n and μ \mu μ lie in P a c ( T d ) \mathcal{P}^{\mathrm{ac}}(\mathbb{T}^{d}) P ac ( T d ) , κ n ∈ Π ( S s n μ n , μ ) \kappa_{n}\in\Pi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},\mu) κ n ∈ Π ( S s n μ n , μ ) and I T ( κ n ) → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\kappa_{n})\to0 I T ( κ n ) → 0 , so condition (c) of intrinsic test functions gives D κ n ( F n , G ) → 0 D_{\kappa_{n}}(F_{n},G)\to0 D κ n ( F n , G ) → 0 . By Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus §convergence , with the couplings κ n \kappa_{n} κ n , the sequence ( ( S s n μ n , ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ) ) ) ((S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n},\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}))) (( S s n μ n , ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ))) converges along couplings to ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) (\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)) ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ )) .
Second sequence. Let w ′ ∈ R d + d w'\in\mathbb{R}^{d+d} w ′ ∈ R d + d with x = p r 1 ( w ′ ) x=\mathrm{pr}_{1}(w') x = pr 1 ( w ′ ) , x ′ = p r 2 ( w ′ ) x'=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(w') x ′ = pr 2 ( w ′ ) . By Heat Averages of Vector Fields on the Torus: Regularity, Contraction, Tangency, the Divergence Identity and Synchronous Couplings §average (at time s n s_{n} s n ), a n ( x ) = ∫ F n ( π ( x + z ) ) N n ( d z ) a_{n}(x)=\int F_{n}(\pi(x+z))\,N_{n}(dz) a n ( x ) = ∫ F n ( π ( x + z )) N n ( d z ) , so, N n N_{n} N n being a probability measure, a n ( x ) − G ( x ′ ) = ∫ ( F n ( π ( x + z ) ) − G ( x ′ ) ) N n ( d z ) a_{n}(x)-G(x')=\int\bigl(F_{n}(\pi(x+z))-G(x')\bigr)N_{n}(dz) a n ( x ) − G ( x ′ ) = ∫ ( F n ( π ( x + z )) − G ( x ′ ) ) N n ( d z ) . Applying Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm on the probability space ( R d , B ( R d ) , N n ) (\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),N_{n}) ( R d , B ( R d ) , N n ) to each component and the constant 1 1 1 , and summing over the components (the inequality is trivial if the right side is infinite),
∥ a n ( x ) − G ( x ′ ) ∥ 2 ≤ ∫ ∥ F n ( π ( x + z ) ) − G ( x ′ ) ∥ 2 N n ( d z ) . \lVert a_{n}(x)-G(x')\rVert^{2}\le\int\bigl\lVert F_{n}(\pi(x+z))-G(x')\bigr\rVert^{2}N_{n}(dz). ∥ a n ( x ) − G ( x ′ ) ∥ 2 ≤ ∫ F n ( π ( x + z )) − G ( x ′ ) 2 N n ( d z ) .
The integrand on the right is H ( ι d + d , d ( w ′ , z ) ) H(\iota^{d+d,d}(w',z)) H ( ι d + d , d ( w ′ , z )) with H ( v ) = ∥ F n ( p r 1 ( σ ( v ) ) ) − G ( p r 2 ( σ ( v ) ) ) ∥ 2 H(v)=\lVert F_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(\sigma(v)))-G(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(\sigma(v)))\rVert^{2} H ( v ) = ∥ F n ( pr 1 ( σ ( v ))) − G ( pr 2 ( σ ( v ))) ∥ 2 , a Borel [ 0 , ∞ ] [0,\infty] [ 0 , ∞ ] -valued map. Integrating against β n \beta_{n} β n and using Tonelli's theorem (Tonelli and Fubini Theorems ) together with the identity ∫ H d P n = ∫ H ∘ ι d ( β n ⊗ N n ) \int H\,dP_{n}=\int H\circ\iota\,d(\beta_{n}\otimes N_{n}) ∫ H d P n = ∫ H ∘ ι d ( β n ⊗ N n ) of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product , then the change-of-variables formula for κ n = σ # P n \kappa_{n}=\sigma_{\#}P_{n} κ n = σ # P n ,
D β n ( a n , G ) ≤ ∫ H d P n = ∫ ∥ F n ( p r 1 ( v ′ ) ) − G ( p r 2 ( v ′ ) ) ∥ 2 κ n ( d v ′ ) = D κ n ( F n , G ) ⟶ 0. D_{\beta_{n}}(a_{n},G)\le\int H\,dP_{n}=\int\lVert F_{n}(\mathrm{pr}_{1}(v'))-G(\mathrm{pr}_{2}(v'))\rVert^{2}\,\kappa_{n}(dv')=D_{\kappa_{n}}(F_{n},G)\longrightarrow0 . D β n ( a n , G ) ≤ ∫ H d P n = ∫ ∥ F n ( pr 1 ( v ′ )) − G ( pr 2 ( v ′ )) ∥ 2 κ n ( d v ′ ) = D κ n ( F n , G ) ⟶ 0.
Since also I T ( β n ) → 0 I_{\mathbb{T}}(\beta_{n})\to0 I T ( β n ) → 0 and β n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) \beta_{n}\in\Pi(\mu_{n},\mu) β n ∈ Π ( μ n , μ ) , Convergence Along Couplings of Measures Carrying Square-Integrable Vector Fields on the Torus §convergence shows that ( ( μ n , A s n μ n ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ) ) ) ((\mu_{n},A^{\mu_{n}}_{s_{n}}\nabla\varphi(S_{s_{n}}\mu_{n}))) (( μ n , A s n μ n ∇ φ ( S s n μ n ))) converges along couplings to ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ ) ) (\mu,\nabla\varphi(\mu)) ( μ , ∇ φ ( μ )) . ■ \blacksquare ■