TheoremBase

Proof of Basic Properties of a Confining Potential on Euclidean Space: Continuity, Quadratic Minorants, the Tangent Inequality, Hessian Bounds, Growth under Translation, and Integrability

lemmalem:confining-potential-basic-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 13,195 chars · 45 deps · depth 22 Reason: Proof of lem:confining-potential-basic-euclidean-2026a.

Continuity comes from the C2C^2 definition. The quadratic minorant combines superquadratic growth with the extreme value theorem on a closed ball, and the tangent inequality comes from the subdifferential at a point of differentiability. The Hessian bounds come from positive semidefiniteness, and the growth bound from the mean value theorem applied to log(V - v0v_0 + 1) along a segment. Integrability follows by domination.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. By Confining Potentials on Euclidean Space §confining, VV is of class C2C^{2} on the open convex set Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} and convex on it, and satisfies conditions (a), (b) and (c) there. By claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, VV is also of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Claim 1 (Regularity; claim 1). By claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, VV is continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}. By clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set (with k=1k=1), each iV\partial_{i}V is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, hence continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. By clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, applied to the C1C^{1} function iV\partial_{i}V, each jiV\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V (clause 4 there) exists at every point and is continuous at every point in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces; since dE(x,y)d_{E}(x,y) is the nonnegative square root of k(xkyk)2\sum_{k}(x_{k}-y_{k})^{2} by Euclidean Distance on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and the Euclidean distance of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is the absolute-value metric by Euclidean, Metric and Sequential Continuity of a Real Function of a Real Variable §distance, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field shows that this is the condition of Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, so jiV\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V is continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}. For the Laplacian ΔV=i=1diiV\Delta V=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}V (The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian), let (xk)kN(x_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converge to xx in (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}); then iiV(xk)iiV(x)\partial_{i}\partial_{i}V(x_{k})\to\partial_{i}\partial_{i}V(x) for each ii by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential, so ΔV(xk)ΔV(x)\Delta V(x_{k})\to\Delta V(x) by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, applied to the finitely many summands, and ΔV\Delta V is continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset. All these functions are Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. Finally V(x)=DV(x)\nabla V(x)=DV(x) has components 1V(x),,dV(x)\partial_{1}V(x),\dots,\partial_{d}V(x) by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set, so V\nabla V is Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps (the componentwise criterion, claim 2 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets).

Claim 2 (Quadratic minorants; claim 2). Let MM be positive, and let KK be positive with Mx2V(x)M\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le V(x) whenever KxK\le\lVert x\rVert, by condition (a). The closed ball Bˉ=BˉdE(0Rd,K)={x:xK}\bar{B}=\bar{B}_{d_{E}}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},K)=\{x:\lVert x\rVert\le K\} is nonempty by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space and compact by claim 2 of A Closed Euclidean Ball is Convex and Compact, and VV restricted to Bˉ\bar{B} has the continuity property required there by Claim 1; so Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space gives xBˉx_{*}\in\bar{B} with b=V(x)V(x)b=V(x_{*})\le V(x) for every xBˉx\in\bar{B}. Put CM=MK2bC_{M}=|MK^{2}-b|, so that 0CM0\le C_{M} and MK2bCMMK^{2}-b\le C_{M} by claims 1 and 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. If xK\lVert x\rVert\le K, then x2K2\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le K^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, so Mx2MK2M\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le MK^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and, since CM(MK2b)-C_{M}\le-(MK^{2}-b) by sign reversal (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) applied to MK2bCMMK^{2}-b\le C_{M}, adding these two inequalities (compatibility of the order with addition in Ordered Field, used twice) gives Mx2CMMK2(MK2b)=bV(x)M\lVert x\rVert^{2}-C_{M}\le MK^{2}-(MK^{2}-b)=b\le V(x). If KxK\le\lVert x\rVert, then Mx2CMMx2V(x)M\lVert x\rVert^{2}-C_{M}\le M\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le V(x). As the order of R\mathbb{R} is total, every xx falls under one of the two cases.

Claim 3 (Tangent inequality; claim 3). Let xRdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. By A Real-Valued C^1 Function is Differentiable at Every Point, VV is differentiable at xx with derivative matrix the row matrix whose entry in column ii is iV(x)\partial_{i}V(x). By Elementary Calculus of the Subdifferential of a Convex Function §gradient, with U=RdU=\mathbb{R}^{d} and f=Vf=V, the subdifferential of VV at xx relative to Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} is {g}\{g\} with gi=iV(x)g_{i}=\partial_{i}V(x), that is g=DV(x)g=DV(x) by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set. In particular DV(x)DV(x) is a subgradient, which by Subdifferential of a Real-Valued Function on a Convex Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n §subdifferential means V(x)+DV(x)(yx)V(y)V(x)+DV(x)\cdot(y-x)\le V(y) for every yRdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Claim 4 (Hessian bounds; claim 4). Let xRdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and A=D2V(x)A=D^{2}V(x), so Aij=ijV(x)A_{ij}=\partial_{i}\partial_{j}V(x) by Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function and Aij=AjiA_{ij}=A_{ji} by claim 2 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian. The function VV satisfies the hypotheses of A Convex Function of Class C2C^2 has Positive Semidefinite Hessian with U=RdU=\mathbb{R}^{d}: the class C2C^{2} used there asks, for a real-valued function, exactly continuity at every point of VV, of each iV\partial_{i}V and of each jiV\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V, which is clauses 1 and 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set (the definition that supersedes it). Indeed, the older C1C^{1} notion on which that C2C^{2} notion is built asks, as clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set does with m=1m=1, that the function be continuous at every point and that each of its partial derivatives exist at every point and be continuous at every point; and its partial derivatives are the same difference-quotient limits as in Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set, whose extra requirement that the displaced point lie in the domain is automatic here since the domain is Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}. Moreover the Hessian matrix used there has the same entries ijV(x)\partial_{i}\partial_{j}V(x) as that of Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function. Hence 0dA0_{d}\preceq A, that is, by The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices, 0z(Az)0\le z\cdot(Az) for every zRdz\in\mathbb{R}^{d}. With z=eiz=e_{i} this gives 0Aii0\le A_{ii} for each ii, so ΔV(x)=iAii\Delta V(x)=\sum_{i}A_{ii} (The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function §laplacian) is nonnegative and AiiΔV(x)A_{ii}\le\Delta V(x), by claims 5 and 6 of Properties of Finite Sums. For iji\ne j, moreover, Aii+Ajj=l{i,j}AllA_{ii}+A_{jj}=\sum_{l\in\{i,j\}}A_{ll} by claims 1 and 2 of Peeling, Splitting, and Interchange for Sums over a Finite Index Set (with F={i}F=\{i\} and the object jFj\notin F), and this is at most l[d]All=ΔV(x)\sum_{l\in[d]}A_{ll}=\Delta V(x) by claim 3 of Nonnegativity and Monotonicity of a Sum over a Finite Index Set and claim 1 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set; so Aii+AjjΔV(x)A_{ii}+A_{jj}\le\Delta V(x). For iji\ne j and s{1,1}s\in\{1,-1\}, z=ei+sejz=e_{i}+s\,e_{j} gives 0z(Az)=Aii+2sAij+Ajj0\le z\cdot(Az)=A_{ii}+2s\,A_{ij}+A_{jj}, so (Aii+Ajj)2AijAii+Ajj-(A_{ii}+A_{jj})\le2A_{ij}\le A_{ii}+A_{jj} and 2AijAii+AjjΔV(x)|2A_{ij}|\le A_{ii}+A_{jj}\le\Delta V(x) by claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; hence, since 2Aij=2Aij=2Aij|2A_{ij}|=|2|\,|A_{ij}|=2|A_{ij}| by claim 4 there (as 0<20<2), multiplying by 12=21\tfrac12=2^{-1}, which is positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives Aij12ΔV(x)|A_{ij}|\le\tfrac12\Delta V(x) (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); and 12ΔV(x)ΔV(x)\tfrac12\Delta V(x)\le\Delta V(x), by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field if 0<ΔV(x)0<\Delta V(x) and trivially if ΔV(x)=0\Delta V(x)=0. For i=ji=j, Aii=AiiΔV(x)|A_{ii}|=A_{ii}\le\Delta V(x). Since jiV(x)=Aji=Aij\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V(x)=A_{ji}=A_{ij}, this proves jiV(x)ΔV(x)|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V(x)|\le\Delta V(x) for all i,j[d]i,j\in[d].

Claim 5 (Growth under translation; claim 5). Let C1C_{1} be the constant of Claim 2 for M=1M=1 and put v0=C1v_{0}=-C_{1}; then v0x2C1V(x)v_{0}\le\lVert x\rVert^{2}-C_{1}\le V(x) for every xx. Put W(y)=V(y)v0+1W(y)=V(y)-v_{0}+1, so 1W(y)1\le W(y). Let CbC_{b} be a constant as in condition (b). At y=0Rdy=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} one has 0DV(y)Cb(1+V(y))0\le\lVert DV(y)\rVert\le C_{b}(1+|V(y)|) with 0<1+V(y)0<1+|V(y)|, so 0Cb0\le C_{b} by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. For every yy, claims 1 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give V(y)=W(y)+(v01)W(y)+v01|V(y)|=|W(y)+(v_{0}-1)|\le W(y)+|v_{0}-1|, and since 1W(y)1\le W(y), 1+V(y)(2+v01)W(y)1+|V(y)|\le(2+|v_{0}-1|)\,W(y); hence, by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

DV(y)CW(y),C=Cb(2+v01)0.\lVert DV(y)\rVert\le C\,W(y),\qquad C=C_{b}\,(2+|v_{0}-1|)\ge0 .

For yRdy\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, VV is differentiable at yy with derivative matrix ByB_{y}, the row of the iV(y)\partial_{i}V(y), by A Real-Valued C^1 Function is Differentiable at Every Point; since W(y+h)W(y)Byh=V(y+h)V(y)ByhW(y+h)-W(y)-B_{y}h=V(y+h)-V(y)-B_{y}h, WW is differentiable at yy with the same derivative matrix by Differentiability at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces, and iW(y)=iV(y)\partial_{i}W(y)=\partial_{i}V(y) by claim 1 of A Derivative Matrix is the Jacobian Matrix, and is Unique. Fix x,aRdx,a\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and put F(τ)=W(x+τa)F(\tau)=W(x+\tau a) for τ\tau in the open interval (1,2)(-1,2). By Chain Rule Along an Affine Path, FF is differentiable at every τ(1,2)\tau\in(-1,2) with F(τ)=iiV(x+τa)ai=DV(x+τa)aF'(\tau)=\sum_{i}\partial_{i}V(x+\tau a)\,a_{i}=DV(x+\tau a)\cdot a, so by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product, claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and the display, F(τ)DV(x+τa)aCaF(τ)F'(\tau)\le\lVert DV(x+\tau a)\rVert\,\lVert a\rVert\le C\lVert a\rVert\,F(\tau). Since 1F(τ)1\le F(\tau), F(τ)F(\tau) is an interior point of (0,)(0,\infty), at which log\log is differentiable with derivative F(τ)1F(\tau)^{-1} by The Natural Logarithm; by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives, G=logFG=\log\circ F is differentiable at every τ(1,2)\tau\in(-1,2) with G(τ)=F(τ)F(τ)1CaG'(\tau)=F'(\tau)\,F(\tau)^{-1}\le C\lVert a\rVert, using claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By Mean Value Theorem on an Open Interval, applied on (1,2)(-1,2) to the points 0<10<1, there is σ(0,1)\sigma\in(0,1) with G(1)G(0)=G(σ)CaG(1)-G(0)=G'(\sigma)\le C\lVert a\rVert. As exp\exp is increasing with exp(u+v)=exp(u)exp(v)\exp(u+v)=\exp(u)\exp(v) by claims 4 and 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, and exp(logt)=t\exp(\log t)=t by The Natural Logarithm,

V(x+a)v0+1=exp(G(1))exp(G(0)+Ca)=exp(Ca)(V(x)v0+1).V(x+a)-v_{0}+1=\exp(G(1))\le\exp\bigl(G(0)+C\lVert a\rVert\bigr)=\exp\bigl(C\lVert a\rVert\bigr)\bigl(V(x)-v_{0}+1\bigr).

Claim 6 (Integrability; claim 6). Let μ\mu be as there; then Vdμ<\int|V|\,d\mu<\infty by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, and constant functions are integrable with respect to μ\mu by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures. In each case below a Borel function is dominated by a function of finite integral, so it is integrable by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, the dominating integrals being computed by claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and μ(Rd)=1\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1.

Second moment: with C1C_{1} as in Claim 5, x2V(x)+C1V(x)+C1\lVert x\rVert^{2}\le V(x)+C_{1}\le|V(x)|+|C_{1}| by Claim 2 and claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, so M2(μ)Vdμ+C1<M_{2}(\mu)\le\int|V|\,d\mu+|C_{1}|<\infty (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment) and μP2(Rd)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) by The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space.

Gradient: V\lVert\nabla V\rVert is Borel as the composite of V\nabla V (Claim 1) with the Borel norm (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps), and VCb(1+V)\lVert\nabla V\rVert\le C_{b}(1+|V|) with Cb0C_{b}\ge0 as in Claim 5.

Laplacian and second derivatives: ΔV\Delta V and jiV\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V are Borel by Claim 1; by Claim 4 and condition (c) with ε=1\varepsilon=1 there is CC' with 0ΔVV+CV+C0\le\Delta V\le|V|+C'\le|V|+|C'|, and jiVΔV|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}V|\le\Delta V.

Translates: let aRda\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and Va(x)=V(x+a)V_{a}(x)=V(x+a). If xkxx_{k}\to x in (Rd,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{d},d_{E}), then xk+ax+ax_{k}+a\to x+a, as dE(xk+a,x+a)=dE(xk,x)d_{E}(x_{k}+a,x+a)=d_{E}(x_{k},x) by Euclidean Distance on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so Va(xk)Va(x)V_{a}(x_{k})\to V_{a}(x) by Claim 1 and Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §sequential; thus VaV_{a} is continuous by Continuity Between Metric Spaces is Equivalent to Sequential Continuity §on-subset, hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps. With E=exp(Ca)E=\exp(C\lVert a\rVert), positive by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function, Claim 5 gives v0Va(x)v01+E(V(x)v0+1)v_{0}\le V_{a}(x)\le v_{0}-1+E\,(V(x)-v_{0}+1), and by claims 1, 3 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Va(x)v0-V_{a}(x)\le|v_{0}| and Va(x)(1+E)v01+EV(x)V_{a}(x)\le(1+E)|v_{0}-1|+E\,|V(x)|; so Va(x)v0+(1+E)v01+EV(x)|V_{a}(x)|\le|v_{0}|+(1+E)|v_{0}-1|+E\,|V(x)| by claim 6 there, a function of finite integral.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…