TheoremBase

Restriction of a subsolution is proved by replacing a test function on the smaller set by the global quadratic that matches it to second order there, so that the subsolution property on the large set applies; the supersolution statements follow by sign reversal, and locality is immediate once the envelopes and shifts are known to be unchanged.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named at the point of use. Throughout, U′U' denotes a nonempty subset of UU open in HH, and W′=D(A)∩U′W'=D(A)\cap U'. Recall that dH(x,y)=∣x−y∣Hd_{H}(x,y)=|x-y|_{H} and that dHd_{H} is symmetric, by Real Inner Product Spaces (iii) and the metric axioms.

Claim 1. Since U′⊆UU'\subseteq U we have W′=D(A)∩U′⊆D(A)∩U=WW'=D(A)\cap U'\subseteq D(A)\cap U=W. The function F∣U′F|_{U'} maps W′×R×H×Sym(V)W'\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(V) into R\mathbb{R}, so it is a second-order equation operator on U′U' relative to (H,V,A)(H,V,A) by Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ\delta-Shifts (i), U′U' being nonempty and open in HH.

Let δ>0\delta>0 and (x,r,p,Y)∈W′×R×H×Sym(H)(x,r,p,Y)\in W'\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(H). Then x∈Wx\in W, so both sides below are defined, and by Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ\delta-Shifts (ii), applied first to F∣U′F|_{U'} and then to FF,

(F∣U′)δ−(x,r,p,Y)=F∣U′(x,r+δh(x),p+δAx,Y∣V+δIV)=F(x,r+δh(x),p+δAx,Y∣V+δIV)=Fδ−(x,r,p,Y),\bigl(F|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p,Y)=F|_{U'}\bigl(x,r+\delta h(x),p+\delta Ax,Y|_{V}+\delta I_{V}\bigr)=F\bigl(x,r+\delta h(x),p+\delta Ax,Y|_{V}+\delta I_{V}\bigr)=F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p,Y),

the middle equality holding because F∣U′F|_{U'} takes the value of FF at every point of its domain. The identity for the ++ shifts is obtained in the same way. Finally, if FF is degenerate elliptic and x∈W′x\in W', r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, p∈Hp\in H and X,Y∈Sym(V)X,Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(V) satisfy X⪯YX\preceq Y, then x∈Wx\in W, so F(x,r,p,Y)≤F(x,r,p,X)F(x,r,p,Y)\le F(x,r,p,X) by Degenerate Elliptic Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple (i), and these are the values of F∣U′F|_{U'} at the same data; hence F∣U′F|_{U'} is degenerate elliptic.

Claim 2. Suppose first that uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU; in particular uu is bounded above near each point of UU, so by claim 1 of The δ\delta-Envelopes on an Open Subset, under Penalisation of a Continuous Function, and on a Closed Subset the function u∣U′u|_{U'} is bounded above near each point of U′U' and

(u∣U′)δ−(x)=uδ−(x)for every δ>0 and every x∈V∩U′.\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\qquad\text{for every }\delta>0\text{ and every }x\in V\cap U' .

Let δ>0\delta>0, let φ′∈C2(U′)\varphi'\in C^{2}(U'), let x^∈V∩U′\hat{x}\in V\cap U' be a point at which the function V∩U′→RV\cap U'\to\mathbb{R} with value (u∣U′)δ−(x)−φ′(x)\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi'(x) at xx has a local maximum relative to V∩U′V\cap U', and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. Since U′U' is open in HH and x^∈U′\hat{x}\in U', there is a positive ρ∈R\rho\in\mathbb{R} with BdH(x^,ρ)⊆U′B_{d_{H}}(\hat{x},\rho)\subseteq U', by Open Subset of a Metric Space. Put

η=ε4,ε′=min⁡{ε2,ρ},\eta=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4},\qquad \varepsilon'=\min\bigl\{\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2},\rho\bigr\},

both positive, with ε′≤ε2\varepsilon'\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} and ε′≤ρ\varepsilon'\le\rho by claims 1 and 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements, and 2η=ε22\eta=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}.

Let T:H→RT:H\to\mathbb{R} be the function of Quadratic Test Functions: a Global C2C^2 Majorant and Minorant Matching a C2C^2 Function to Second Order at a Point formed from the open set U′U', the function φ′\varphi', the point x^\hat{x} and the number η\eta. By claim 1 of that lemma, the restriction of TT to UU belongs to C2(U)C^{2}(U), with DT(x^)=Dφ′(x^)DT(\hat{x})=D\varphi'(\hat{x}) and ∥D2T(x^)−D2φ′(x^)∥≤2η\lVert D^{2}T(\hat{x})-D^{2}\varphi'(\hat{x})\rVert\le 2\eta; here x^∈U′⊆U\hat{x}\in U'\subseteq U and the gradients and Hessians of the restriction agree with those of TT.

By claim 4 of Quadratic Test Functions: a Global C2C^2 Majorant and Minorant Matching a C2C^2 Function to Second Order at a Point, applied with the set A=V∩U′A=V\cap U', which is contained in U′U' and contains x^\hat{x}, and with g=(u∣U′)δ−g=\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}, the function V∩U′→RV\cap U'\to\mathbb{R} with value uδ−(x)−T(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-T(x) at xx has a local maximum at x^\hat{x} relative to V∩U′V\cap U'. By claim 4 of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set, applied in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) with S=V∩US=V\cap U, O=U′O=U', so that S∩O=V∩U′S\cap O=V\cap U', and with the function on V∩UV\cap U whose value at xx is uδ−(x)−T(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-T(x), that function has a local maximum at x^\hat{x} relative to V∩UV\cap U.

Since uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU, Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple (i), applied with δ\delta, the test function TT restricted to UU, the point x^\hat{x} and the tolerance ε′\varepsilon', yields y∈Wy\in W, s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, q∈Hq\in H and Y∈Sym(H)Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) with

∣y−x^∣H<ε′,∣uδ−(y)−uδ−(x^)∣<ε′,∣s−uδ−(x^)∣<ε′,|y-\hat{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon',\quad |u^{-}_{\delta}(y)-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<\varepsilon',\quad |s-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<\varepsilon', ∣q−DT(x^)∣H<ε′,∥Y−D2T(x^)∥<ε′,Fδ−(y,s,q,Y)≤ε′.|q-DT(\hat{x})|_{H}<\varepsilon',\quad \lVert Y-D^{2}T(\hat{x})\rVert<\varepsilon',\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(y,s,q,Y)\le\varepsilon' .

From dH(x^,y)=∣y−x^∣H<ε′≤ρd_{H}(\hat{x},y)=|y-\hat{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon'\le\rho and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we get y∈BdH(x^,ρ)⊆U′y\in B_{d_{H}}(\hat{x},\rho)\subseteq U', so y∈W′y\in W' and in particular y∈V∩U′y\in V\cap U'; hence (u∣U′)δ−(y)=uδ−(y)\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(y)=u^{-}_{\delta}(y) and (u∣U′)δ−(x^)=uδ−(x^)\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x}). Since DT(x^)=Dφ′(x^)DT(\hat{x})=D\varphi'(\hat{x}) and

∥Y−D2φ′(x^)∥≤∥Y−D2T(x^)∥+∥D2T(x^)−D2φ′(x^)∥<ε′+2η≤ε2+ε2=ε\lVert Y-D^{2}\varphi'(\hat{x})\rVert\le\lVert Y-D^{2}T(\hat{x})\rVert+\lVert D^{2}T(\hat{x})-D^{2}\varphi'(\hat{x})\rVert<\varepsilon'+2\eta\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon

by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity and claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and since (F∣U′)δ−(y,s,q,Y)=Fδ−(y,s,q,Y)≤ε′≤ε\bigl(F|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(y,s,q,Y)=F^{-}_{\delta}(y,s,q,Y)\le\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon by claim 1, the six conditions of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple (i) hold for u∣U′u|_{U'}, F∣U′F|_{U'}, δ\delta, φ′\varphi', x^\hat{x} and ε\varepsilon, all the remaining ones because ε′≤ε\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon. As the data were arbitrary, u∣U′u|_{U'} is a viscosity subsolution of F∣U′F|_{U'} on U′U'.

Now suppose uu is a viscosity supersolution of FF on UU, and let F~\tilde{F} be the operator of Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of FF are Supersolutions of F~\tilde F. By claim 5 of that lemma, −u-u is a viscosity subsolution of F~\tilde{F} on UU, so by the case just proved (−u)∣U′(-u)|_{U'} is a viscosity subsolution of F~∣U′\tilde{F}|_{U'} on U′U'. The operator obtained from F∣U′F|_{U'} by the construction of that lemma is F~∣U′\tilde{F}|_{U'}, since both are the function on W′×R×H×Sym(V)W'\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(V) with value −F(x,−r,−p,−X)-F(x,-r,-p,-X) at (x,r,p,X)(x,r,p,X), and (−u)∣U′(-u)|_{U'} is the function −(u∣U′)-\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr). Applying claim 5 of Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of FF are Supersolutions of F~\tilde F to the operator F∣U′F|_{U'} on U′U' and the function u∣U′u|_{U'} therefore shows that u∣U′u|_{U'} is a viscosity supersolution of F∣U′F|_{U'} on U′U'.

Claim 3. Assume the hypothesis for subsolutions and let x∈Ux\in U, with UxU_{x} as given.

Local bounds. Being a viscosity subsolution of F∣UxF|_{U_{x}} on UxU_{x}, the function u∣Uxu|_{U_{x}} is bounded above near each point of UxU_{x}, so by Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function (i) there are c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R} and a positive r0∈Rr_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with u(z)≤cu(z)\le c for every z∈Uxz\in U_{x} with dH(z,x)≤r0d_{H}(z,x)\le r_{0}. Since UxU_{x} is open in HH and contains xx, there is a positive ρ\rho with BdH(x,ρ)⊆UxB_{d_{H}}(x,\rho)\subseteq U_{x}. Put r=min⁡{r0,ρ2}r=\min\{r_{0},\tfrac{\rho}{2}\}, positive by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements, with r≤r0r\le r_{0} and r≤ρ2<ρr\le\tfrac{\rho}{2}<\rho by claim 1 of that lemma and claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Every z∈Uz\in U with dH(z,x)≤rd_{H}(z,x)\le r satisfies dH(x,z)=dH(z,x)≤r<ρd_{H}(x,z)=d_{H}(z,x)\le r<\rho, hence z∈BdH(x,ρ)⊆Uxz\in B_{d_{H}}(x,\rho)\subseteq U_{x} by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and dH(z,x)≤r0d_{H}(z,x)\le r_{0}, hence u(z)≤cu(z)\le c. So c∈Au(x)c\in A_{u}(x) and, xx being arbitrary, uu is bounded above near each point of UU.

The subsolution property. Let δ>0\delta>0, let φ∈C2(U)\varphi\in C^{2}(U), let x^∈V∩U\hat{x}\in V\cap U be a point at which the function V∩U→RV\cap U\to\mathbb{R} with value uδ−(x)−φ(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi(x) at xx has a local maximum relative to V∩UV\cap U, and let ε>0\varepsilon>0. Put U′=Ux^U'=U_{\hat{x}}, so that x^∈U′\hat{x}\in U' and W′=D(A)∩U′⊆WW'=D(A)\cap U'\subseteq W. By claim 1 of The δ\delta-Envelopes on an Open Subset, under Penalisation of a Continuous Function, and on a Closed Subset, (u∣U′)δ−=uδ−\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}=u^{-}_{\delta} on V∩U′V\cap U'. By claim 4 of Basic Properties of Differentiability on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space, the restriction φ∣U′\varphi|_{U'} belongs to C2(U′)C^{2}(U') and has the gradient Dφ(z)D\varphi(z) and the Hessian D2φ(z)D^{2}\varphi(z) at every z∈U′z\in U'. By claim 4 of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set, applied with S=V∩US=V\cap U, O=U′O=U' and the function with value uδ−(x)−φ(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi(x) at xx, the restriction of that function to V∩U′V\cap U' has a local maximum at x^\hat{x} relative to V∩U′V\cap U'; and that restriction is the function with value (u∣U′)δ−(x)−φ∣U′(x)\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi|_{U'}(x) at xx.

Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple (i) to the viscosity subsolution u∣U′u|_{U'} of F∣U′F|_{U'} on U′U', with δ\delta, φ∣U′\varphi|_{U'}, x^\hat{x} and ε\varepsilon, we obtain y∈W′y\in W', s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}, q∈Hq\in H and Y∈Sym(H)Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) satisfying the six conditions there. Now y∈W′⊆Wy\in W'\subseteq W and y,x^∈V∩U′y,\hat{x}\in V\cap U', so (u∣U′)δ−\bigl(u|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta} may be replaced by uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} at both points; Dφ∣U′(x^)=Dφ(x^)D\varphi|_{U'}(\hat{x})=D\varphi(\hat{x}) and D2φ∣U′(x^)=D2φ(x^)D^{2}\varphi|_{U'}(\hat{x})=D^{2}\varphi(\hat{x}); and Fδ−(y,s,q,Y)=(F∣U′)δ−(y,s,q,Y)≤εF^{-}_{\delta}(y,s,q,Y)=\bigl(F|_{U'}\bigr)^{-}_{\delta}(y,s,q,Y)\le\varepsilon by claim 1. Hence the six conditions of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple (i) hold for uu, FF, δ\delta, φ\varphi, x^\hat{x} and ε\varepsilon, and uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF on UU.

Finally, assume the hypothesis for supersolutions, and let F~\tilde{F} be as in Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of FF are Supersolutions of F~\tilde F. For each x∈Ux\in U, claim 5 of that lemma applied to F∣UxF|_{U_{x}} on UxU_{x} shows that −(u∣Ux)=(−u)∣Ux-\bigl(u|_{U_{x}}\bigr)=(-u)|_{U_{x}} is a viscosity subsolution of the operator obtained from F∣UxF|_{U_{x}} by that construction, which as above is F~∣Ux\tilde{F}|_{U_{x}}. By the part of this claim already proved, applied to F~\tilde{F} and −u-u, the function −u-u is bounded above near each point of UU and is a viscosity subsolution of F~\tilde{F} on UU. By Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity (ii), uu is then bounded below near each point of UU, and by claim 5 of Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of FF are Supersolutions of F~\tilde F, uu is a viscosity supersolution of FF on UU.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…