Proof of Restriction of the Equation and the Locality of the Viscosity Sub- and Supersolution Properties on a Hilbert Triple
lemmalem:viscosity-locality-hilbert-triple-2026aRestriction of a subsolution is proved by replacing a test function on the smaller set by the global quadratic that matches it to second order there, so that the subsolution property on the large set applies; the supersolution statements follow by sign reversal, and locality is immediate once the envelopes and shifts are known to be unchanged.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data appearing in its own statement, and is applied here to the data named at the point of use. Throughout, denotes a nonempty subset of open in , and . Recall that and that is symmetric, by Real Inner Product Space §distance and the metric axioms.
Claim 1. Since we have . The function maps into , so it is a second-order equation operator on relative to by Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its -Shifts §operator, being nonempty and open in .
Let and . Then , so both sides below are defined, and by Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its -Shifts §shifted, applied first to and then to ,
the middle equality holding because takes the value of at every point of its domain. The identity for the shifts is obtained in the same way. Finally, if is degenerate elliptic and , , and satisfy , then , so by Degenerate Elliptic Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §elliptic, and these are the values of at the same data; hence is degenerate elliptic.
Claim 2. Suppose first that is a viscosity subsolution of on ; in particular is bounded above near each point of , so by claim 1 of The -Envelopes on an Open Subset, under Penalisation of a Continuous Function, and on a Closed Subset the function is bounded above near each point of and
Let , let , let be a point at which the function with value at has a local maximum relative to , and let . Since is open in and , there is a positive with , by Open Subset of a Metric Space. Put
both positive, with and by claims 1 and 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements, and .
Let be the function of Quadratic Test Functions: a Global Majorant and Minorant Matching a Function to Second Order at a Point formed from the open set , the function , the point and the number . By claim 1 of that lemma, the restriction of to belongs to , with and ; here and the gradients and Hessians of the restriction agree with those of .
By claim 4 of Quadratic Test Functions: a Global Majorant and Minorant Matching a Function to Second Order at a Point, applied with the set , which is contained in and contains , and with , the function with value at has a local maximum at relative to . By claim 4 of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set, applied in with , , so that , and with the function on whose value at is , that function has a local maximum at relative to .
Since is a viscosity subsolution of on , Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §subsolution, applied with , the test function restricted to , the point and the tolerance , yields , , and with
From and claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we get , so and in particular ; hence and . Since and
by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity and claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and since by claim 1, the six conditions of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §subsolution hold for , , , , and , all the remaining ones because . As the data were arbitrary, is a viscosity subsolution of on .
Now suppose is a viscosity supersolution of on , and let be the operator of Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of are Supersolutions of . By claim 5 of that lemma, is a viscosity subsolution of on , so by the case just proved is a viscosity subsolution of on . The operator obtained from by the construction of that lemma is , since both are the function on with value at , and is the function . Applying claim 5 of Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of are Supersolutions of to the operator on and the function therefore shows that is a viscosity supersolution of on .
Claim 3. Assume the hypothesis for subsolutions and let , with as given.
Local bounds. Being a viscosity subsolution of on , the function is bounded above near each point of , so by Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function §near-bounds there are and a positive with for every with . Since is open in and contains , there is a positive with . Put , positive by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements, with and by claim 1 of that lemma and claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Every with satisfies , hence by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and , hence . So and, being arbitrary, is bounded above near each point of .
The subsolution property. Let , let , let be a point at which the function with value at has a local maximum relative to , and let . Put , so that and . By claim 1 of The -Envelopes on an Open Subset, under Penalisation of a Continuous Function, and on a Closed Subset, on . By claim 4 of Basic Properties of Differentiability on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space, the restriction belongs to and has the gradient and the Hessian at every . By claim 4 of Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set, applied with , and the function with value at , the restriction of that function to has a local maximum at relative to ; and that restriction is the function with value at .
Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §subsolution to the viscosity subsolution of on , with , , and , we obtain , , and satisfying the six conditions there. Now and , so may be replaced by at both points; and ; and by claim 1. Hence the six conditions of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §subsolution hold for , , , , and , and is a viscosity subsolution of on .
Finally, assume the hypothesis for supersolutions, and let be as in Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of are Supersolutions of . For each , claim 5 of that lemma applied to on shows that is a viscosity subsolution of the operator obtained from by that construction, which as above is . By the part of this claim already proved, applied to and , the function is bounded above near each point of and is a viscosity subsolution of on . By Basic Properties of the -Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §duality, is then bounded below near each point of , and by claim 5 of Sign Reversal for Second-Order Equations on a Hilbert Triple: Subsolutions of are Supersolutions of , is a viscosity supersolution of on .
Loading…
Prerequisites
cf0f5e9e-05d5-4d15-b13d-a68657bb63de