Throughout, sums are finite sums of real numbers, ⣠t ⣠|t| ⣠t ⣠is the absolute value of t ā R t\in\mathbb{R} t ā R , and t 2 t^{2} t 2 abbreviates t ā
t t\cdot t t ā
t .
Squares are nonnegative. For every s ā R s\in\mathbb{R} s ā R we have 0 ⤠s 2 0\le s^{2} 0 ⤠s 2 . Indeed, ⣠s ⣠|s| ⣠s ⣠equals s s s or ā s -s ā s by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , so ⣠s ⣠ā ⣠s ⣠|s|\,|s| ⣠s ⣠⣠s ⣠equals s ā
s s\cdot s s ā
s in the first case and, in the second, equals ( ā s ) ( ā s ) = s ā
s (-s)(-s)=s\cdot s ( ā s ) ( ā s ) = s ā
s by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field . Also 0 ⤠⣠s ⣠0\le|s| 0 ⤠⣠s ⣠by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , so claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , applied to the inequality 0 ⤠⣠s ⣠0\le|s| 0 ⤠⣠s ⣠with the nonnegative factor ⣠s ⣠|s| ⣠s ⣠, gives ⣠s ⣠ā
0 ⤠⣠s ⣠ā ⣠s ⣠|s|\cdot 0\le|s|\,|s| ⣠s ⣠ā
0 ⤠⣠s ⣠⣠s ⣠, and ⣠s ⣠ā
0 = 0 |s|\cdot 0=0 ⣠s ⣠ā
0 = 0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field .
Claim 1. By claim 4 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum ,
w ā
( A z ) = ā i = 1 n ā j = 1 n A i j ā w i ā z j , z ā
( A w ) = ā i = 1 n ā j = 1 n A i j ā z i ā w j . w\cdot(Az)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}A_{ij}\,w_{i}\,z_{j},\qquad
z\cdot(Aw)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}A_{ij}\,z_{i}\,w_{j}. w ā
( A z ) = i = 1 ā n ā j = 1 ā n ā A ij ā w i ā z j ā , z ā
( A w ) = i = 1 ā n ā j = 1 ā n ā A ij ā z i ā w j ā .
Applying Interchange of a Finite Double Sum to the second double sum and then renaming the two summation indices, it equals
ā j = 1 n ā i = 1 n A i j ā z i ā w j = ā i = 1 n ā j = 1 n A j i ā z j ā w i . \sum_{j=1}^{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_{ij}\,z_{i}\,w_{j}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}A_{ji}\,z_{j}\,w_{i}. j = 1 ā n ā i = 1 ā n ā A ij ā z i ā w j ā = i = 1 ā n ā j = 1 ā n ā A ji ā z j ā w i ā .
Since A A A is symmetric we have A j i = A i j A_{ji}=A_{ij} A ji ā = A ij ā , so every summand of the last double sum equals A i j ā w i ā z j A_{ij}\,w_{i}\,z_{j} A ij ā w i ā z j ā , and the two double sums agree. This proves claim 1.
Claim 2. By claim 2 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product , applied with both matrices equal to A A A , we have A 2 ξ = ( A A ) ξ = A ( A ξ ) A^{2}\xi=(AA)\xi=A(A\xi) A 2 ξ = ( AA ) ξ = A ( A ξ ) . Hence claim 1, applied with w = ξ w=\xi w = ξ and z = A ξ z=A\xi z = A ξ , gives
ξ ā
( A 2 ξ ) = ξ ā
( A ( A ξ ) ) = ( A ξ ) ā
( A ξ ) , \xi\cdot(A^{2}\xi)=\xi\cdot\bigl(A(A\xi)\bigr)=(A\xi)\cdot(A\xi), ξ ā
( A 2 ξ ) = ξ ā
( A ( A ξ ) ) = ( A ξ ) ā
( A ξ ) ,
and ( A ξ ) ā
( A ξ ) = ā„ A ξ ā„ 2 (A\xi)\cdot(A\xi)=\lVert A\xi\rVert^{2} ( A ξ ) ā
( A ξ ) = ℠A ξ ℠2 by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n .
Claim 3. Put z = x ā ξ z=x-\xi z = x ā ξ ; since R n \mathbb{R}^{n} R n is a real vector space by Euclidean Space R n \mathbb{R}^n R n is a Real Vector Space , we have ξ + z = x \xi+z=x ξ + z = x . By claim 3 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum , A x = A ξ + A z Ax=A\xi+Az A x = A ξ + A z , so by claims 2 and 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n ,
x ā
( A x ) = ( ξ + z ) ā
( A ξ + A z ) = ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ξ ā
( A z ) + z ā
( A ξ ) + z ā
( A z ) . x\cdot(Ax)=(\xi+z)\cdot(A\xi+Az)=\xi\cdot(A\xi)+\xi\cdot(Az)+z\cdot(A\xi)+z\cdot(Az). x ā
( A x ) = ( ξ + z ) ā
( A ξ + A z ) = ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ξ ā
( A z ) + z ā
( A ξ ) + z ā
( A z ) .
Write β = ξ ā
( A z ) \beta=\xi\cdot(Az) β = ξ ā
( A z ) ; by claim 1 the third summand also equals β \beta β , so the two middle summands sum to β + β \beta+\beta β + β . Put a = ℠A ξ ℠a=\lVert A\xi\rVert a = ℠A ξ ℠and b = ℠z ℠b=\lVert z\rVert b = ℠z ℠, both nonnegative by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n .
Bounding the cross terms. By claim 1 above and claim 1 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , β = z ā
( A ξ ) = ( A ξ ) ā
z \beta=z\cdot(A\xi)=(A\xi)\cdot z β = z ā
( A ξ ) = ( A ξ ) ā
z , so Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product gives ⣠β ⣠⤠a ā b |\beta|\le a\,b ⣠β ⣠⤠a b , while β ⤠⣠β ⣠\beta\le|\beta| β ⤠⣠β ⣠by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field . Hence β ⤠a ā b \beta\le a\,b β ⤠a b , and adding this inequality to itself ā legitimate by claims 3 and 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ā gives β + β ⤠a ā b + a ā b \beta+\beta\le a\,b+a\,b β + β ⤠a b + a b .
Next put s = a ā ε ā 1 b s=a-\varepsilon^{-1}b s = a ā ε ā 1 b . By the paragraph on squares, 0 ⤠s 2 0\le s^{2} 0 ⤠s 2 , so 0 ⤠ε ā s 2 0\le\varepsilon\,s^{2} 0 ⤠ε s 2 by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , the factor ε \varepsilon ε being nonnegative. Expanding s 2 s^{2} s 2 with the field axioms and using ε ā ε ā 1 = 1 \varepsilon\,\varepsilon^{-1}=1 ε ε ā 1 = 1 ,
ε ā s 2 = ε ā a 2 ā ( a ā b + a ā b ) + ε ā 1 b 2 , \varepsilon\,s^{2}=\varepsilon\,a^{2}-(a\,b+a\,b)+\varepsilon^{-1}b^{2}, ε s 2 = ε a 2 ā ( a b + a b ) + ε ā 1 b 2 ,
so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field turns 0 ⤠ε ā s 2 0\le\varepsilon\,s^{2} 0 ⤠ε s 2 into
a ā b + a ā b ā
ā ⤠ā
ā ε ā a 2 + ε ā 1 b 2 . a\,b+a\,b\;\le\;\varepsilon\,a^{2}+\varepsilon^{-1}b^{2}. a b + a b ⤠ε a 2 + ε ā 1 b 2 .
Combining with the previous display and using transitivity,
β + β ā
ā ⤠ā
ā ε ā„ A ξ ā„ 2 + ε ā 1 ā„ z ā„ 2 . \beta+\beta\;\le\;\varepsilon\lVert A\xi\rVert^{2}+\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert z\rVert^{2}. β + β ⤠ε ā„ A ξ ā„ 2 + ε ā 1 ā„ z ā„ 2 .
Bounding the last term. By claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 2 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix ,
z ā
( A z ) ā
ā ⤠ā
ā ⣠z ā
( A z ) ⣠ā
ā ⤠ā
ā ā„ A ā„ ā ā„ z ā„ 2 . z\cdot(Az)\;\le\;\bigl|z\cdot(Az)\bigr|\;\le\;\lVert A\rVert\,\lVert z\rVert^{2}. z ā
( A z ) ⤠ā z ā
( A z ) ā ⤠℠A ā„ ā„ z ā„ 2 .
Adding the last two displayed inequalities to the identity for x ā
( A x ) x\cdot(Ax) x ā
( A x ) ā that is, applying claims 3 and 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to add them and then translating ā yields
x ā
( A x ) ā
ā ⤠ā
ā ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ε ā„ A ξ ā„ 2 + ε ā 1 ā„ z ā„ 2 + ā„ A ā„ ā ā„ z ā„ 2 . x\cdot(Ax)\;\le\;\xi\cdot(A\xi)+\varepsilon\lVert A\xi\rVert^{2}+\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\lVert A\rVert\,\lVert z\rVert^{2}. x ā
( A x ) ⤠ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ε ā„ A ξ ā„ 2 + ε ā 1 ā„ z ā„ 2 + ā„ A ā„ ā„ z ā„ 2 .
Identifying the right-hand side. By claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum ,
( A + ε A 2 ) ξ = A ξ + ( ε A 2 ) ξ = A ξ + ε ā ( A 2 ξ ) , (A+\varepsilon A^{2})\xi=A\xi+(\varepsilon A^{2})\xi=A\xi+\varepsilon\,(A^{2}\xi), ( A + ε A 2 ) ξ = A ξ + ( ε A 2 ) ξ = A ξ + ε ( A 2 ξ ) ,
so claims 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n and claim 2 above give
ξ ā
( ( A + ε A 2 ) ξ ) = ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ε ā ( ξ ā
( A 2 ξ ) ) = ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ε ā„ A ξ ā„ 2 , \xi\cdot\bigl((A+\varepsilon A^{2})\xi\bigr)=\xi\cdot(A\xi)+\varepsilon\,\bigl(\xi\cdot(A^{2}\xi)\bigr)=\xi\cdot(A\xi)+\varepsilon\lVert A\xi\rVert^{2}, ξ ā
( ( A + ε A 2 ) ξ ) = ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ε ( ξ ā
( A 2 ξ ) ) = ξ ā
( A ξ ) + ε ℠A ξ ℠2 ,
while distributivity in the field of real numbers gives
( ε ā 1 + ā„ A ā„ ) ā„ z ā„ 2 = ε ā 1 ā„ z ā„ 2 + ā„ A ā„ ā ā„ z ā„ 2 . \bigl(\varepsilon^{-1}+\lVert A\rVert\bigr)\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\varepsilon^{-1}\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\lVert A\rVert\,\lVert z\rVert^{2}. ( ε ā 1 + ā„ A ā„ ) ā„ z ā„ 2 = ε ā 1 ā„ z ā„ 2 + ā„ A ā„ ā„ z ā„ 2 .
Since z = x ā ξ z=x-\xi z = x ā ξ , the previous display is exactly the asserted inequality, and claim 3 is proved.