TheoremBase

Uses the bounds q โ‰ค y < q + 2^{-m} for the dyadic truncation q of y to show the dyadic approximations are simple, nondecreasing in m and below f with supremum f; the real case splits f into its positive and negative parts.

Proof

Step 1: the dyadic maps. Arithmetic on real numbers is done in the ordered ring of The Real Numbers as a Type (vi), with the laws of The Real Numbers as a Type (iv) and The Real Numbers as a Type (v); differences, reciprocals, quotients and absolute values of real numbers lie in R\mathbb{R} and are read there by Differences, Quotients and Absolute Values of Real Numbers, and Their Order in the Extended Real Line, Read in the Type Real (i), Differences, Quotients and Absolute Values of Real Numbers, and Their Order in the Extended Real Line, Read in the Type Real (ii) and Differences, Quotients and Absolute Values of Real Numbers, and Their Order in the Extended Real Line, Read in the Type Real (iii). For zโˆˆRz\in\mathbb{R}, โŒŠzโŒ‹\lfloor z\rfloor is the integer part of zz, an integer with โŒŠzโŒ‹โ‰คz<โŒŠzโŒ‹+1\lfloor z\rfloor\le z<\lfloor z\rfloor+1 by The Integer Part of a Real Number (i), which read in R\mathbb{R} is a real number by Maps Used to Build the Integral: Fibres of a Map, Pointwise Combinations with Finite Image, Tail Extrema of a Sequence of Maps, the Integer Part, and Indicators (iv); for y,zโˆˆRy,z\in\mathbb{R}, minโก{y,z}\min\{y,z\} is formed in R\mathbb{R} as in The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (i). For yโˆˆRy\in\mathbb{R} and mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} write qm(y)=2โˆ’mโŒŠ2myโŒ‹q_{m}(y)=2^{-m}\lfloor2^{m}y\rfloor. By Dyadic Approximations of a Map into [0,โˆž] (i), for a map g:Xโ†’[0,โˆž]g:X\to[0,\infty], xโˆˆXx\in X and mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}, sm(g)(x)=minโก{m,qm(g(x))}s_{m}(g)(x)=\min\{m,q_{m}(g(x))\} if g(x)โˆˆRg(x)\in\mathbb{R} and sm(g)(x)=ms_{m}(g)(x)=m if g(x)=โˆžg(x)=\infty. For mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}, the number 22, the image of mm in R\mathbb{R} and the power 2m2^{m} lie in R\mathbb{R} by Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima (vi), Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima (v) and Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima (iv); further 0<m<2m0<m<2^{m} and 0<2โˆ’m<1/m0<2^{-m}<1/m by The Integer Part as the Greatest Integer Below, the Integer Part of a Double, and Powers of Two (iii), where 2โˆ’m=1/2m2^{-m}=1/2^{m} and 1/m1/m lie in R\mathbb{R} by Closure Facts in an Ordered Field: Negatives, Differences, Quotients, Absolute Values, Powers, Natural Numbers, Halves and Minima (ii), as mโ‰ 0m\neq0 and 2mโ‰ 02^{m}\neq0.

(a) For n,nโ€ฒโˆˆZn,n'\in\mathbb{Z} with n<nโ€ฒn<n', read in R\mathbb{R}, we have n+1โ‰คnโ€ฒn+1\le n'. Otherwise nโ‰คnโ€ฒ<n+1n\le n'<n+1, and also nโ€ฒโ‰คnโ€ฒ<nโ€ฒ+1n'\le n'<n'+1, so n=โŒŠnโ€ฒโŒ‹=nโ€ฒn=\lfloor n'\rfloor=n' by the uniqueness in The Integers in the Real Numbers: Greatest Elements, the Integer Part, and Archimedean Consequences (iv), contradicting n<nโ€ฒn<n'.

(b) Let yโˆˆRy\in\mathbb{R} and mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}. Multiplying โŒŠ2myโŒ‹โ‰ค2my<โŒŠ2myโŒ‹+1\lfloor2^{m}y\rfloor\le2^{m}y<\lfloor2^{m}y\rfloor+1 by 2โˆ’m>02^{-m}>0 gives yโˆ’2โˆ’m<qm(y)โ‰คyy-2^{-m}<q_{m}(y)\le y; if yโ‰ฅ0y\ge0, then โŒŠ2myโŒ‹โ‰ฅ0\lfloor2^{m}y\rfloor\ge0 by The Integers in the Real Numbers: Greatest Elements, the Integer Part, and Archimedean Consequences (vi), so qm(y)โ‰ฅ0q_{m}(y)\ge0. Here m+1โˆˆNm+1\in\mathbb{N} by Natural Numbers Are the Successors in Omega: One Is Least and Not a Successor of a Natural Number, the Successor Is Injective, and N Is Closed under Addition and Multiplication (vi), and 2m+1=2mโ‹…22^{m+1}=2^{m}\cdot2 by Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality (i) and Powers in a Commutative Ring, a Field and an Ordered Field: Exponent Laws, Factorisation, Geometric Sums, Monotonicity and Bernoulli's Inequality (ii); as 2โˆ’mโ‹…2m=12^{-m}\cdot2^{m}=1 and 2โˆ’(m+1)โ‹…2m+1=12^{-(m+1)}\cdot2^{m+1}=1 (Differences, Quotients and Absolute Values of Real Numbers, and Their Order in the Extended Real Line, Read in the Type Real (ii)), it follows that 2โˆ’(m+1)โ‹…2=2โˆ’m2^{-(m+1)}\cdot2=2^{-m}. With z=2myz=2^{m}y we have 2m+1y=2z2^{m+1}y=2z, and 2โŒŠzโŒ‹โ‰คโŒŠ2zโŒ‹2\lfloor z\rfloor\le\lfloor2z\rfloor by The Integer Part as the Greatest Integer Below, the Integer Part of a Double, and Powers of Two (ii), so qm(y)=2โˆ’(m+1)โ‹…2โŒŠzโŒ‹โ‰ค2โˆ’(m+1)โŒŠ2zโŒ‹=qm+1(y)q_{m}(y)=2^{-(m+1)}\cdot2\lfloor z\rfloor\le2^{-(m+1)}\lfloor2z\rfloor=q_{m+1}(y).

(c) Let g:Xโ†’[0,โˆž]g:X\to[0,\infty], xโˆˆXx\in X and mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}. If g(x)=โˆžg(x)=\infty, then sm(g)(x)=ms_{m}(g)(x)=m. If g(x)=yโˆˆRg(x)=y\in\mathbb{R}, then yโ‰ฅ0y\ge0 by The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,โˆž] (ii), and sm(g)(x)=minโก{m,qm(y)}s_{m}(g)(x)=\min\{m,q_{m}(y)\} is one of mm and qm(y)q_{m}(y) and is at most each of them, by The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (i) and The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (iii); if moreover yโ‰คmy\le m, then qm(y)โ‰คyโ‰คmq_{m}(y)\le y\le m by (b), so sm(g)(x)=qm(y)s_{m}(g)(x)=q_{m}(y) by The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (ii) and yโˆ’2โˆ’m<sm(g)(x)โ‰คyy-2^{-m}<s_{m}(g)(x)\le y by (b). In every case 0โ‰คsm(g)(x)โ‰คm0\le s_{m}(g)(x)\le m, by (b) and since 0<m0<m by The Integer Part as the Greatest Integer Below, the Integer Part of a Double, and Powers of Two (iii).

(d) For yโˆˆRy\in\mathbb{R} with yโ‰ฅ0y\ge0 and real ฮต>0\varepsilon>0 there is NโˆˆNN\in\mathbb{N} with y<my<m and 2โˆ’m<ฮต2^{-m}<\varepsilon for every mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} with mโ‰ฅNm\ge N. Indeed, The Integers in the Real Numbers: Greatest Elements, the Integer Part, and Archimedean Consequences (vii), applied to y+1/ฮตy+1/\varepsilon, gives NโˆˆNN\in\mathbb{N} with y+1/ฮต<my+1/\varepsilon<m for every mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} with mโ‰ฅNm\ge N. For such mm, y<my<m and 1/ฮต<m1/\varepsilon<m, as 1/ฮต>01/\varepsilon>0 and yโ‰ฅ0y\ge0; multiplying by ฮต/m>0\varepsilon/m>0 gives 1/m<ฮต1/m<\varepsilon, and 2โˆ’m<1/m2^{-m}<1/m by The Integer Part as the Greatest Integer Below, the Integer Part of a Double, and Powers of Two (iii).

(e) Let g:Xโ†’[0,โˆž]g:X\to[0,\infty], xโˆˆXx\in X and mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}. Then sm(g)(x)โ‰คsm+1(g)(x)โ‰คg(x)s_{m}(g)(x)\le s_{m+1}(g)(x)\le g(x), where between real numbers โ‰ค\le is the order of R\mathbb{R} by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (i). Here m+1โˆˆNm+1\in\mathbb{N} by Natural Numbers Are the Successors in Omega: One Is Least and Not a Successor of a Natural Number, the Successor Is Injective, and N Is Closed under Addition and Multiplication (vi), and m+1m+1 read in R\mathbb{R} is the sum of mm and 11 in R\mathbb{R} by The Image of the Natural Numbers with Zero in a Commutative Ring Respects Zero, One, Sums, Products, Differences, Powers, and Finite Sums and Products (ii) and The Image of the Natural Numbers with Zero in a Commutative Ring Respects Zero, One, Sums, Products, Differences, Powers, and Finite Sums and Products (i), so mโ‰คm+1m\le m+1 in R\mathbb{R}. If g(x)=โˆžg(x)=\infty, the claim reads mโ‰คm+1โ‰คโˆžm\le m+1\le\infty, the second by The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,โˆž] (iii). If g(x)=yโˆˆRg(x)=y\in\mathbb{R}, then by (c) and (b) sm(g)(x)โ‰คmโ‰คm+1s_{m}(g)(x)\le m\le m+1 and sm(g)(x)โ‰คqm(y)โ‰คqm+1(y)s_{m}(g)(x)\le q_{m}(y)\le q_{m+1}(y), so sm(g)(x)โ‰คminโก{m+1,qm+1(y)}=sm+1(g)(x)s_{m}(g)(x)\le\min\{m+1,q_{m+1}(y)\}=s_{m+1}(g)(x) by The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (v); and sm+1(g)(x)โ‰คqm+1(y)โ‰คys_{m+1}(g)(x)\le q_{m+1}(y)\le y.

Proof of (i). Fix mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}. Finite image. By The Integers Lying in a Bounded Real Interval Form a Finite Set (i), with a=0a=0 and b=2mmb=2^{m}m, there is a finite subset EE of R\mathbb{R} whose elements are exactly the integers read in R\mathbb{R} lying between 00 and 2mm2^{m}m. Let ฯˆ:Eโ†’R\psi:E\to\mathbb{R}, uโ†ฆ2โˆ’muu\mapsto2^{-m}u, be the restriction to EE (Domains and Restrictions of Maps (ii), Domains and Restrictions of Maps (iii)) of the map Rโ†’R\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, uโ†ฆ2โˆ’mโ‹…uu\mapsto2^{-m}\cdot u, given by Maps Formed Pointwise: Constant Maps, Pairs of Values, Maps Applied to Values, and Families of Maps (iv) applied to the multiplication of R\mathbb{R}. Then D=ฯˆ[E]โˆช{m}D=\psi[E]\cup\{m\} is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (vi), Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iii) and Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (v). Let xโˆˆXx\in X. By (c), sm(f)(x)s_{m}(f)(x) is either mโˆˆDm\in D, or qm(y)q_{m}(y) with y=f(x)โˆˆRy=f(x)\in\mathbb{R}, yโ‰ฅ0y\ge0 and qm(y)=sm(f)(x)โ‰คmq_{m}(y)=s_{m}(f)(x)\le m; in the latter case the integer n=โŒŠ2myโŒ‹n=\lfloor2^{m}y\rfloor satisfies 0โ‰คn0\le n by The Integers in the Real Numbers: Greatest Elements, the Integer Part, and Archimedean Consequences (vi), as 2myโ‰ฅ02^{m}y\ge0, and n=2mqm(y)โ‰ค2mmn=2^{m}q_{m}(y)\le2^{m}m, so nโˆˆEn\in E and sm(f)(x)=2โˆ’mn=ฯˆ(n)โˆˆDs_{m}(f)(x)=2^{-m}n=\psi(n)\in D. Hence sm(f)[X]โІDs_{m}(f)[X]\subseteq D is finite by Finite Sets: the Pigeonhole Principle, Uniqueness of the Length, Subsets, Unions, Products, Images, Bounded Sets of Natural Numbers, Extreme Elements, Sets of Maps, Finite Unions and Finite Choice (iv).

Measurability. By criterion (b) of Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,โˆž]-Valued Maps (v) it suffices that La={xโˆˆX:sm(f)(x)>a}L_{a}=\{x\in X:s_{m}(f)(x)>a\} lies in F\mathcal{F} for every aโˆˆRa\in\mathbb{R}. If aโ‰ฅma\ge m, then La=โˆ…โˆˆFL_{a}=\emptyset\in\mathcal{F} by (c) and Closure Properties of ฯƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of ฯƒ-Algebras, and the Generated ฯƒ-Algebra (vi). Let a<ma<m, let p=โŒŠ2maโŒ‹p=\lfloor2^{m}a\rfloor and b=2โˆ’m(p+1)โˆˆRb=2^{-m}(p+1)\in\mathbb{R}; we show La={xโˆˆX:f(x)โ‰ฅb}L_{a}=\{x\in X:f(x)\ge b\}. If f(x)=โˆžf(x)=\infty, then sm(f)(x)=m>as_{m}(f)(x)=m>a by (c), and โˆžโ‰ฅb\infty\ge b by The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,โˆž] (iii). If f(x)=yโˆˆRf(x)=y\in\mathbb{R}, let n=โŒŠ2myโŒ‹n=\lfloor2^{m}y\rfloor. As a<ma<m and sm(f)(x)=minโก{m,qm(y)}s_{m}(f)(x)=\min\{m,q_{m}(y)\} is one of mm and qm(y)q_{m}(y) and at most each of them (The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (i), The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (iii)), sm(f)(x)>as_{m}(f)(x)>a holds if and only if qm(y)>aq_{m}(y)>a, that is, multiplying by 2m>02^{m}>0, n>2man>2^{m}a. If n>2man>2^{m}a, then pโ‰ค2ma<np\le2^{m}a<n by The Integer Part of a Real Number (i), so p+1โ‰คnโ‰ค2myp+1\le n\le2^{m}y by (a) and The Integer Part of a Real Number (i), that is bโ‰คyb\le y. Conversely, let bโ‰คyb\le y, so p+1โ‰ค2myp+1\le2^{m}y; if nโ‰ค2man\le2^{m}a, then nโ‰คpn\le p by The Integer Part as the Greatest Integer Below, the Integer Part of a Double, and Powers of Two (i), applied to the integer nn and the real number 2ma2^{m}a, and 2my<n+1โ‰คp+1โ‰ค2my2^{m}y<n+1\le p+1\le2^{m}y, which is impossible; so n>2man>2^{m}a. So La=fโˆ’1(R)L_{a}=f^{-1}(R) with R={uโˆˆ[0,โˆž]:uโ‰ฅb}R=\{u\in[0,\infty]:u\ge b\}, which lies in B([0,โˆž])\mathcal{B}([0,\infty]) by Borel Subsets of [0,โˆž]: Rays, the Point โˆž, and Traces on โ„ (i); hence LaโˆˆFL_{a}\in\mathcal{F} by Measurable Map, and the Set of Measurable Maps (vi) and Measurable Map, and the Set of Measurable Maps (i).

So sm(f)s_{m}(f) is measurable as a map into R\mathbb{R} with finite image, a simple function, hence in S\mathcal{S} by Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (ii); its values are โ‰ฅ0\ge0 by (c), so sm(f)โˆˆS+s_{m}(f)\in\mathcal{S}^{+} by Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iii). The inequalities sm(f)(x)โ‰คsm+1(f)(x)โ‰คf(x)s_{m}(f)(x)\le s_{m+1}(f)(x)\le f(x) are (e).

Supremum. Fix xโˆˆXx\in X and let A={sm(f)(x):mโˆˆN}โІRA=\{s_{m}(f)(x):m\in\mathbb{N}\}\subseteq\mathbb{R}, whose elements are the values sm(f)(x)s_{m}(f)(x) (Preimages, Unions and Intersections over an Index Set, Suprema and Infima, and Superlevel Sets as Typed Terms (iv)). If f(x)=โˆžf(x)=\infty, then sn(f)(x)=ns_{n}(f)(x)=n for every nโˆˆNn\in\mathbb{N} by (c), so for every cโˆˆRc\in\mathbb{R} the NโˆˆNN\in\mathbb{N} of The Integers in the Real Numbers: Greatest Elements, the Integer Part, and Archimedean Consequences (vii), applied to cc, satisfies c<N=sN(f)(x)โˆˆAc<N=s_{N}(f)(x)\in A: AA is not bounded above in R\mathbb{R}, and supโกA=โˆž=f(x)\sup A=\infty=f(x) by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (v). If f(x)=yโˆˆRf(x)=y\in\mathbb{R}, then AA is nonempty, as s1(f)(x)โˆˆAs_{1}(f)(x)\in A with 1โˆˆN1\in\mathbb{N} by Natural Numbers Are the Successors in Omega: One Is Least and Not a Successor of a Natural Number, the Successor Is Injective, and N Is Closed under Addition and Multiplication (ii), and yy is an upper bound of AA in R\mathbb{R} by (e). Let cโˆˆRc\in\mathbb{R} be an upper bound of AA and suppose c<yc<y. As yโ‰ฅ0y\ge0 by The Extended Real Line, Its Order, and [0,โˆž] (ii), (d) with ฮต=yโˆ’c\varepsilon=y-c gives NโˆˆNN\in\mathbb{N} with y<Ny<N and 2โˆ’N<yโˆ’c2^{-N}<y-c, and by (c) sN(f)(x)>yโˆ’2โˆ’N>cs_{N}(f)(x)>y-2^{-N}>c, a contradiction. So yโ‰คcy\le c for every upper bound cc, and yy is the least element of the set of upper bounds of AA in R\mathbb{R}, that is the supremum of AA in R\mathbb{R}, unique by Bounds, Least and Greatest Elements, Suprema and Infima for a Partial Order (iv). Hence supโกA=y=f(x)\sup A=y=f(x) by Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (iv).

Proof of (ii). As ff is measurable as a map into R\mathbb{R} with values โ‰ฅ0\ge0, it is measurable as a map into [0,โˆž][0,\infty] by Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,โˆž]-Valued Maps (vii), so sm(f)โˆˆS+s_{m}(f)\in\mathcal{S}^{+} for every mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} by (i). Let xโˆˆXx\in X and mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} with mโ‰ฅKm\ge K, and y=f(x)y=f(x). Then yโˆˆRy\in\mathbb{R} and 0โ‰คyโ‰คKโ‰คm0\le y\le K\le m, so yโˆ’2โˆ’m<sm(f)(x)โ‰คyy-2^{-m}<s_{m}(f)(x)\le y by (c), that is 0โ‰คf(x)โˆ’sm(f)(x)<2โˆ’m0\le f(x)-s_{m}(f)(x)<2^{-m}.

Proof of (iii). The maps f+f^{+} and fโˆ’f^{-} are measurable as maps into R\mathbb{R} by Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,โˆž]-Valued Maps (i), and their values are โ‰ฅ0\ge0 by The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (iii); so they are measurable as maps into [0,โˆž][0,\infty] by Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,โˆž]-Valued Maps (vii), and sm(f+),sm(fโˆ’)โˆˆS+s_{m}(f^{+}),s_{m}(f^{-})\in\mathcal{S}^{+} for every mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} by (i). Fix mm. Then tmt_{m} is measurable as a map into R\mathbb{R} by Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,โˆž]-Valued Maps (i), applied to the difference of the maps sm(f+)s_{m}(f^{+}) and sm(fโˆ’)s_{m}(f^{-}), which are simple functions, so measurable as maps into R\mathbb{R} with finite images, by Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (iii), Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (ii) and Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (i). Let F=ฯ€1โˆ’ฯ€2:Rร—Rโ†’RF=\pi_{1}-\pi_{2}:\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, the pointwise difference (Pointwise Operations on Real-Valued Maps (i)) of the projections ฯ€1\pi_{1} and ฯ€2\pi_{2} of Projection, Evaluation and Currying Maps (i), so that F(c,cโ€ฒ)=cโˆ’cโ€ฒF(c,c')=c-c' for c,cโ€ฒโˆˆRc,c'\in\mathbb{R}. Then tmt_{m} is the map with tm(x)=F(sm(f+)(x),sm(fโˆ’)(x))t_{m}(x)=F(s_{m}(f^{+})(x),s_{m}(f^{-})(x)) for every xโˆˆXx\in X, so tm[X]t_{m}[X] is finite by Maps Used to Build the Integral: Fibres of a Map, Pointwise Combinations with Finite Image, Tail Extrema of a Sequence of Maps, the Integer Part, and Indicators (ii). So tmโˆˆSt_{m}\in\mathcal{S} by Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (i) and Simple Functions, Nonnegative Simple Functions, and the Simple Integral (ii).

Fix xโˆˆXx\in X. If f(x)โ‰ฅ0f(x)\ge0, then f+(x)=f(x)=โˆฃf(x)โˆฃf^{+}(x)=f(x)=|f(x)| and fโˆ’(x)=0f^{-}(x)=0, by The Maximum and Minimum of Two Elements of a Total Order (ii) and Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (i); 0โ‰คsm(fโˆ’)(x)โ‰ค00\le s_{m}(f^{-})(x)\le0 by (c), with y=fโˆ’(x)=0โ‰คmy=f^{-}(x)=0\le m, so sm(fโˆ’)(x)=0s_{m}(f^{-})(x)=0 and tm(x)=umt_{m}(x)=u_{m} with um=sm(f+)(x)u_{m}=s_{m}(f^{+})(x). If f(x)<0f(x)<0, then likewise f+(x)=0f^{+}(x)=0 and fโˆ’(x)=โˆ’f(x)=โˆฃf(x)โˆฃf^{-}(x)=-f(x)=|f(x)|, and 0โ‰คsm(f+)(x)โ‰ค00\le s_{m}(f^{+})(x)\le0 by (c), so tm(x)=โˆ’umt_{m}(x)=-u_{m} with um=sm(fโˆ’)(x)u_{m}=s_{m}(f^{-})(x). In both cases um=sm(g)(x)u_{m}=s_{m}(g)(x) for a map gโˆˆ{f+,fโˆ’}g\in\{f^{+},f^{-}\} with g(x)=โˆฃf(x)โˆฃg(x)=|f(x)|, so 0โ‰คumโ‰คโˆฃf(x)โˆฃ0\le u_{m}\le|f(x)| by (c) and (e), and Absolute Value in an Ordered Field (i) gives โˆฃtm(x)โˆฃ=umโ‰คโˆฃf(x)โˆฃ|t_{m}(x)|=u_{m}\le|f(x)| and โˆฃtm(x)โˆ’f(x)โˆฃ=โˆฃf(x)โˆฃโˆ’um|t_{m}(x)-f(x)|=|f(x)|-u_{m}, for every mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N}. Now let ฮต>0\varepsilon>0 be real. By (d) with y=โˆฃf(x)โˆฃy=|f(x)| there is NโˆˆNN\in\mathbb{N} with โˆฃf(x)โˆฃ<m|f(x)|<m and 2โˆ’m<ฮต2^{-m}<\varepsilon for every mโˆˆNm\in\mathbb{N} with mโ‰ฅNm\ge N; for such mm, (c) gives โˆฃf(x)โˆฃโˆ’2โˆ’m<um|f(x)|-2^{-m}<u_{m}, so โˆฃtm(x)โˆ’f(x)โˆฃ<2โˆ’m<ฮต|t_{m}(x)-f(x)|<2^{-m}<\varepsilon. By Convergent Sequences of Real Numbers (i), (tm(x))mโˆˆN(t_{m}(x))_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges to f(x)f(x).

Citations

Loadingโ€ฆ

Dependencies

Uses0

Loadingโ€ฆ

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loadingโ€ฆ