TheoremBase

Proof of Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings

lemmalem:l2-tuple-law-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 13,281 chars · 24 deps · depth 30 Reason: V-A2: passage to limits from the bounded case.

Each clause is obtained by passing to the limit along approximating sequences of bounded self-adjoint tuples, using the corresponding clause for bounded tuples together with the agreement and Lipschitz estimates of the L2L^2 law calculus.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Throughout, the letter MM denotes the algebra of operators; only the second moment M^\widehat{M} of L2L^{2} laws occurs below, never M(λ)M(\lambda). The identity map of HH is II, and the cost of L2L^{2} laws is written I\mathcal{I}.

Step 0 (Limits). (a) A sequence (yk)(y_{k}) in a metric space (Z,e)(Z,e) converges to yy in the sense of Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space if and only if the real sequence (e(yk,y))k(e(y_{k},y))_{k} converges to 00 in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers, since ∣e(yk,y)−0∣=e(yk,y)≥0|e(y_{k},y)-0|=e(y_{k},y)\ge0 by condition 1 of Metric Space. Likewise a real sequence converges to LL in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers if and only if it converges to LL in the real line of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line; so limits of real sequences are unique by Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space.

(b) Distances. If yk→yy_{k}\to y and zk→zz_{k}\to z in a metric space (Z,e)(Z,e), then e(yk,zk)→e(y,z)e(y_{k},z_{k})\to e(y,z). Indeed, conditions 3 and 4 of Metric Space give ∣e(yk,zk)−e(y,z)∣≤e(yk,y)+e(zk,z)|e(y_{k},z_{k})-e(y,z)|\le e(y_{k},y)+e(z_{k},z); the right side tends to 00 by (a) and claim 1 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, so the assertion follows from claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences.

(c) Vectors. Let H1,H2H_{1},H_{2} be complex Hilbert spaces, let vk→vv^{k}\to v and wk→ww^{k}\to w in H1H_{1} (for the metric of Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation §spaces), and let a,ba,b be real. (i) avk+bwk→av+bwav^{k}+bw^{k}\to av+bw: by claim 2 of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric, ∥(avk+bwk)−(av+bw)∥≤∣a∣ ∥vk−v∥+∣b∣ ∥wk−w∥\lVert(av^{k}+bw^{k})-(av+bw)\rVert\le|a|\,\lVert v^{k}-v\rVert+|b|\,\lVert w^{k}-w\rVert, whose right side tends to 00 by (a) and claims 1 and 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; conclude by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences and (a). By induction, finite real linear combinations of convergent sequences converge to the corresponding combination of the limits. (ii) ∥vk∥→∥v∥\lVert v^{k}\rVert\to\lVert v\rVert, because ∣∥vk∥−∥v∥∣≤∥vk−v∥|\lVert v^{k}\rVert-\lVert v\rVert|\le\lVert v^{k}-v\rVert by the triangle inequality of claim 2 of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric, and claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences applies. (iii) If ⟨vk,wk⟩\langle v^{k},w^{k}\rangle and ⟨v,w⟩\langle v,w\rangle are real, then ⟨vk,wk⟩→⟨v,w⟩\langle v^{k},w^{k}\rangle\to\langle v,w\rangle. Indeed, sesquilinearity (Complex Hilbert Spaces and Bounded Linear Maps: Standing Notation §spaces) gives

⟨vk,wk⟩−⟨v,w⟩=⟨vk−v,wk−w⟩+⟨vk−v,w⟩+⟨v,wk−w⟩,\langle v^{k},w^{k}\rangle-\langle v,w\rangle=\langle v^{k}-v,w^{k}-w\rangle+\langle v^{k}-v,w\rangle+\langle v,w^{k}-w\rangle,

so by claim 7 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus and claim 1 of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric its modulus is at most ∥vk−v∥ ∥wk−w∥+∥vk−v∥ ∥w∥+∥v∥ ∥wk−w∥\lVert v^{k}-v\rVert\,\lVert w^{k}-w\rVert+\lVert v^{k}-v\rVert\,\lVert w\rVert+\lVert v\rVert\,\lVert w^{k}-w\rVert, which tends to 00 by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; the modulus of a real number is its absolute value by claim 8 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus, and claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences applies. (iv) If V∈L(H1,H2)V\in\mathcal{L}(H_{1},H_{2}), then Vvk→VvVv^{k}\to Vv: by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §least-bound, ∥V∥op\lVert V\rVert_{\mathrm{op}} is a bound for VV, so Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded gives ∥Vvk−Vv∥=∥V(vk−v)∥≤∥V∥op∥vk−v∥\lVert Vv^{k}-Vv\rVert=\lVert V(v^{k}-v)\rVert\le\lVert V\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\lVert v^{k}-v\rVert, and claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences and claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences apply.

(d) Self-adjoint vectors. Ω∈Hsa\Omega\in H_{\mathrm{sa}}, because JΩ=ΩJ\Omega=\Omega by The Trace, the Conjugation and the Right Action of a Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebra §conjugation and Conjugation of a Complex Hilbert Space §fixed; and ⟨ξ,η⟩\langle\xi,\eta\rangle is real for all ξ,η∈Hsa\xi,\eta\in H_{\mathrm{sa}} by Standard Form of a Tracial W*-Probability Space: the Commutation Theorem, Right-Bounded Vectors, Faithfulness and Self-Adjoint Vectors §self-adjoint, where JJ is the conjugation of (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) and Hsa=HJH_{\mathrm{sa}}=H^{J} as in Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws.

Step 1 (Approximating sequences). By Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §limit there are sequences (sk)k∈N(s^{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (tk)k∈N(t^{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} of self-adjoint dd-tuples in MM with sjkΩ→Xjs^{k}_{j}\Omega\to X_{j} and tjkΩ→Yjt^{k}_{j}\Omega\to Y_{j} for every j∈[d]j\in[d]; fix them, and put μk=κd(λsk)\mu_{k}=\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{s^{k}}) and νk=κd(λtk)\nu_{k}=\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{t^{k}}). By Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §law, μk→law(X)\mu_{k}\to\mathrm{law}(X) and νk→law(Y)\nu_{k}\to\mathrm{law}(Y) in (Σd2,W^2)(\Sigma^{2}_{d},\widehat{W}_{2}), which is a metric space by The Metric Completion is a Complete Metric Space with a Dense Isometric Copy of the Space, and Maps Preserving Cauchy Sequences Extend to It §metric.

Clause 1. By Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §law, sjΩ∈Hsas_{j}\Omega\in H_{\mathrm{sa}} for every jj, so sΩs\Omega is an L2L^{2} dd-tuple by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples. The constant sequence with every term ss satisfies ∥sjΩ−sjΩ∥=0\lVert s_{j}\Omega-s_{j}\Omega\rVert=0, so it is an admissible sequence for sΩs\Omega in Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §law, and its sequence of laws is the constant sequence κd(λs)\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{s}), which converges to κd(λs)\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{s}) by condition 2 of Metric Space. Hence law(sΩ)=κd(λs)\mathrm{law}(s\Omega)=\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{s}).

Clause 2. For each kk, Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §coupling together with The Metric Completion is a Complete Metric Space with a Dense Isometric Copy of the Space, and Maps Preserving Cauchy Sequences Extend to It §isometry (for the completion of (Σd,W2)(\Sigma_{d},W_{2}) in Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: the Wasserstein Completion of the Laws, Affine Push-Forwards, Moments, Couplings and Cost §laws) gives

W^2(μk,νk)2=W2(λsk,λtk)2≤∑j=1d∥sjkΩ−tjkΩ∥2.\widehat{W}_{2}(\mu_{k},\nu_{k})^{2}=W_{2}(\lambda_{s^{k}},\lambda_{t^{k}})^{2}\le\sum_{j=1}^{d}\lVert s^{k}_{j}\Omega-t^{k}_{j}\Omega\rVert^{2}.

By Step 0(b) and claim 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, the left side tends to W^2(law(X),law(Y))2\widehat{W}_{2}(\mathrm{law}(X),\mathrm{law}(Y))^{2}. By Step 0(c)(i),(ii), ∥sjkΩ−tjkΩ∥→∥Xj−Yj∥\lVert s^{k}_{j}\Omega-t^{k}_{j}\Omega\rVert\to\lVert X_{j}-Y_{j}\rVert for every jj, so by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences the right side tends to ∑j=1d∥Xj−Yj∥2\sum_{j=1}^{d}\lVert X_{j}-Y_{j}\rVert^{2}, which is ∥X−Y∥22\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}^{2} by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples. Claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences gives W^2(law(X),law(Y))2≤∥X−Y∥22\widehat{W}_{2}(\mathrm{law}(X),\mathrm{law}(Y))^{2}\le\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}^{2}. The two numbers squared here are nonnegative (condition 1 of Metric Space, and ∥X−Y∥2\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2} is a nonnegative square root), so claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives the assertion.

Clause 3. Reality. Ω\Omega, XiX_{i} and XjX_{j} lie in HsaH_{\mathrm{sa}} (Step 0(d) and Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples), so ⟨Ω,Xi⟩\langle\Omega,X_{i}\rangle and ⟨Xi,Xj⟩\langle X_{i},X_{j}\rangle are real by Step 0(d).

First moments. By Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §bounded (with m=dm=d) and Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §moments, mi(μk)=λsk(xi)=⟨Ω,sikΩ⟩\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mu_{k})=\lambda_{s^{k}}(x_{i})=\langle\Omega,s^{k}_{i}\Omega\rangle, a real number; by Step 0(c)(iii), applied to the constant sequence Ω\Omega and to (sikΩ)k(s^{k}_{i}\Omega)_{k}, this sequence converges to ⟨Ω,Xi⟩\langle\Omega,X_{i}\rangle. On the other hand Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §lipschitz gives ∣mi(μk)−mi(law(X))∣≤W^2(μk,law(X))|\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mu_{k})-\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mathrm{law}(X))|\le\widehat{W}_{2}(\mu_{k},\mathrm{law}(X)), which tends to 00 by Step 0(a), so mi(μk)→mi(law(X))\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mu_{k})\to\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mathrm{law}(X)) by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences. Uniqueness of real limits (Step 0(a)) gives mi(law(X))=⟨Ω,Xi⟩\mathrm{m}_{i}(\mathrm{law}(X))=\langle\Omega,X_{i}\rangle.

Quadratic moments. Likewise mij(μk)=λsk(xixj)=⟨sikΩ,sjkΩ⟩\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mu_{k})=\lambda_{s^{k}}(x_{i}x_{j})=\langle s^{k}_{i}\Omega,s^{k}_{j}\Omega\rangle, real by Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §moments, and this sequence converges to ⟨Xi,Xj⟩\langle X_{i},X_{j}\rangle by Step 0(c)(iii). Put ωk=W^2(μk,law(X))≥0\omega_{k}=\widehat{W}_{2}(\mu_{k},\mathrm{law}(X))\ge0, so ωk→0\omega_{k}\to0 by Step 0(a), and let σ\sigma be the nonnegative square root of M^(law(X))≥0\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(X))\ge0 (Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §moments). The third estimate of Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §lipschitz gives M^(μk)1/2≤σ+ωk\widehat{M}(\mu_{k})^{1/2}\le\sigma+\omega_{k}, and its fourth estimate then gives

∣mij(μk)−mij(law(X))∣≤ωk(M^(μk)1/2+σ)≤ωk(2σ+ωk).|\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mu_{k})-\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mathrm{law}(X))|\le\omega_{k}\bigl(\widehat{M}(\mu_{k})^{1/2}+\sigma\bigr)\le\omega_{k}(2\sigma+\omega_{k}).

The right side tends to 00 by claims 1 to 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, so mij(μk)→mij(law(X))\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mu_{k})\to\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mathrm{law}(X)) by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, and uniqueness of real limits gives mij(law(X))=⟨Xi,Xj⟩\mathrm{m}_{ij}(\mathrm{law}(X))=\langle X_{i},X_{j}\rangle.

Second moment. By Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: the Wasserstein Completion of the Laws, Affine Push-Forwards, Moments, Couplings and Cost §moments, the formula just proved, Norm Induced by a Complex Inner Product and Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples,

M^(law(X))=∑i=1dmii(law(X))=∑i=1d⟨Xi,Xi⟩=∑i=1d∥Xi∥2=∥X∥22.\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(X))=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\mathrm{m}_{ii}(\mathrm{law}(X))=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\langle X_{i},X_{i}\rangle=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert X_{i}\rVert^{2}=\lVert X\rVert_{2}^{2}.

Clause 4. Let T=(A,c)T=(A,c) be an affine datum from dd to nn variables. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let uku^{k} be the nn-tuple with uik=ciI+∑j=1dAijsjku^{k}_{i}=c_{i}I+\sum_{j=1}^{d}A_{ij}s^{k}_{j}. By Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §affine, uku^{k} is a self-adjoint nn-tuple in MM, uikΩ=ciΩ+∑j=1dAijsjkΩu^{k}_{i}\Omega=c_{i}\Omega+\sum_{j=1}^{d}A_{ij}s^{k}_{j}\Omega, and λuk=λsk∘σT\lambda_{u^{k}}=\lambda_{s^{k}}\circ\sigma_{T}. By Step 0(c)(i), applied to the constant sequence Ω\Omega and the sequences (sjkΩ)k(s^{k}_{j}\Omega)_{k} with the real coefficients ci,Aijc_{i},A_{ij}, uikΩ→ciΩ+∑j=1dAijXju^{k}_{i}\Omega\to c_{i}\Omega+\sum_{j=1}^{d}A_{ij}X_{j}, which is (TX)i(TX)_{i} by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations. Hence, by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §law for the L2L^{2} nn-tuple TXTX, κn(λuk)→law(TX)\kappa_{n}(\lambda_{u^{k}})\to\mathrm{law}(TX). By Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §bounded (with m=dm=d), κn(λuk)=κn(λsk∘σT)=T#μk\kappa_{n}(\lambda_{u^{k}})=\kappa_{n}(\lambda_{s^{k}}\circ\sigma_{T})=T_{\#}\mu_{k}. By Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §lipschitz, W^2(T#μk,T#law(X))≤∥T∥ W^2(μk,law(X))\widehat{W}_{2}(T_{\#}\mu_{k},T_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X))\le\lVert T\rVert\,\widehat{W}_{2}(\mu_{k},\mathrm{law}(X)), whose right side tends to 00 by Step 0(a) and claim 3 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences; so T#μk→T#law(X)T_{\#}\mu_{k}\to T_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X) by claim 3 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences and Step 0(a). The sequence (T#μk)k(T_{\#}\mu_{k})_{k} thus converges in (Σn2,W^2)(\Sigma^{2}_{n},\widehat{W}_{2}) to both law(TX)\mathrm{law}(TX) and T#law(X)T_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X), and these coincide by Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space.

Clause 5. The lemma is quantified over dd, nn and the L2L^{2} tuples, and the proof of Clause 4 above used only that XX is an L2L^{2} tuple; so Clause 4 applies to the L2L^{2} 2d2d-tuple (X,Y)(X,Y) of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations and to affine data from 2d2d to dd variables. Likewise Clause 3 applies to every L2L^{2} dd-tuple.

Marginals. By Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §coordinate, pr1=(P1,0)\mathrm{pr}^{1}=(P^{1},0) with Pij1=1P^{1}_{ij}=1 if j=ij=i and 00 otherwise, so by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations, (pr1(X,Y))i=0 Ω+∑j=12dPij1(X,Y)j=(X,Y)i=Xi(\mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,Y))_{i}=0\,\Omega+\sum_{j=1}^{2d}P^{1}_{ij}(X,Y)_{j}=(X,Y)_{i}=X_{i} for i∈[d]i\in[d], since 0 Ω0\,\Omega is the zero vector; similarly pr2=(P2,0)\mathrm{pr}^{2}=(P^{2},0) with Pij2=1P^{2}_{ij}=1 exactly when j=d+ij=d+i, so (pr2(X,Y))i=(X,Y)d+i=Yi(\mathrm{pr}^{2}(X,Y))_{i}=(X,Y)_{d+i}=Y_{i}. Hence pr1(X,Y)=X\mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,Y)=X and pr2(X,Y)=Y\mathrm{pr}^{2}(X,Y)=Y, and Clause 4 gives pr#1law(X,Y)=law(X)\mathrm{pr}^{1}_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X,Y)=\mathrm{law}(X) and pr#2law(X,Y)=law(Y)\mathrm{pr}^{2}_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X,Y)=\mathrm{law}(Y). Since law(X,Y)∈Σ2d2\mathrm{law}(X,Y)\in\Sigma^{2}_{2d}, Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: the Wasserstein Completion of the Laws, Affine Push-Forwards, Moments, Couplings and Cost §couplings gives law(X,Y)∈Π2(law(X),law(Y))\mathrm{law}(X,Y)\in\Pi^{2}(\mathrm{law}(X),\mathrm{law}(Y)).

Cost. The difference datum is D=(P1−P2,0)D=(P^{1}-P^{2},0) by Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §coordinate, so for i∈[d]i\in[d]

(D(X,Y))i=0 Ω+∑j=12d(Pij1−Pij2)(X,Y)j=∑j=12dPij1(X,Y)j−∑j=12dPij2(X,Y)j=Xi−Yi,(D(X,Y))_{i}=0\,\Omega+\sum_{j=1}^{2d}\bigl(P^{1}_{ij}-P^{2}_{ij}\bigr)(X,Y)_{j}=\sum_{j=1}^{2d}P^{1}_{ij}(X,Y)_{j}-\sum_{j=1}^{2d}P^{2}_{ij}(X,Y)_{j}=X_{i}-Y_{i},

that is, D(X,Y)=X−YD(X,Y)=X-Y in the sense of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples. By Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: the Wasserstein Completion of the Laws, Affine Push-Forwards, Moments, Couplings and Cost §cost, Clause 4 for DD, and Clause 3 for the L2L^{2} dd-tuple X−YX-Y,

I(law(X,Y))=M^(D#law(X,Y))=M^(law(D(X,Y)))=M^(law(X−Y))=∥X−Y∥22.\mathcal{I}(\mathrm{law}(X,Y))=\widehat{M}(D_{\#}\mathrm{law}(X,Y))=\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(D(X,Y)))=\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(X-Y))=\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}^{2}.

Clause 6. Let π\pi be a trace-preserving embedding of (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) into (K,N,Ψ)(K,N,\Psi). By Laws of Self-Adjoint Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Moments, Affine Images, Couplings, Embeddings and L^2 Approximation §embedding, for every kk the dd-tuple π(sk)\pi(s^{k}) is a self-adjoint dd-tuple in NN with π(sjk)Ψ=VπsjkΩ\pi(s^{k}_{j})\Psi=V_{\pi}s^{k}_{j}\Omega and λπ(sk)=λsk\lambda_{\pi(s^{k})}=\lambda_{s^{k}}. Since Vπ∈L(H,K)V_{\pi}\in\mathcal{L}(H,K) by Trace-Preserving Embeddings of Tracial W*-Probability Spaces, Their Implementing Isometries and Conditional Expectations §isometry, Step 0(c)(iv) gives π(sjk)Ψ=VπsjkΩ→VπXj\pi(s^{k}_{j})\Psi=V_{\pi}s^{k}_{j}\Omega\to V_{\pi}X_{j} for every j∈[d]j\in[d]. The dd-tuple VπXV_{\pi}X is an L2L^{2} dd-tuple of (K,N,Ψ)(K,N,\Psi) by Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations, so Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §law, applied in (K,N,Ψ)(K,N,\Psi) with the sequence (π(sk))k(\pi(s^{k}))_{k}, shows that law(VπX)\mathrm{law}(V_{\pi}X) is the limit of κd(λπ(sk))=κd(λsk)=μk\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{\pi(s^{k})})=\kappa_{d}(\lambda_{s^{k}})=\mu_{k}. This sequence converges to law(X)\mathrm{law}(X) by Step 1, so law(VπX)=law(X)\mathrm{law}(V_{\pi}X)=\mathrm{law}(X) by Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space. ■\blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…