TheoremBase

Verifies the inner-product axioms termwise via linearity of convergent series and proves completeness by taking coordinatewise limits of a Cauchy sequence and bounding partial sums. The basis property and the embedding follow from the one-term series formula for the inner product with fkf_k and from Parseval's identity in X with the comparison test.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, series of real numbers, their convergence and their sums are those of Series of Real Numbers §convergent. Two elementary facts are used repeatedly. (P) If (tm)m∈N(t_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence of real numbers and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with tm=0t_{m}=0 for every m≠km\ne k, then the partial sums ∑m=1ntm\sum_{m=1}^{n}t_{m} equal 00 for n<kn<k and tkt_{k} for n≥kn\ge k, so the series ∑m=1∞tm\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}t_{m} converges with sum tkt_{k}. (Q) If v∈Xav\in X_{a} and K∈NK\in\mathbb{N}, then the terms akvk2a_{k}v_{k}^{2} are nonnegative, since ak>0a_{k}>0, so by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates

0≤aKvK2≤∑k=1Kakvk2≤∑k=1∞akvk2=⟨v,v⟩a,0\le a_{K}v_{K}^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{K}a_{k}v_{k}^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}v_{k}^{2}=\langle v,v\rangle_{a},

the second inequality because every term of the finite sum is nonnegative.

Claim 1. Vector space. By Weighted Square-Summable Sequence Spaces §space, termwise sums and real multiples of elements of XaX_{a} lie in XaX_{a}. The zero sequence 00 lies in XaX_{a}, all terms of ∑kak02\sum_{k}a_{k}0^{2} being 00, and v+0=vv+0=v termwise. For v∈Xav\in X_{a} the sequence (−1)v=(−vk)k(-1)v=(-v_{k})_{k} lies in XaX_{a} and v+(−1)v=0v+(-1)v=0. Conditions 1, 2 and 5 to 8 of Vector Space over a Field hold because they hold in each term by the field axioms of R\mathbb{R}. Hence XaX_{a} is a real vector space with zero vector the zero sequence, which is its only zero vector by claim 1 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space; by claim 2 there the additive inverse of ww is (−wk)k(-w_{k})_{k}, so v−w=(vk−wk)kv-w=(v_{k}-w_{k})_{k}. Inner product. By Weighted Square-Summable Sequence Spaces §inner-product the series defining ⟨v,w⟩a\langle v,w\rangle_{a} converges for v,w∈Xav,w\in X_{a}. We check conditions (a) to (d) of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product; let v,w,z∈Xav,w,z\in X_{a} and λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R}. (a) The series for ⟨v,w⟩a\langle v,w\rangle_{a} and ⟨w,v⟩a\langle w,v\rangle_{a} have the same terms akvkwk=akwkvka_{k}v_{k}w_{k}=a_{k}w_{k}v_{k}. (b) The kk-th term of the series for ⟨v+w,z⟩a\langle v+w,z\rangle_{a} is akvkzk+akwkzka_{k}v_{k}z_{k}+a_{k}w_{k}z_{k}; since ∑kakvkzk\sum_{k}a_{k}v_{k}z_{k} and ∑kakwkzk\sum_{k}a_{k}w_{k}z_{k} converge, Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity gives ⟨v+w,z⟩a=⟨v,z⟩a+⟨w,z⟩a\langle v+w,z\rangle_{a}=\langle v,z\rangle_{a}+\langle w,z\rangle_{a}. (c) The kk-th term of the series for ⟨λv,w⟩a\langle\lambda v,w\rangle_{a} is λ(akvkwk)\lambda(a_{k}v_{k}w_{k}), so ⟨λv,w⟩a=λ⟨v,w⟩a\langle\lambda v,w\rangle_{a}=\lambda\langle v,w\rangle_{a} by Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity. (d) 0≤⟨v,v⟩a0\le\langle v,v\rangle_{a} by Weighted Square-Summable Sequence Spaces §inner-product. If ⟨v,v⟩a=0\langle v,v\rangle_{a}=0, then for each K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} fact (Q) gives 0≤aKvK2≤00\le a_{K}v_{K}^{2}\le0, so aKvK2=0a_{K}v_{K}^{2}=0, hence vK2=0v_{K}^{2}=0 because aK>0a_{K}>0, and vK=0v_{K}=0; thus vv is the zero sequence. So ⟨⋅,⋅⟩a\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{a} is an inner product on XaX_{a}. Since ∣v∣a=⟨v,v⟩a|v|_{a}=\sqrt{\langle v,v\rangle_{a}} is the nonnegative real number whose square is ⟨v,v⟩a\langle v,v\rangle_{a}, it is the norm of Real Inner Product Space §norm, and the distance of Real Inner Product Space §distance is da(v,w)=∣v−w∣ad_{a}(v,w)=|v-w|_{a}. Completeness. By Real Hilbert Space §hilbert and Complete Metric Space it remains to show that every Cauchy sequence (vj)j∈N(v^{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} in (Xa,da)(X_{a},d_{a}) converges to a point of XaX_{a}. For i,j,k∈Ni,j,k\in\mathbb{N} the kk-th term of vj−viv^{j}-v^{i} is vkj−vkiv^{j}_{k}-v^{i}_{k}, so by (Q)

ak(vkj−vki)2≤∑l=1Kal(vlj−vli)2≤∣vj−vi∣a2(k≤K).(1)a_{k}\bigl(v^{j}_{k}-v^{i}_{k}\bigr)^{2}\le\sum_{l=1}^{K}a_{l}\bigl(v^{j}_{l}-v^{i}_{l}\bigr)^{2}\le|v^{j}-v^{i}|_{a}^{2}\qquad(k\le K).\tag{1}

Coordinates. Fix k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and ε>0\varepsilon>0; then choose JJ with da(vj,vi)<εak1/2d_{a}(v^{j},v^{i})<\varepsilon a_{k}^{1/2} for all i,j≥Ji,j\ge J, where ak1/2>0a_{k}^{1/2}>0 is the power of Real Power of a Nonnegative Real Number §power, with (ak1/2)2=ak(a_{k}^{1/2})^{2}=a_{k} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement and 0<ak1/20<a_{k}^{1/2} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §values. By (1), ak(vkj−vki)2<akε2a_{k}(v^{j}_{k}-v^{i}_{k})^{2}<a_{k}\varepsilon^{2}, so (vkj−vki)2<ε2(v^{j}_{k}-v^{i}_{k})^{2}<\varepsilon^{2} and ∣vkj−vki∣<ε|v^{j}_{k}-v^{i}_{k}|<\varepsilon for i,j≥Ji,j\ge J. Thus (vkj)j(v^{j}_{k})_{j} is a Cauchy sequence of real numbers and converges to a real number vkv_{k}. Let v=(vk)k∈Nv=(v_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}. Uniform estimate. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0; choose JJ with da(vj,vi)<εd_{a}(v^{j},v^{i})<\varepsilon for all i,j≥Ji,j\ge J; then fix j≥Jj\ge J and K∈NK\in\mathbb{N}. By (1), ∑l=1Kal(vlj−vli)2<ε2\sum_{l=1}^{K}a_{l}(v^{j}_{l}-v^{i}_{l})^{2}<\varepsilon^{2} for every i≥Ji\ge J. As i→∞i\to\infty the left side converges to ∑l=1Kal(vlj−vl)2\sum_{l=1}^{K}a_{l}(v^{j}_{l}-v_{l})^{2} by the limit laws for sums and products applied to its finitely many terms, so this finite sum is at most ε2\varepsilon^{2} by the order properties of limits. Hence the partial sums of the series ∑lal(vlj−vl)2\sum_{l}a_{l}(v^{j}_{l}-v_{l})^{2}, whose terms are nonnegative, are bounded above by ε2\varepsilon^{2}, and by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion the series converges with sum their supremum, which is at most ε2\varepsilon^{2}. So wj=(vlj−vl)lw^{j}=(v^{j}_{l}-v_{l})_{l} belongs to XaX_{a} and ∣wj∣a≤ε|w^{j}|_{a}\le\varepsilon for every j≥Jj\ge J. Taking ε=1\varepsilon=1 and j=Jj=J, the sequence v=vJ+(−1)wJv=v^{J}+(-1)w^{J} (termwise) belongs to XaX_{a}; then vj−v=wjv^{j}-v=w^{j} termwise for every jj. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, apply the uniform estimate with ε/2\varepsilon/2 to get JJ with da(vj,v)=∣wj∣a≤ε/2<εd_{a}(v^{j},v)=|w^{j}|_{a}\le\varepsilon/2<\varepsilon for j≥Jj\ge J. Hence vj→vv^{j}\to v in (Xa,da)(X_{a},d_{a}), and XaX_{a} is a real Hilbert space.

Claim 2. Fix kk and write rkr_{k} for the reciprocal of ak1/2a_{k}^{1/2}, which exists since 0<ak1/20<a_{k}^{1/2} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §values; by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement, ak1/2a_{k}^{1/2} is the nonnegative square root of aka_{k}, so ak=(ak1/2)2a_{k}=(a_{k}^{1/2})^{2}. The terms am((fka)m)2a_{m}((f^{a}_{k})_{m})^{2} vanish for m≠km\ne k, so by (P) the series ∑mam((fka)m)2\sum_{m}a_{m}((f^{a}_{k})_{m})^{2} converges and fka∈Xaf^{a}_{k}\in X_{a}. For v∈Xav\in X_{a}, the terms amvm(fka)ma_{m}v_{m}(f^{a}_{k})_{m} vanish for m≠km\ne k, so by (P)

⟨v,fka⟩a=akvkrk=ak1/2 ak1/2 rk vk=ak1/2vk.(2)\langle v,f^{a}_{k}\rangle_{a}=a_{k}v_{k}r_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}\,a_{k}^{1/2}\,r_{k}\,v_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}v_{k}.\tag{2}

Applying (2) with v=fjav=f^{a}_{j}: for j≠kj\ne k, ⟨fja,fka⟩a=ak1/2⋅0=0\langle f^{a}_{j},f^{a}_{k}\rangle_{a}=a_{k}^{1/2}\cdot0=0, and ⟨fka,fka⟩a=ak1/2rk=1\langle f^{a}_{k},f^{a}_{k}\rangle_{a}=a_{k}^{1/2}r_{k}=1, so ∣fka∣a=1|f^{a}_{k}|_{a}=1, 11 being the nonnegative real number with square 11. Thus (fka)k(f^{a}_{k})_{k} is an orthonormal sequence in the real Hilbert space XaX_{a} of claim 1. If v∈Xav\in X_{a} satisfies ⟨v,fka⟩a=0\langle v,f^{a}_{k}\rangle_{a}=0 for every kk, then ak1/2vk=0a_{k}^{1/2}v_{k}=0 by (2), hence vk=0v_{k}=0 because ak1/2≠0a_{k}^{1/2}\ne0, for every kk; so vv is the zero sequence, the zero vector of XaX_{a} by claim 1. By Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis, (fka)k(f^{a}_{k})_{k} is an orthonormal basis of XaX_{a}.

Claim 3. Let x∈Xx\in X. Since (ek)k(e_{k})_{k} is an orthonormal basis of the real Hilbert space XX by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space, Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §parseval shows that ∑kxk2\sum_{k}x_{k}^{2} converges with sum ∣x∣2|x|^{2}, where xk=⟨x,ek⟩x_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle. By Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, ∑kaˉxk2\sum_{k}\bar{a}x_{k}^{2} converges with sum aˉ∣x∣2\bar{a}|x|^{2}. Since 0≤akxk2≤aˉxk20\le a_{k}x_{k}^{2}\le\bar{a}x_{k}^{2} for every kk, Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §comparison shows that ∑kakxk2\sum_{k}a_{k}x_{k}^{2} converges, so ιa(x)∈Xa\iota_{a}(x)\in X_{a}, and ∣ιa(x)∣a2=∑kakxk2≤aˉ∣x∣2|\iota_{a}(x)|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k}a_{k}x_{k}^{2}\le\bar{a}|x|^{2}. For x,y∈Xx,y\in X and λ∈R\lambda\in\mathbb{R}, conditions (b) and (c) of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product for the inner product of XX give ⟨x+y,ek⟩=xk+yk\langle x+y,e_{k}\rangle=x_{k}+y_{k} and ⟨λx,ek⟩=λxk\langle\lambda x,e_{k}\rangle=\lambda x_{k} for every kk, so ιa(x+y)=ιa(x)+ιa(y)\iota_{a}(x+y)=\iota_{a}(x)+\iota_{a}(y) and ιa(λx)=λιa(x)\iota_{a}(\lambda x)=\lambda\iota_{a}(x) termwise; ιa\iota_{a} is linear. If ιa(x)=ιa(y)\iota_{a}(x)=\iota_{a}(y), then z=x+(−1)yz=x+(-1)y satisfies ιa(z)=ιa(x)+(−1)ιa(y)=0\iota_{a}(z)=\iota_{a}(x)+(-1)\iota_{a}(y)=0, that is ⟨z,ek⟩=0\langle z,e_{k}\rangle=0 for every kk, so z=0Xz=0_{X} by Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis; since (−1)y=−y(-1)y=-y by claim 5 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, x=z+y=yx=z+y=y. Hence ιa\iota_{a} is injective.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…