TheoremBase

Proof of Strictly Increasing Sequences of Natural Numbers Dominate Their Index

lemmalem:subsequence-index-growth-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published version: induction using the order arithmetic of the natural numbers.

Proof

All properties of the order on N\mathbb{N} used below are those listed in Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, and m+1=S(m)m+1=S(m) for the successor map SS is claim 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers.

For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} let P(k)P(k) be the assertion k≀nkk\le n_k. We prove P(k)P(k) for every kk by the principle of induction.

Base case. 1≀n11\le n_1 by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers.

Inductive step. Assume k≀nkk\le n_k. By claim 6 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, S(k)≀S(nk)S(k)\le S(n_k), that is k+1≀nk+1k+1\le n_k+1.

By the strict increase hypothesis of Subsequence of a Sequence in a Set we have nk<nk+1n_k<n_{k+1}, so by claim 7 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers there is t∈Nt\in\mathbb{N} with nk+1=nk+tn_{k+1}=n_k+t. By claim 4, 1≀t1\le t, and hence by claim 6, nk+1≀nk+t=nk+1n_k+1\le n_k+t=n_{k+1}.

Combining k+1≀nk+1k+1\le n_k+1 and nk+1≀nk+1n_k+1\le n_{k+1} with transitivity (claim 1) gives k+1≀nk+1k+1\le n_{k+1}, which is P(k+1)P(k+1).

By induction, k≀nkk\le n_k for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}.

For the final assertion, let N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} and take k=Nk=N; then N≀nNN\le n_N.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…