TheoremBase

Closure arguments give linearity, closedness and the chain rule; a smoothed modulus shows that the gradient of sqrt f vanishes where f does, which gives the norm identity; integration by parts is extended to the Gibbs Sobolev space and applied to truncated squares of sqrt f.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

We write ν=γβV\nu=\gamma^{V}_{\beta} and D=Da1,2(γβV)\mathbb{D}=\mathbb{D}^{1,2}_{a}(\gamma^{V}_{\beta}). By Integration by Parts for the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential, and Closability of the Noise Gradient in Its Square-Integrable Space §measure, ν\nu is a Borel probability measure in P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X); by The Gibbs Measure of a Borel Potential Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure §gibbs it is the measure with density ZV,β−1wV,βZ_{V,\beta}^{-1}w_{V,\beta} with respect to γc\gamma_{c} of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, so for a γc\gamma_{c}-null Borel set NN we have ν(N)=ZV,β−1∫X1NwV,β dγc=0\nu(N)=Z_{V,\beta}^{-1}\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{N}w_{V,\beta}\,d\gamma_{c}=0 by the homogeneity in Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral; that is, γc\gamma_{c}-null Borel sets are ν\nu-null. We fix a Borel representative of each ∂kV\partial_{k}V (Cameron-Martin Partial Derivatives on the Gaussian Sobolev Space with the Variances as Weights §partial); by what was just said (and, for μ\mu below, by the same argument applied to its density relative to ν\nu) nothing depends on this choice. A function square-integrable with respect to a probability measure is integrable, by Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder with exponents 2,22,2 against the constant 11; and the product of two members of L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu) is ν\nu-integrable with integral their inner product, by The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product. For φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) the functions φ\varphi and ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi are Borel and bounded (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel), and the kk-th coordinate ⟨∇aφ(x),ek⟩\langle\nabla_{a}\varphi(x),e_{k}\rangle of ∇aφ(x)\nabla_{a}\varphi(x) is ak∂kφ(x)a_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi(x) for every kk (The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient and Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial). A map v:X→Xav:X\to X^{a} is measurable if and only if every x↦⟨v(x),ek⟩x\mapsto\langle v(x),e_{k}\rangle is Borel (The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §measurable). (CB) For y∈Xay\in X^{a} and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, (ak−1⟨y,ek⟩)2=ak−1⋅ak−1⟨y,ek⟩2≤ak−1∣y∣a2(a_{k}^{-1}\langle y,e_{k}\rangle)^{2}=a_{k}^{-1}\cdot a_{k}^{-1}\langle y,e_{k}\rangle^{2}\le a_{k}^{-1}|y|_{a}^{2}, as ak−1⟨y,ek⟩2a_{k}^{-1}\langle y,e_{k}\rangle^{2} is a term of the series of nonnegative terms with sum ∣y∣a2|y|_{a}^{2} (The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product, Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates).

Step 0 (calculus on cylindrical functions). (P) Let φ,χ∈FCb1(X)\varphi,\chi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) have representations (n,ψ)(n,\psi), (m,ϑ)(m,\vartheta), say n≤mn\le m, and let s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}. Let π:Rm→Rn\pi:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} keep the first nn coordinates; its coordinate functions are smooth (claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set), hence of class C1C^{1} (Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set), so it is of class C1C^{1} (clauses 3 and 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set), with ∂iπl=1\partial_{i}\pi_{l}=1 if i=li=l and 00 otherwise, its difference quotients in Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set being constant. By claims 2 and 1 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k, ψ∘π∈Cb1(Rm)\psi\circ\pi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) with ∂i(ψ∘π)=(∂iψ)∘π\partial_{i}(\psi\circ\pi)=(\partial_{i}\psi)\circ\pi for i≤ni\le n and 00 for i>ni>n, and (m,ψ∘π)(m,\psi\circ\pi) represents φ\varphi since pn=π∘pmp_{n}=\pi\circ p_{m} (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates). By claims 3 and 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, ψ∘π+ϑ\psi\circ\pi+\vartheta, sψs\psi and (ψ∘π)ϑ(\psi\circ\pi)\vartheta are of class C1C^{1}, and bounded, as ψ\psi and ϑ\vartheta are, with the bounded partial derivatives ∂i(ψ∘π)+∂iϑ\partial_{i}(\psi\circ\pi)+\partial_{i}\vartheta, s∂iψs\partial_{i}\psi and ∂i(ψ∘π)ϑ+(ψ∘π)∂iϑ\partial_{i}(\psi\circ\pi)\vartheta+(\psi\circ\pi)\partial_{i}\vartheta. Hence φ+χ\varphi+\chi, sφs\varphi, φχ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\chi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), and Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial applied to these representations gives ∂k(φ+χ)=∂kφ+∂kχ\partial_{k}(\varphi+\chi)=\partial_{k}\varphi+\partial_{k}\chi, ∂k(sφ)=s∂kφ\partial_{k}(s\varphi)=s\partial_{k}\varphi and ∂k(φχ)=∂kφ χ+φ ∂kχ\partial_{k}(\varphi\chi)=\partial_{k}\varphi\,\chi+\varphi\,\partial_{k}\chi for all kk; by the formula of The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient, ∇a(φ+χ)=∇aφ+∇aχ\nabla_{a}(\varphi+\chi)=\nabla_{a}\varphi+\nabla_{a}\chi and ∇a(sφ)=s∇aφ\nabla_{a}(s\varphi)=s\nabla_{a}\varphi. (C) Let h:R→Rh:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with ∣h′∣≤L|h'|\le L, h′=∂1hh'=\partial_{1}h. Then hh and h′h' are continuous from (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) to itself (claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, Euclidean, Metric and Sequential Continuity of a Real Function of a Real Variable §distance and Euclidean, Metric and Sequential Continuity of a Real Function of a Real Variable §equivalent), hence Borel (claims 2 and 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), and hh is differentiable at every point with derivative h′h' (claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line); so Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval gives ∣h(t)−h(r)∣≤L∣t−r∣|h(t)-h(r)|\le L|t-r| for all real r,tr,t. If φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) has a representation (n,ψ)(n,\psi) with ∣ψ∣≤M|\psi|\le M, then by claims 2 and 1 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k h∘ψh\circ\psi is of class C1C^{1} with ∂i(h∘ψ)=h′(ψ)∂iψ\partial_{i}(h\circ\psi)=h'(\psi)\partial_{i}\psi, bounded, and ∣h∘ψ∣≤∣h(0)∣+LM|h\circ\psi|\le|h(0)|+LM; so h∘φ∈FCb1(X)h\circ\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), ∂k(h∘φ)=h′(φ)∂kφ\partial_{k}(h\circ\varphi)=h'(\varphi)\partial_{k}\varphi by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial, and ∇a(h∘φ)=h′(φ)∇aφ\nabla_{a}(h\circ\varphi)=h'(\varphi)\nabla_{a}\varphi pointwise.

Step 1 (claim 1). For real tt the constant function tt lies in FCb1(X)\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §linear) with the representation (1,ψt)(1,\psi_{t}), ψt\psi_{t} constant on R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, which is smooth (claim 2 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set), hence of class C1C^{1} (Smooth Map on a Euclidean Open Set), and bounded, with ∂1ψt=0\partial_{1}\psi_{t}=0, all its difference quotients vanishing (Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set). By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial, ∂kt=0\partial_{k}t=0 for all kk, so ∇at=0\nabla_{a}t=0. The constant sequence approximates tt, so t∈Dt\in\mathbb{D} and ∇aVt=∇at\nabla^{V}_{a}t=\nabla_{a}t is the zero vector of L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) (The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §gradient, The Space of Square-Integrable Hilbert-Valued Maps is a Real Hilbert Space: Coordinates and Synthesis §hilbert). Let F,F′∈DF,F'\in\mathbb{D} have approximating sequences (Fj)(F_{j}), (Fj′)(F'_{j}), and let s,s′∈Rs,s'\in\mathbb{R}. By (P), sFj+s′Fj′∈FCb1(X)sF_{j}+s'F'_{j}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) and ∇a(sFj+s′Fj′)=s∇aFj+s′∇aFj′\nabla_{a}(sF_{j}+s'F'_{j})=s\nabla_{a}F_{j}+s'\nabla_{a}F'_{j}, which by The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §gradient and the triangle inequality and homogeneity of the norm converges to s∇aVF+s′∇aVF′s\nabla^{V}_{a}F+s'\nabla^{V}_{a}F', hence is Cauchy; and ∥sFj+s′Fj′−(sF+s′F′)∥L2(ν)≤∣s∣∥Fj−F∥L2(ν)+∣s′∣∥Fj′−F′∥L2(ν)→0\lVert sF_{j}+s'F'_{j}-(sF+s'F')\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}\le|s|\lVert F_{j}-F\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}+|s'|\lVert F'_{j}-F'\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}\to0. By The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §space and The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §gradient, sF+s′F′∈DsF+s'F'\in\mathbb{D} and ∇aV(sF+s′F′)=s∇aVF+s′∇aVF′\nabla^{V}_{a}(sF+s'F')=s\nabla^{V}_{a}F+s'\nabla^{V}_{a}F'.

Step 2 (claim 2). For each jj, an approximating sequence of FjF_{j} converges to FjF_{j} in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu) and its noise gradients converge to ∇aVFj\nabla^{V}_{a}F_{j} (The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §space, The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §gradient); so we may choose φj∈FCb1(X)\varphi_{j}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∥φj−Fj∥L2(ν)<1/j\lVert\varphi_{j}-F_{j}\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}<1/j and ∥∇aφj−∇aVFj∥ν<1/j\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}-\nabla^{V}_{a}F_{j}\rVert_{\nu}<1/j. Then ∥φj−F∥L2(ν)<1/j+∥Fj−F∥L2(ν)→0\lVert\varphi_{j}-F\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}<1/j+\lVert F_{j}-F\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}\to0 and ∥∇aφj−G∥ν<1/j+∥∇aVFj−G∥ν→0\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}-G\rVert_{\nu}<1/j+\lVert\nabla^{V}_{a}F_{j}-G\rVert_{\nu}\to0. A convergent sequence is Cauchy, so (φj)(\varphi_{j}) approximates FF; thus F∈DF\in\mathbb{D} and ∇aVF=G\nabla^{V}_{a}F=G.

Step 3 (claim 3). Let LL bound ∣h′∣|h'| and let (φj)(\varphi_{j}) approximate FF. By (C), h∘fh\circ f is Borel (claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space) with ∣h∘f∣≤∣h(0)∣+L∣f∣|h\circ f|\le|h(0)|+L|f|, so (h∘f)2≤2h(0)2+2L2f2(h\circ f)^{2}\le2h(0)^{2}+2L^{2}f^{2} is ν\nu-integrable; h∘φj∈FCb1(X)h\circ\varphi_{j}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with ∇a(h∘φj)=h′(φj)∇aφj\nabla_{a}(h\circ\varphi_{j})=h'(\varphi_{j})\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}; and ∥h∘φj−h∘f∥L2(ν)≤L∥φj−f∥L2(ν)→0\lVert h\circ\varphi_{j}-h\circ f\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}\le L\lVert\varphi_{j}-f\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}\to0. By The Riesz-Fischer Theorem: the Lebesgue Space is a Real Banach Space §subsequence (with p=2p=2, measure ν\nu) we may pass to a subsequence along which φj→f\varphi_{j}\to f off a ν\nu-null set. The maps h′(f)gh'(f)g, h′(φj)(∇aφj−g)h'(\varphi_{j})(\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}-g) and (h′(φj)−h′(f))g(h'(\varphi_{j})-h'(f))g are measurable into XaX^{a}, their coordinates being products of Borel functions, and square-integrable, as ∣t y∣a2=t2∣y∣a2|t\,y|_{a}^{2}=t^{2}|y|_{a}^{2}. By the triangle inequality of ∥⋅∥ν\lVert\cdot\rVert_{\nu} and The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations,

∥h′(φj)∇aφj−h′(f)g∥ν≤L∥∇aφj−g∥ν+(∫X(h′(φj)−h′(f))2∣g∣a2 dν)1/2.\lVert h'(\varphi_{j})\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}-h'(f)g\rVert_{\nu}\le L\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}-g\rVert_{\nu}+\Bigl(\int_{X}(h'(\varphi_{j})-h'(f))^{2}|g|_{a}^{2}\,d\nu\Bigr)^{1/2}.

The first term tends to 00 by The Gibbs Sobolev Space of the Noise Gradient §gradient; the integrand of the second tends to 00 ν\nu-almost everywhere by the continuity of h′h' (Euclidean, Metric and Sequential Continuity of a Real Function of a Real Variable §sequential) and is bounded by the integrable 4L2∣g∣a24L^{2}|g|_{a}^{2}, so the second term tends to 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §dominated. Thus (h∘φj)(h\circ\varphi_{j}), along the subsequence, approximates the class of h∘fh\circ f and its noise gradients converge to the class of h′(f)gh'(f)g, which proves claim 3.

Step 4 (claim 4). The constant function 11 is a Borel density of ν\nu relative to ν\nu, since ν(A)=∫X1A⋅1 dν\nu(A)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}\cdot1\,d\nu, and 1=1\sqrt{1}=1 lies in D\mathbb{D} with ∇aV1=0\nabla^{V}_{a}1=0 by Step 1. So ν\nu has finite intrinsic Fisher information by The Intrinsic Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential §information, and IaV(ν)=4EaV(1,1)=4⟨0,0⟩ν=0\mathcal{I}^{V}_{a}(\nu)=4\mathcal{E}^{V}_{a}(1,1)=4\langle0,0\rangle_{\nu}=0 by The Gibbs Dirichlet Form of the Noise Gradient §form.

Step 5 (the gradient of f\sqrt{f} vanishes where ff does). Let f,gf,g be as in claims 5 to 7, put u=f≥0u=\sqrt{f}\ge0 (Borel by The Intrinsic Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential §information) and UU its class in D\mathbb{D}. For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} let hm=mϕmh_{m}=m\phi_{m}, where ϕm\phi_{m} is the function of A Bounded-Derivative Truncation of the Cube Map on the Real Line §defined with ε=m\varepsilon=m, so hm(s)=s3/(1/m+s2)h_{m}(s)=s^{3}/(1/m+s^{2}). By A Bounded-Derivative Truncation of the Cube Map on the Real Line §derivative and claims 3 and 1 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, hmh_{m} is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with hm′(s)=m(3s2+ms4)(1+ms2)−2h_{m}'(s)=m(3s^{2}+ms^{4})(1+ms^{2})^{-2}, which lies in [0,4][0,4] by A Bounded-Derivative Truncation of the Cube Map on the Real Line §derivative-bound. Moreover hm′(0)=0h_{m}'(0)=0; for s≠0s\ne0, hm′(s)=(3s2/m+s4)(1/m+s2)−2→1h_{m}'(s)=(3s^{2}/m+s^{4})(1/m+s^{2})^{-2}\to1 as m→∞m\to\infty; and ∣hm(s)∣≤∣s∣|h_{m}(s)|\le|s| and ∣hm(s)−s∣=∣s∣ m−1(1/m+s2)−1→0|h_{m}(s)-s|=|s|\,m^{-1}(1/m+s^{2})^{-1}\to0 for every ss. By claim 3 (Step 3) with uu in place of its ff, the class of hm∘uh_{m}\circ u lies in D\mathbb{D} with gradient the class of hm′(u)gh_{m}'(u)g. As m→∞m\to\infty: (hm(u)−u)2≤4u2(h_{m}(u)-u)^{2}\le4u^{2}, with ∫Xu2 dν=1\int_{X}u^{2}\,d\nu=1, and (hm(u)−u)2→0(h_{m}(u)-u)^{2}\to0 pointwise; and with g+=1{f>0}gg^{+}=\mathbf{1}_{\{f>0\}}g (measurable and square-integrable), ∣hm′(u)g−g+∣a2=(hm′(u)−1{u>0})2∣g∣a2≤16∣g∣a2|h_{m}'(u)g-g^{+}|_{a}^{2}=(h_{m}'(u)-\mathbf{1}_{\{u>0\}})^{2}|g|_{a}^{2}\le16|g|_{a}^{2} tends to 00 pointwise, as {u>0}={f>0}\{u>0\}=\{f>0\}. By Dominated Convergence Theorem the classes of hm∘uh_{m}\circ u converge to UU in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu) and their gradients to the class of g+g^{+}; by claim 2 (Step 2), ∇aVU\nabla^{V}_{a}U is the class of g+g^{+}, so g=g+g=g^{+} off a ν\nu-null set (The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §classes), that is, g(x)=0g(x)=0 for ν\nu-almost every xx with f(x)=0f(x)=0.

Step 6 (claims 5 and 6). By The Intrinsic Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential §information, μ\mu is the measure with density ff relative to ν\nu of claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables; so ∫Xϱ dμ=∫Xϱf dν\int_{X}\varrho\,d\mu=\int_{X}\varrho f\,d\nu for Borel ϱ≥0\varrho\ge0, and a Borel ϱ\varrho is μ\mu-integrable if and only if ϱf\varrho f is ν\nu-integrable, with the same identity. Let r(x)=1/f(x)r(x)=1/\sqrt{f(x)} if f(x)>0f(x)>0 and r(x)=0r(x)=0 otherwise; for real tt the set of xx with r(x)>tr(x)>t is XX if t<0t<0, is {f>0}\{f>0\} if t=0t=0, and is {0<f<t−2}\{0<f<t^{-2}\} if t>0t>0, so rr is Borel by Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable. Then ζ=2rg\zeta=2rg, its coordinates 2r⟨g,ek⟩2r\langle g,e_{k}\rangle are Borel, and its values lie in the linear subspace XaX^{a} (The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert), so ζ\zeta is measurable into XaX^{a}. Since r2f=1{f>0}r^{2}f=\mathbf{1}_{\{f>0\}}, we get ∣ζ∣a2f=4⋅1{f>0}∣g∣a2|\zeta|_{a}^{2}f=4\cdot\mathbf{1}_{\{f>0\}}|g|_{a}^{2}, and by Step 5 and The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison,

∫X∣ζ∣a2 dμ=4∫X1{f>0}∣g∣a2 dν=4∫X∣g∣a2 dν=4EaV(U,U)=IaV(μ)<∞,\int_{X}|\zeta|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu=4\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{\{f>0\}}|g|_{a}^{2}\,d\nu=4\int_{X}|g|_{a}^{2}\,d\nu=4\mathcal{E}^{V}_{a}(U,U)=\mathcal{I}^{V}_{a}(\mu)<\infty,

by The Gibbs Dirichlet Form of the Noise Gradient §form and The Intrinsic Fisher Information Relative to the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential §information. So the class of ζ\zeta lies in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) and claim 6 holds. If f~,g~\tilde f,\tilde g are other admissible choices, then {f≠f~}\{f\ne\tilde f\} is ν\nu-null by The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities §uniqueness, so f~\sqrt{\tilde f} has the class UU, and g~=g\tilde g=g off a ν\nu-null set (The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §classes), the set {g≠g~}=⋃k∈N{⟨g,ek⟩≠⟨g~,ek⟩}\{g\ne\tilde g\}=\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\{\langle g,e_{k}\rangle\ne\langle\tilde g,e_{k}\rangle\} being Borel since the coordinates of gg and g~\tilde g are Borel by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §measurable; hence the corresponding ζ~\tilde\zeta equals ζ\zeta off a ν\nu-null Borel set MM, and μ(M)=∫X1Mf dν=0\mu(M)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{M}f\,d\nu=0 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral, so ζ~\tilde\zeta and ζ\zeta have the same class in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}). This proves claim 5.

Step 7 (integration by parts on D\mathbb{D}). Let F∈DF\in\mathbb{D} with a Borel representative vv, let GG be a map in the class ∇aVF\nabla^{V}_{a}F, let χ∈FCb1(X)\chi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, and ρ(x)=χ(x)(xk/ck+∂kV(x)/β)−∂kχ(x)\rho(x)=\chi(x)(x_{k}/c_{k}+\partial_{k}V(x)/\beta)-\partial_{k}\chi(x), which lies in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu) by Integration by Parts for the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential, and Closability of the Noise Gradient in Its Square-Integrable Space §square-integrable and the boundedness of χ\chi, ∂kχ\partial_{k}\chi. We show

∫Xak−1⟨G(x),ek⟩ χ(x) ν(dx)=∫Xv ρ dν,\int_{X}a_{k}^{-1}\langle G(x),e_{k}\rangle\,\chi(x)\,\nu(dx)=\int_{X}v\,\rho\,d\nu,

both integrands being integrable as products of members of L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu), ak−1⟨G,ek⟩a_{k}^{-1}\langle G,e_{k}\rangle being Borel and in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu) by (CB). For φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), (P) and Integration by Parts for the Gibbs Measure of a Gibbs-Sobolev Potential, and Closability of the Noise Gradient in Its Square-Integrable Space §ibp applied to φχ\varphi\chi, together with Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, give ∫X∂kφ χ dν=∫Xφρ dν\int_{X}\partial_{k}\varphi\,\chi\,d\nu=\int_{X}\varphi\rho\,d\nu. Let (φj)(\varphi_{j}) approximate FF. By (CB) applied to ∇aφj(x)−G(x)\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}(x)-G(x), whose kk-th coordinate is ak∂kφj(x)−⟨G(x),ek⟩a_{k}\partial_{k}\varphi_{j}(x)-\langle G(x),e_{k}\rangle, we get ∥∂kφj−ak−1⟨G,ek⟩∥L2(ν)2≤ak−1∥∇aφj−∇aVF∥ν2→0\lVert\partial_{k}\varphi_{j}-a_{k}^{-1}\langle G,e_{k}\rangle\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}^{2}\le a_{k}^{-1}\lVert\nabla_{a}\varphi_{j}-\nabla^{V}_{a}F\rVert_{\nu}^{2}\to0, and ∥φj−v∥L2(ν)→0\lVert\varphi_{j}-v\rVert_{L^{2}(\nu)}\to0; so the identity follows from that for φj\varphi_{j} by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu).

Step 8 (claim 7). Let ψ\psi, nn and ψ~\tilde\psi be as in claim 7. By claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous and Bounded Twice Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded First and Second Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded, ψ~∈Cb1(Rn)\tilde\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), so ψ∈FCb1(X)\psi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X); for k≤nk\le n, χk=∂kψ=(∂kψ~)∘pn\chi_{k}=\partial_{k}\psi=(\partial_{k}\tilde\psi)\circ p_{n} by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial, where ∂kψ~\partial_{k}\tilde\psi is of class C1C^{1} (clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set) and bounded with bounded partial derivatives, so χk∈FCb1(X)\chi_{k}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) and ∂kχk=∂k∂kψ\partial_{k}\chi_{k}=\partial_{k}\partial_{k}\psi. Let ρk(x)=(xk/ck+∂kV(x)/β)χk(x)−∂kχk(x)\rho_{k}(x)=(x_{k}/c_{k}+\partial_{k}V(x)/\beta)\chi_{k}(x)-\partial_{k}\chi_{k}(x). It is μ\mu-integrable: x↦xkχk(x)x\mapsto x_{k}\chi_{k}(x) by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §coordinate-integrable (as μ∈P2(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X)), ∂kVχk\partial_{k}V\chi_{k} since ∂kV\partial_{k}V is μ\mu-integrable and χk\chi_{k} bounded Borel, and ∂kχk\partial_{k}\chi_{k} by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §square-integrable; hence fρkf\rho_{k} is ν\nu-integrable (Step 6).

For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} let qm(s)=1+s2/m≥1q_{m}(s)=1+s^{2}/m\ge1 and Hm(s)=s2qm(s)−1H_{m}(s)=s^{2}q_{m}(s)^{-1}. Every point of R\mathbb{R} is interior (claim 1 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line) and the identity has derivative 11 (its difference quotients are 11, Derivative at an Interior Point); by Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives and claim 1 of Reciprocal Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives, qm′(s)=2s/mq_{m}'(s)=2s/m and Hm′(s)=2sqm(s)−1−s2(2s/m)qm(s)−2=2s qm(s)−2H_{m}'(s)=2sq_{m}(s)^{-1}-s^{2}(2s/m)q_{m}(s)^{-2}=2s\,q_{m}(s)^{-2}. These functions are continuous (Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space §on-set, Continuity of the Reciprocal of a Nonvanishing Real-Valued Function on a Metric Space), hence Euclidean continuous (Euclidean, Metric and Sequential Continuity of a Real Function of a Real Variable §equivalent), and ∂1Hm=Hm′\partial_{1}H_{m}=H_{m}' (claim 2 of One-Dimensional Derivatives, Partial Derivatives, and Smoothness on the Real Line), so HmH_{m} is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} (clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set). Also 0≤Hm(s)≤s20\le H_{m}(s)\le s^{2} and ∣Hm′(s)∣≤2∣s∣|H_{m}'(s)|\le2|s|; ∣Hm′(s)∣≤2m|H_{m}'(s)|\le2m, since for ∣s∣>m|s|>m we have qm(s)−2≤qm(s)−1≤m/s2q_{m}(s)^{-2}\le q_{m}(s)^{-1}\le m/s^{2}; and Hm(s)→s2H_{m}(s)\to s^{2}, Hm′(s)→2sH_{m}'(s)\to2s as m→∞m\to\infty, because qm(s)→1q_{m}(s)\to1.

Fix k≤nk\le n. By claim 3 the class of Hm∘uH_{m}\circ u lies in D\mathbb{D} with gradient the class of Hm′(u)gH_{m}'(u)g, and Step 7 with v=Hm∘uv=H_{m}\circ u, G=Hm′(u)gG=H_{m}'(u)g and χ=χk\chi=\chi_{k} gives

∫XHm′(u) ak−1⟨g,ek⟩ χk dν=∫XHm(u) ρk dν.\int_{X}H_{m}'(u)\,a_{k}^{-1}\langle g,e_{k}\rangle\,\chi_{k}\,d\nu=\int_{X}H_{m}(u)\,\rho_{k}\,d\nu .

As m→∞m\to\infty the left integrand tends pointwise to 2u ak−1⟨g,ek⟩χk2u\,a_{k}^{-1}\langle g,e_{k}\rangle\chi_{k} and is bounded by 2Bu ∣ak−1⟨g,ek⟩∣2Bu\,|a_{k}^{-1}\langle g,e_{k}\rangle|, with BB a bound of ∣χk∣|\chi_{k}|, which is integrable as uu and ak−1⟨g,ek⟩a_{k}^{-1}\langle g,e_{k}\rangle lie in L2(ν)L^{2}(\nu); the right integrand tends to u2ρk=fρku^{2}\rho_{k}=f\rho_{k} and is bounded by f∣ρk∣f|\rho_{k}|. By Dominated Convergence Theorem and Step 6,

∫X2u ⟨g,ek⟩ ∂kψ dν=ak∫Xfρk dν=ak∫Xρk dμ.\int_{X}2u\,\langle g,e_{k}\rangle\,\partial_{k}\psi\,d\nu=a_{k}\int_{X}f\rho_{k}\,d\nu=a_{k}\int_{X}\rho_{k}\,d\mu .

Finally, ∇aψ\nabla_{a}\psi and ζ\zeta lie in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) (The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient and claim 5), so ⟨ζ,∇aψ⟩μ=∫X⟨ζ,∇aψ⟩a dμ\langle\zeta,\nabla_{a}\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{X}\langle\zeta,\nabla_{a}\psi\rangle_{a}\,d\mu with a μ\mu-integrable integrand (The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations). By The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product, the terms ai−1⟨ζ(x),ei⟩ ai∂iψ(x)a_{i}^{-1}\langle\zeta(x),e_{i}\rangle\,a_{i}\partial_{i}\psi(x) of the series for ⟨ζ(x),∇aψ(x)⟩a\langle\zeta(x),\nabla_{a}\psi(x)\rangle_{a} vanish for i>ni>n, so it equals ∑k=1n⟨ζ(x),ek⟩∂kψ(x)\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle\zeta(x),e_{k}\rangle\partial_{k}\psi(x); and ⟨ζ,ek⟩f=2u⟨g,ek⟩\langle\zeta,e_{k}\rangle f=2u\langle g,e_{k}\rangle pointwise, both sides vanishing where f=0f=0 and 2u−1f=2u2u^{-1}f=2u where f>0f>0. By Step 6 and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable,

⟨ζ,∇aψ⟩μ=∫X⟨ζ,∇aψ⟩af dν=∑k=1n∫X2u ⟨g,ek⟩ ∂kψ dν=∑k=1nak∫Xρk dμ,\langle\zeta,\nabla_{a}\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\int_{X}\langle\zeta,\nabla_{a}\psi\rangle_{a}f\,d\nu=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\int_{X}2u\,\langle g,e_{k}\rangle\,\partial_{k}\psi\,d\nu=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}\int_{X}\rho_{k}\,d\mu,

which is claim 7.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…