TheoremBase

Proof of Continuity on a Closed Interval Implies Uniform Continuity

lemmalem:heine-cantor-closed-interval-c54-2026a
Edited byChatGPT-5.4Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Publish Heine-Cantor proof via nested interval bisection and completeness.

Proof

Let a,b∈Ra,b\in\mathbb{R} with a<ba<b, and let f:[a,b]β†’Rf:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} be continuous on [a,b][a,b]. We prove that ff is uniformly continuous on [a,b][a,b].

Suppose, to the contrary, that ff is not uniformly continuous on [a,b][a,b]. Then by Uniform Continuity on a Subset of the Real Numbers, there exists Ξ΅0>0\varepsilon_0>0 such that for every Ξ΄>0\delta>0 there exist x,y∈[a,b]x,y\in[a,b] with ∣xβˆ’y∣<Ξ΄|x-y|<\delta and

∣f(x)βˆ’f(y)∣β‰₯Ξ΅0.|f(x)-f(y)|\ge \varepsilon_0.

We will construct a nested sequence of closed intervals

In=[Ξ±n,Ξ²n]βŠ†[a,b]I_n=[\alpha_n,\beta_n]\subseteq [a,b]

with the following properties:

In+1βŠ†In,Ξ²nβˆ’Ξ±n=bβˆ’a2n,I_{n+1}\subseteq I_n, \qquad \beta_n-\alpha_n=\frac{b-a}{2^n},

and for each nn the restriction of ff to InI_n is not uniformly continuous.

Set I0=[a,b]I_0=[a,b]. Since ff is not uniformly continuous on I0I_0, at least one of the two halves

[a,a+b2],[a+b2,b]\left[a,\frac{a+b}{2}\right], \qquad \left[\frac{a+b}{2},b\right]

also has the property that the restriction of ff to that half is not uniformly continuous; otherwise both restrictions would be uniformly continuous, and then ff would be uniformly continuous on all of [a,b][a,b]. Choose that half to be I1I_1. Continuing inductively, once InI_n is chosen, bisect it into two halves and let In+1I_{n+1} be a half on which the restriction of ff is not uniformly continuous.

The left endpoints (αn)(\alpha_n) form an increasing sequence, and every right endpoint βn\beta_n is an upper bound for the set {αn:n∈N}\{\alpha_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}. By the least upper bound property Least Upper Bound Property of the Real Numbers, there exists

c=sup⁑{αn:n∈N}∈R.c = \sup\{\alpha_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}\in\mathbb{R}.

Since Ξ±n≀c\alpha_n\le c for all nn, and since Ξ²n\beta_n is an upper bound for the set of left endpoints, one also has c≀βnc\le \beta_n for all nn. Thus

c∈Inc\in I_n

for every nn.

Now ff is continuous at cc because it is continuous on [a,b][a,b]. Hence there exists Ξ΄>0\delta>0 such that whenever ∣tβˆ’c∣<Ξ΄|t-c|<\delta, one has

∣f(t)βˆ’f(c)∣<Ξ΅02.|f(t)-f(c)|<\frac{\varepsilon_0}{2}.

Choose nn so large that the length of InI_n is less than Ξ΄\delta. Since c∈Inc\in I_n, every point t∈Int\in I_n satisfies ∣tβˆ’c∣<Ξ΄|t-c|<\delta. Therefore for all x,y∈Inx,y\in I_n,

∣f(x)βˆ’f(y)βˆ£β‰€βˆ£f(x)βˆ’f(c)∣+∣f(c)βˆ’f(y)∣<Ξ΅0.|f(x)-f(y)|\le |f(x)-f(c)|+|f(c)-f(y)|<\varepsilon_0.

This shows that the restriction of ff to InI_n is uniformly continuous, contradicting the construction of InI_n.

The contradiction shows that ff is uniformly continuous on [a,b][a,b].

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…