TheoremBase

Proof

Write 11 for the multiplicative identity of the underlying field, βˆ’x-x for the additive inverse of xx, xβˆ’yx-y for x+(βˆ’y)x+(-y), and xβˆ’1x^{-1} for the multiplicative inverse of xx when xβ‰ 0x\ne 0. Set 2=1+12=1+1. By claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we have 0<20<2, the inverse 2βˆ’12^{-1} exists, and for every real Ξ΅\varepsilon with 0<Ξ΅0<\varepsilon both 0<Ξ΅β‹…2βˆ’10<\varepsilon\cdot 2^{-1} and Ξ΅β‹…2βˆ’1<Ξ΅\varepsilon\cdot 2^{-1}<\varepsilon hold. Properties of the order on N\mathbb{N} are those of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers.

Define a sequence (hk)k∈N(h_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in R\mathbb{R} by recursion on the natural numbers:

h1=1,hk+1=hkβ‹…2βˆ’1.h_1=1,\qquad h_{k+1}=h_k\cdot 2^{-1}.

Step 1 (positivity). We show 0<hk0<h_k for every kk by the principle of induction. For k=1k=1, claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<1=h10<1=h_1. If 0<hk0<h_k, then claim 8 of that lemma applied with Ξ΅=hk\varepsilon=h_k gives 0<hkβ‹…2βˆ’1=hk+10<h_k\cdot 2^{-1}=h_{k+1}.

Step 2 (strict decrease). For every kk, Step 1 gives 0<hk0<h_k, so claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied with Ξ΅=hk\varepsilon=h_k gives hk+1=hkβ‹…2βˆ’1<hkh_{k+1}=h_k\cdot 2^{-1}<h_k.

Step 3 (monotonicity along the index). If j,k∈Nj,k\in\mathbb{N} and j≀kj\le k, then hk≀hjh_k\le h_j. Indeed, if j=kj=k this is reflexivity of ≀\le. Otherwise j<kj<k, and by claim 7 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers there is t∈Nt\in\mathbb{N} with k=j+tk=j+t. We induct on tt. For t=1t=1: hj+1<hjh_{j+1}<h_j by Step 2, hence hj+1≀hjh_{j+1}\le h_j. If hj+t≀hjh_{j+t}\le h_j, then hj+t+1<hj+th_{j+t+1}<h_{j+t} by Step 2, so hj+t+1≀hj+t≀hjh_{j+t+1}\le h_{j+t}\le h_j and transitivity gives hj+t+1≀hjh_{j+t+1}\le h_j.

Step 4 (the infimum). Let S={hk:k∈N}S=\{h_k:k\in\mathbb{N}\}, a nonempty subset of R\mathbb{R}. By Step 1, 0≀hk0\le h_k for every kk, so 00 is a lower bound for SS and SS is bounded below. By Existence of the Infimum of a Nonempty Subset of R\mathbb{R} Bounded Below the greatest lower bound c=inf⁑Sc=\inf S exists, and 0≀c0\le c because 00 is a lower bound and cc is a greatest lower bound.

Step 5 (2c2c is also a lower bound). Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Since cc is a lower bound for SS and hk+1∈Sh_{k+1}\in S, we have c≀hk+1=hkβ‹…2βˆ’1c\le h_{k+1}=h_k\cdot 2^{-1}. As 0<20<2 implies 0≀20\le 2, claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 2c≀2 (hkβ‹…2βˆ’1)2c\le 2\,(h_k\cdot 2^{-1}). By commutativity and associativity of multiplication in a field, together with 2β‹…2βˆ’1=12\cdot 2^{-1}=1 and hkβ‹…1=hkh_k\cdot 1=h_k,

2 (hkβ‹…2βˆ’1)=hk (2β‹…2βˆ’1)=hkβ‹…1=hk.2\,(h_k\cdot 2^{-1})=h_k\,(2\cdot 2^{-1})=h_k\cdot 1=h_k .

Hence 2c≀hk2c\le h_k for every kk, so 2c2c is a lower bound for SS.

Step 6 (c=0c=0). Since cc is the greatest lower bound, Step 5 gives 2c≀c2c\le c. By distributivity, 2c=(1+1)c=c+c2c=(1+1)c=c+c. By claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, 2c≀c2c\le c is equivalent to 0≀cβˆ’2c0\le c-2c. Using claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field for βˆ’(c+c)=(βˆ’c)+(βˆ’c)-(c+c)=(-c)+(-c), together with associativity of addition and claims 3 and 4 of that lemma,

cβˆ’2c=c+((βˆ’c)+(βˆ’c))=(c+(βˆ’c))+(βˆ’c)=0+(βˆ’c)=βˆ’c,c-2c=c+\bigl((-c)+(-c)\bigr)=\bigl(c+(-c)\bigr)+(-c)=0+(-c)=-c,

so 0β‰€βˆ’c0\le -c. By the sign reversal in claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, this is equivalent to βˆ’(βˆ’c)β‰€βˆ’0-(-c)\le -0, and claims 4 and 5 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field give βˆ’(βˆ’c)=c-(-c)=c and βˆ’0=0-0=0; hence c≀0c\le 0. With 0≀c0\le c from Step 4 and antisymmetry of ≀\le, we conclude c=0c=0.

Step 7 (limit). Let Ρ\varepsilon be a real number with 0<Ρ0<\varepsilon. By claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} applied to the nonempty set SS, which is bounded below, there is s∈Ss\in S with s<inf⁑S+Ρ=0+Ρ=Ρs<\inf S+\varepsilon=0+\varepsilon=\varepsilon, the last equalities by Step 6 and the additive identity axiom of a field. By the definition of SS there is K∈NK\in\mathbb{N} with s=hKs=h_K, so hK<Ρh_K<\varepsilon.

Let k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with K≀kK\le k. By Step 3, hk≀hKh_k\le h_K, and hK<Ξ΅h_K<\varepsilon, so the mixed transitivity in claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives hk<Ξ΅h_k<\varepsilon. By claim 4 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field we have hkβˆ’0=hkh_k-0=h_k, and since 0<hk0<h_k the absolute value satisfies ∣hk∣=hk|h_k|=h_k. Hence ∣hkβˆ’0∣<Ξ΅|h_k-0|<\varepsilon for every kk with K≀kK\le k.

Since Ρ>0\varepsilon>0 was arbitrary, Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers shows that (hk)k∈N(h_k)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} has limit 00. Together with Step 1 this exhibits a sequence with the required properties.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…