TheoremBase

Splits a real-valued function into positive and negative parts to reduce the first claim to the nonnegative restriction identity, then compares the two zero extensions of a continuous function, which differ only at a single point.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here. The argument for claim 1 is the one given as Claim 1 in the published proof of The Integral over the Unit Cell of a Product of One-Variable Functions, recorded here as a standing item so that later results may cite it; the citation attached to this proof records that provenance.

Proof of claim 1. Measurability of a real-valued function is that of Measurable Map, and the Set of Measurable Maps: the preimage of every member of the Borel Οƒ\sigma-algebra B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) lies in the Οƒ\sigma-algebra of the domain. Let B∈B(R)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}). If 0βˆ‰B0\notin B then f~βˆ’1(B)=fβˆ’1(B)\tilde{f}^{-1}(B)=f^{-1}(B), and if 0∈B0\in B then f~βˆ’1(B)=fβˆ’1(B)βˆͺ(Xβˆ–X0)\tilde{f}^{-1}(B)=f^{-1}(B)\cup(X\setminus X_{0}), since f~\tilde{f} takes the value 00 at every point outside X0X_{0} and agrees with ff on X0X_{0}. By claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions every member of F∣X0\mathcal{F}|_{X_{0}} lies in F\mathcal{F}, and Xβˆ–X0∈FX\setminus X_{0}\in\mathcal{F} because F\mathcal{F} is a Οƒ\sigma-algebra and X0∈FX_{0}\in\mathcal{F}; so measurability of ff gives measurability of f~\tilde{f} in both cases. Conversely fβˆ’1(B)=f~βˆ’1(B)∩X0f^{-1}(B)=\tilde{f}^{-1}(B)\cap X_{0}, which lies in F\mathcal{F} and is contained in X0X_{0}, hence lies in F∣X0\mathcal{F}|_{X_{0}}; so measurability of f~\tilde{f} gives measurability of ff.

Assume now that both are measurable. Let f+f^{+} and fβˆ’f^{-} be the positive and negative parts of ff as in Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral, and (f~)+(\tilde{f})^{+} and (f~)βˆ’(\tilde{f})^{-} those of f~\tilde{f}. Since max⁑{0,0}=0\max\{0,0\}=0, the map (f~)+(\tilde{f})^{+} is the zero extension of f+f^{+} and (f~)βˆ’(\tilde{f})^{-} is the zero extension of fβˆ’f^{-}. All four maps are nonnegative, real-valued and measurable, the measurability by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral; and for a nonnegative real-valued function, measurability in the sense of Measurable Map, and the Set of Measurable Maps and measurability as a map into [0,∞][0,\infty] agree, as recorded in Nonnegative Measurable Maps and Their Lebesgue Integral. Claim 1 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions, applied to f+f^{+} and then to fβˆ’f^{-}, therefore gives

∫X0f+ dμ∣X0=∫X(f~)+ dΞΌ,∫X0fβˆ’β€‰dμ∣X0=∫X(f~)βˆ’β€‰dΞΌ.\int_{X_{0}}f^{+}\,d\mu|_{X_{0}}=\int_{X}(\tilde{f})^{+}\,d\mu,\qquad \int_{X_{0}}f^{-}\,d\mu|_{X_{0}}=\int_{X}(\tilde{f})^{-}\,d\mu .

By Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral, ff is integrable with respect to μ∣X0\mu|_{X_{0}} exactly when the two left-hand sides are finite, f~\tilde{f} is integrable with respect to μ\mu exactly when the two right-hand sides are finite, and in that case each of the two integrals in the claim is the difference of the corresponding pair of values. The two differences agree by the two displayed identities.

Proof of claim 2. By claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, applied with B=[0,1]βŠ†A=RB=[0,1]\subseteq A=\mathbb{R}, the restriction h∣[0,1]h|_{[0,1]} is continuous on [0,1][0,1]. Let h~:Rβ†’R\tilde{h}:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be the map equal to hh on [0,1][0,1] and to 00 at every point outside [0,1][0,1], that is, the zero extension of h∣[0,1]h|_{[0,1]}. By Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval, applied to the continuous map h∣[0,1]h|_{[0,1]} on the closed interval determined by 0<10<1, the map h∣[0,1]h|_{[0,1]} is Riemann integrable on [0,1][0,1] (claim 1 there), the map h~\tilde{h} is measurable with respect to B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and integrable with respect to Lebesgue measure Ξ»\lambda (claim 2 there), and

∫Rh~ dΞ»=∫01h(t) dt\int_{\mathbb{R}}\tilde{h}\,d\lambda=\int_{0}^{1}h(t)\,dt

(claim 3 there).

Let g:Rβ†’Rg:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be the zero extension of h∣Jh|_{J}, that is, the map equal to hh on JJ and to 00 at every point outside JJ. Since JβŠ†[0,1]J\subseteq[0,1], we have g=h~ 1Jg=\tilde{h}\,\mathbf{1}_{J}, where 1J\mathbf{1}_{J} is the indicator of JJ: at a point of JJ both sides equal h(t)h(t), and at a point outside JJ both sides are 00. The set JJ belongs to B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by The Integral over the Unit Cell of a Product of One-Variable Functions, so 1J\mathbf{1}_{J} is measurable by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and gg is measurable by claim 3 of that lemma. By claim 1 of the present statement, applied to the measure space (R,B(R),Ξ»)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\lambda), to X0=JX_{0}=J and to f=h∣Jf=h|_{J}, whose zero extension is gg, the map h∣Jh|_{J} is measurable with respect to BJ\mathcal{B}_{J}; here the restriction of (R,B(R),Ξ»)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\lambda) to JJ is (J,BJ,Ξ»J)(J,\mathcal{B}_{J},\lambda_{J}) by The Integral over the Unit Cell of a Product of One-Variable Functions.

The maps gg and h~\tilde{h} agree at every point of R\mathbb{R} except possibly at 11: they agree on JJ and outside [0,1][0,1] by their descriptions, and [0,1][0,1] is the union of JJ and {1}\{1\}, since a real tt satisfies 0≀t≀10\le t\le1 exactly when either 0≀t<10\le t<1 or t=1t=1. The set {1}\{1\} is the closed interval determined by 11 and 11, so {1}∈B(R)\{1\}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) by Borel Sigma-Algebra on the Real Line and Ξ»({1})=0\lambda(\{1\})=0 by claim 4 of Lebesgue Measure on the Real Line: Existence, Lengths of Intervals and Uniqueness. Hence g=h~g=\tilde{h} almost everywhere with respect to Ξ»\lambda. Both maps are measurable and h~\tilde{h} is integrable, so The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets (iii) gives that gg is integrable with respect to Ξ»\lambda and that ∫Rg dΞ»=∫Rh~ dΞ»\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\,d\lambda=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\tilde{h}\,d\lambda.

By claim 1 of the present statement again, h∣Jh|_{J} is integrable with respect to λJ\lambda_{J} and

∫Jh∣J dΞ»J=∫Rg dΞ»=∫Rh~ dΞ»=∫01h(t) dt,\int_{J}h|_{J}\,d\lambda_{J}=\int_{\mathbb{R}}g\,d\lambda=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\tilde{h}\,d\lambda=\int_{0}^{1}h(t)\,dt ,

which is the asserted identity.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…