TheoremBase

Proof of The Dissipative Hamilton-Jacobi Operator on a Hilbert Triple Satisfies the Comparison Hypotheses

propositionprop:dissipative-hamilton-jacobi-hilbert-triple-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 11,082 chars · 16 deps · depth 27 Reason: Copied from the previous proof version; Claim 3 rewritten to produce the explicit structure pair.

Direct expansion of the shifted operators: the structure pair comes from the coercive term delta|Ax|^2 absorbing the cross terms, the truncated envelope of the modulus of g, and the bound |x-y|^2 <= 4(h(x)+h(y)); the shift modulus comes from bounding |Ax| on admissible data.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, a+bH2=aH2+2a,bH+bH2|a+b|_{H}^{2}=|a|_{H}^{2}+2\langle a,b\rangle_{H}+|b|_{H}^{2} for a,bHa,b\in H by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §expansion, and a,bHaHbH|\langle a,b\rangle_{H}|\le|a|_{H}|b|_{H} by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space. We record one identity: for x,yD(A)x,y\in D(A),

AxAy,xyH=xyV2,(1)\langle Ax-Ay,\,x-y\rangle_{H}=|x-y|_{V}^{2}, \tag{1}

since xyVx-y\in V, so that Ax,xyH=x,xyV\langle Ax,x-y\rangle_{H}=\langle x,x-y\rangle_{V} and Ay,xyH=y,xyV\langle Ay,x-y\rangle_{H}=\langle y,x-y\rangle_{V} by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §operator, and subtracting gives xy,xyV\langle x-y,x-y\rangle_{V}.

Claim 1. Each of λ0r\lambda_{0}r, 12pH2\tfrac12|p|_{H}^{2}, Ax,pH\langle Ax,p\rangle_{H} and g(x)g(x) is a real number for (x,r,p,X)D(A)×R×H×Sym(V)(x,r,p,X)\in D(A)\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(V), so FF is a function from D(A)×R×H×Sym(V)D(A)\times\mathbb{R}\times H\times\mathrm{Sym}(V) to R\mathbb{R}. Since W=D(A)H=D(A)W=D(A)\cap H=D(A), this is exactly the shape required by Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ\delta-Shifts §operator. The defining expression does not involve the fourth argument, so F(x,r,p,X)=F(x,r,p,X)F(x,r,p,X)=F(x,r,p,X') for all X,XSym(V)X,X'\in\mathrm{Sym}(V), i.e. FF is first order; degenerate ellipticity follows from A First-Order Equation Operator is Degenerate Elliptic and Its δ\delta-Shifts Ignore the Form Argument §elliptic.

Claim 2. Let RR be positive, let xD(A)x\in D(A), pHp\in H, XSym(V)X\in\mathrm{Sym}(V) and let r,sRr,s\in\mathbb{R} satisfy RsrR-R\le s\le r\le R. All terms of FF other than λ0r\lambda_{0}r are unchanged when rr is replaced by ss, so

F(x,r,p,X)F(x,s,p,X)=λ0(rs),F(x,r,p,X)-F(x,s,p,X)=\lambda_{0}(r-s),

and in particular λ0(rs)F(x,r,p,X)F(x,s,p,X)\lambda_{0}(r-s)\le F(x,r,p,X)-F(x,s,p,X). Thus λ0\lambda_{0} is a properness constant for FF at RR, for every positive RR, and FF is locally strictly proper.

Claim 3. For a real α>1\alpha>1 the function tω2(t,α)=3α2tt\mapsto\omega_{2}(t,\alpha)=3\alpha^{2}t is the linear function with the nonnegative constant 3α23\alpha^{2}, hence a modulus of continuity by Linear Moduli of Continuity §modulus. Two preliminary inequalities. First, for x,yHx,y\in H, since g(x)g(y)g(x)+g(y)2Cg|g(x)-g(y)|\le|g(x)|+|g(y)|\le2C_{g} (claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field) and g(x)g(y)ωg(xyH)|g(x)-g(y)|\le\omega_{g}(|x-y|_{H}), the last assertion of The Nondecreasing Envelope of a Truncated Modulus of Continuity §majorant gives g(x)g(y)ω1(xyH)|g(x)-g(y)|\le\omega_{1}(|x-y|_{H}). Secondly, for a real α>1\alpha>1 and a nonnegative real ss,

αs2+1αs=1α(αs12)2+34α  0,\alpha s^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}-s=\tfrac{1}{\alpha}\bigl(\alpha s-\tfrac12\bigr)^{2}+\tfrac{3}{4\alpha}\ \ge\ 0 ,

as one checks by expanding 1α(αs12)2=αs2s+14α\tfrac{1}{\alpha}(\alpha s-\tfrac12)^{2}=\alpha s^{2}-s+\tfrac{1}{4\alpha}; so sαs2+1αs\le\alpha s^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}, and by The Nondecreasing Envelope of a Truncated Modulus of Continuity §monotone, ω1(s)ω1(αs2+1α)\omega_{1}(s)\le\omega_{1}\bigl(\alpha s^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}\bigr).

Let RR be positive, let x,yD(A)x,y\in D(A), rRr\in\mathbb{R}, X,YSym(H)X,Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) and let α,δ\alpha,\delta satisfy 1<α1<\alpha and 0<δ<10<\delta<1; put P=α(xy)P=\alpha(x-y). By Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ\delta-Shifts §shifted and the expansion of the norm,

Fδ(x,r,P,X)=λ0r+λ0δh(x)+12PH2+δP,AxH+δ22AxH2+Ax,PH+δAxH2g(x),F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,P,X)=\lambda_{0}r+\lambda_{0}\delta h(x)+\tfrac12|P|_{H}^{2}+\delta\langle P,Ax\rangle_{H}+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ax|_{H}^{2}+\langle Ax,P\rangle_{H}+\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}-g(x), Fδ+(y,r,P,Y)=λ0rλ0δh(y)+12PH2δP,AyH+δ22AyH2+Ay,PHδAyH2g(y).F^{+}_{\delta}(y,r,P,Y)=\lambda_{0}r-\lambda_{0}\delta h(y)+\tfrac12|P|_{H}^{2}-\delta\langle P,Ay\rangle_{H}+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}+\langle Ay,P\rangle_{H}-\delta|Ay|_{H}^{2}-g(y).

Subtracting and using (1) in the form Ax,PHAy,PH=αxyV2\langle Ax,P\rangle_{H}-\langle Ay,P\rangle_{H}=\alpha|x-y|_{V}^{2},

Fδ(x,r,P,X)Fδ+(y,r,P,Y)=λ0δ(h(x)+h(y))+αxyV2+Tx+Ty+g(y)g(x),F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,P,X)-F^{+}_{\delta}(y,r,P,Y)=\lambda_{0}\delta\bigl(h(x)+h(y)\bigr)+\alpha|x-y|_{V}^{2}+T_{x}+T_{y}+g(y)-g(x),

where

Tx=δAxH2+δ22AxH2+δP,AxH,Ty=δAyH2δ22AyH2+δP,AyH.T_{x}=\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ax|_{H}^{2}+\delta\langle P,Ax\rangle_{H},\qquad T_{y}=\delta|Ay|_{H}^{2}-\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}+\delta\langle P,Ay\rangle_{H}.

Since δ22AxH20\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ax|_{H}^{2}\ge0 and δP,AxHδPHAxH\delta\langle P,Ax\rangle_{H}\ge-\delta|P|_{H}|Ax|_{H}, while δ(AxHPH2)20\delta\bigl(|Ax|_{H}-\tfrac{|P|_{H}}{2}\bigr)^{2}\ge0 gives δAxH2δPHAxHδ4PH2\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}-\delta|P|_{H}|Ax|_{H}\ge-\tfrac{\delta}{4}|P|_{H}^{2}, we get Txδ4PH2T_{x}\ge-\tfrac{\delta}{4}|P|_{H}^{2}. Since δ1\delta\le1 we have δδ22δ2\delta-\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}\ge\tfrac{\delta}{2}, and δ2(AyHPH)20\tfrac{\delta}{2}\bigl(|Ay|_{H}-|P|_{H}\bigr)^{2}\ge0 gives δ2AyH2δPHAyHδ2PH2\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}-\delta|P|_{H}|Ay|_{H}\ge-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|P|_{H}^{2}, so Tyδ2PH2T_{y}\ge-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|P|_{H}^{2}. Moreover h(x)+h(y)0h(x)+h(y)\ge0 by The Penalty Function h=12V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §nonneg together with claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, αxyV20\alpha|x-y|_{V}^{2}\ge0, and g(y)g(x)g(x)g(y)g(y)-g(x)\ge-|g(x)-g(y)| by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Since PH2=α2xyH2|P|_{H}^{2}=\alpha^{2}|x-y|_{H}^{2}, we conclude

Fδ(x,r,P,X)Fδ+(y,r,P,Y)  g(x)g(y)34δα2xyH2.F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,P,X)-F^{+}_{\delta}(y,r,P,Y)\ \ge\ -|g(x)-g(y)|-\tfrac{3}{4}\delta\alpha^{2}|x-y|_{H}^{2}.

By the first preliminary inequality and then the second with s=xyHs=|x-y|_{H}, g(x)g(y)ω1(αxyH2+1α)|g(x)-g(y)|\le\omega_{1}\bigl(\alpha|x-y|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}\bigr). For the second term, xyHxH+yH|x-y|_{H}\le|x|_{H}+|y|_{H} by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle, (a+b)22a2+2b2(a+b)^{2}\le2a^{2}+2b^{2} for real a,ba,b because 2a2+2b2(a+b)2=(ab)202a^{2}+2b^{2}-(a+b)^{2}=(a-b)^{2}\ge0, and xH2xV2=2h(x)|x|_{H}^{2}\le|x|_{V}^{2}=2h(x) by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §triple and Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; hence xyH24(h(x)+h(y))4(h(x)+h(y)+1)|x-y|_{H}^{2}\le4\bigl(h(x)+h(y)\bigr)\le4\bigl(h(x)+h(y)+1\bigr), and multiplying by 34δα20\tfrac34\delta\alpha^{2}\ge0,

34δα2xyH23α2δ(h(x)+h(y)+1)=ω2(δ(h(x)+h(y)+1),α).\tfrac{3}{4}\delta\alpha^{2}|x-y|_{H}^{2}\le3\alpha^{2}\,\delta\bigl(h(x)+h(y)+1\bigr)=\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta(h(x)+h(y)+1),\alpha\bigr).

Therefore

Fδ(x,r,P,X)Fδ+(y,r,P,Y)  ω1(αxyH2+1α)ω2(δ(h(x)+h(y)+1),α).F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,P,X)-F^{+}_{\delta}(y,r,P,Y)\ \ge\ -\omega_{1}\Bigl(\alpha|x-y|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}\Bigr)-\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta(h(x)+h(y)+1),\alpha\bigr).

No restriction on rr was used, so (ω1,ω2)(\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) is a structure pair for FF at every positive RR, by The First-Order Structure Condition for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §pair.

Claim 4. Let δ,R\delta,R satisfy 0<δ<10<\delta<1 and 0<R0<R. Recall from Test Data for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple and the Admissible Sets §bounded that an RR-bounded datum (x,r,p,X)(x,r,p,X) satisfies h(x)<Rh(x)<R, r<R|r|<R and pH<R|p|_{H}<R.

(a) An upper bound for Fδ+F^{+}_{\delta}. For RR-bounded η=(y,s,p,X)\eta=(y,s,p',X'), expanding as above,

Fδ+(η)=λ0sλ0δh(y)+12pH2δp,AyH+δ22AyH2+Ay,pHδAyH2g(y).F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)=\lambda_{0}s-\lambda_{0}\delta h(y)+\tfrac12|p'|_{H}^{2}-\delta\langle p',Ay\rangle_{H}+\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}+\langle Ay,p'\rangle_{H}-\delta|Ay|_{H}^{2}-g(y).

Here λ0sλ0R\lambda_{0}s\le\lambda_{0}R, λ0δh(y)0-\lambda_{0}\delta h(y)\le0, 12pH212R2\tfrac12|p'|_{H}^{2}\le\tfrac12R^{2}, δp,AyHRAyH-\delta\langle p',Ay\rangle_{H}\le R|Ay|_{H}, Ay,pHRAyH\langle Ay,p'\rangle_{H}\le R|Ay|_{H}, δ22AyH2δAyH2δ2AyH2\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}-\delta|Ay|_{H}^{2}\le-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2} and g(y)Cg-g(y)\le C_{g}, so

Fδ+(η)λ0R+12R2+Cg+2RAyHδ2AyH2.(2)F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)\le\lambda_{0}R+\tfrac12R^{2}+C_{g}+2R|Ay|_{H}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}. \tag{2}

Since δ2(AyH2Rδ)20\tfrac{\delta}{2}\bigl(|Ay|_{H}-\tfrac{2R}{\delta}\bigr)^{2}\ge0 gives 2RAyHδ2AyH22R2δ2R|Ay|_{H}-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}\le\tfrac{2R^{2}}{\delta}, we obtain Fδ+(η)ΣF^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)\le\Sigma, where Σ=λ0R+12R2+Cg+2R2δ\Sigma=\lambda_{0}R+\tfrac12R^{2}+C_{g}+\tfrac{2R^{2}}{\delta}.

(b) A lower bound for FδF^{-}_{\delta}. For RR-bounded ξ=(x,r,p,X)\xi=(x,r,p,X), in the same way,

Fδ(ξ)  λ0RRAxHRAxH+δAxH2Cg=δAxH22RAxHλ0RCg,(3)F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)\ \ge\ -\lambda_{0}R-R|Ax|_{H}-R|Ax|_{H}+\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}-C_{g}=\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}-2R|Ax|_{H}-\lambda_{0}R-C_{g}, \tag{3}

using λ0δh(x)0\lambda_{0}\delta h(x)\ge0, 12pH20\tfrac12|p|_{H}^{2}\ge0 and δ22AxH20\tfrac{\delta^{2}}{2}|Ax|_{H}^{2}\ge0. Since δ(AxHRδ)20\delta\bigl(|Ax|_{H}-\tfrac{R}{\delta}\bigr)^{2}\ge0 gives δAxH22RAxHR2δ\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}-2R|Ax|_{H}\ge-\tfrac{R^{2}}{\delta}, we obtain Fδ(ξ)ΞF^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)\ge\Xi, where Ξ=R2δλ0RCg\Xi=-\tfrac{R^{2}}{\delta}-\lambda_{0}R-C_{g}.

(c) A bound on AxH|Ax|_{H} for admissible data. Let ξ=(x,r,p,X)Sδ,R\xi=(x,r,p,X)\in S^{-}_{\delta,R}. By Test Data for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple and the Admissible Sets §admissible there is an RR-bounded η\eta with Fδ(ξ)<R+Fδ+(η)R+ΣF^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)<R+F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)\le R+\Sigma, so by (3)

δAxH22RAxHK,K=R+Σ+λ0R+Cg  (0).\delta|Ax|_{H}^{2}-2R|Ax|_{H}\le K,\qquad K=R+\Sigma+\lambda_{0}R+C_{g}\ \ (\ge0).

As 2RAxHδ2AxH2+2R2δ2R|Ax|_{H}\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ax|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{2R^{2}}{\delta}, this gives δ2AxH2K+2R2δ\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ax|_{H}^{2}\le K+\tfrac{2R^{2}}{\delta}, so AxHΛ1|Ax|_{H}\le\Lambda_{1}, the nonnegative square root of 2δ(K+2R2δ)\tfrac{2}{\delta}\bigl(K+\tfrac{2R^{2}}{\delta}\bigr).

Let now η=(y,s,p,X)Sδ,R+\eta=(y,s,p',X')\in S^{+}_{\delta,R}. There is an RR-bounded ξ\xi with Fδ+(η)>Fδ(ξ)RΞRF^{+}_{\delta}(\eta)>F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi)-R\ge\Xi-R, so by (2)

δ2AyH22RAyHK,K=λ0R+12R2+CgΞ+R  (0),\tfrac{\delta}{2}|Ay|_{H}^{2}-2R|Ay|_{H}\le K',\qquad K'=\lambda_{0}R+\tfrac12R^{2}+C_{g}-\Xi+R\ \ (\ge0),

and since 2RAyHδ4AyH2+4R2δ2R|Ay|_{H}\le\tfrac{\delta}{4}|Ay|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{4R^{2}}{\delta} we get AyHΛ2|Ay|_{H}\le\Lambda_{2}, the nonnegative square root of 4δ(K+4R2δ)\tfrac{4}{\delta}\bigl(K'+\tfrac{4R^{2}}{\delta}\bigr).

(d) The shift modulus. Put Λ=Λ1+Λ2\Lambda=\Lambda_{1}+\Lambda_{2}, c=R+2Λc=R+2\Lambda and let ω\omega have value ct+12t2ct+\tfrac12t^{2} at a nonnegative tt. Then ω\omega is a modulus of continuity: its values are nonnegative, and for positive ϵ\epsilon every tt with 0tτ0\le t\le\tau, where τ\tau is the smaller of 11 and ϵc+1\tfrac{\epsilon}{c+1}, satisfies 12t212t\tfrac12t^{2}\le\tfrac12 t and hence ω(t)(c+1)tϵ\omega(t)\le(c+1)t\le\epsilon. Note also that ω\omega is nondecreasing on the nonnegative reals, since c0c\ge0.

Let qHq\in H and YSym(H)Y\in\mathrm{Sym}(H). For ξ=(x,r,p,X)Sδ,R\xi=(x,r,p,X)\in S^{-}_{\delta,R} we have Fδ(x,r,p+q,X+Y)=Fδ(x,r,p+q,X)F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p+q,X+Y)=F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p+q,X) by A First-Order Equation Operator is Degenerate Elliptic and Its δ\delta-Shifts Ignore the Form Argument §shifts and claim 1, and, expanding the norm,

Fδ(x,r,p+q,X)Fδ(x,r,p,X)=p+δAx,qH+12qH2+Ax,qH  (R+Λ+Λ)qH+12qH2=ω(qH),F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p+q,X)-F^{-}_{\delta}(x,r,p,X)=\langle p+\delta Ax,q\rangle_{H}+\tfrac12|q|_{H}^{2}+\langle Ax,q\rangle_{H}\ \le\ \bigl(R+\Lambda+\Lambda\bigr)|q|_{H}+\tfrac12|q|_{H}^{2}=\omega\bigl(|q|_{H}\bigr),

using pH<R|p|_{H}<R, δ<1\delta<1 and AxHΛ1Λ|Ax|_{H}\le\Lambda_{1}\le\Lambda. Since ω\omega is nondecreasing, ω(qH)ω(qH+Y)\omega(|q|_{H})\le\omega\bigl(|q|_{H}+\lVert Y\rVert\bigr), which is the first condition of The Shift-Continuity Condition on Admissible Test Data §modulus.

For η=(y,s,p,X)Sδ,R+\eta=(y,s,p',X')\in S^{+}_{\delta,R} we have Fδ+(y,s,p+q,X+Y)=Fδ+(y,s,p+q,X)F^{+}_{\delta}(y,s,p'+q,X'+Y)=F^{+}_{\delta}(y,s,p'+q,X'), again by A First-Order Equation Operator is Degenerate Elliptic and Its δ\delta-Shifts Ignore the Form Argument §shifts and claim 1, and the same computation gives

Fδ+(y,s,p+q,X+Y)Fδ+(y,s,p,X)=pδAy,qH+12qH2+Ay,qH  (R+Λ+Λ)qH  ω(qH+Y),F^{+}_{\delta}(y,s,p'+q,X'+Y)-F^{+}_{\delta}(y,s,p',X')=\langle p'-\delta Ay,q\rangle_{H}+\tfrac12|q|_{H}^{2}+\langle Ay,q\rangle_{H}\ \ge\ -\bigl(R+\Lambda+\Lambda\bigr)|q|_{H}\ \ge\ -\omega\bigl(|q|_{H}+\lVert Y\rVert\bigr),

using 12qH20\tfrac12|q|_{H}^{2}\ge0 and AyHΛ2Λ|Ay|_{H}\le\Lambda_{2}\le\Lambda. Hence ω\omega is a shift modulus for FF at (δ,R)(\delta,R), and as δ\delta and RR were arbitrary, FF satisfies the shift-continuity condition.

Claim 5. By claims 1 to 4 the operator FF satisfies all hypotheses on the operator in A Comparison Principle on a Hilbert Triple under the First-Order Structure Condition, and uu, vv, CC satisfy the remaining ones, so A Comparison Principle on a Hilbert Triple under the First-Order Structure Condition §comparison gives u(x)v(x)u(x)\le v(x) for every xVx\in V.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…