TheoremBase

Proof of Linearisation of a Perturbed Controlled Aggregate Flow Along a Comparison Pair: Exact Variation-of-Constants Identity and Residual Bound

lemmalem:perturbed-flow-linearisation-comparison-pair-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of the perturbed-flow linearisation identity along a comparison pair (P7.2).

Proof

Throughout, C2C^2 and C1C^1 refer to C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set; by claim 1 of Shared-Clock Point Insertion into the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Exact Response Identity, Crude Bound, and Linearisation Defect, each ψc\psi_c is of class C2C^2 on the open set U×VRl+mU\times V\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{l+m}, its partial derivatives satisfy iψcB+K|\partial_i\psi_c|\le B+K and jiψc3K|\partial_j\partial_i\psi_c|\le3K at every point of Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}, and ψc(Σ,α)=Σσβ(σ,γ,Σ,α)\psi_c(\Sigma,\alpha)=\Sigma^\sigma\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha) on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} for c=(σ,γ)c=(\sigma,\gamma). By clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set each iψc\partial_i\psi_c is of class C1C^1 on U×VU\times V, and ψc\psi_c and its first partial derivatives are continuous at every point of U×VU\times V by clause 1 (see also claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous); such a function FF is sequentially continuous at every xU×Vx\in U\times V: given a sequence xnxx_n\to x and ε>0\varepsilon>0, continuity at xx provides δ>0\delta>0 with F(x)F(x)ε|F(x')-F(x)|\le\varepsilon whenever d(x,x)<δd(x',x)<\delta, and d(xn,x)<δd(x_n,x)<\delta for all large nn. We use that vc=2|v_c|=\sqrt{2} (as vc=δγδσv_c=\delta_\gamma-\delta_\sigma with σγ\sigma\neq\gamma has exactly two nonzero coordinates, equal to 11 and 1-1), that L\mathcal{L} has l(l1)l(l-1) elements, that Σ1|\Sigma|\le1 for ΣΔl\Sigma\in\Delta^l (since Σ2=σ(Σσ)2(σΣσ)2=1|\Sigma|^{2}=\sum_\sigma(\Sigma^\sigma)^{2}\le(\sum_\sigma\Sigma^\sigma)^{2}=1, the coordinates being nonnegative with sum 11), so that any two points of Δl\Delta^l are at distance at most 22, and that Δl\Delta^l is convex: if Σ,ΣΔl\Sigma,\Sigma'\in\Delta^l and τ[0,1]\tau\in[0,1], the coordinates of Σ+τ(ΣΣ)=(1τ)Σ+τΣ\Sigma+\tau(\Sigma'-\Sigma)=(1-\tau)\Sigma+\tau\Sigma' are nonnegative and sum to (1τ)+τ=1(1-\tau)+\tau=1, so the point lies in Δl\Delta^l; hence for Σ,ΣΔl\Sigma,\Sigma'\in\Delta^l and αA\alpha\in\mathcal{A} the segment between (Σ,α)(\Sigma,\alpha) and (Σ,α)(\Sigma',\alpha) lies in Δl×AU×V\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}\subseteq U\times V.

Claim 1. For γ{1,,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\} the γ\gamma-th component of vcv_c is 11 if c=(σ,γ)c=(\sigma,\gamma) for some σγ\sigma\neq\gamma, 1-1 if c=(γ,γ)c=(\gamma,\gamma') for some γγ\gamma'\neq\gamma, and 00 otherwise; hence on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A}

bγ(Σ,α)=σ:σγΣσβ(σ,γ,Σ,α)γ:γγΣγβ(γ,γ,Σ,α),b^{\gamma}(\Sigma,\alpha)=\sum_{\sigma:\sigma\neq\gamma}\Sigma^\sigma\beta(\sigma,\gamma,\Sigma,\alpha)-\sum_{\gamma':\gamma'\neq\gamma}\Sigma^\gamma\beta(\gamma,\gamma',\Sigma,\alpha),

which is the γ\gamma-th component of the aggregate state drift. The identity E(Σ,α)z=cvc(gc(Σ,α)z)\mathcal{E}(\Sigma,\alpha)z=\sum_cv_c(g^{c}(\Sigma,\alpha)\cdot z) is recalled from the setting of Shared-Clock Point Insertion into the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Exact Response Identity, Crude Bound, and Linearisation Defect, where it follows from the entry formula Eγη=cvcγηψc\mathcal{E}^{\gamma\eta}=\sum_cv_c^{\gamma}\partial_\eta\psi_c. Since 0ψcB0\le\psi_c\le B on Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} (the coordinate Σσ\Sigma^\sigma lies in [0,1][0,1] and 0βB0\le\beta\le B by clause 1 of Transition-Rate Family), the triangle inequality gives bcvcψc2l(l1)B|b|\le\sum_c|v_c|\psi_c\le\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)B; the bound gcl(B+K)|g^{c}|\le\sqrt{l}(B+K) follows from iψcB+K|\partial_i\psi_c|\le B+K for the ll components; and Ezcvcgcz2l(l1)l(B+K)z|\mathcal{E}z|\le\sum_c|v_c|\,|g^{c}\cdot z|\le\sqrt{2}\,l(l-1)\sqrt{l}(B+K)|z| by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. For measurable xx' and aa' the map u(xu,au)Rl+mu\mapsto(x'_u,a'_u)\in\mathbb{R}^{l+m} is measurable componentwise, and ψc\psi_c, iψc\partial_i\psi_c are continuous on the open set U×VU\times V containing its values, so uψc(xu,au)u\mapsto\psi_c(x'_u,a'_u) and uiψc(xu,au)u\mapsto\partial_i\psi_c(x'_u,a'_u) are measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable (sequential continuity having been noted above); finite linear combinations of these are measurable by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and the bounds just proved show boundedness. The absolute value of a measurable function is measurable (claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) and the Euclidean norm of a bounded measurable Rl\mathbb{R}^l-valued map is bounded measurable (Norm Bound for a Vector-Valued Lebesgue Integral over a Compact Interval), so uduu\mapsto\mathsf{d}_u is bounded measurable, with dul(l1)2l(B+K)\mathsf{d}_u\le l(l-1)\cdot2\sqrt{l}(B+K).

Claim 2. Measurability and boundedness of ρ\rho follow from claim 1 and claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions (the entries of E\mathcal{E}^{\star} are continuous, hence bounded measurable by claim 4 of Measurability of Countable Suprema, Bounded Pointwise Limits, Monotone Functions, and Continuous Functions and Continuous Real-Valued Functions on a Compact Interval are Bounded, and ee is bounded measurable with eu2|e_u|\le2 by the preliminary remarks). Fix u[0,T]u\in[0,T] and a label cc. Apply part (ii) of Multivariate Taylor Expansion with Uniform Second-Order Remainder to f=ψcf=\psi_c on W=U×VW=U\times V with n=l+mn=l+m, at the points (yu,au)(y_u,a_u) and (xu,au)(x_u,a_u), whose segment lies in Δl×A\Delta^l\times\mathcal{A} by convexity, with h=(eu,0)h=(e_u,0), h=eu|h|=|e_u| and M2=3KM_2=3K: since hi=0h_i=0 for i>li>l,

ψc(xu,au)ψc(yu,au)gc(yu,au)eu12(l+m)3Keu2=Λ2eu2.\bigl|\psi_c(x_u,a_u)-\psi_c(y_u,a_u)-g^{c}(y_u,a_u)\cdot e_u\bigr|\le\tfrac12(l+m)\,3K\,|e_u|^{2}=\Lambda_2|e_u|^{2}.

Next apply part (i) of the same lemma to f=iψcf=\partial_i\psi_c (ili\le l), of class C1C^1 on WW, at the points (Su,au)(S_u,a_u) and (yu,au)(y_u,a_u) with h=(yuSu,0)h=(y_u-S_u,0) and M1=3KM_1=3K: iψc(yu,au)iψc(Su,au)l+m3KyuSu|\partial_i\psi_c(y_u,a_u)-\partial_i\psi_c(S_u,a_u)|\le\sqrt{l+m}\,3K\,|y_u-S_u|, so that, summing the squares of the ll components, gc(yu,au)gc(Su,au)ll+m3KyuSu=Λ3yuSu|g^{c}(y_u,a_u)-g^{c}(S_u,a_u)|\le\sqrt{l}\sqrt{l+m}\,3K\,|y_u-S_u|=\Lambda_3|y_u-S_u|. Now, by claim 1,

ρu=cvc(ψc(xu,au)ψc(yu,au)gc(yu,au)eu)+cvc((gc(yu,au)gc(Su,Au))eu),\rho_u=\sum_{c}v_c\Bigl(\psi_c(x_u,a_u)-\psi_c(y_u,a_u)-g^{c}(y_u,a_u)\cdot e_u\Bigr)+\sum_{c}v_c\Bigl(\bigl(g^{c}(y_u,a_u)-g^{c}(S_u,\mathsf{A}_u)\bigr)\cdot e_u\Bigr),

and (gc(yu,au)gc(Su,Au))eu(Λ3yuSu+gc(Su,au)gc(Su,Au))eu|(g^{c}(y_u,a_u)-g^{c}(S_u,\mathsf{A}_u))\cdot e_u|\le\bigl(\Lambda_3|y_u-S_u|+|g^{c}(S_u,a_u)-g^{c}(S_u,\mathsf{A}_u)|\bigr)|e_u| by the triangle inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Taking norms, using vc=2|v_c|=\sqrt{2} and summing over the l(l1)l(l-1) labels gives the stated bound.

Claim 3. Put zt=etmtz_t=e_t-\mathfrak{m}_t, a bounded measurable map. Subtracting the two integral equations of the statement and using linearity of the integral,

zt=e0+[0,t](b(xu,au)b(yu,au))du=e0+[0,t](Euzu+gu)du,gu:=Eumu+ρu,z_t=e_0+\int_{[0,t]}\bigl(b(x_u,a_u)-b(y_u,a_u)\bigr)\,du=e_0+\int_{[0,t]}\bigl(\mathcal{E}^{\star}_u z_u+g_u\bigr)\,du,\qquad g_u:=\mathcal{E}^{\star}_u\mathfrak{m}_u+\rho_u,

since b(xu,au)b(yu,au)=Eueu+ρu=Euzu+Eumu+ρub(x_u,a_u)-b(y_u,a_u)=\mathcal{E}^{\star}_ue_u+\rho_u=\mathcal{E}^{\star}_uz_u+\mathcal{E}^{\star}_u\mathfrak{m}_u+\rho_u by the definition of ρ\rho and claim 1 of Linearity, Compatibility with the Matrix Product, and a Norm Bound for the Matrix-Vector Product. Here gg is bounded measurable (claims 1 and 2). By claims 2 and 3 of Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution applied with k=lk=l, A(u)=EuA(u)=\mathcal{E}^{\star}_u, ξ=e0\xi=e_0 and this gg, the bounded measurable solution zz is given by zt=Φ(t)e0+[0,t]ΦE(t,u)guduz_t=\Phi(t)e_0+\int_{[0,t]}\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)g_u\,du, where Φ(t)=ΦE(t,0)\Phi(t)=\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,0) because Ψ(0)=Il\Psi(0)=I_l by claim 2 of Fundamental Solution and Variation of Constants for Linear Ordinary Differential Equations. Adding mt\mathfrak{m}_t and splitting the integral by linearity gives the identity of claim 3; the integrands uΦE(t,u)Eumuu\mapsto\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)\mathcal{E}^{\star}_u\mathfrak{m}_u and uΦE(t,u)ρuu\mapsto\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)\rho_u are bounded measurable by claim 2 of Variation of Constants with Bounded Measurable Forcing and the Two-Parameter Fundamental Solution.

Claim 4. By claim 3, etΦE(t,0)e0Lt(m)=[0,t]ΦE(t,u)ρudue_t-\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,0)e_0-L_t(\mathfrak{m})=\int_{[0,t]}\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)\rho_u\,du, whose norm is at most [0,t]ΦE(t,u)ρuduΦˉ2[0,t]ρudu\int_{[0,t]}|\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)\rho_u|\,du\le\bar{\Phi}^{2}\int_{[0,t]}|\rho_u|\,du by Norm Bound for a Vector-Valued Lebesgue Integral over a Compact Interval, the bound ΦE(t,u)yΦˉ2y|\Phi^{\mathcal{E}}(t,u)y|\le\bar{\Phi}^{2}|y| of the statement, and monotonicity of the integral.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…