TheoremBase

Proof

We use the [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurability and integral of Lebesgue Integral of a Nonnegative Measurable Function and the [0,∞][0,\infty] conventions of Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure. Fix disjoint decompositions X=⋃iCiX=\bigcup_iC_i, Y=⋃nDnY=\bigcup_nD_n with μ(Ci)<∞\mu(C_i)<\infty, ν(Dn)<∞\nu(D_n)<\infty, and finite measures νn(B)=ν(B∩Dn)\nu_n(B)=\nu(B\cap D_n), μi(A)=μ(A∩Ci)\mu_i(A)=\mu(A\cap C_i), as in Step 0 of the proof of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure. For E∈F⊗GE\in\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G} and x∈Xx\in X, y∈Yy\in Y, write Ex={y:(x,y)∈E}E_x=\{y:(x,y)\in E\} and Ey={x:(x,y)∈E}E^y=\{x:(x,y)\in E\}.

Step 1 (indicator Tonelli). By Steps 1 and 2 of the proof of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure: Ex∈GE_x\in\mathcal{G} for every xx, each x↦νn(Ex)x\mapsto\nu_n(E_x) is real-valued F\mathcal{F}-measurable, and the measure constructed there, which by the uniqueness clause of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure equals μ⊗ν\mu\otimes\nu, satisfies

(μ⊗ν)(E)=∑n∫Xνn(Ex) dμ(x).(\mu\otimes\nu)(E)=\sum_n\int_X\nu_n(E_x)\,d\mu(x).

Now ν(Ex)=∑nνn(Ex)\nu(E_x)=\sum_n\nu_n(E_x) by countable additivity along the disjoint DnD_n, so x↦ν(Ex)x\mapsto\nu(E_x) is [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable (a nondecreasing pointwise supremum of measurable partial sums, using {sup⁡juj>t}=⋃j{uj>t}\{\sup_j u_j>t\}=\bigcup_j\{u_j>t\}), and by Monotone Convergence Theorem together with claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral (finite sums pull out; the partial sums increase),

(μ⊗ν)(E)=∫Xν(Ex) dμ(x).(\mu\otimes\nu)(E)=\int_X\nu(E_x)\,d\mu(x).

Symmetrically, the set function E↦∑i∫Yμi(Ey) dν(y)E\mapsto\sum_i\int_Y\mu_i(E^y)\,d\nu(y) is, by the same arguments with the roles of the factors exchanged, a measure on F⊗G\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G} assigning μ(A)ν(B)\mu(A)\nu(B) to every measurable rectangle; the uniqueness clause of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure identifies it with μ⊗ν\mu\otimes\nu as well, giving

(μ⊗ν)(E)=∫Yμ(Ey) dν(y).(\mu\otimes\nu)(E)=\int_Y\mu(E^y)\,d\nu(y).

Step 2 (sections of functions). Let f:X×Y→[0,∞]f:X\times Y\to[0,\infty] be F⊗G\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{G}-measurable. For fixed xx and real tt, {y:fx(y)>t}=({f>t})x∈G\{y:f_x(y)>t\}=(\{f>t\})_x\in\mathcal{G} by Step 1 sections; hence fxf_x is G\mathcal{G}-measurable, and symmetrically for fy:x↦f(x,y)f^y:x\mapsto f(x,y). This proves the Sections claim.

Step 3 (Tonelli). For indicators f=1Ef=\mathbf{1}_E the three quantities in the display of the statement coincide by Step 1 (note ∫Y(1E)x dν=ν(Ex)\int_Y(\mathbf{1}_E)_x\,d\nu=\nu(E_x)). For nonnegative simple ff the identity follows by linearity (claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral) applied on (Y,G,ν)(Y,\mathcal{G},\nu) for each fixed xx, then on (X,F,μ)(X,\mathcal{F},\mu), then on the product; sums of measurable functions are measurable (rational-union argument with density of the rationals). For general ff, let φL\varphi_L be the dyadic staircase functions of Step 0(b) of the proof of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, extended by φL(∞)=L\varphi_L(\infty)=L; then φL∘f\varphi_L\circ f are nonnegative simple, nondecreasing in LL, with φL∘f↑f\varphi_L\circ f\uparrow f pointwise (at points where f=∞f=\infty the values LL increase to ∞\infty). For each fixed xx, (φL∘f)x↑fx(\varphi_L\circ f)_x\uparrow f_x, so by Monotone Convergence Theorem on (Y,G,ν)(Y,\mathcal{G},\nu),

∫Yfx dν=sup⁡L∫Y(φL∘f)x dν;\int_Yf_x\,d\nu=\sup_L\int_Y(\varphi_L\circ f)_x\,d\nu;

the right side is a nondecreasing supremum of F\mathcal{F}-measurable functions of xx (simple case), so x↦∫Yfx dνx\mapsto\int_Yf_x\,d\nu is measurable, and by Monotone Convergence Theorem on (X,F,μ)(X,\mathcal{F},\mu) (the inner integrals are nondecreasing in LL by monotonicity) and on the product space,

∫X(∫Yfx dν)dμ=sup⁡L∫X(∫Y(φL∘f)x dν)dμ=sup⁡L∫X×YφL∘f d(μ⊗ν)=∫X×Yf d(μ⊗ν).\int_X\Bigl(\int_Yf_x\,d\nu\Bigr)d\mu=\sup_L\int_X\Bigl(\int_Y(\varphi_L\circ f)_x\,d\nu\Bigr)d\mu=\sup_L\int_{X\times Y}\varphi_L\circ f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu).

The other order is symmetric. This proves Tonelli.

Step 4 (Fubini). Let f:X×Y→Rf:X\times Y\to\mathbb{R} be integrable with respect to μ⊗ν\mu\otimes\nu. Applying Step 3 to ∣f∣|f|, the [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable function G(x)=∫Y∣fx∣ dνG(x)=\int_Y|f_x|\,d\nu satisfies ∫XG dμ=∫∣f∣ d(μ⊗ν)<∞\int_XG\,d\mu=\int|f|\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)<\infty. Let N={x:G(x)=∞}=⋂L{G>L}∈FN=\{x:G(x)=\infty\}=\bigcap_L\{G>L\}\in\mathcal{F}. If μ(N)>0\mu(N)>0 then, since G≥L 1NG\ge L\,\mathbf{1}_N pointwise for every real LL, monotonicity and the simple-function integral would give ∫XG dμ≥L μ(N)\int_XG\,d\mu\ge L\,\mu(N) for all LL, contradicting finiteness; so μ(N)=0\mu(N)=0.

For x∉Nx\notin N: (f±)x=(fx)±(f^{\pm})_x=(f_x)^{\pm} are G\mathcal{G}-measurable (Step 2 applied to f±f^{\pm}) with ∫Y(f±)x dν≤G(x)<∞\int_Y(f^{\pm})_x\,d\nu\le G(x)<\infty, so fxf_x is ν\nu-integrable. Define u±(x)=1X∖N(x)∫Y(f±)x dνu^{\pm}(x)=\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus N}(x)\int_Y(f^{\pm})_x\,d\nu; these are real-valued (finite off NN, zero on NN), measurable (for t≥0t\ge0, {u±>t}=(X∖N)∩{∫Y(f±)x dν>t}\{u^{\pm}>t\}=(X\setminus N)\cap\{\int_Y(f^{\pm})_x\,d\nu>t\}, and for t<0t<0 the set is XX), and the function HH of the statement (equal to ∫Yfx dν\int_Yf_x\,d\nu off NN, zero on NN) is H=u+−u−H=u^{+}-u^{-}, with ∣H∣≤1X∖N G≤G|H|\le\mathbf{1}_{X\setminus N}\,G\le G; hence HH is μ\mu-integrable. Moreover u±u^{\pm} and x↦∫Y(f±)x dνx\mapsto\int_Y(f^{\pm})_x\,d\nu differ only on NN, and a [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable function hh supported on the μ\mu-null set NN has ∫h dμ=0\int h\,d\mu=0 (its dyadic approximations are bounded by multiples of 1N\mathbf{1}_N, whose integrals vanish; take the supremum). Hence, by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and Step 3 applied to f±f^{\pm},

∫XH dμ=∫Xu+ dμ−∫Xu− dμ=∫f+ d(μ⊗ν)−∫f− d(μ⊗ν)=∫X×Yf d(μ⊗ν),\int_XH\,d\mu=\int_Xu^{+}\,d\mu-\int_Xu^{-}\,d\mu=\int f^{+}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)-\int f^{-}\,d(\mu\otimes\nu)=\int_{X\times Y}f\,d(\mu\otimes\nu),

the last equality being the definition of the integral of an integrable function. The statement in the other order follows symmetrically. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…