The first clause follows from 0 ≤ c ≤ s by transitivity of the order; the second reads the pair (y,v) of g as v = g(y) = w(n,y) and uses that (n,y) lies in ℕ×X.
Proof of (i). Let with . By Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (viii), , and by the hypothesis on , so by transitivity of the total order (Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (i)). As , Order and Suprema in the Extended Real Line (viii) gives .
Proof of (ii). Let and let be a set with . Then , and since , the pair lies in (by Maps between Classes: Values, Pairs, Extensionality, Restrictions, Constant Maps and Preimages (ii) for , Maps between Classes: Values, Pairs, Extensionality, Restrictions, Constant Maps and Preimages (viii), and Maps between Classes: Values, Pairs, Extensionality, Restrictions, Constant Maps and Preimages (i) for ).
Loading…