TheoremBase

Proof of Uniqueness of the Adjoint, and Existence in Finite Dimensions

theoremthm:adjoint-existence-uniqueness-2026c
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of thm:adjoint-existence-uniqueness-2026c. Carried over from the proof of the 2026b version with the ambient space renamed from H to V, the adjoint reference updated to def:adjoint-operator-2026b, an opening sentence recording that neither claim uses completeness or boundedness, and the boundedness of T and T* moved to a closing paragraph deriving it from lem:finite-orthonormal-basis-operator-bounded-2026b. No step of the argument changed.

Proof

Throughout we use the four conditions of Complex Inner Product Space, the facts in Elementary Properties of a Complex Inner Product, and the properties of finite sums in Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors and Properties of Finite Sums. Write 0V0_{V} for the zero vector. In claim 2, [n][n] denotes the initial segment determined by nn, and by the definition of a tuple the nn-tuple ee is a map from [n][n] to VV with components eke_{k}, so the finite sums below are formed from maps on [n][n] as required. Neither claim uses completeness of VV or boundedness of TT.

Claim 1. Suppose AA and BB are both adjoints of TT, so that ⟨A(u),v⟩=⟨u,T(v)⟩=⟨B(u),v⟩\langle A(u),v\rangle=\langle u,T(v)\rangle=\langle B(u),v\rangle for all u,v∈Vu,v\in V. Fix u∈Vu\in V and put x=A(u)x=A(u) and y=B(u)y=B(u), so that ⟨x,v⟩=⟨y,v⟩\langle x,v\rangle=\langle y,v\rangle for every v∈Vv\in V. By additivity in the first argument (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of a Complex Inner Product) and conjugate homogeneity in the first argument (claim 2 of the same lemma) applied to βˆ’y=(βˆ’1)y-y=(-1)y, where (βˆ’1)y=βˆ’y(-1)y=-y by Elementary Identities in a Vector Space and βˆ’1β€Ύ=βˆ’1\overline{-1}=-1 because βˆ’1-1 is a real number and claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus applies,

⟨x+(βˆ’y),v⟩=⟨x,vβŸ©βˆ’βŸ¨y,v⟩=0(v∈V).\langle x+(-y),v\rangle=\langle x,v\rangle-\langle y,v\rangle=0\qquad(v\in V).

Taking v=x+(βˆ’y)v=x+(-y) gives ⟨x+(βˆ’y),x+(βˆ’y)⟩=0\langle x+(-y),x+(-y)\rangle=0, so x+(βˆ’y)=0Vx+(-y)=0_{V} by claim 4 of Elementary Properties of a Complex Inner Product, that is x=yx=y. As uu was arbitrary, A=BA=B.

Claim 2. Define a map A:V→VA:V\to V by

A(u)=βˆ‘k=1n⟨T(ek),uβŸ©β€‰ek.A(u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl\langle T(e_{k}),u\bigr\rangle\,e_{k}.

AA is a linear operator. Let u,uβ€²βˆˆVu,u'\in V and λ∈C\lambda\in\mathbb{C}. By additivity in the second argument (condition 2 of Complex Inner Product Space) we have ⟨T(ek),u+uβ€²βŸ©=⟨T(ek),u⟩+⟨T(ek),uβ€²βŸ©\langle T(e_{k}),u+u'\rangle=\langle T(e_{k}),u\rangle+\langle T(e_{k}),u'\rangle for every k∈[n]k\in[n], so by the vector space identity (Ξ±+Ξ²)x=Ξ±x+Ξ²x(\alpha+\beta)x=\alpha x+\beta x and claim 2 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors,

A(u+uβ€²)=βˆ‘k=1n(⟨T(ek),u⟩ek+⟨T(ek),uβ€²βŸ©ek)=A(u)+A(uβ€²).A(u+u')=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\Bigl(\langle T(e_{k}),u\rangle e_{k}+\langle T(e_{k}),u'\rangle e_{k}\Bigr)=A(u)+A(u').

Similarly, by homogeneity in the second argument (condition 3) and the identity (Ξ±Ξ²)x=Ξ±(Ξ²x)(\alpha\beta)x=\alpha(\beta x) together with claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors,

A(Ξ»u)=βˆ‘k=1n(λ⟨T(ek),u⟩)ek=λ A(u).A(\lambda u)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl(\lambda\langle T(e_{k}),u\rangle\bigr)e_{k}=\lambda\,A(u).

Thus AA is a linear map from VV to VV, hence a linear operator on VV.

AA is an adjoint of TT. Let u,v∈Vu,v\in V. By the second identity of claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, applied with the scalars ck=⟨T(ek),u⟩c_{k}=\langle T(e_{k}),u\rangle and the vectors eke_{k}, and then conjugate symmetry (condition 1 of Complex Inner Product Space),

⟨A(u),v⟩=βˆ‘k=1n⟨T(ek),uβŸ©β€Ύβ€‰βŸ¨ek,v⟩=βˆ‘k=1n⟨u,T(ek)βŸ©β€‰βŸ¨ek,v⟩.\langle A(u),v\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\overline{\bigl\langle T(e_{k}),u\bigr\rangle}\,\langle e_{k},v\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl\langle u,T(e_{k})\bigr\rangle\,\langle e_{k},v\rangle .

On the other hand, since ee is an orthonormal basis, claim 1 of Orthonormal Expansion and Parseval's Identity in Finite Dimensions gives v=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,v⟩ekv=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},v\rangle e_{k}; applying TT and using claim 4 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors with the homogeneity of TT,

T(v)=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,vβŸ©β€‰T(ek),T(v)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},v\rangle\,T(e_{k}),

so by the first identity of claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors,

⟨u,T(v)⟩=βˆ‘k=1n⟨ek,vβŸ©β€‰βŸ¨u,T(ek)⟩.\langle u,T(v)\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\langle e_{k},v\rangle\,\bigl\langle u,T(e_{k})\bigr\rangle .

The two nn-tuples in C\mathbb{C} being summed coincide by the commutativity of multiplication in the field of complex numbers, so their finite sums coincide and ⟨A(u),v⟩=⟨u,T(v)⟩\langle A(u),v\rangle=\langle u,T(v)\rangle. Thus AA satisfies the condition of the definition of an adjoint.

By claim 1 the adjoint is unique, so Tβˆ—=AT^{*}=A and the displayed formula holds. Finally, that condition involves only βŸ¨β‹…,β‹…βŸ©\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle and TT; hence the operator obtained from any other orthonormal basis of VV by the same construction is also an adjoint of TT and therefore equals Tβˆ—T^{*}.

Boundedness. Since VV has the orthonormal basis ee, Every Linear Operator on a Space with a Finite Orthonormal Basis is Bounded applies to every linear operator on VV; in particular TT and Tβˆ—T^{*} are bounded linear operators.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…