The restriction as an image measure. Let ι:X→X be the identity. For G∈G we have ι−1(G)=G∈F, so ι is F/G-measurable, and its image measure μ∘ι−1 is the function on G with
(μ∘ι−1)(G)=μ(G)=μ∣G(G)(G∈G).
Hence μ∘ι−1=μ∣G. Moreover f∘ι=f for every function f on X.
Nonnegative functions. Let f∈M+(X,G). Since f=f∘ι is the composite of an F/G-measurable and a G/B([0,∞])-measurable function, f∈M+(X,F) (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (ii)). The change-of-variables formula Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables (ii), with T=ι and (Y,G)=(X,G), gives
∫Xfd(μ∣G)=∫Xfd(μ∘ι−1)=∫Xf∘ιdμ=∫Xfdμ,
which is (i).
Real functions. Let f:X→R be G/B(R)-measurable. As before, f=f∘ι is F/B(R)-measurable (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (ii)). By Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables (iii), again with T=ι, f∈L1(μ∘ι−1)=L1(X,G,μ∣G) if and only if f=f∘ι∈L1(μ), and then
∫Xfd(μ∣G)=∫Xf∘ιdμ=∫Xfdμ,
which is (ii).
Integrals over sets of G. Let G∈G; then also G∈F. For f∈M+(X,G), the product f1G lies in M+(X,G) and ∫Gfd(μ∣G)=∫Xf1Gd(μ∣G), by Integrals over Measurable Subsets (i) in the measure space (X,G,μ∣G); by (i) this equals ∫Xf1Gdμ, which is ∫Gfdμ by the same clause in (X,F,μ). This proves (iii).
Now let f be as in (iv). The indicator 1G is G/B(R)-measurable (Basic Properties of the Integral of Nonnegative Measurable Maps (ii) in (X,G,μ∣G), with Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (vii)), hence so is the real product f1G (Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (i)). By Integrals over Measurable Subsets (ii), applied in (X,G,μ∣G) and in (X,F,μ), f is integrable on G with respect to μ∣G if and only if f1G∈L1(X,G,μ∣G), and integrable on G with respect to μ if and only if f1G∈L1(μ); by (ii) applied to f1G these two conditions are equivalent, and then
∫Gfd(μ∣G)=∫Xf1Gd(μ∣G)=∫Xf1Gdμ=∫Gfdμ.
This proves (iv).