Throughout, "measurable" for a real-valued map means measurable with respect to the relevant σ-algebra and B(R); we use claims 1 to 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions for constants, indicators, sums and products of measurable maps, and claims 2 and 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure (monotonicity, countable subadditivity) together with countable additivity of P (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure). Generic Borel sets are written B′, the letter B being the rate bound. Fix a transition label c for the whole proof, and write z=yc,⋅=(yc,1,…,yc,Jc)∈N0Jc for the c-block of a vector y∈N0L.
Step 0 (the clocks depend on y only through the c-block). By the definition of the deterministic-count clocks in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, Pu(y),c=1Ω0U∑j=1Jc∑i=1yc,j1{Uic,j≤u} involves y only through yc,⋅. Hence for z∈N0Jc we may write P[z],c for P(y),c with any y satisfying yc,⋅=z (a notation coined here), and Pu♯,c(ω)=Pu[Kc,⋅(ω)],c(ω) for every ω and u≥0, the c-block of K(ω) being Kc,⋅(ω). By claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, each Pu[z],c is U-measurable, and Pu[z],c(ω)=puc,(z)(ω) for ω∈Ω0U and u∈[0,R]. By claim 1 of the same lemma, Ω0U∈U with P(Ω0U)=1, each Kc,j is V-measurable with values in N0, and U and V are independent, i.e. P(A∩A′)=P(A)P(A′) for A∈V and A′∈U.
Step 1 (claim 1). Fix r, 0≤u0<⋯<ur≤R and B1′,…,Br′ as in claim 1. Write E♯ for the event on the left of the display in claim 1, and for z∈N0Jc put
Ez=⋂k=1r{Puk[z],c−Puk−1[z],c∈Bk′},Ez′=⋂k=1r{pukc,(z)−puk−1c,(z)∈Bk′},Dz={Kc,⋅=z}=⋂j=1Jc{Kc,j=zj}.
Then Ez∈U (preimages of Borel sets under U-measurable differences), Dz∈V, and Ez′∈F (each puc,(z) is a random variable by claim 2 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion). The events Dz, z∈N0Jc, are pairwise disjoint with union Ω, because Kc,⋅ takes values in N0Jc. The set N0Jc is countable: N0=N∪{0} is countable by claims 1 and 6 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets, and its Jc-th power is countable by claim 2 of Products and Powers of Countable Sets. Fix a sequence (zn)n∈N whose set of terms is N0Jc. Whenever below we sum a family (P(Az))z∈N0Jc of probabilities of pairwise disjoint events Az, we mean the sum ∑n∈NP(An′) with An′=Azn if zn∈/{z1,…,zn−1} and An′=∅ otherwise; the events An′ are pairwise disjoint with ⋃nAn′=⋃zAz, so countable additivity gives P(⋃zAz)=∑zP(Az) in this sense, and the same convention (dropping repeated terms) is used for sums of products P(Dz)P(Ez) and P(Dz)P(Ez′), which are then compared term by term.
(a) E♯=⋃z(Dz∩Ez). Indeed, for ω∈Dz we have Kc,⋅(ω)=z, so by Step 0 Pu♯,c(ω)=Pu[z],c(ω) for every u, and therefore ω∈E♯ if and only if ω∈Ez. By countable additivity and the independence of U and V,
P(E♯)=∑zP(Dz∩Ez)=∑zP(Dz)P(Ez).
(b) P(Ez)=P(Ez′) for every z. By Step 0, Ez∩Ω0U=Ez′∩Ω0U (all uk lie in [0,R]), so each of Ez, Ez′ is contained in the union of the other with Ω∖Ω0U, and monotonicity with subadditivity give P(Ez)≤P(Ez′)+P(Ω∖Ω0U)=P(Ez′) and symmetrically P(Ez′)≤P(Ez), using P(Ω∖Ω0U)=1−P(Ω0U)=0 (claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure).
(c) The conditional-law identity. Let R[0,R] carry the cylinder σ-algebra C of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion, generated by the coordinate maps evu, and put
F=1A,A=⋂k=1r{x∈R[0,R]: evuk(x)−evuk−1(x)∈Bk′}.
Each evu is measurable from C to B(R) (the sets evu−1(B′) generate C), so each difference evuk−evuk−1 is measurable, A is a finite intersection of preimages of Borel sets and lies in C, and F:R[0,R]→[0,∞] is C-measurable. For the maps pc,pc,(z):Ω→R[0,R] (measurable with respect to F and C by claim 3 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion) we have F(pc,(z))=1Ez′ and F(pc)=1E′, where
E′=⋂k=1r{pukc−puk−1c∈Bk′},
the event on the right of the first equality in claim 1. Claim 3 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion, applied for the label c (whose data Kc, (Vic)i, (Uic,j)j,i and cells Ic,1,…,Ic,Jc are those of that lemma, as recorded in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), with this F and y=z gives, the expectation of the indicator of an event being the probability of that event (Simple Function and Its Integral),
P(E′∩Dz)=E[F(pc)1{Kc,⋅=z}]=P(Kc,⋅=z)E[F(pc,(z))]=P(Dz)P(Ez′).
(d) Assembly. By (a), (b), (c) and countable additivity over the partition (Dz)z of Ω,
P(E♯)=∑zP(Dz)P(Ez)=∑zP(Dz)P(Ez′)=∑zP(E′∩Dz)=P(E′),
which is the first equality of claim 1. For the second, claim 2 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion states that the increments pu1c−pu0c,…,purc−pur−1c are independent with pukc−puk−1c Poisson with parameter uk−uk−1; by Independence of Events and of Random Variables (with the full index set) and Distribution and Cumulative Distribution Function of a Random Variable,
P(E′)=∏k=1rP(pukc−puk−1c∈Bk′)=∏k=1rPuk−uk−1(Bk′).
Step 2 (claim 2). Every path of P♯,c is a counting path by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, and a counting path vanishes at 0 by condition 1 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times; hence P0♯,c=0 everywhere. Next let 0≤u<u′≤R. Claim 1 with r=1, u0=u, u1=u′ gives P(Pu′♯,c−Pu♯,c∈B′)=Pu′−u(B′) for every Borel set B′; the increment is a random variable (a difference of the F-measurable variables of claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), so its distribution is Pu′−u, i.e. it is Poisson with parameter u′−u. Finally let 0≤u0<⋯<ur≤R and write Xk=Puk♯,c−Puk−1♯,c. For Borel sets B1′,…,Br′ and a nonempty S⊆{1,…,r}, apply claim 1 with Bk′ replaced by R for k∈/S (so that {Xk∈R}=Ω and Puk−uk−1(R)=1): P(⋂k∈S{Xk∈Bk′})=∏k∈SPuk−uk−1(Bk′)=∏k∈SP(Xk∈Bk′), the last step by the single-increment case just proved. This is the independence of X1,…,Xr in the sense of Independence of Events and of Random Variables.
Step 3 (claim 3). Let n≤R be a natural number. Every path of P♯,c is a counting path and every Pu♯,c is F-measurable by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, so P♯,c is a stochastic process on (Ω,F,P) with counting paths; and for integers 0≤i<i′≤n≤R the increment Pi′♯,c−Pi♯,c is Poisson with parameter i′−i by claim 2. These are exactly the hypotheses of Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid for this n and an arbitrary natural number in the role of the window length called m there (the m of the present setting is the control dimension and plays no role here).