Proof of The Copy Clocks Have Independent Poisson Increments on the Clock Interval: Law Identity with the Uniform Poisson Path and Applicability of the Window Discrepancy Bound
lemmalem:copy-clocks-poisson-increments-2026aThroughout, "measurable" for a real-valued map means measurable with respect to the relevant -algebra and ; we use claims 1 to 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions for constants, indicators, sums and products of measurable maps, and claims 2 and 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure (monotonicity, countable subadditivity) together with countable additivity of (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure). Generic Borel sets are written , the letter being the rate bound. Fix a transition label for the whole proof, and write for the -block of a vector .
Step 0 (the clocks depend on only through the -block). By the definition of the deterministic-count clocks in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, involves only through . Hence for we may write for with any satisfying (a notation coined here), and for every and , the -block of being . By claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, each is -measurable, and for and . By claim 1 of the same lemma, with , each is -measurable with values in , and and are independent, i.e. for and .
Step 1 (claim 1). Fix , and as in claim 1. Write for the event on the left of the display in claim 1, and for put Then (preimages of Borel sets under -measurable differences), , and (each is a random variable by claim 2 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion). The events , , are pairwise disjoint with union , because takes values in . The set is countable: is countable by claims 1 and 6 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets, and its -th power is countable by claim 2 of Products and Powers of Countable Sets. Fix a sequence whose set of terms is . Whenever below we sum a family of probabilities of pairwise disjoint events , we mean the sum with if and otherwise; the events are pairwise disjoint with , so countable additivity gives in this sense, and the same convention (dropping repeated terms) is used for sums of products and , which are then compared term by term.
(a) . Indeed, for we have , so by Step 0 for every , and therefore if and only if . By countable additivity and the independence of and ,
(b) for every . By Step 0, (all lie in ), so each of , is contained in the union of the other with , and monotonicity with subadditivity give and symmetrically , using (claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure).
(c) The conditional-law identity. Let carry the cylinder -algebra of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion, generated by the coordinate maps , and put Each is measurable from to (the sets generate ), so each difference is measurable, is a finite intersection of preimages of Borel sets and lies in , and is -measurable. For the maps (measurable with respect to and by claim 3 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion) we have and , where the event on the right of the first equality in claim 1. Claim 3 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion, applied for the label (whose data , , and cells are those of that lemma, as recorded in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), with this and gives, the expectation of the indicator of an event being the probability of that event (Simple Function and Its Integral),
(d) Assembly. By (a), (b), (c) and countable additivity over the partition of , which is the first equality of claim 1. For the second, claim 2 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion states that the increments are independent with Poisson with parameter ; by Independence of Events and of Random Variables (with the full index set) and Distribution and Cumulative Distribution Function of a Random Variable,
Step 2 (claim 2). Every path of is a counting path by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, and a counting path vanishes at by condition 1 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times; hence everywhere. Next let . Claim 1 with , , gives for every Borel set ; the increment is a random variable (a difference of the -measurable variables of claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), so its distribution is , i.e. it is Poisson with parameter . Finally let and write . For Borel sets and a nonempty , apply claim 1 with replaced by for (so that and ): , the last step by the single-increment case just proved. This is the independence of in the sense of Independence of Events and of Random Variables.
Step 3 (claim 3). Let be a natural number. Every path of is a counting path and every is -measurable by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, so is a stochastic process on with counting paths; and for integers the increment is Poisson with parameter by claim 2. These are exactly the hypotheses of Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid for this and an arbitrary natural number in the role of the window length called there (the of the present setting is the control dimension and plays no role here).
Loading…
Prerequisites
6deeace2-ac7c-43fd-a831-35d63a551ae0