TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, "measurable" for a real-valued map means measurable with respect to the relevant σ\sigma-algebra and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}); we use claims 1 to 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions for constants, indicators, sums and products of measurable maps, and claims 2 and 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure (monotonicity, countable subadditivity) together with countable additivity of PP (Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure). Generic Borel sets are written B′B', the letter BB being the rate bound. Fix a transition label cc for the whole proof, and write z=yc,⋅=(yc,1,…,yc,Jc)∈N0Jcz=y_{c,\cdot}=(y_{c,1},\dots,y_{c,J_c})\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c} for the cc-block of a vector y∈N0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}.

Step 0 (the clocks depend on yy only through the cc-block). By the definition of the deterministic-count clocks in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, Pu(y),c=1Ω0U∑j=1Jc∑i=1yc,j1{Uic,j≤u}\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega^{U}_0}\sum_{j=1}^{J_c}\sum_{i=1}^{y_{c,j}}\mathbf{1}\{U^{c,j}_i\le u\} involves yy only through yc,⋅y_{c,\cdot}. Hence for z∈N0Jcz\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c} we may write P[z],c\mathsf{P}^{[z],c} for P(y),c\mathsf{P}^{(y),c} with any yy satisfying yc,⋅=zy_{c,\cdot}=z (a notation coined here), and Pu♯,c(ω)=Pu[Kc,⋅(ω)],c(ω)\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{[\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot}(\omega)],c}_u(\omega) for every ω\omega and u≥0u\ge0, the cc-block of K(ω)\mathsf{K}(\omega) being Kc,⋅(ω)\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot}(\omega). By claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, each Pu[z],c\mathsf{P}^{[z],c}_u is U\mathcal{U}-measurable, and Pu[z],c(ω)=puc,(z)(ω)\mathsf{P}^{[z],c}_u(\omega)=p^{c,(z)}_u(\omega) for ω∈Ω0U\omega\in\Omega^{U}_0 and u∈[0,R]u\in[0,R]. By claim 1 of the same lemma, Ω0U∈U\Omega^{U}_0\in\mathcal{U} with P(Ω0U)=1P(\Omega^{U}_0)=1, each Kc,j\mathsf{K}_{c,j} is V\mathcal{V}-measurable with values in N0\mathbb{N}_0, and U\mathcal{U} and V\mathcal{V} are independent, i.e. P(A∩A′)=P(A)P(A′)P(A\cap A')=P(A)P(A') for A∈VA\in\mathcal{V} and A′∈UA'\in\mathcal{U}.

Step 1 (claim 1). Fix rr, 0≤u0<⋯<ur≤R0\le u_0<\dots<u_r\le R and B1′,…,Br′B'_1,\dots,B'_r as in claim 1. Write E♯E^{\sharp} for the event on the left of the display in claim 1, and for z∈N0Jcz\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c} put Ez=⋂k=1r{Puk[z],c−Puk−1[z],c∈Bk′},Ez′=⋂k=1r{pukc,(z)−puk−1c,(z)∈Bk′},Dz={Kc,⋅=z}=⋂j=1Jc{Kc,j=zj}.E_z=\bigcap_{k=1}^{r}\bigl\{\mathsf{P}^{[z],c}_{u_k}-\mathsf{P}^{[z],c}_{u_{k-1}}\in B'_k\bigr\},\qquad E'_z=\bigcap_{k=1}^{r}\bigl\{p^{c,(z)}_{u_k}-p^{c,(z)}_{u_{k-1}}\in B'_k\bigr\},\qquad D_z=\{\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot}=z\}=\bigcap_{j=1}^{J_c}\{\mathsf{K}_{c,j}=z_j\}. Then Ez∈UE_z\in\mathcal{U} (preimages of Borel sets under U\mathcal{U}-measurable differences), Dz∈VD_z\in\mathcal{V}, and Ez′∈FE'_z\in\mathcal{F} (each puc,(z)p^{c,(z)}_u is a random variable by claim 2 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion). The events DzD_z, z∈N0Jcz\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c}, are pairwise disjoint with union Ω\Omega, because Kc,⋅\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot} takes values in N0Jc\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c}. The set N0Jc\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c} is countable: N0=N∪{0}\mathbb{N}_0=\mathbb{N}\cup\{0\} is countable by claims 1 and 6 of Basic Properties of Countable Sets, and its JcJ_c-th power is countable by claim 2 of Products and Powers of Countable Sets. Fix a sequence (zn)n∈N(z_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} whose set of terms is N0Jc\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c}. Whenever below we sum a family (P(Az))z∈N0Jc(P(A_z))_{z\in\mathbb{N}_0^{J_c}} of probabilities of pairwise disjoint events AzA_z, we mean the sum ∑n∈NP(An′)\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}P(A'_n) with An′=AznA'_n=A_{z_n} if zn∉{z1,…,zn−1}z_n\notin\{z_1,\dots,z_{n-1}\} and An′=∅A'_n=\emptyset otherwise; the events An′A'_n are pairwise disjoint with ⋃nAn′=⋃zAz\bigcup_nA'_n=\bigcup_zA_z, so countable additivity gives P(⋃zAz)=∑zP(Az)P(\bigcup_zA_z)=\sum_zP(A_z) in this sense, and the same convention (dropping repeated terms) is used for sums of products P(Dz)P(Ez)P(D_z)P(E_z) and P(Dz)P(Ez′)P(D_z)P(E'_z), which are then compared term by term.

(a) E♯=⋃z(Dz∩Ez)E^{\sharp}=\bigcup_{z}(D_z\cap E_z). Indeed, for ω∈Dz\omega\in D_z we have Kc,⋅(ω)=z\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot}(\omega)=z, so by Step 0 Pu♯,c(ω)=Pu[z],c(ω)\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{[z],c}_u(\omega) for every uu, and therefore ω∈E♯\omega\in E^{\sharp} if and only if ω∈Ez\omega\in E_z. By countable additivity and the independence of U\mathcal{U} and V\mathcal{V}, P(E♯)=∑zP(Dz∩Ez)=∑zP(Dz) P(Ez).P(E^{\sharp})=\sum_{z}P(D_z\cap E_z)=\sum_{z}P(D_z)\,P(E_z).

(b) P(Ez)=P(Ez′)P(E_z)=P(E'_z) for every zz. By Step 0, Ez∩Ω0U=Ez′∩Ω0UE_z\cap\Omega^{U}_0=E'_z\cap\Omega^{U}_0 (all uku_k lie in [0,R][0,R]), so each of EzE_z, Ez′E'_z is contained in the union of the other with Ω∖Ω0U\Omega\setminus\Omega^{U}_0, and monotonicity with subadditivity give P(Ez)≤P(Ez′)+P(Ω∖Ω0U)=P(Ez′)P(E_z)\le P(E'_z)+P(\Omega\setminus\Omega^{U}_0)=P(E'_z) and symmetrically P(Ez′)≤P(Ez)P(E'_z)\le P(E_z), using P(Ω∖Ω0U)=1−P(Ω0U)=0P(\Omega\setminus\Omega^{U}_0)=1-P(\Omega^{U}_0)=0 (claim 3 of Basic Properties of a Measure).

(c) The conditional-law identity. Let R[0,R]\mathbb{R}^{[0,R]} carry the cylinder σ\sigma-algebra C\mathcal{C} of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion, generated by the coordinate maps evu\mathrm{ev}_u, and put F=1A,A=⋂k=1r{x∈R[0,R]: evuk(x)−evuk−1(x)∈Bk′}.F=\mathbf{1}_{A},\qquad A=\bigcap_{k=1}^{r}\bigl\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{[0,R]}:\ \mathrm{ev}_{u_k}(x)-\mathrm{ev}_{u_{k-1}}(x)\in B'_k\bigr\}. Each evu\mathrm{ev}_u is measurable from C\mathcal{C} to B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) (the sets evu−1(B′)\mathrm{ev}_u^{-1}(B') generate C\mathcal{C}), so each difference evuk−evuk−1\mathrm{ev}_{u_k}-\mathrm{ev}_{u_{k-1}} is measurable, AA is a finite intersection of preimages of Borel sets and lies in C\mathcal{C}, and F:R[0,R]→[0,∞]F:\mathbb{R}^{[0,R]}\to[0,\infty] is C\mathcal{C}-measurable. For the maps pc,pc,(z):Ω→R[0,R]p^{c},p^{c,(z)}:\Omega\to\mathbb{R}^{[0,R]} (measurable with respect to F\mathcal{F} and C\mathcal{C} by claim 3 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion) we have F(pc,(z))=1Ez′F(p^{c,(z)})=\mathbf{1}_{E'_z} and F(pc)=1E′F(p^{c})=\mathbf{1}_{E'}, where E′=⋂k=1r{pukc−puk−1c∈Bk′},E'=\bigcap_{k=1}^{r}\bigl\{p^{c}_{u_k}-p^{c}_{u_{k-1}}\in B'_k\bigr\}, the event on the right of the first equality in claim 1. Claim 3 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion, applied for the label cc (whose data KcK^{c}, (Vic)i(V^{c}_i)_i, (Uic,j)j,i(U^{c,j}_i)_{j,i} and cells Ic,1,…,Ic,JcI_{c,1},\dots,I_{c,J_c} are those of that lemma, as recorded in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), with this FF and y=zy=z gives, the expectation of the indicator of an event being the probability of that event (Simple Function and Its Integral), P(E′∩Dz)=E[F(pc)1{Kc,⋅=z}]=P(Kc,⋅=z) E[F(pc,(z))]=P(Dz) P(Ez′).P(E'\cap D_z)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[F(p^{c})\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot}=z\}\bigr]=P(\mathsf{K}_{c,\cdot}=z)\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[F(p^{c,(z)})\bigr]=P(D_z)\,P(E'_z).

(d) Assembly. By (a), (b), (c) and countable additivity over the partition (Dz)z(D_z)_z of Ω\Omega, P(E♯)=∑zP(Dz)P(Ez)=∑zP(Dz)P(Ez′)=∑zP(E′∩Dz)=P(E′),P(E^{\sharp})=\sum_{z}P(D_z)P(E_z)=\sum_{z}P(D_z)P(E'_z)=\sum_{z}P(E'\cap D_z)=P(E'), which is the first equality of claim 1. For the second, claim 2 of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion states that the increments pu1c−pu0c,…,purc−pur−1cp^{c}_{u_1}-p^{c}_{u_0},\dots,p^{c}_{u_r}-p^{c}_{u_{r-1}} are independent with pukc−puk−1cp^{c}_{u_k}-p^{c}_{u_{k-1}} Poisson with parameter uk−uk−1u_k-u_{k-1}; by Independence of Events and of Random Variables (with the full index set) and Distribution and Cumulative Distribution Function of a Random Variable, P(E′)=∏k=1rP(pukc−puk−1c∈Bk′)=∏k=1rPuk−uk−1(Bk′).P(E')=\prod_{k=1}^{r}P\bigl(p^{c}_{u_k}-p^{c}_{u_{k-1}}\in B'_k\bigr)=\prod_{k=1}^{r}P_{u_k-u_{k-1}}(B'_k).

Step 2 (claim 2). Every path of P♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} is a counting path by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, and a counting path vanishes at 00 by condition 1 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times; hence P0♯,c=0\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0=0 everywhere. Next let 0≤u<u′≤R0\le u<u'\le R. Claim 1 with r=1r=1, u0=uu_0=u, u1=u′u_1=u' gives P(Pu′♯,c−Pu♯,c∈B′)=Pu′−u(B′)P(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u'}-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u}\in B')=P_{u'-u}(B') for every Borel set B′B'; the increment is a random variable (a difference of the F\mathcal{F}-measurable variables of claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), so its distribution is Pu′−uP_{u'-u}, i.e. it is Poisson with parameter u′−uu'-u. Finally let 0≤u0<⋯<ur≤R0\le u_0<\dots<u_r\le R and write Xk=Puk♯,c−Puk−1♯,cX_k=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u_k}-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u_{k-1}}. For Borel sets B1′,…,Br′B'_1,\dots,B'_r and a nonempty S⊆{1,…,r}S\subseteq\{1,\dots,r\}, apply claim 1 with Bk′B'_k replaced by R\mathbb{R} for k∉Sk\notin S (so that {Xk∈R}=Ω\{X_k\in\mathbb{R}\}=\Omega and Puk−uk−1(R)=1P_{u_k-u_{k-1}}(\mathbb{R})=1): P(⋂k∈S{Xk∈Bk′})=∏k∈SPuk−uk−1(Bk′)=∏k∈SP(Xk∈Bk′)P(\bigcap_{k\in S}\{X_k\in B'_k\})=\prod_{k\in S}P_{u_k-u_{k-1}}(B'_k)=\prod_{k\in S}P(X_k\in B'_k), the last step by the single-increment case just proved. This is the independence of X1,…,XrX_1,\dots,X_r in the sense of Independence of Events and of Random Variables.

Step 3 (claim 3). Let n≤Rn\le R be a natural number. Every path of P♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} is a counting path and every Pu♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u is F\mathcal{F}-measurable by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, so P♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} is a stochastic process on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) with counting paths; and for integers 0≤i<i′≤n≤R0\le i<i'\le n\le R the increment Pi′♯,c−Pi♯,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{i'}-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{i} is Poisson with parameter i′−ii'-i by claim 2. These are exactly the hypotheses of Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid for this nn and an arbitrary natural number in the role of the window length called mm there (the mm of the present setting is the control dimension and plays no role here).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…