TheoremBase

Proof of Properties of the Ito Integral: Linearity, Isometry, Martingale Property, and Mean-Square Continuity

theoremthm:ito-integral-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial publication of the proof (limit transfer of the elementary properties; mean-square continuity via absolute continuity of the integral), with its theorem (batch publication approved by coauthor).

Proof

Fix approximating sequences (Hk)(H^k) for HH and (Gk)(G^k) for GG in the sense of Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Extension of the Elementary Stochastic Integral, write I=0THtdMtI=\int_0^T H_t\,dM_t and J=0TGtdMtJ=\int_0^T G_t\,dM_t for the It^{o} integrals, Ik,JkI^k,J^k for the corresponding elementary integrals over (0,T](0,T], and 2\lVert\cdot\rVert_2 for the mean-square norm of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. Throughout we use the triangle and Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities, and the elementary pointwise bounds (x+y)22x2+2y2(x+y)^2\le2x^2+2y^2 and, for δ>0\delta>0, (x+y)2(1+δ)x2+(1+δ1)y2(x+y)^{2}\le(1+\delta)x^{2}+(1+\delta^{-1})y^{2} (from 2xyδx2+δ1y22xy\le\delta x^{2}+\delta^{-1}y^{2}).

Step 1 (Linearity). Each aHk+bGkaH^k+bG^k is a simple adapted process (claim 1 of Linearity, Mean Zero, and Isometry of the Elementary Stochastic Integral). The sequence (aHk+bGk)(aH^k+bG^k) satisfies condition (b) of Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Extension of the Elementary Stochastic Integral for aH+bGaH+bG at every tt, since aHtk+bGtk(aHt+bGt)2aHtkHt2+bGtkGt20\lVert aH^k_t+bG^k_t-(aH_t+bG_t)\rVert_2\le|a|\lVert H^k_t-H_t\rVert_2+|b|\lVert G^k_t-G_t\rVert_2\to0; and condition (a), since pointwise in tt

E[(a(HtjHtk)+b(GtjGtk))2]2a2E[(HtjHtk)2]+2b2E[(GtjGtk)2],\mathbb{E}\bigl[(a(H^j_t-H^k_t)+b(G^j_t-G^k_t))^{2}\bigr]\le2a^{2}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[(H^j_t-H^k_t)^{2}\bigr]+2b^{2}\,\mathbb{E}\bigl[(G^j_t-G^k_t)^{2}\bigr],

and the Lebesgue integral is monotone and linear (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral). Hence aH+bGaH+bG is It^{o} integrable, and by claim 1 of Linearity, Mean Zero, and Isometry of the Elementary Stochastic Integral its elementary approximants satisfy 0T(aHtk+bGtk)dMt=aIk+bJk\int_0^T(aH^k_t+bG^k_t)\,dM_t=aI^k+bJ^k, which converges in mean square both to 0T(aHt+bGt)dMt\int_0^T(aH_t+bG_t)\,dM_t (by Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Extension of the Elementary Stochastic Integral) and to aI+bJaI+bJ; two mean-square limits of one sequence are at mean-square distance 00, hence almost surely equal by the null-equivalence clause of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product.

Step 2 (Moments and polarization). E[I]=0\mathbb{E}[I]=0 and E[I2]=HM2\mathbb{E}[I^{2}]=\lVert H\rVert_M^{2} are claim 3 of Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Extension of the Elementary Stochastic Integral. By Step 1, H±GH\pm G are It^{o} integrable with approximating sequences (Hk±Gk)(H^k\pm G^k), so by claim 3 of Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Extension of the Elementary Stochastic Integral the limits H±GM2=limk1(0,T]E[(Hk±Gk)2]ρdλ\lVert H\pm G\rVert_M^{2}=\lim_k\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k\pm G^k)^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda exist, do not depend on the chosen approximating sequences, and equal E[(I±J)2]\mathbb{E}[(I\pm J)^{2}] (using Step 1 to identify (H±G)dM\int(H\pm G)\,dM with I±JI\pm J almost surely; almost surely equal square-integrable random variables have equal second moments, their mean-square distance being 00). Pointwise in tt, expanding squares gives E[HtkGtk]=14(E[(Htk+Gtk)2]E[(HtkGtk)2])\mathbb{E}[H^k_tG^k_t]=\tfrac14\bigl(\mathbb{E}[(H^k_t+G^k_t)^{2}]-\mathbb{E}[(H^k_t-G^k_t)^{2}]\bigr), and all three functions are measurable step functions with ρ\rho-weighted integrals over (0,T](0,T] (claim 3 of Linearity, Mean Zero, and Isometry of the Elementary Stochastic Integral); by linearity of the integral,

1(0,T]E[HkGk]ρdλ=14(1(0,T]E[(Hk+Gk)2]ρdλ1(0,T]E[(HkGk)2]ρdλ)14(H+GM2HGM2);\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[H^k G^k]\rho\,d\lambda=\tfrac14\Bigl(\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k+G^k)^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda-\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k-G^k)^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda\Bigr)\longrightarrow\tfrac14\bigl(\lVert H+G\rVert_M^{2}-\lVert H-G\rVert_M^{2}\bigr);

in particular the limit exists and is independent of the chosen sequences. On the other side, E[IJ]=14(E[(I+J)2]E[(IJ)2])=14(H+GM2HGM2)\mathbb{E}[IJ]=\tfrac14(\mathbb{E}[(I+J)^{2}]-\mathbb{E}[(I-J)^{2}])=\tfrac14(\lVert H+G\rVert_M^{2}-\lVert H-G\rVert_M^{2}), proving claim 2.

Step 3 (Explicit isometry). For each kk define φk(t)=lim infjE[(HtkHtj)2]\varphi_k(t)=\liminf_{j}\mathbb{E}[(H^k_t-H^j_t)^{2}] for t(0,T]t\in(0,T], extended by 00; each E[(HkHj)2]\mathbb{E}[(H^k_\cdot-H^j_\cdot)^{2}] is a measurable step function and the lower limit of measurable functions is measurable, as recorded in Fatou's Lemma. For every tt, condition (b) and the triangle inequality give HtkHtj2HtkHt2\lVert H^k_t-H^j_t\rVert_2\to\lVert H^k_t-H_t\rVert_2 as jj\to\infty, so φk(t)=E[(HtkHt)2]\varphi_k(t)=\mathbb{E}[(H^k_t-H_t)^{2}]. By Fatou's lemma and condition (a), given ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is KK with, for kKk\ge K,

1(0,T]φkρdλ  lim infj1(0,T]E[(HkHj)2]ρdλ  ε;\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\varphi_k\rho\,d\lambda\ \le\ \liminf_{j}\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k-H^j)^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda\ \le\ \varepsilon;

hence 1(0,T]φkρdλ0\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\varphi_k\rho\,d\lambda\to0 as kk\to\infty. Now let e(t)=E[Ht2]e(t)=\mathbb{E}[H_t^{2}] (extended by 00) be measurable, and write ak=1(0,T]E[(Hk)2]ρdλa_k=\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k)^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda, so akHM2a_k\to\lVert H\rVert_M^{2}. For every tt and δ>0\delta>0, from Ht2Htk2+HtHtk2\lVert H_t\rVert_2\le\lVert H^k_t\rVert_2+\lVert H_t-H^k_t\rVert_2 and the second elementary bound above,

e(t)(1+δ)E[(Htk)2]+(1+δ1)φk(t),E[(Htk)2](1+δ)e(t)+(1+δ1)φk(t).e(t)\le(1+\delta)\,\mathbb{E}[(H^k_t)^{2}]+(1+\delta^{-1})\,\varphi_k(t),\qquad \mathbb{E}[(H^k_t)^{2}]\le(1+\delta)\,e(t)+(1+\delta^{-1})\,\varphi_k(t).

Integrating the first bound shows 1(0,T]eρ\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}e\rho is integrable (dominated by an integrable function; monotonicity from Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral) with 1(0,T]eρdλ(1+δ)ak+(1+δ1)1(0,T]φkρdλ\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}e\rho\,d\lambda\le(1+\delta)a_k+(1+\delta^{-1})\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\varphi_k\rho\,d\lambda; letting kk\to\infty and then δ0\delta\downarrow0 gives 1(0,T]eρdλHM2\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}e\rho\,d\lambda\le\lVert H\rVert_M^{2}. Integrating the second bound and passing to the same limits gives HM21(0,T]eρdλ\lVert H\rVert_M^{2}\le\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}e\rho\,d\lambda. Together with claim 2, this proves claim 3.

Step 4 (Martingale property). By Ito Integrable Process and the Ito Integral, for each t(0,T]t\in(0,T] the restricted sequence approximates (Hu)u(0,t](H_u)_{u\in(0,t]} and ItI_t is an Ft\mathcal{F}_t-measurable square-integrable mean-square limit of the elementary integrals Itk=0tHukdMuI^k_t=\int_0^t H^k_u\,dM_u; also I0=0=I0kI_0=0=I^k_0. Let 0stT0\le s\le t\le T and AFsA\in\mathcal{F}_s. By The Elementary Stochastic Integral Process is a Square-Integrable Martingale, E[(ItkIsk)1A]=0\mathbb{E}[(I^k_t-I^k_s)\mathbf{1}_A]=0 for every kk, and by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality (with 1A21\lVert\mathbf{1}_A\rVert_2\le1),

E[(ItIs)1A]=E[(ItIs)1A]E[(ItkIsk)1A]ItItk2+IsIsk20,\bigl|\mathbb{E}[(I_t-I_s)\mathbf{1}_A]\bigr|=\bigl|\mathbb{E}[(I_t-I_s)\mathbf{1}_A]-\mathbb{E}[(I^k_t-I^k_s)\mathbf{1}_A]\bigr|\le\lVert I_t-I^k_t\rVert_2+\lVert I_s-I^k_s\rVert_2\longrightarrow0,

so E[(ItIs)1A]=0\mathbb{E}[(I_t-I_s)\mathbf{1}_A]=0. For the process I~s=Imin(s,T)\tilde I_s=I_{\min(s,T)}, s0s\ge0: it is adapted (Imin(s,T)I_{\min(s,T)} is Fmin(s,T)\mathcal{F}_{\min(s,T)}-measurable, and Fmin(s,T)Fs\mathcal{F}_{\min(s,T)}\subseteq\mathcal{F}_s) with square-integrable values, and for 0st0\le s\le t and AFsA\in\mathcal{F}_s the averaged identity E[I~t1A]=E[I~s1A]\mathbb{E}[\tilde I_t\mathbf{1}_A]=\mathbb{E}[\tilde I_s\mathbf{1}_A] holds: it is trivial when sTs\ge T, and for s<Ts<T it is the displayed identity with tt replaced by min(t,T)\min(t,T). By the averaged-form equivalence in Square-Integrable Martingale, Submartingale, and Supermartingale, (I~s)s0(\tilde I_s)_{s\ge0} is a square-integrable martingale.

Step 5 (Mean-square continuity). Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0. By condition (a), choose KK such that 1(0,T]E[(HkHK)2]ρdλε\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k-H^{K})^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda\le\varepsilon for all kKk\ge K; then let C>0C>0 bound the step function E[(HK)2]\mathbb{E}[(H^{K}_\cdot)^{2}], and finally choose δ>0\delta>0 by absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral (interval form, applied to ρ\rho on (0,T](0,T], which is integrable by clause (iv) of Ito Integrator of Intensity Type) so that 1(s,t]ρdλ<ε/C\int\mathbf{1}_{(s,t]}\rho\,d\lambda<\varepsilon/C whenever 0stT0\le s\le t\le T with ts<δt-s<\delta.

Now let 0stT0\le s\le t\le T with ts<δt-s<\delta and let kKk\ge K. The family H~k\tilde H^k equal to HukH^k_u for u(s,t]u\in(s,t] and to 00 for u(0,s]u\in(0,s] is a simple adapted process on (0,t](0,t] (insert ss into a representation of HkH^k and replace the coefficients on (0,s](0,s] by 00; the zero coefficients are measurable for every σ\sigma-algebra). Its elementary integral over (0,t](0,t] is ItkIskI^k_t-I^k_s: writing the refined sum of ItkI^k_t over a partition of (0,t](0,t] containing ss, the terms over (0,s](0,s] sum to IskI^k_s (Elementary Stochastic Integral of a Simple Adapted Process), and the remaining terms are exactly the refined sum of the elementary integral of H~k\tilde H^k. The isometry (claim 3 of Linearity, Mean Zero, and Isometry of the Elementary Stochastic Integral) then gives

ItkIsk22=1(s,t]E[(Hk)2]ρdλ  21(0,T]E[(HkHK)2]ρdλ+21(s,t]E[(HK)2]ρdλ  2ε+2C(ε/C)=4ε,\lVert I^k_t-I^k_s\rVert_2^{2}=\int\mathbf{1}_{(s,t]}\,\mathbb{E}[(H^k)^{2}]\,\rho\,d\lambda\ \le\ 2\int\mathbf{1}_{(0,T]}\mathbb{E}[(H^k-H^{K})^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda+2\int\mathbf{1}_{(s,t]}\mathbb{E}[(H^{K})^{2}]\rho\,d\lambda\ \le\ 2\varepsilon+2C\cdot(\varepsilon/C)=4\varepsilon,

using the first elementary bound and monotonicity. Letting kk\to\infty in ItIs2ItItk2+ItkIsk2+IskIs2\lVert I_t-I_s\rVert_2\le\lVert I_t-I^k_t\rVert_2+\lVert I^k_t-I^k_s\rVert_2+\lVert I^k_s-I_s\rVert_2 yields ItIs224ε\lVert I_t-I_s\rVert_2^{2}\le4\varepsilon whenever ts<δ|t-s|<\delta (the case t<st<s by symmetry). Since each ItI_t is square-integrable, (It)t[0,T](I_t)_{t\in[0,T]} is uniformly mean-square continuous on [0,T][0,T], as claimed. \square

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…