Reason: Initial publication of the proof (limit transfer of the elementary properties; mean-square continuity via absolute continuity of the integral), with its theorem (batch publication approved by coauthor).
in particular the limit exists and is independent of the chosen sequences. On the other side, E[IJ]=41(E[(I+J)2]−E[(I−J)2])=41(∥H+G∥M2−∥H−G∥M2), proving claim 2.
Step 3 (Explicit isometry). For each k define φk(t)=liminfjE[(Htk−Htj)2] for t∈(0,T], extended by 0; each E[(H⋅k−H⋅j)2] is a measurable step function and the lower limit of measurable functions is measurable, as recorded in Fatou's Lemma. For every t, condition (b) and the triangle inequality give ∥Htk−Htj∥2→∥Htk−Ht∥2 as j→∞, so φk(t)=E[(Htk−Ht)2]. By Fatou's lemma and condition (a), given ε>0 there is K with, for k≥K,
∫1(0,T]φkρdλ≤jliminf∫1(0,T]E[(Hk−Hj)2]ρdλ≤ε;
hence ∫1(0,T]φkρdλ→0 as k→∞. Now let e(t)=E[Ht2] (extended by 0) be measurable, and write ak=∫1(0,T]E[(Hk)2]ρdλ, so ak→∥H∥M2. For every t and δ>0, from ∥Ht∥2≤∥Htk∥2+∥Ht−Htk∥2 and the second elementary bound above,
Integrating the first bound shows 1(0,T]eρ is integrable (dominated by an integrable function; monotonicity from Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral) with ∫1(0,T]eρdλ≤(1+δ)ak+(1+δ−1)∫1(0,T]φkρdλ; letting k→∞ and then δ↓0 gives ∫1(0,T]eρdλ≤∥H∥M2. Integrating the second bound and passing to the same limits gives ∥H∥M2≤∫1(0,T]eρdλ. Together with claim 2, this proves claim 3.
so E[(It−Is)1A]=0. For the process I~s=Imin(s,T), s≥0: it is adapted (Imin(s,T) is Fmin(s,T)-measurable, and Fmin(s,T)⊆Fs) with square-integrable values, and for 0≤s≤t and A∈Fs the averaged identity E[I~t1A]=E[I~s1A] holds: it is trivial when s≥T, and for s<T it is the displayed identity with t replaced by min(t,T). By the averaged-form equivalence in Square-Integrable Martingale, Submartingale, and Supermartingale, (I~s)s≥0 is a square-integrable martingale.
Step 5 (Mean-square continuity). Fix ε>0. By condition (a), choose K such that ∫1(0,T]E[(Hk−HK)2]ρdλ≤ε for all k≥K; then let C>0 bound the step function E[(H⋅K)2], and finally choose δ>0 by absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral (interval form, applied to ρ on (0,T], which is integrable by clause (iv) of Ito Integrator of Intensity Type) so that ∫1(s,t]ρdλ<ε/C whenever 0≤s≤t≤T with t−s<δ.
Now let 0≤s≤t≤T with t−s<δ and let k≥K. The family H~k equal to Huk for u∈(s,t] and to 0 for u∈(0,s] is a simple adapted process on (0,t] (insert s into a representation of Hk and replace the coefficients on (0,s] by 0; the zero coefficients are measurable for every σ-algebra). Its elementary integral over (0,t] is Itk−Isk: writing the refined sum of Itk over a partition of (0,t] containing s, the terms over (0,s] sum to Isk (Elementary Stochastic Integral of a Simple Adapted Process), and the remaining terms are exactly the refined sum of the elementary integral of H~k. The isometry (claim 3 of Linearity, Mean Zero, and Isometry of the Elementary Stochastic Integral) then gives
using the first elementary bound and monotonicity. Letting k→∞ in ∥It−Is∥2≤∥It−Itk∥2+∥Itk−Isk∥2+∥Isk−Is∥2 yields ∥It−Is∥22≤4ε whenever ∣t−s∣<δ (the case t<s by symmetry). Since each It is square-integrable, (It)t∈[0,T] is uniformly mean-square continuous on [0,T], as claimed. □