TheoremBase

Claim 1 slices along the i-th coordinate: each slice of h is a compactly supported C1C^1 function of one variable whose derivative integrates to zero by the fundamental theorem of calculus, and coordinate Fubini assembles the slices. Claim 2 applies claim 1 to the product fg and the product rule.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) is the σ\sigma-algebra Bq\mathcal{B}_{q} of Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l by claim 5 of The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Euclidean Space as a Product, and Measurability of Projections, Sequentially Continuous Maps, and Open and Closed Sets, and λq\lambda_{q} is the measure λq\lambda_{q} built there, by Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n; λ\lambda denotes Lebesgue measure on B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) as in Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l, so that λ=λ1\lambda=\lambda_{1}; measurability of real-valued functions is that of Measurable Map, and the Set of Measurable Maps, which for real-valued functions agrees with the reading of Nonnegative Measurable Maps and Their Lebesgue Integral, as recorded in that definition. The set Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself. Points of Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} are tuples, and the coordinates of sums, differences and scalar multiples are the sums, differences and scalar multiples of the coordinates (Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, claims 2 and 3 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space).

Step 1: regularity of ∂ih\partial_{i}h. By clause 1 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ (read through its clause 3), hh and ∂ih\partial_{i}h are continuous at every point of Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces, hence continuous on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} in the sense of Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation (iv) by claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions. By claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set there is a real number R>0R>0 with h(x)=0h(x)=0 whenever ∥x∥>R\lVert x\rVert>R. Put W={x∈Rq:∥x∥>R}W=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{q}:\lVert x\rVert>R\}. The set WW is open: if x∈Wx\in W and y∈Rqy\in\mathbb{R}^{q} satisfies ∥y−x∥<∥x∥−R\lVert y-x\rVert<\lVert x\rVert-R, then ∥x∥≤∥y∥+∥x−y∥\lVert x\rVert\le\lVert y\rVert+\lVert x-y\rVert by claim 6 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square applied to x=y+(x−y)x=y+(x-y), so ∥y∥>R\lVert y\rVert>R; thus the open ball of centre xx and radius ∥x∥−R\lVert x\rVert-R lies in WW (claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square identifies dE(x,y)d_{E}(x,y) with ∥x−y∥\lVert x-y\rVert), which is openness in the metric sense, and metric openness is Euclidean openness by Euclidean Openness Agrees with Metric Openness on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. The restriction h∣Wh|_{W} is the zero function on WW, so h∣W=0⋅h∣Wh|_{W}=0\cdot h|_{W}. By claim 3 of Restriction of a Cᵏ Function to an Open Subset, h∣Wh|_{W} is of class C1C^{1} on WW, so its partial derivative with respect to the iith variable exists at every point of WW, and by the scalar-multiple rule in claim 1 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions, ∂i(h∣W)(x)=∂i(0⋅h∣W)(x)=0⋅∂i(h∣W)(x)=0\partial_{i}(h|_{W})(x)=\partial_{i}(0\cdot h|_{W})(x)=0\cdot\partial_{i}(h|_{W})(x)=0 for every x∈Wx\in W. By claim 1 of Restriction of a Cᵏ Function to an Open Subset this gives ∂ih(x)=0\partial_{i}h(x)=0 for every x∈Wx\in W. Hence ∂ih\partial_{i}h is compactly supported by claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set, and by claim 2 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable it is measurable with respect to B(Rq)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{q}) and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) and integrable.

Step 2: the slices. For q≥2q\ge2 write Rq=Rq−1×R\mathbb{R}^{q}=\mathbb{R}^{q-1}\times\mathbb{R} as in Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l, and for θ′=(θ1,…,θq−1)∈Rq−1\theta'=(\theta_{1},\dots,\theta_{q-1})\in\mathbb{R}^{q-1} and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} let θ′[t]=(θ1,…,θi−1,t,θi,…,θq−1)∈Rq\theta'[t]=(\theta_{1},\dots,\theta_{i-1},t,\theta_{i},\dots,\theta_{q-1})\in\mathbb{R}^{q}, the point whose iith coordinate is tt and whose remaining coordinates are those of θ′\theta' in order. If q=1q=1 the parameter θ′\theta' is absent: every clause below of the form ``for every θ′∈Rq−1\theta'\in\mathbb{R}^{q-1}'' is read with θ′\theta' deleted, θ′[t]\theta'[t] is tt, a pair (θ′,y)(\theta',y) is yy, and Bq−1⊗G\mathcal{B}_{q-1}\otimes\mathcal{G} and λq−1⊗δ\lambda_{q-1}\otimes\delta are G\mathcal{G} and δ\delta, in accordance with the conventions for l=1l=1 stated in Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l. Fix θ′\theta' and define γ:R→R\gamma:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} by γ(t)=h(θ′[t])\gamma(t)=h(\theta'[t]).

(a) γ\gamma is differentiable at every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with γ′(t)=∂ih(θ′[t])\gamma'(t)=\partial_{i}h(\theta'[t]). Fix tt and put a=θ′[t]a=\theta'[t], a point of the open set Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} (claim 1 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself); in the notation of Slice Function and the Partial Derivative, a[s]=θ′[s]a[s]=\theta'[s] for every s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 1 there choose an admissible radius ρ>0\rho>0, and let I={s:t−ρ<s<t+ρ}I=\{s:t-\rho<s<t+\rho\}. Since ∂ih(a)\partial_{i}h(a) exists, claim 2 there says that the slice function γ∣I\gamma|_{I} is differentiable at tt with derivative ∂ih(a)\partial_{i}h(a): by Derivative of a Real Function on an Interval, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is δ>0\delta>0 such that ∣(γ(t+u)−γ(t))/u−∂ih(a)∣<ε|(\gamma(t+u)-\gamma(t))/u-\partial_{i}h(a)|<\varepsilon whenever 0<∣u∣<δ0<|u|<\delta and t+u∈It+u\in I. Given ε\varepsilon, let δ′\delta' be the least of δ\delta and ρ\rho (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); then 0<∣u∣<δ′0<|u|<\delta' forces t+u∈It+u\in I, so the same estimate holds for all uu with 0<∣u∣<δ′0<|u|<\delta', which is differentiability of γ\gamma at tt with derivative ∂ih(a)\partial_{i}h(a) (every tt is an interior point of the interval R\mathbb{R} by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (i)).

(b) γ′\gamma' is continuous, and γ\gamma and γ′\gamma' vanish for ∣t∣>R|t|>R. The map τ:R→Rq\tau:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}^{q}, τ(t)=θ′[t]\tau(t)=\theta'[t], satisfies dE(τ(t),τ(s))=∣t−s∣d_{E}(\tau(t),\tau(s))=|t-s|: the difference τ(t)−τ(s)\tau(t)-\tau(s) has iith coordinate t−st-s and all other coordinates 00, so by claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums, ∥τ(t)−τ(s)∥2=(t−s)2=∣t−s∣2\lVert\tau(t)-\tau(s)\rVert^{2}=(t-s)^{2}=|t-s|^{2} (claim 1 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field), and ∣t−s∣≥0|t-s|\ge0, so ∥τ(t)−τ(s)∥=∣t−s∣\lVert\tau(t)-\tau(s)\rVert=|t-s| by the uniqueness in claim 1 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square. Hence τ\tau is continuous from (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) to (Rq,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{q},d_{E}) (take δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon), where dRd_{\mathbb{R}} is the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Numbers. By (a), γ′=∂ih∘τ\gamma'=\partial_{i}h\circ\tau, which is continuous on R\mathbb{R} by Step 1 and claim 3 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map. Moreover ∣t∣≤∥θ′[t]∥|t|\le\lVert\theta'[t]\rVert by claim 4 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, so if ∣t∣>R|t|>R then θ′[t]∈W\theta'[t]\in W and, by the choice of RR and Step 1, γ(t)=h(θ′[t])=0\gamma(t)=h(\theta'[t])=0 and γ′(t)=∂ih(θ′[t])=0\gamma'(t)=\partial_{i}h(\theta'[t])=0.

(c) ∫Rγ′ dλ=0\int_{\mathbb{R}}\gamma'\,d\lambda=0. Put S=R+1S=R+1; then 0<S0<S and −S<0<S-S<0<S by claims 6, 3 and 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so J=[−S,S]J=[-S,S] is an interval of which every xx with −S<x<S-S<x<S is an interior point, by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line (v). Let G=γ∣JG=\gamma|_{J} and f0=γ′∣Jf_{0}=\gamma'|_{J}. By claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, GG is differentiable at every xx with −S<x<S-S<x<S with G′(x)=γ′(x)=f0(x)G'(x)=\gamma'(x)=f_{0}(x); by The Increment Form of the Derivative, and Differentiability Implies Continuity γ\gamma is continuous at every point of R\mathbb{R}, so GG is continuous on JJ by claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, and so is f0f_{0}, by (b) and the same claim 1. By claim 1 of Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval, f0f_{0} is Riemann integrable on JJ, and Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II: Evaluating an Integral by an Antiderivative gives ∫−SSf0(x) dx=G(S)−G(−S)=γ(S)−γ(−S)=0\int_{-S}^{S}f_{0}(x)\,dx=G(S)-G(-S)=\gamma(S)-\gamma(-S)=0, both values vanishing by (b) since S>RS>R. By claim 3 of Agreement of the Riemann and Lebesgue Integrals for Continuous Functions on a Closed Interval, the zero extension f~0\tilde f_{0} of f0f_{0} satisfies ∫Rf~0 dλ=∫−SSf0(x) dx=0\int_{\mathbb{R}}\tilde f_{0}\,d\lambda=\int_{-S}^{S}f_{0}(x)\,dx=0, and f~0\tilde f_{0} is integrable by claim 2 there. But f~0=γ′\tilde f_{0}=\gamma' as functions on R\mathbb{R}: they agree on JJ, and off JJ we have ∣t∣>S>R|t|>S>R, where γ′(t)=0\gamma'(t)=0 by (b). Hence γ′\gamma' is integrable with respect to λ\lambda and ∫Rγ′ dλ=0\int_{\mathbb{R}}\gamma'\,d\lambda=0; that is,

∫R∂ih(θ′[t]) dλ(t)=0for every θ′∈Rq−1.\int_{\mathbb{R}}\partial_{i}h(\theta'[t])\,d\lambda(t)=0\qquad\text{for every }\theta'\in\mathbb{R}^{q-1}.

Step 3: assembly. Let (Y,G,δ)(Y,\mathcal{G},\delta) be the one-point measure space with unit mass at a point zz (claim 3 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions); since δ(Y)=1\delta(Y)=1, the measure δ\delta is finite and hence σ\sigma-finite in the sense of Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure, and λq\lambda_{q} is σ\sigma-finite by claim 1 of Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l. Define F:Rq×Y→RF:\mathbb{R}^{q}\times Y\to\mathbb{R} by F(θ,z)=∂ih(θ)F(\theta,z)=\partial_{i}h(\theta). For every Borel set B⊆RB\subseteq\mathbb{R}, F−1(B)=(∂ih)−1(B)×YF^{-1}(B)=(\partial_{i}h)^{-1}(B)\times Y is a measurable rectangle (Step 1), hence lies in Bq⊗G\mathcal{B}_{q}\otimes\mathcal{G} by Measurable Rectangles and the Product σ-Algebra; so FF is measurable, and likewise the functions (θ,z)↦∣∂ih(θ)∣(\theta,z)\mapsto|\partial_{i}h(\theta)|, (∂ih)+(θ)(\partial_{i}h)^{+}(\theta), (∂ih)−(θ)(\partial_{i}h)^{-}(\theta), which are ∣F∣|F|, F+F^{+}, F−F^{-} in the notation of Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral (the functions ∣∂ih∣|\partial_{i}h|, (∂ih)±(\partial_{i}h)^{\pm} on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} are measurable by claim 4 of Arithmetic of Measurable Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps and by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral). For each of u=∣∂ih∣,(∂ih)+,(∂ih)−u=|\partial_{i}h|,(\partial_{i}h)^{+},(\partial_{i}h)^{-}, Tonelli (Tonelli's and Fubini's Theorems) applied to (θ,z)↦u(θ)(\theta,z)\mapsto u(\theta) and claim 3 of Assembly of Measure Spaces: Restriction, Transport, One-Point Spaces, and Countable Disjoint Unions for the inner integral give

∫Rq×Yu(θ) d(λq⊗δ)(θ,z)=∫Rq(∫Yu(θ) dδ(z))dλq(θ)=∫Rqu dλq.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}\times Y}u(\theta)\,d(\lambda_{q}\otimes\delta)(\theta,z)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\Bigl(\int_{Y}u(\theta)\,d\delta(z)\Bigr)d\lambda_{q}(\theta)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}u\,d\lambda_{q}.

With u=∣∂ih∣u=|\partial_{i}h| the right side is finite (Step 1), so FF is integrable with respect to λq⊗δ\lambda_{q}\otimes\delta by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral; with u=(∂ih)±u=(\partial_{i}h)^{\pm} and the definition of the integral of an integrable function, ∫Rq×YF d(λq⊗δ)=∫Rq∂ih dλq\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}\times Y}F\,d(\lambda_{q}\otimes\delta)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\partial_{i}h\,d\lambda_{q}.

Now apply claim 4 of Finite Products of Lebesgue Measure and Coordinate Integration on Rl\mathbb{R}^l with l=ql=q, the index ii, and (Y,G,μ)=(Y,G,δ)(Y,\mathcal{G},\mu)=(Y,\mathcal{G},\delta). In the notation of its claim 2, F(Ψi(t,(θ′,z)))=∂ih(θ′[t])F(\Psi_{i}(t,(\theta',z)))=\partial_{i}h(\theta'[t]) for all t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} and θ′∈Rq−1\theta'\in\mathbb{R}^{q-1}. Claim 4 provides a set N∈Bq−1⊗GN\in\mathcal{B}_{q-1}\otimes\mathcal{G} with (λq−1⊗δ)(N)=0(\lambda_{q-1}\otimes\delta)(N)=0 such that the function Φ\Phi on Rq−1×Y\mathbb{R}^{q-1}\times Y, equal to ∫R∂ih(θ′[t]) dλ(t)\int_{\mathbb{R}}\partial_{i}h(\theta'[t])\,d\lambda(t) at (θ′,z)∉N(\theta',z)\notin N and to 00 on NN, is integrable and satisfies ∫Φ d(λq−1⊗δ)=∫Rq×YF d(λq⊗δ)\int\Phi\,d(\lambda_{q-1}\otimes\delta)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}\times Y}F\,d(\lambda_{q}\otimes\delta). By Step 2(c), Φ\Phi is the zero function; as Φ\Phi is integrable and Φ=0⋅Φ\Phi=0\cdot\Phi, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion gives ∫Φ d(λq−1⊗δ)=0⋅∫Φ d(λq−1⊗δ)=0\int\Phi\,d(\lambda_{q-1}\otimes\delta)=0\cdot\int\Phi\,d(\lambda_{q-1}\otimes\delta)=0. Hence ∫Rq∂ih dλq=0\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\partial_{i}h\,d\lambda_{q}=0, which completes the proof of claim 1.

Claim 2. By claim 3 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions, fgfg is of class C1C^{1} on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}; it vanishes wherever gg does, so it is compactly supported by claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set (applied to gg and then to fgfg). By claim 1 of Constants, Affine Functions, Sums, Products and Quotients of Cᵏ Functions, ∂i(fg)=∂if g+f ∂ig\partial_{i}(fg)=\partial_{i}f\,g+f\,\partial_{i}g on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}. As in Step 1, the functions ff, gg, ∂if\partial_{i}f, ∂ig\partial_{i}g are continuous on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}, and ∂ig\partial_{i}g is compactly supported by claim 1 applied to h=gh=g. Hence (∂if) g(\partial_{i}f)\,g and f ∂igf\,\partial_{i}g are continuous on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, and compactly supported since they vanish wherever gg, respectively ∂ig\partial_{i}g, vanishes; so they are integrable by claim 2 of A Continuous Compactly Supported Function on Rn\mathbb{R}^n is Bounded and Integrable. By claim 1 applied to h=fgh=fg and the linearity of the integral for integrable functions (claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion),

0=∫Rq∂i(fg) dλq=∫Rq(∂if) g dλq+∫Rqf ∂ig dλq,0=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}\partial_{i}(fg)\,d\lambda_{q}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}(\partial_{i}f)\,g\,d\lambda_{q}+\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}f\,\partial_{i}g\,d\lambda_{q},

which is the asserted identity.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…