TheoremBase

Pushing the fibre kernel K forward under u -> pn∗(u)+wp_n^*(u)+w gives a conditional kernel of mu given QnQ_n, which agrees with lambda off a nun−nullnu_n-null set by uniqueness; on tails w with pn(wp_n(w)=0 the head of lambdawlambda_w is then K(w,.), which is absolutely continuous.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied below with the data named at each use.

Throughout, KK and knk_{n} are the objects of The Conditional Law of the Head Given the Tail for a Measure with a Density Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space, formed for the present cc, nn, μ\mu and ff; the measure νn\nu_{n} of that lemma is the present νn=(Qn)#μ\nu_{n}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\mu. By the kernel claim of that lemma KK is a probability kernel from (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) to (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})), so Kw=K(w,⋅)K_{w}=K(w,\cdot) is a probability measure on (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})) for every w∈Xw\in X by Probability Kernels Between Measurable Spaces §kernel. To avoid a clash with the kernel λ\lambda, we write Ln\mathcal{L}_{n} for the Lebesgue measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) that Absolutely Continuous Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §ac calls λn\lambda_{n}. The order of choices is: λ\lambda is given; from KK we build a second conditional kernel λ′\lambda' of μ\mu given QnQ_{n} (Steps 1 to 3), compare it with λ\lambda (Step 4), and then compute the heads (Steps 5 and 6).

Step 1 (Translation maps). Define Φ:X×Rn→X\Phi:X\times\mathbb{R}^{n}\to X by Φ(w,u)=pn∗(u)+w\Phi(w,u)=p_{n}^{*}(u)+w, and for w∈Xw\in X define ιw:Rn→X\iota_{w}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to X by ιw(u)=Φ(w,u)\iota_{w}(u)=\Phi(w,u). The map pn∗p_{n}^{*} is linear, since pn∗(u)−pn∗(u′)=∑k=1n(uk−uk′)ek=pn∗(u−u′)p_{n}^{*}(u)-p_{n}^{*}(u')=\sum_{k=1}^{n}(u_{k}-u'_{k})e_{k}=p_{n}^{*}(u-u') by vector space arithmetic. Hence for (w,u),(w′,u′)∈X×Rn(w,u),(w',u')\in X\times\mathbb{R}^{n} we have Φ(w,u)−Φ(w′,u′)=(w−w′)+pn∗(u−u′)\Phi(w,u)-\Phi(w',u')=(w-w')+p_{n}^{*}(u-u'), and by the triangle inequality together with ∣pn∗(v)∣=∥v∥|p_{n}^{*}(v)|=\lVert v\rVert for v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n} (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity)

∣Φ(w,u)−Φ(w′,u′)∣≤∣w−w′∣+∥u−u′∥≤2 dX×Rn((w,u),(w′,u′)),|\Phi(w,u)-\Phi(w',u')|\le|w-w'|+\lVert u-u'\rVert\le 2\,d_{X\times\mathbb{R}^{n}}\bigl((w,u),(w',u')\bigr),

where dX×Rnd_{X\times\mathbb{R}^{n}} is the product metric and the last inequality is claim 2 of The Product Metric is a Metric. So Φ\Phi is continuous from (X×Rn,dX×Rn)(X\times\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{X\times\mathbb{R}^{n}}) to (X,d)(X,d) (given ε>0\varepsilon>0, the choice δ=ε/2\delta=\varepsilon/2 works), hence measurable with respect to the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of X×RnX\times\mathbb{R}^{n} and B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; that Borel σ\sigma-algebra is B(X)⊗B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by The Borel Sigma-Algebra of a Product of Two Separable Metric Spaces is the Product Sigma-Algebra §product, (X,d)(X,d) being separable by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space and (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) by Euclidean Space is a Separable Metric Space §separable. Likewise ∣ιw(u)−ιw(u′)∣=∣pn∗(u−u′)∣=∥u−u′∥|\iota_{w}(u)-\iota_{w}(u')|=|p_{n}^{*}(u-u')|=\lVert u-u'\rVert, so each ιw\iota_{w} is continuous, hence Borel by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

For B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X) let EB=Φ−1(B)E_{B}=\Phi^{-1}(B), which belongs to B(X)⊗B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by the measurability of Φ\Phi. Its section at w∈Xw\in X is (EB)w={u∈Rn:pn∗(u)+w∈B}=ιw−1(B)(E_{B})_{w}=\{u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:p_{n}^{*}(u)+w\in B\}=\iota_{w}^{-1}(B).

Step 2 (The kernel λ′\lambda'). For w∈Xw\in X and B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X) put

λ′(w,B)=K(w,(EB)w)=Kw(ιw−1(B)).\lambda'(w,B)=K\bigl(w,(E_{B})_{w}\bigr)=K_{w}\bigl(\iota_{w}^{-1}(B)\bigr).

For fixed ww, the function λw′=λ′(w,⋅)\lambda'_{w}=\lambda'(w,\cdot) is the image measure of KwK_{w} under the Borel map ιw\iota_{w}, a probability measure on (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. For fixed BB, the function w↦λ′(w,B)=K(w,(EB)w)w\mapsto\lambda'(w,B)=K(w,(E_{B})_{w}) is measurable with respect to B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) by Integration Against a Probability Kernel: Measurable Sections, the Composite Measure on the Product and the Iterated Integral §sections, applied with (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)), (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})), the kernel KK, the probability measure νn\nu_{n} and the set EBE_{B} in place of (Y,Y)(Y,\mathcal{Y}), (Z,Z)(Z,\mathcal{Z}), κ\kappa, μ\mu and EE. Hence λ′\lambda' is a probability kernel from (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) to (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)) by Probability Kernels Between Measurable Spaces §kernel.

Step 3 (λ′\lambda' is a conditional kernel of μ\mu given QnQ_{n}). Let A,B∈B(X)A,B\in\mathcal{B}(X) and let E=(A×Rn)∩EBE=(A\times\mathbb{R}^{n})\cap E_{B}, which belongs to B(X)⊗B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(X)\otimes\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) because A×RnA\times\mathbb{R}^{n} is a measurable rectangle (Product Sigma-Algebra) and a σ\sigma-algebra is closed under finite intersections. By Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, Pn=pn∗∘pnP_{n}=p_{n}^{*}\circ p_{n} and Qnx=x−PnxQ_{n}x=x-P_{n}x, so every x∈Xx\in X satisfies

pn∗(pn(x))+Qnx=Pnx+(x−Pnx)=x.p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))+Q_{n}x=P_{n}x+(x-P_{n}x)=x .

Hence kn(x)=(Qnx,pn(x))k_{n}(x)=(Q_{n}x,p_{n}(x)) lies in EE if and only if Qnx∈AQ_{n}x\in A and pn∗(pn(x))+Qnx∈Bp_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))+Q_{n}x\in B, that is, if and only if Qnx∈AQ_{n}x\in A and x∈Bx\in B; so kn−1(E)=B∩Qn−1(A)k_{n}^{-1}(E)=B\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(A). The section EwE_{w} is (EB)w(E_{B})_{w} for w∈Aw\in A and ∅\varnothing for w∉Aw\notin A, so K(w,Ew)=1A(w) λ′(w,B)K(w,E_{w})=\mathbf{1}_{A}(w)\,\lambda'(w,B) for every w∈Xw\in X, because K(w,∅)=0K(w,\varnothing)=0. The map knk_{n} is Borel by The Conditional Law of the Head Given the Tail for a Measure with a Density Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §good-tails, and by The Conditional Law of the Head Given the Tail for a Measure with a Density Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §disintegration and the defining formula of Integration Against a Probability Kernel: Measurable Sections, the Composite Measure on the Product and the Iterated Integral §composite (with (X,B(X))(X,\mathcal{B}(X)), (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})), KK and νn\nu_{n} in place of (Y,Y)(Y,\mathcal{Y}), (Z,Z)(Z,\mathcal{Z}), κ\kappa and μ\mu),

μ(B∩Qn−1(A))=μ(kn−1(E))=((kn)#μ)(E)=(νn⊗K)(E)=∫XK(w,Ew) νn(dw)=∫X1A(w) λ′(w,B) νn(dw).\mu\bigl(B\cap Q_{n}^{-1}(A)\bigr)=\mu\bigl(k_{n}^{-1}(E)\bigr)=\bigl((k_{n})_{\#}\mu\bigr)(E)=(\nu_{n}\otimes K)(E)=\int_{X}K(w,E_{w})\,\nu_{n}(dw)=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{A}(w)\,\lambda'(w,B)\,\nu_{n}(dw).

This is the identity of The Conditional Kernel of a Probability Measure Given a Measurable Map §conditional-kernel with (X,d)(X,d), (X,d)(X,d), QnQ_{n}, μ\mu and νn=(Qn)#μ\nu_{n}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\mu in place of (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}), (Y,dY)(Y,d_{Y}), qq, π\pi and ν\nu, the map QnQ_{n} being Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. So λ′\lambda' is a conditional kernel of μ\mu given QnQ_{n}.

Step 4 (Comparison with λ\lambda). The metric space (X,d)(X,d) is complete and separable by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space. By Conditional Kernels of a Borel Probability Measure on a Polish Space Given a Borel Map: Existence, Uniqueness and Concentration on the Fibres §uniqueness, applied with (X,d)(X,d) in place of both (Z,d)(Z,d) and (Y,dY)(Y,d_{Y}), with QnQ_{n}, μ\mu and νn\nu_{n} in place of qq, π\pi and ν\nu, and with the conditional kernels λ\lambda and λ′\lambda', the set N={w∈X:λw≠λw′}N=\{w\in X:\lambda_{w}\ne\lambda'_{w}\} belongs to B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) and νn(N)=0\nu_{n}(N)=0.

Step 5 (Tails have zero head). Let Wp=pn−1({0})W_{p}=p_{n}^{-1}(\{0\}), where 00 is the origin of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; it belongs to B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), since {0}∈B(Rn)\{0\}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §finite-sets and pnp_{n} is Borel by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity. Each coordinate x↦xk=⟨x,ek⟩x\mapsto x_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle is linear, the inner product being linear in its first argument, so pnp_{n} is linear; with pn(pn∗(v))=vp_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(v))=v for v∈Rnv\in\mathbb{R}^{n} (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity) this gives, for every x∈Xx\in X,

pn(Qnx)=pn(x−pn∗(pn(x)))=pn(x)−pn(pn∗(pn(x)))=pn(x)−pn(x)=0.p_{n}(Q_{n}x)=p_{n}\bigl(x-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))\bigr)=p_{n}(x)-p_{n}\bigl(p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))\bigr)=p_{n}(x)-p_{n}(x)=0 .

So Qn−1(Wp)=XQ_{n}^{-1}(W_{p})=X and νn(Wp)=μ(X)=1\nu_{n}(W_{p})=\mu(X)=1. Let W1=Wp∖NW_{1}=W_{p}\setminus N, which belongs to B(X)\mathcal{B}(X). Since νn\nu_{n} is a probability measure, νn(X∖Wp)=1−1=0\nu_{n}(X\setminus W_{p})=1-1=0 by Basic Properties of a Measure §differences; as X∖W1=(X∖Wp)∪NX\setminus W_{1}=(X\setminus W_{p})\cup N, Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity (applied to the sequence X∖Wp,N,∅,∅,…X\setminus W_{p},N,\varnothing,\varnothing,\dots) gives νn(X∖W1)≤0+0=0\nu_{n}(X\setminus W_{1})\le0+0=0, and then νn(W1)=1−0=1\nu_{n}(W_{1})=1-0=1 by Basic Properties of a Measure §differences.

Step 6 (The head of λw\lambda_{w}). Let w∈W1w\in W_{1} and C∈B(Rn)C\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). For u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, linearity of pnp_{n}, pn∘pn∗=idp_{n}\circ p_{n}^{*}=\mathrm{id} and pn(w)=0p_{n}(w)=0 (as w∈Wpw\in W_{p}) give

pn(ιw(u))=pn(pn∗(u))+pn(w)=u+0=u,p_{n}(\iota_{w}(u))=p_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(u))+p_{n}(w)=u+0=u ,

so ιw−1(pn−1(C))=C\iota_{w}^{-1}(p_{n}^{-1}(C))=C. Since w∉Nw\notin N, λw=λw′\lambda_{w}=\lambda'_{w}, and therefore

((pn)#λw)(C)=λw′(pn−1(C))=Kw(ιw−1(pn−1(C)))=Kw(C).\bigl((p_{n})_{\#}\lambda_{w}\bigr)(C)=\lambda'_{w}\bigl(p_{n}^{-1}(C)\bigr)=K_{w}\bigl(\iota_{w}^{-1}(p_{n}^{-1}(C))\bigr)=K_{w}(C).

Thus (pn)#λw=Kw(p_{n})_{\#}\lambda_{w}=K_{w}. If Ln(C)=0\mathcal{L}_{n}(C)=0, then K(w,C)=0K(w,C)=0 by The Conditional Law of the Head Given the Tail for a Measure with a Density Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §absolutely-continuous, which holds for every w∈Xw\in X. Hence (pn)#λw(p_{n})_{\#}\lambda_{w}, a probability measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, is absolutely continuous in the sense of Absolutely Continuous Probability Measure on Euclidean Space §ac for every w∈W1w\in W_{1}, where W1∈B(X)W_{1}\in\mathcal{B}(X) and νn(W1)=1\nu_{n}(W_{1})=1. This proves claim 1.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…