TheoremBase

Shifts the summation variable by a periodic difference map of the lattice torus, expands each one-dimensional factor with the addition formulas, and removes the sine terms one coordinate at a time using the reflection of that coordinate, which preserves the interaction and flips the sign of the sine; the energy identity follows from discrete inversion and the bound from the triangle inequality.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, and of Zn⊆Rn\mathbb{Z}^{n}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n} (Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §lattice), are added, subtracted and multiplied by real numbers componentwise (Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n). The side LL is a natural number, read in R\mathbb{R} as in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §numbers, so L∈ZL\in\mathbb{Z} by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §sign; and 0,1∈Z0,1\in\mathbb{Z} and Z\mathbb{Z} is closed under ++, −- and multiplication by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §ring, so that sums, differences and integer multiples of points of Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} lie in Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}. For m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z}, CmC_{m} and SmS_{m} are the trigonometric monomials Cm(t)=cos⁡(2πmt)C_{m}(t)=\cos(2\pi mt) and Sm(t)=sin⁡(2πmt)S_{m}(t)=\sin(2\pi mt) of Cell Integrals of the Trigonometric Monomials, and ϕm\phi_{m} is the one-dimensional map of The Trigonometric System on the Torus §one-dimensional; since ψk\psi_{k} is the map written eke_{k} in The Trigonometric System on the Torus §system (The Lattice Torus of Odd Side, Lattice Fields, and the Discrete Fourier Coefficients of a Lattice Field),

ψk(x)=∏i=1nϕki(xi)(k∈Zn, x∈Rn).\psi_{k}(x)=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\phi_{k_{i}}(x_{i})\qquad(k\in\mathbb{Z}^{n},\ x\in\mathbb{R}^{n}).

The map w↦L−1ww\mapsto L^{-1}w from WLW_{L} to LM\mathbb{L}_{M} is a bijection: it is onto by The Lattice Torus of Odd Side, Lattice Fields, and the Discrete Fourier Coefficients of a Lattice Field §lattice, and L−1w=L−1w′L^{-1}w=L^{-1}w' implies w=w′w=w' after multiplying each component by LL. Every site yy is therefore L−1wL^{-1}w for exactly one w∈WLw\in W_{L}, and by Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols §matrix, J(L−1w,L−1w′)=j(w−w′)J(L^{-1}w,L^{-1}w')=\mathfrak{j}(w-w') for w,w′∈WLw,w'\in W_{L}.

Step 1: symmetry (claim 1). For p∈[n]p\in[n] the reflection RpR_{p} of Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols maps Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} to Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}. Let b∈Znb\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}. Put b(0)=bb^{(0)}=b and b(p)=Rpb(p−1)∈Znb^{(p)}=R_{p}b^{(p-1)}\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} for p∈[n]p\in[n]. By induction on pp, the ii-th component of b(p)b^{(p)} is −bi-b_{i} for i≤pi\le p and bib_{i} for p<ip<i, so b(n)=−bb^{(n)}=-b; and j(b(p))=j(Rpb(p−1))=j(b(p−1))\mathfrak{j}(b^{(p)})=\mathfrak{j}(R_{p}b^{(p-1)})=\mathfrak{j}(b^{(p-1)}) by Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols §interaction. Hence j(−b)=j(b)\mathfrak{j}(-b)=\mathfrak{j}(b). Now let y=L−1wy=L^{-1}w and z=L−1w′z=L^{-1}w' with w,w′∈WLw,w'\in W_{L}. Then J(z,y)=j(w′−w)=j(−(w−w′))=j(w−w′)=J(y,z)J(z,y)=\mathfrak{j}(w'-w)=\mathfrak{j}(-(w-w'))=\mathfrak{j}(w-w')=J(y,z).

Step 2: two involutions of WLW_{L}. A map τ:WL→WL\tau:W_{L}\to W_{L} with τ(τ(u))=u\tau(\tau(u))=u for every u∈WLu\in W_{L} is a bijection: for v∈WLv\in W_{L} one has τ(τ(v))=v\tau(\tau(v))=v, and τ(u)=v\tau(u)=v forces u=τ(τ(u))=τ(v)u=\tau(\tau(u))=\tau(v).

(a) Fix w∈WLw\in W_{L} and put y=L−1wy=L^{-1}w. For u∈WLu\in W_{L} and i∈[n]i\in[n] let λi(u)=1\lambda_{i}(u)=1 if wi<uiw_{i}<u_{i} and λi(u)=0\lambda_{i}(u)=0 otherwise, let λ(u)∈Zn\lambda(u)\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} have components λi(u)∈{0,1}⊆Z\lambda_{i}(u)\in\{0,1\}\subseteq\mathbb{Z}, and let τ(u)∈Zn\tau(u)\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} have components τ(u)i=wi−ui+Lλi(u)\tau(u)_{i}=w_{i}-u_{i}+L\lambda_{i}(u), integers by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §ring as wi,ui,L,λi(u)∈Zw_{i},u_{i},L,\lambda_{i}(u)\in\mathbb{Z}. If ui≤wiu_{i}\le w_{i}, then 0≤τ(u)i=wi−ui≤wi≤L−10\le\tau(u)_{i}=w_{i}-u_{i}\le w_{i}\le L-1. If wi<uiw_{i}<u_{i}, then wi+1≤uiw_{i}+1\le u_{i} by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §discrete, that is, wi−ui≤−1w_{i}-u_{i}\le-1, and wi−ui≥−ui≥−(L−1)w_{i}-u_{i}\ge-u_{i}\ge-(L-1), so 1≤τ(u)i≤L−11\le\tau(u)_{i}\le L-1. Thus τ(u)∈WL\tau(u)\in W_{L}. Moreover τ(τ(u))=u\tau(\tau(u))=u: if ui≤wiu_{i}\le w_{i}, then τ(u)i≤wi\tau(u)_{i}\le w_{i}, so λi(τ(u))=0\lambda_{i}(\tau(u))=0 and τ(τ(u))i=wi−(wi−ui)=ui\tau(\tau(u))_{i}=w_{i}-(w_{i}-u_{i})=u_{i}; if wi<uiw_{i}<u_{i}, then τ(u)i=wi+(L−ui)>wi\tau(u)_{i}=w_{i}+(L-u_{i})>w_{i} as ui≤L−1u_{i}\le L-1, so λi(τ(u))=1\lambda_{i}(\tau(u))=1 and τ(τ(u))i=wi−τ(u)i+L=ui\tau(\tau(u))_{i}=w_{i}-\tau(u)_{i}+L=u_{i}. So τ\tau is a bijection of WLW_{L}, and

w−τ(u)=u+L(−λ(u)),L−1τ(u)=(y−L−1u)+λ(u)(u∈WL).w-\tau(u)=u+L\bigl(-\lambda(u)\bigr),\qquad L^{-1}\tau(u)=\bigl(y-L^{-1}u\bigr)+\lambda(u)\qquad(u\in W_{L}).

Here w−τ(u)w-\tau(u) and −λ(u)-\lambda(u) lie in Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n} by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §ring. Hence j(w−τ(u))=j(u)\mathfrak{j}(w-\tau(u))=\mathfrak{j}(u) by Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols §interaction, applied with l=−λ(u)l=-\lambda(u). Also ψk∈Cper\psi_{k}\in C_{\mathrm{per}} by The Trigonometric System on the Torus is Orthonormal §classes, so ψk\psi_{k} is Zn\mathbb{Z}^{n}-periodic by Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §classes and Lattice-Periodic Functions and the Periodic Function Classes §periodic, and ψk(L−1τ(u))=ψk(y−L−1u)\psi_{k}(L^{-1}\tau(u))=\psi_{k}(y-L^{-1}u) for every k∈Znk\in\mathbb{Z}^{n}.

(b) Let p∈[n]p\in[n]. For u∈WLu\in W_{L} let ϱpu∈Zn\varrho_{p}u\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} have components (ϱpu)i=ui(\varrho_{p}u)_{i}=u_{i} for i≠pi\ne p, and (ϱpu)p=0(\varrho_{p}u)_{p}=0 if up=0u_{p}=0, (ϱpu)p=L−up(\varrho_{p}u)_{p}=L-u_{p} if up≠0u_{p}\ne0; these components are integers by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §ring. If up≠0u_{p}\ne0 then 0<up0<u_{p}, as 0≤up0\le u_{p}, so 1≤up1\le u_{p} by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §discrete; thus 1≤up≤L−11\le u_{p}\le L-1, so 1≤L−up≤L−11\le L-u_{p}\le L-1; thus ϱpu∈WL\varrho_{p}u\in W_{L}, and ϱp(ϱpu)=u\varrho_{p}(\varrho_{p}u)=u since L−(L−up)=upL-(L-u_{p})=u_{p}. So ϱp\varrho_{p} is a bijection of WLW_{L}. Further ϱpu=Rpu+L η(u)\varrho_{p}u=R_{p}u+L\,\eta(u), where η(u)∈Zn\eta(u)\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} has pp-th component 11 if up≠0u_{p}\ne0 and 00 if up=0u_{p}=0, and all other components 00, so that η(u)∈Zn\eta(u)\in\mathbb{Z}^{n} as 0,1∈Z0,1\in\mathbb{Z} (Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §ring); by Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols §interaction, applied with l=η(u)l=\eta(u) and then with i=pi=p, j(ϱpu)=j(Rpu)=j(u)\mathfrak{j}(\varrho_{p}u)=\mathfrak{j}(R_{p}u)=\mathfrak{j}(u). Finally, for q∈Zq\in\mathbb{Z},

Sq(L−1(ϱpu)p)=−Sq(L−1up).S_{q}\bigl(L^{-1}(\varrho_{p}u)_{p}\bigr)=-S_{q}\bigl(L^{-1}u_{p}\bigr).

If up=0u_{p}=0, both sides are ±sin⁡0=0\pm\sin0=0 by Values at Zero, Parity, Addition and Double-Angle Identities for Sine and Cosine §zero. If up≠0u_{p}\ne0, put s=L−1ups=L^{-1}u_{p}; then L−1(L−up)=1−sL^{-1}(L-u_{p})=1-s and Sq(1−s)=sin⁡(−2πqs+2πq)=sin⁡(−2πqs)=−sin⁡(2πqs)=−Sq(s)S_{q}(1-s)=\sin(-2\pi qs+2\pi q)=\sin(-2\pi qs)=-\sin(2\pi qs)=-S_{q}(s), by Quarter-Turn Identities and Periodicity of Sine and Cosine §integer and Values at Zero, Parity, Addition and Double-Angle Identities for Sine and Cosine §parity.

Step 3: a one-variable expansion. Let m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z}. By Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §sign, exactly one of m=0m=0, 0<m0<m and m<0m<0 holds. By Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣m∣|m| is mm or −m-m, so ∣m∣∈Z|m|\in\mathbb{Z} by Arithmetic, Order, Discreteness and Intervals of the Integers §ring, and S∣m∣S_{|m|} is defined. Let ϵm=1\epsilon_{m}=1 if 0≤m0\le m and ϵm=−1\epsilon_{m}=-1 if m<0m<0. We show that for all m∈Zm\in\mathbb{Z} and t,s∈Rt,s\in\mathbb{R}

ϕm(t−s)=ϕm(t) Cm(s)+ϵm ϕ−m(t) S∣m∣(s).(A)\phi_{m}(t-s)=\phi_{m}(t)\,C_{m}(s)+\epsilon_{m}\,\phi_{-m}(t)\,S_{|m|}(s).\qquad\text{(A)}

If m=0m=0: ϕ0(t−s)=1=ϕ0(t) C0(s)\phi_{0}(t-s)=1=\phi_{0}(t)\,C_{0}(s) and S0(s)=0S_{0}(s)=0, by The Trigonometric System on the Torus §one-dimensional and Cell Integrals of the Trigonometric Monomials §calculus. If 0<m0<m: then ∣m∣=m|m|=m and −m<0-m<0, so ϕ−m(t)=2 Sm(t)\phi_{-m}(t)=\sqrt{2}\,S_{m}(t); by Addition Formulas for Sine and Cosine §cosine with a=2πmta=2\pi mt and x=−2πmsx=-2\pi ms, and by Values at Zero, Parity, Addition and Double-Angle Identities for Sine and Cosine §parity,

ϕm(t−s)=2cos⁡(2πmt−2πms)=2 Cm(t) Cm(s)+2 Sm(t) Sm(s)=ϕm(t) Cm(s)+ϕ−m(t) S∣m∣(s).\phi_{m}(t-s)=\sqrt{2}\cos(2\pi mt-2\pi ms)=\sqrt{2}\,C_{m}(t)\,C_{m}(s)+\sqrt{2}\,S_{m}(t)\,S_{m}(s)=\phi_{m}(t)\,C_{m}(s)+\phi_{-m}(t)\,S_{|m|}(s).

If m<0m<0: put q=−m=∣m∣q=-m=|m|, so 0<q0<q, ϕm(t)=2 Sq(t)\phi_{m}(t)=\sqrt{2}\,S_{q}(t), ϕ−m(t)=2 Cq(t)\phi_{-m}(t)=\sqrt{2}\,C_{q}(t), and Cm(s)=cos⁡(−2πqs)=Cq(s)C_{m}(s)=\cos(-2\pi qs)=C_{q}(s) by Values at Zero, Parity, Addition and Double-Angle Identities for Sine and Cosine §parity; by Addition Formulas for Sine and Cosine §sine with a=2πqta=2\pi qt and x=−2πqsx=-2\pi qs, and by the same parity clause,

ϕm(t−s)=2sin⁡(2πqt−2πqs)=2 Sq(t) Cq(s)−2 Cq(t) Sq(s)=ϕm(t) Cm(s)−ϕ−m(t) S∣m∣(s).\phi_{m}(t-s)=\sqrt{2}\sin(2\pi qt-2\pi qs)=\sqrt{2}\,S_{q}(t)\,C_{q}(s)-\sqrt{2}\,C_{q}(t)\,S_{q}(s)=\phi_{m}(t)\,C_{m}(s)-\phi_{-m}(t)\,S_{|m|}(s).

Step 4: eigenvectors (claim 2). Let k∈ΓMk\in\Gamma_{M} and y∈LMy\in\mathbb{L}_{M}, let w∈WLw\in W_{L} with y=L−1wy=L^{-1}w, and let τ\tau be the bijection of Step 2(a) for this ww. Reindexing along w′↦L−1w′w'\mapsto L^{-1}w' and along τ\tau (claim 2 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set), and using Step 2(a),

∑z∈LMJ(y,z) ψk(z)=∑w′∈WLj(w−w′) ψk(L−1w′)=∑u∈WLj(w−τ(u)) ψk(L−1τ(u))=∑u∈WLj(u) ψk(y−L−1u).\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}J(y,z)\,\psi_{k}(z)=\sum_{w'\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(w-w')\,\psi_{k}(L^{-1}w')=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(w-\tau(u))\,\psi_{k}(L^{-1}\tau(u))=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,\psi_{k}(y-L^{-1}u).

For an integer pp with 0≤p≤n0\le p\le n, i∈[n]i\in[n] and u∈WLu\in W_{L} let gp,i(u)=ϕki(yi) Cki(L−1ui)g_{p,i}(u)=\phi_{k_{i}}(y_{i})\,C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i}) if i≤pi\le p and gp,i(u)=ϕki(yi−L−1ui)g_{p,i}(u)=\phi_{k_{i}}(y_{i}-L^{-1}u_{i}) if p<ip<i, and let Fp(u)=∏i=1ngp,i(u)F_{p}(u)=\prod_{i=1}^{n}g_{p,i}(u). As the ii-th component of y−L−1uy-L^{-1}u is yi−L−1uiy_{i}-L^{-1}u_{i}, F0(u)=ψk(y−L−1u)F_{0}(u)=\psi_{k}(y-L^{-1}u); and by claim 2 of Properties of Finite Products, Fn(u)=ψk(y)∏i=1nCki(L−1ui)F_{n}(u)=\psi_{k}(y)\prod_{i=1}^{n}C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i}).

Let p∈[n]p\in[n]. For i≠pi\ne p one has gp−1,i=gp,ig_{p-1,i}=g_{p,i}, since i≤p−1i\le p-1 if and only if i≤pi\le p. Let ri(u)=gp,i(u)r_{i}(u)=g_{p,i}(u) for i∈[n]i\in[n] with i≠pi\ne p, rp(u)=1r_{p}(u)=1, and Πp(u)=∏i=1nri(u)\Pi_{p}(u)=\prod_{i=1}^{n}r_{i}(u). Writing each factor gp,i(u)g_{p,i}(u), respectively gp−1,i(u)g_{p-1,i}(u), as ri(u)r_{i}(u) times the number equal to 11 for i≠pi\ne p and to gp,p(u)g_{p,p}(u), respectively gp−1,p(u)g_{p-1,p}(u), for i=pi=p, claims 2 and 3 of Properties of Finite Products give Fp(u)=Πp(u) gp,p(u)F_{p}(u)=\Pi_{p}(u)\,g_{p,p}(u) and Fp−1(u)=Πp(u) gp−1,p(u)F_{p-1}(u)=\Pi_{p}(u)\,g_{p-1,p}(u). By (A) with m=kpm=k_{p}, t=ypt=y_{p} and s=L−1ups=L^{-1}u_{p},

Fp−1(u)=Fp(u)+ϵkp ϕ−kp(yp) D(u),D(u)=Πp(u) S∣kp∣(L−1up).F_{p-1}(u)=F_{p}(u)+\epsilon_{k_{p}}\,\phi_{-k_{p}}(y_{p})\,D(u),\qquad D(u)=\Pi_{p}(u)\,S_{|k_{p}|}(L^{-1}u_{p}).

Each ri(u)r_{i}(u) depends on uu only through uiu_{i} for i≠pi\ne p, and (ϱpu)i=ui(\varrho_{p}u)_{i}=u_{i} for i≠pi\ne p, so Πp(ϱpu)=Πp(u)\Pi_{p}(\varrho_{p}u)=\Pi_{p}(u); with Step 2(b) this gives j(ϱpu) D(ϱpu)=−j(u) D(u)\mathfrak{j}(\varrho_{p}u)\,D(\varrho_{p}u)=-\mathfrak{j}(u)\,D(u). Put Σ=∑u∈WLj(u) D(u)\Sigma=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,D(u). Reindexing along the bijection ϱp\varrho_{p} (claim 2 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set) and then claim 4 of that lemma give Σ=∑u∈WLj(ϱpu) D(ϱpu)=∑u∈WL(−1) j(u) D(u)=−Σ\Sigma=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(\varrho_{p}u)\,D(\varrho_{p}u)=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}(-1)\,\mathfrak{j}(u)\,D(u)=-\Sigma, so Σ=0\Sigma=0. By claims 3 and 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set,

∑u∈WLj(u) Fp−1(u)=∑u∈WLj(u) Fp(u)+ϵkp ϕ−kp(yp) Σ=∑u∈WLj(u) Fp(u).\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,F_{p-1}(u)=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,F_{p}(u)+\epsilon_{k_{p}}\,\phi_{-k_{p}}(y_{p})\,\Sigma=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,F_{p}(u).

By induction on pp the sum ∑u∈WLj(u) Fp(u)\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,F_{p}(u) is the same for all pp with 0≤p≤n0\le p\le n. Hence, by claim 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set and Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols §symbol,

∑z∈LMJ(y,z) ψk(z)=∑u∈WLj(u) F0(u)=∑u∈WLj(u) Fn(u)=ψk(y)∑u∈WLj(u)∏i=1nCki(L−1ui)=J^(k) ψk(y).\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}J(y,z)\,\psi_{k}(z)=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,F_{0}(u)=\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\,F_{n}(u)=\psi_{k}(y)\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\mathfrak{j}(u)\prod_{i=1}^{n}C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i})=\hat{J}(k)\,\psi_{k}(y).

Step 5: the interaction energy (claim 3). Let ff and gg be lattice fields and y∈LMy\in\mathbb{L}_{M}. By Discrete Fourier Analysis on the Lattice Torus: Counting, Orthogonality, Inversion, Parseval, and the Spin Sum §inversion-formula, g(z)=∑k∈ΓMg^(k) ψk(z)g(z)=\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{g}(k)\,\psi_{k}(z) for z∈LMz\in\mathbb{L}_{M}. Using claim 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set, the interchange of claim 5 of Peeling, Splitting, and Interchange for Sums over a Finite Index Set, and Step 4,

∑z∈LMJ(y,z) f(y) g(z)=f(y)∑z∈LM∑k∈ΓMg^(k) J(y,z) ψk(z)=f(y)∑k∈ΓMg^(k)∑z∈LMJ(y,z) ψk(z)=∑k∈ΓMJ^(k) g^(k) f(y) ψk(y).\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}J(y,z)\,f(y)\,g(z)=f(y)\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{g}(k)\,J(y,z)\,\psi_{k}(z)=f(y)\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{g}(k)\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}J(y,z)\,\psi_{k}(z)=\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{J}(k)\,\hat{g}(k)\,f(y)\,\psi_{k}(y).

By The Lattice Torus of Odd Side, Lattice Fields, and the Discrete Fourier Coefficients of a Lattice Field §coefficients, ∑y∈LMf(y) ψk(y)=Lnf^(k)\sum_{y\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}f(y)\,\psi_{k}(y)=L^{n}\hat{f}(k), as LnL−n=1L^{n}L^{-n}=1. Summing over yy and using the same interchange and claim 4 of Properties of a Sum over a Finite Index Set again,

∑y∈LM∑z∈LMJ(y,z) f(y) g(z)=∑k∈ΓMJ^(k) g^(k)∑y∈LMf(y) ψk(y)=∑k∈ΓMJ^(k) g^(k) Lnf^(k)=Ln∑k∈ΓMJ^(k) f^(k) g^(k).\sum_{y\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}\sum_{z\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}J(y,z)\,f(y)\,g(z)=\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{J}(k)\,\hat{g}(k)\sum_{y\in\mathbb{L}_{M}}f(y)\,\psi_{k}(y)=\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{J}(k)\,\hat{g}(k)\,L^{n}\hat{f}(k)=L^{n}\sum_{k\in\Gamma_{M}}\hat{J}(k)\,\hat{f}(k)\,\hat{g}(k).

Step 6: the bound (claim 4). Let k∈ΓMk\in\Gamma_{M} and u∈WLu\in W_{L}. By Cell Integrals of the Trigonometric Monomials §calculus, ∣Cki(L−1ui)∣≤1|C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i})|\le1 for every i∈[n]i\in[n]. By induction on j∈[n]j\in[n], using the recursion of claim 1 of Properties of Finite Products and ∣αβ∣=∣α∣ ∣β∣|\alpha\beta|=|\alpha|\,|\beta| for α,β∈R\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{R}, one has ∣∏i=1jCki(L−1ui)∣≤1\bigl|\prod_{i=1}^{j}C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i})\bigr|\le1: for j=1j=1 the product is Ck1(L−1u1)C_{k_{1}}(L^{-1}u_{1}), and if the bound holds for jj with j+1≤nj+1\le n, then the product up to j+1j+1 has absolute value ∣∏i=1jCki(L−1ui)∣ ∣Ckj+1(L−1uj+1)∣≤1⋅1\bigl|\prod_{i=1}^{j}C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i})\bigr|\,|C_{k_{j+1}}(L^{-1}u_{j+1})|\le1\cdot1. Hence ∣j(u)∏i=1nCki(L−1ui)∣≤∣j(u)∣\bigl|\mathfrak{j}(u)\prod_{i=1}^{n}C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i})\bigr|\le|\mathfrak{j}(u)|, and by Reflection-Symmetric Periodic Pair Interactions on the Lattice Torus, Their Interaction Matrices and Their Symbols §symbol, Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §absolute and Real Sums over a Finite Index Set: Comparison, Nonnegativity, Monotonicity, Term Bounds, Absolute Values, Counting and Limits §comparison,

∣J^(k)∣≤∑u∈WL∣j(u)∏i=1nCki(L−1ui)∣≤∑u∈WL∣j(u)∣.|\hat{J}(k)|\le\sum_{u\in W_{L}}\Bigl|\mathfrak{j}(u)\prod_{i=1}^{n}C_{k_{i}}(L^{-1}u_{i})\Bigr|\le\sum_{u\in W_{L}}|\mathfrak{j}(u)|.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…