Reason: First published version of the proof of mean-field well-posedness, by applying the differential equation theorem to the projected drift and then the forward invariance lemma to return to the simplex.
Proof
Define f:[0,T]×Rl→Rl by f(t,y)=b^(y,At).
Step 1: f satisfies the hypotheses of the differential equation theorem. Fix y∈Rl and γ. By the projected-extension lemma, b^(y,α)=b(πΔl(y),α) and ∣b(Σ,α)−b(Σ,α′)∣≤2l(l−1)K1∣α−α′∣ for Σ∈Δl, so α↦b^γ(y,α) is sequentially continuous on Rm. Since the components of A are measurable, measurability of sequentially continuous functions of measurable Euclidean maps shows that t↦fγ(t,y)=b^γ(y,At) is measurable. The bound and the state-Lipschitz property of the projected drift in the projected-extension lemma give ∣f(t,y)∣=∣b^(y,At)∣≤Kb for all (t,y), and
its value at t=0 is S0, and it satisfies ∣xt−xr∣≤Kb∣t−r∣, which is claim 3.
The hypotheses of the forward invariance lemma hold for this x: the components of A are measurable, x is continuous, x0=S0∈Δl, and the displayed integral equation is exactly the one required. Hence xt∈Δl for every t∈[0,T] and b^(xt,At)=b(xt,At) for every t∈[0,T].
Step 3: (S,A) is a generalized mean-field trajectory pair. Put S=x. Then S maps [0,T] into Δl and A maps [0,T] into A by hypothesis. Condition 1 of the definition holds: the components of S are continuous and those of A are measurable. For condition 2, the identity b^γ(Ss,As)=bγ(Ss,As), valid for every s∈[0,T] by Step 2, turns the displayed integral equation into
Step 4: uniqueness. Let (S~,A) be a generalized mean-field trajectory pair with horizon T whose value at t=0 is S0. Then S~ is continuous with values in Δl, so the fixed-point clause of the projection lemma gives πΔl(S~s)=S~s and hence bγ(S~s,As)=b^γ(S~s,As) for every s. Condition 2 of the definition therefore states that