TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, R\mathbb{R} denotes the real numbers, an ordered field whose order ≀\le is a total order, with the addition of the underlying field, additive identity 00 and multiplicative identity 11; for real numbers s,ts,t we write s<ts<t to mean s≀ts\le t and sβ‰ ts\ne t. For a∈Xa\in X and a real number r>0r>0, Bd(a,r)B_d(a,r) denotes the open ball in (X,d)(X,d) with center aa and radius rr. Let N\mathbb{N} be the natural numbers.

Step 1: a 11-net. Statement 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<10<1 in R\mathbb{R}. Applying the definition of total boundedness with Ξ΅=1\varepsilon=1 yields a finite subset FβŠ†XF\subseteq X such that

KβŠ†β‹ƒa∈FBd(a,1).K\subseteq\bigcup_{a\in F}B_d(a,1).

Step 2: the case F=βˆ…F=\emptyset. By the convention recorded in the definition of total boundedness, the union over the empty index set is empty, so KβŠ†βˆ…K\subseteq\emptyset and therefore K=βˆ…K=\emptyset. Since XX is nonempty, fix a point x∈Xx\in X and put R=1R=1. Then 0<R0<R, and the requirement that d(x,y)≀Rd(x,y)\le R for every y∈Ky\in K holds vacuously because KK has no elements. Hence KK is bounded in (X,d)(X,d).

Step 3: the case Fβ‰ βˆ…F\ne\emptyset, a bound on the centers. Since FF is finite and nonempty, the definition of a finite set gives a natural number nn such that FF has nn elements, and hence a bijection Ξ²:[n]β†’F\beta:[n]\to F, where [n][n] is the initial segment of N\mathbb{N} determined by nn. Fix a point x0∈Fx_0\in F.

Let cc be the nn-tuple in R\mathbb{R} whose components are

ck=d(x0,β(k))(k∈[n]).c_k=d\bigl(x_0,\beta(k)\bigr)\qquad (k\in[n]).

By Greatest Element of a Finite Family in a Totally Ordered Set, applied to the totally ordered set R\mathbb{R}, there is j∈[n]j\in[n] with ck≀cjc_k\le c_j for every k∈[n]k\in[n]. Put M=cjM=c_j. Because Ξ²\beta is a bijection onto FF, every a∈Fa\in F equals Ξ²(k)\beta(k) for some k∈[n]k\in[n], so

d(x0,a)≀MforΒ everyΒ a∈F.d(x_0,a)\le M\qquad\text{for every } a\in F.

Step 4: the radius. Put R=1+MR=1+M. Condition 1 in the definition of a metric gives 0≀d(x0,Ξ²(j))=M0\le d(x_0,\beta(j))=M. Applying statement 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the pair of inequalities 0<10<1 and 0≀M0\le M gives 0+0<1+M0+0<1+M, and 0+0=00+0=0 by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. Hence 0<R0<R.

Step 5: the bound on KK. Let y∈Ky\in K. By Step 1 there is a∈Fa\in F with y∈Bd(a,1)y\in B_d(a,1), that is, d(a,y)<1d(a,y)<1 by the definition of the open ball. From d(a,y)<1d(a,y)<1 and d(x0,a)≀Md(x_0,a)\le M, statement 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives

d(a,y)+d(x0,a)<1+M=R,d(a,y)+d(x_0,a)<1+M=R,

and addition in a field is commutative, so d(x0,a)+d(a,y)<Rd(x_0,a)+d(a,y)<R. Condition 4 in the definition of a metric gives d(x0,y)≀d(x0,a)+d(a,y)d(x_0,y)\le d(x_0,a)+d(a,y), so mixed transitivity, statement 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, yields d(x0,y)<Rd(x_0,y)<R and in particular d(x0,y)≀Rd(x_0,y)\le R.

Thus x0∈FβŠ†Xx_0\in F\subseteq X and the real number RR satisfy 0<R0<R and d(x0,y)≀Rd(x_0,y)\le R for every y∈Ky\in K, so KK is bounded in (X,d)(X,d).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…