TheoremBase

Proof of The Pointwise Supremum of a Uniformly Subordinate Family of Viscosity Subsolutions on the Wasserstein Space is a Viscosity Subsolution

lemmalem:sup-of-subsolutions-wasserstein-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 16,465 chars · 35 deps · depth 40 Reason: P2b: proof carried onto lem:sup-of-subsolutions-wasserstein-2026b; growth replaces local bounds, ball bound via the delta-envelope bound lemma with weight delta/2.

The uniform constants give the supremum subordinate growth and dominate each member's envelope. At a test maximum of the supremum's envelope, make the maximum strict, pick a member nearly attaining the supremum, maximise its penalised envelope minus the test function over a small ball (the envelope lies below a constant minus half the penalty), apply that member's subsolution property at the maximiser, and transport the witnesses back by gluing couplings.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The symmetry and the triangle inequality of W2W_{2} (The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §symmetry, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle) and the rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding and scaling inequalities are used without further mention. For ν,ρP2(Rd)\nu,\rho\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) and πΠ(ν,ρ)\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\rho) we have W2(ν,ρ)I(π)W_{2}(\nu,\rho)\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}, by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Each vSv\in\mathcal{S}, being a viscosity subsolution, has penalty-subordinate growth from above (Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution). By Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §lsc the penalty E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D}.

Claim 1. Let δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let CC be as in the assumption that S\mathcal{S} is uniformly subordinate from above, for δ\delta. For μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}, C+δE(μ)C+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu) is an upper bound of {v(μ):vS}\{v(\mu):v\in\mathcal{S}\}, so u(μ)C+δE(μ)u(\mu)\le C+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu) by Upper Bound and Least Upper Bound. As δ\delta was arbitrary, uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above by Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Penalty Domain §above. For vSv\in\mathcal{S} and μD\mu\in\mathcal{D}, v(μ)v(\mu) lies in the set of which u(μ)u(\mu) is an upper bound, so v(μ)u(μ)v(\mu)\le u(\mu). Consequently, for positive δ\delta the functions vδEv-\delta\mathcal{E} and uδEu-\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D}, both bounded above near each point of D\mathcal{D} by The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Penalty Domain Relative to a Penalty Pair §minus, satisfy vδEuδEv-\delta\mathcal{E}\le u-\delta\mathcal{E} pointwise, and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §monotone gives vδ(ν)uδ(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu) for νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}.

Claim 2. By claim 1, uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above, so its δ\delta-envelopes uδu^{-}_{\delta} are defined. Let δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive, let φ\varphi be an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, let μ^D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} be a point at which the function with value uδ(μ)φ(μ)u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-\varphi(\mu) at μD\mu\in\mathcal{D} has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D}, witnessed by a positive radius τ\tau as in Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space, and let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Write M=uδ(μ^)φ(μ^)M=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varphi(\hat{\mu}).

Step 1: a strict maximum. Put β=ε8\beta=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8} and let ψ0(ν)=W2(ν,μ^)2\psi_{0}(\nu)=W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}. Since D\mathcal{D} has the map property, ψ0\psi_{0} is an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with Hψ0(ν)=2IdH_{\psi_{0}}(\nu)=2I_{d} for every ν\nu and ψ0(μ^)=2(idS)\nabla\psi_{0}(\hat{\mu})=2(\mathrm{id}-S) for any optimal map SS from μ^\hat{\mu} to μ^\hat{\mu}, by The Squared Wasserstein Distance to a Fixed Measure and Functions of the Mean are Intrinsic Test Functions §distance. The identity map is such an SS: id#μ^=μ^\mathrm{id}_{\#}\hat{\mu}=\hat{\mu}, and by The Displacement Pairing of a Square-Integrable Vector Field Along a Coupling §displacement with S=idS=\mathrm{id} the coupling (id,id)#μ^(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\hat{\mu} has cost ididμ^2=0=W2(μ^,μ^)2\lVert\mathrm{id}-\mathrm{id}\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=0=W_{2}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu})^{2}, so it is optimal by Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §optimal and id\mathrm{id} is an optimal map by Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map. Hence ψ0(μ^)=0\nabla\psi_{0}(\hat{\mu})=0. Let φ~=φ+βψ0\tilde{\varphi}=\varphi+\beta\psi_{0}. By Restrictions, Sums, Real Multiples and Differences of Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space §linear, φ~\tilde{\varphi} is an intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with

φ~(μ^)=φ(μ^),Hφ~(μ^)=Hφ(μ^)+2βId,φ~(μ^)=φ(μ^),\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}),\qquad H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\mu})=H_{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})+2\beta I_{d},\qquad\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\varphi(\hat{\mu}),

the last because W2(μ^,μ^)=0W_{2}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu})=0. Moreover Id1\lVert I_{d}\rVert\le1: for ξRd\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{d} with ξ1\lVert\xi\rVert\le1 we have ξ(Idξ)=ξ21|\xi\cdot(I_{d}\xi)|=\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, so 11 is an upper bound of the set whose least upper bound is Id\lVert I_{d}\rVert by Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §norm. By claim 5 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix, Hφ~(μ^)Hφ(μ^)=2βId2β=ε4\lVert H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\mu})-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})\rVert=\lVert2\beta I_{d}\rVert\le2\beta=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}. For νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(ν,μ^)<τW_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\tau the local maximum gives

uδ(ν)φ~(ν)MβW2(ν,μ^)2.(1)u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)\le M-\beta\,W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}. \tag{1}

Step 2: radii. Using Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces for φ\varphi and φ~\tilde{\varphi} (property (a), Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §continuity), Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space for uδu^{-}_{\delta}, which is upper semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} by Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity, and property (e) of φ~\tilde{\varphi} (Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §hessian-continuity), choose positive radii θ0,θ2,θ3,θ4\theta_{0},\theta_{2},\theta_{3},\theta_{4} such that for νP2(Rd)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}): W2(ν,μ^)<θ0W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{0} implies φ(ν)φ(μ^)<1|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<1; W2(ν,μ^)<θ2W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{2} implies Hφ~(ν)Hφ~(μ^)<ε4\lVert H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\nu)-H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\mu})\rVert<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}; νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and W2(ν,μ^)<θ3W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{3} imply uδ(ν)<uδ(μ^)+ε4u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)<u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}; W2(ν,μ^)<θ4W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{4} implies φ~(ν)φ~(μ^)<ε8|\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}.

We also need a radius for the gradients: there is a positive θ1\theta_{1} such that for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and every πΠ(ν,μ^)\pi\in\Pi(\nu,\hat{\mu}) with I(π)<θ12I(\pi)<\theta_{1}^{2} the discrepancy of φ~(ν)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\nu) and φ~(μ^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu}) along π\pi is less than (ε4)2(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}. Suppose not. Let (hn)nN(h_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence of positive reals with limit 00 (Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero); for each nn there are νnD\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D} and πnΠ(νn,μ^)\pi_{n}\in\Pi(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) with I(πn)<hn2I(\pi_{n})<h_{n}^{2} and discrepancy Dn(ε4)2D_{n}\ge(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}. Since 0I(πn)<hn20\le I(\pi_{n})<h_{n}^{2} and (hn2)(h_{n}^{2}) has limit 00 by claim 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences, (I(πn))(I(\pi_{n})) has limit 00 by claim 2 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences; property (c) of φ~\tilde{\varphi} on D\mathcal{D} (Intrinsic Test Functions on the Wasserstein Space and Their Translation Hessians §gradient-continuity), at the point μ^D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}, then says that (Dn)(D_{n}) has limit 00, and claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences gives (ε4)20(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}\le0, contradicting claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Let CC be as in the assumption that S\mathcal{S} is uniformly subordinate from above, for the positive number δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2} (claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Put

ρ=12min{τ,θ0},σ=12min{ρ,θ1,θ2,θ3,θ4,ε},η=min{βσ23,ε24},\rho=\tfrac12\min\{\tau,\theta_{0}\},\qquad\sigma=\tfrac12\min\{\rho,\theta_{1},\theta_{2},\theta_{3},\theta_{4},\varepsilon\},\qquad\eta=\min\Bigl\{\tfrac{\beta\sigma^{2}}{3},\tfrac{\varepsilon}{24}\Bigr\},

all positive by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements (applied repeatedly) and claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and let K={νD:W2(ν,μ^)ρ}K=\{\nu\in\mathcal{D}:W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\le\rho\}. Since ρ<τ\rho<\tau and ρ<θ0\rho<\theta_{0}, every νK\nu\in K satisfies (1) and φ(ν)φ(μ^)<1|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<1.

Step 3: a member of the family and its maximiser. Let θη\theta_{\eta} be a positive radius with φ~(ν)φ~(μ^)<η|\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})|<\eta whenever W2(ν,μ^)<θηW_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{\eta}, and put η=min{η,12θη,ρ}\eta'=\min\{\eta,\tfrac12\theta_{\eta},\rho\}. By Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §approximation, applied to uδEu-\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D} at μ^\hat{\mu} with η\eta', there is zDz\in\mathcal{D} with W2(z,μ^)ηW_{2}(z,\hat{\mu})\le\eta' and u(z)δE(z)uδ(μ^)<ηη|u(z)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(z)-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\eta'\le\eta. Then zKz\in K and φ~(z)φ~(μ^)<η|\tilde{\varphi}(z)-\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})|<\eta. By claim 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} there is vSv\in\mathcal{S} with u(z)η<v(z)u(z)-\eta<v(z).

Let g:DRg:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be g(ν)=vδ(ν)φ~(ν)g(\nu)=v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu). It is upper semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D}: at ν0D\nu_{0}\in\mathcal{D} and for positive ε0\varepsilon_{0}, Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity and Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space give a radius within which vδ(ν)<vδ(ν0)+ε02v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)<v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{0})+\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2}, continuity of φ~\tilde{\varphi} a radius within which φ~(ν)<φ~(ν0)+ε02-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)<-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu_{0})+\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2} (claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field), and within the lesser radius the two add to g(ν)<g(ν0)+ε0g(\nu)<g(\nu_{0})+\varepsilon_{0}. Since v(ν)C+δ2E(ν)v(\nu)\le C+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}, 0δ2δ0\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\le\delta and δδ2=δ2\delta-\tfrac{\delta}{2}=\tfrac{\delta}{2}, Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §bound, applied to vv with δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2} in the role of the weight there written η\eta and with the constant CC, gives vδ(ν)Cδ2E(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}; and for νK\nu\in K, φ~(ν)φ(ν)<1φ(μ^)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)\le-\varphi(\nu)<1-\varphi(\hat{\mu}), since βψ0(ν)0\beta\psi_{0}(\nu)\ge0. Hence g(ν)(C+1φ(μ^))δ2E(ν)g(\nu)\le\bigl(C+1-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for νK\nu\in K, and Attained Maxima on Closed Balls of the Penalty Domain, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §attained, with δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2} in place of δ\delta, the radius ρ\rho and the constant C+1φ(μ^)C+1-\varphi(\hat{\mu}), provides ν^K\hat{\nu}\in K with g(ν)g(ν^)g(\nu)\le g(\hat{\nu}) for every νK\nu\in K.

Step 4: the maximiser is close to μ^\hat{\mu}. By Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space §semicontinuity, v(z)δE(z)vδ(z)v(z)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(z)\le v^{-}_{\delta}(z), so, using zKz\in K, the choice of vv, of zz and φ~(μ^)=φ(μ^)\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\varphi(\hat{\mu}),

g(ν^)g(z)v(z)δE(z)φ~(z)>u(z)δE(z)ηφ~(z)>uδ(μ^)2η(φ(μ^)+η)=M3η.g(\hat{\nu})\ge g(z)\ge v(z)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(z)-\tilde{\varphi}(z)>u(z)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(z)-\eta-\tilde{\varphi}(z)>u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-2\eta-\bigl(\varphi(\hat{\mu})+\eta\bigr)=M-3\eta .

On the other hand vδ(ν^)uδ(ν^)v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}) by claim 1, and ν^K\hat{\nu}\in K satisfies (1), so g(ν^)MβW2(ν^,μ^)2g(\hat{\nu})\le M-\beta\,W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}. Therefore βW2(ν^,μ^)2<3ηβσ2\beta\,W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}<3\eta\le\beta\sigma^{2}, whence W2(ν^,μ^)2<σ2W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}<\sigma^{2} and W2(ν^,μ^)<σW_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<\sigma by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. In particular W2(ν^,μ^)W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) is less than each of ρ,θ1,θ2,θ3,θ4\rho,\theta_{1},\theta_{2},\theta_{3},\theta_{4} and ε\varepsilon, each of which is at least 2σ2\sigma. Consequently

uδ(μ^)ε4<vδ(ν^)<uδ(μ^)+ε4:(2)u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})<u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}: \tag{2}

the right inequality from vδ(ν^)uδ(ν^)v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}) and the choice of θ3\theta_{3}; the left from vδ(ν^)=g(ν^)+φ~(ν^)>M3η+φ~(μ^)ε8=uδ(μ^)3ηε8v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})=g(\hat{\nu})+\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})>M-3\eta+\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-3\eta-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}, the choice of θ4\theta_{4} and 3ηε83\eta\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}.

Step 5: the witnesses for vv. The function DR\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} with value vδ(ν)φ~(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu) has a local maximum at ν^\hat{\nu} relative to D\mathcal{D}, with radius ρW2(ν^,μ^)\rho-W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}), positive since W2(ν^,μ^)<ρW_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<\rho: if νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} and W2(ν^,ν)<ρW2(ν^,μ^)W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\nu)<\rho-W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) then W2(ν,μ^)<ρW_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\rho, so νK\nu\in K and g(ν)g(ν^)g(\nu)\le g(\hat{\nu}). Put ε=min{ε8,σ}\varepsilon''=\min\{\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8},\sigma\}. Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution to the viscosity subsolution vv, with δ\delta, the intrinsic test function φ~\tilde{\varphi} on D\mathcal{D}, the point ν^\hat{\nu} and the tolerance ε\varepsilon'', we obtain νDΣ\nu'\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, πΠ(ν,ν^)\pi'\in\Pi(\nu',\hat{\nu}), sRs\in\mathbb{R}, qL2(ν;Rd)q\in L^{2}(\nu';\mathbb{R}^{d}) and YS(d)Y\in\mathcal{S}(d) with

I(π)<ε2,vδ(ν)vδ(ν^)<ε,svδ(ν^)<ε,I(\pi')<\varepsilon''^{2},\quad|v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')-v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|<\varepsilon'',\quad|s-v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|<\varepsilon'', Rd+dq(x)φ~(ν^)(y)2π(dz)<ε2,YHφ~(ν^)<ε,Fδ(ν,s,q,Y)ε.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q(x)-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})(y)\rVert^{2}\,\pi'(dz)<\varepsilon''^{2},\quad\lVert Y-H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\nu})\rVert<\varepsilon'',\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(\nu',s,q,Y)\le\varepsilon'' .

Step 6: transport to μ^\hat{\mu}. By Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment there is γΠ(ν^,μ^)\gamma\in\Pi(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) with I(γ)=W2(ν^,μ^)2I(\gamma)=W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}. Let ς\varsigma be a gluing of π\pi' and γ\gamma (Gluing Two Couplings over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Composite Coupling §glued) and π=(q1,q3)#ς\pi=(\mathrm{q}_{1},\mathrm{q}_{3})_{\#}\varsigma, which belongs to Π(ν,μ^)\Pi(\nu',\hat{\mu}) with I(π)I(π)+I(γ)<ε+W2(ν^,μ^)<2σ\sqrt{I(\pi)}\le\sqrt{I(\pi')}+\sqrt{I(\gamma)}<\varepsilon''+W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<2\sigma by Gluing Two Couplings over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Composite Coupling §composite and claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. We check the six conditions of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on the Wasserstein Space §subsolution for uu at μ^\hat{\mu} with φ\varphi and tolerance ε\varepsilon, with witnesses ν\nu', π\pi, ss, qq, YY.

First, I(π)<2σε\sqrt{I(\pi)}<2\sigma\le\varepsilon, so I(π)<ε2I(\pi)<\varepsilon^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Secondly, νD\nu'\in\mathcal{D} and W2(ν,μ^)I(π)<2σθ3W_{2}(\nu',\hat{\mu})\le\sqrt{I(\pi)}<2\sigma\le\theta_{3}, so uδ(ν)<uδ(μ^)+ε4u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')<u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}; and by claim 1 and (2), uδ(ν)vδ(ν)>vδ(ν^)ε>uδ(μ^)ε4ε8u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')\ge v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')>v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varepsilon''>u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}. So uδ(ν)uδ(μ^)<ε|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field.

Thirdly, by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and (2), suδ(μ^)svδ(ν^)+vδ(ν^)uδ(μ^)<ε8+ε4<ε|s-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|\le|s-v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|+|v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<\varepsilon.

Fourthly, since ν^D\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D} and I(γ)=W2(ν^,μ^)2<θ12I(\gamma)=W_{2}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}<\theta_{1}^{2} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), the choice of θ1\theta_{1} bounds the discrepancy of φ~(ν^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}) and φ~(μ^)=φ(μ^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) along γ\gamma by (ε4)2(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}. By A Triangle Inequality for Discrepancies Along a Composite Coupling §triangle, applied with qq, φ~(ν^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}) and φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}), and claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field,

Rd+dq(x)φ(μ^)(y)2π(dz)<ε+ε4<ε,\sqrt{\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d+d}}\lVert q(x)-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})(y)\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)}<\varepsilon''+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<\varepsilon ,

so the discrepancy of qq and φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) along π\pi is less than ε2\varepsilon^{2}.

Fifthly, all matrices below lie in S(d)\mathcal{S}(d), differences of symmetric matrices being symmetric by claim 1 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure, and claim 5 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix gives

YHφ(μ^)YHφ~(ν^)+Hφ~(ν^)Hφ~(μ^)+Hφ~(μ^)Hφ(μ^)<ε8+ε4+ε4<ε,\lVert Y-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})\rVert\le\lVert Y-H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\nu})\rVert+\lVert H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\nu})-H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\mu})\rVert+\lVert H_{\tilde{\varphi}}(\hat{\mu})-H_{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})\rVert<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<\varepsilon ,

the middle term by the choice of θ2\theta_{2} and the last by Step 1.

Finally, Fδ(ν,s,q,Y)εεF^{-}_{\delta}(\nu',s,q,Y)\le\varepsilon''\le\varepsilon.

As δ\delta, φ\varphi, μ^\hat{\mu} and ε\varepsilon were arbitrary and uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above, uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the penalty pair.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…