TheoremBase

The bad set is exhausted by countably many bounded pieces on which the density ratio drops below a fixed threshold; on such a piece a fine Vitali cover by balls of small ratio, drawn from an almost minimal open hull, forces the outer measure to be at most a fixed fraction of itself.

Proof

We use the notation of the statement. By The Lebesgue Measure of a Closed Ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^n (i) every closed ball is a Borel set of finite measure, so the numbers λn(Bˉ(y,r))\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(y,r)) below are defined and finite; by The Lebesgue Measure of a Closed Ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^n (iii) they equal κnrn\kappa_{n}r^{n}, where 0<κn0<\kappa_{n} by The Lebesgue Measure of a Closed Ball in Rn\mathbb{R}^n (ii).

Step 1 (Reduction to countably many bounded pieces). For a natural number pp with 2≤p2\le p put αp=1−1/p\alpha_{p}=1-1/p, so that 0<αp<10<\alpha_{p}<1, and let NpN_{p} be the set of those x∈Ex\in E with the following property: for every ρ∈R\rho\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ρ0<\rho there is r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R} with 0<r<ρ0<r<\rho and

λn∗(E∩Bˉ(x,r))<αp λn(Bˉ(x,r)).\lambda_{n}^{\ast}\bigl(E\cap\bar{B}(x,r)\bigr)<\alpha_{p}\,\lambda_{n}\bigl(\bar{B}(x,r)\bigr).

We claim that every x∈Ex\in E which is not a density point of EE belongs to NpN_{p} for some such pp. Indeed, negating Density Point of an Arbitrary Subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n (i) gives α∈R\alpha\in\mathbb{R} with α<1\alpha<1 such that for every ρ>0\rho>0 there is rr with 0<r<ρ0<r<\rho and λn∗(E∩Bˉ(x,r))<α λn(Bˉ(x,r))\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E\cap\bar{B}(x,r))<\alpha\,\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(x,r)). Since 0<1−α0<1-\alpha, The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers provides a natural number pp with 1/p<1−α1/p<1-\alpha, and replacing pp by a larger natural number only decreases 1/p1/p, so we may assume 2≤p2\le p. Then α<1−1/p=αp\alpha<1-1/p=\alpha_{p}, and since 0≤λn(Bˉ(x,r))0\le\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(x,r)) we get α λn(Bˉ(x,r))≤αp λn(Bˉ(x,r))\alpha\,\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(x,r))\le\alpha_{p}\,\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(x,r)); hence x∈Npx\in N_{p}.

For natural numbers p≥2p\ge2 and mm put Np,m=Np∩Bˉ(0,m)N_{p,m}=N_{p}\cap\bar{B}(0,m). Given x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers provides a natural number mm with ∥x∥≤m\lVert x\rVert\le m, and dE(x,0)=∥x∥d_{E}(x,0)=\lVert x\rVert by claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square, so x∈Bˉ(0,m)x\in\bar{B}(0,m); hence Np=⋃m∈NNp,mN_{p}=\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}N_{p,m}. By claim 5 of Elementary Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n a countable union of null sets is null, and a set is null exactly when its outer measure vanishes. Applying this twice, first over mm and then over the natural numbers p≥2p\ge2 re-indexed as p=q+1p=q+1 with q∈Nq\in\mathbb{N}, it suffices to prove that λn∗(Np,m)=0\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(N_{p,m})=0 for all p≥2p\ge2 and all mm.

Step 2 (The covering estimate). Fix such pp and mm and write P=Np,mP=N_{p,m}, α=αp\alpha=\alpha_{p} and α′=1−1/(2p)\alpha'=1-1/(2p), so that 0<α<α′<10<\alpha<\alpha'<1. Suppose, for contradiction, that 0<λn∗(P)0<\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P).

Since P⊆Bˉ(0,m)P\subseteq\bar{B}(0,m), claims 2 and 1 of Elementary Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n give λn∗(P)≤λn∗(Bˉ(0,m))=λn(Bˉ(0,m))=κnmn<∞\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)\le\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(\bar{B}(0,m))=\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(0,m))=\kappa_{n}m^{n}<\infty, so λn∗(P)\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P) is a positive real number.

Put ε0=(α′/α−1) λn∗(P)\varepsilon_{0}=(\alpha'/\alpha-1)\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P), a positive real number because α<α′\alpha<\alpha' and 0<α0<\alpha. By Outer and Inner Regularity of Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (iv), applicable because λn∗(P)<∞\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)<\infty, there is an open set U⊆RnU\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n} with P⊆UP\subseteq U and

λn(U)≤λn∗(P)+ε0=α′α λn∗(P).\lambda_{n}(U)\le\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)+\varepsilon_{0}=\frac{\alpha'}{\alpha}\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P).

Let F\mathcal{F} be the set of all pairs (y,r)(y,r) with y∈Py\in P, r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}, 0<r0<r, Bˉ(y,r)⊆U\bar{B}(y,r)\subseteq U and λn∗(E∩Bˉ(y,r))≤α λn(Bˉ(y,r))\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E\cap\bar{B}(y,r))\le\alpha\,\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(y,r)).

We check that F\mathcal{F} finely covers PP. Let x∈Px\in P and let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<η0<\eta. Since UU is open and x∈Ux\in U there is ρ1∈R\rho_{1}\in\mathbb{R} with 0<ρ10<\rho_{1} and B(x,ρ1)⊆UB(x,\rho_{1})\subseteq U. If 0<r<ρ10<r<\rho_{1} and z∈Bˉ(x,r)z\in\bar{B}(x,r) then dE(z,x)≤r<ρ1d_{E}(z,x)\le r<\rho_{1}, so z∈B(x,ρ1)z\in B(x,\rho_{1}); hence Bˉ(x,r)⊆U\bar{B}(x,r)\subseteq U for every such rr. Let ρ\rho be the smaller of η\eta and ρ1\rho_{1}. Since x∈Npx\in N_{p} there is rr with 0<r<ρ0<r<\rho and λn∗(E∩Bˉ(x,r))<α λn(Bˉ(x,r))\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E\cap\bar{B}(x,r))<\alpha\,\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}(x,r)). Then (x,r)∈F(x,r)\in\mathcal{F}, while x∈Bˉ(x,r)x\in\bar{B}(x,r) and r<ηr<\eta, which is what fine covering requires.

Put ε=12(1−α′) λn∗(P)\varepsilon=\tfrac{1}{2}(1-\alpha')\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P), a positive real number. Since λn∗(P)<∞\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)<\infty, The Vitali Covering Theorem in Rn\mathbb{R}^n (ii) provides a natural number NN, possibly 00, and pairs (y1,r1),…,(yN,rN)∈F(y_{1},r_{1}),\dots,(y_{N},r_{N})\in\mathcal{F} whose closed balls Bˉi=Bˉ(yi,ri)\bar{B}_{i}=\bar{B}(y_{i},r_{i}) are pairwise disjoint and satisfy λn∗(P∖⋃i=1NBˉi)≤ε\lambda_{n}^{\ast}\bigl(P\setminus\bigcup_{i=1}^{N}\bar{B}_{i}\bigr)\le\varepsilon.

Now PP is the union of P∖⋃i=1NBˉiP\setminus\bigcup_{i=1}^{N}\bar{B}_{i} and the sets P∩BˉiP\cap\bar{B}_{i} for 1≤i≤N1\le i\le N. Applying claim 4 of Elementary Properties of Lebesgue Outer Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n to the sequence consisting of these N+1N+1 sets followed by empty sets, and then claim 2 of that lemma together with P⊆EP\subseteq E, we obtain

λn∗(P)≤λn∗(P∖⋃i=1NBˉi)+∑i=1Nλn∗(P∩Bˉi)≤ε+∑i=1Nλn∗(E∩Bˉi).\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)\le\lambda_{n}^{\ast}\Bigl(P\setminus\bigcup_{i=1}^{N}\bar{B}_{i}\Bigr)+\sum_{i=1}^{N}\lambda_{n}^{\ast}\bigl(P\cap\bar{B}_{i}\bigr)\le\varepsilon+\sum_{i=1}^{N}\lambda_{n}^{\ast}\bigl(E\cap\bar{B}_{i}\bigr).

Each pair (yi,ri)(y_{i},r_{i}) lies in F\mathcal{F}, so λn∗(E∩Bˉi)≤α λn(Bˉi)\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(E\cap\bar{B}_{i})\le\alpha\,\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}_{i}). The balls Bˉi\bar{B}_{i} are pairwise disjoint Borel sets contained in UU, so claim 1 of Basic Properties of a Measure and then claim 2 of that lemma give

∑i=1Nλn∗(E∩Bˉi)≤α∑i=1Nλn(Bˉi)=α λn(⋃i=1NBˉi)≤α λn(U)≤α⋅α′α λn∗(P)=α′ λn∗(P).\sum_{i=1}^{N}\lambda_{n}^{\ast}\bigl(E\cap\bar{B}_{i}\bigr)\le\alpha\sum_{i=1}^{N}\lambda_{n}(\bar{B}_{i})=\alpha\,\lambda_{n}\Bigl(\bigcup_{i=1}^{N}\bar{B}_{i}\Bigr)\le\alpha\,\lambda_{n}(U)\le\alpha\cdot\frac{\alpha'}{\alpha}\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)=\alpha'\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P).

Combining the two displays, λn∗(P)≤ε+α′λn∗(P)\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)\le\varepsilon+\alpha'\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P), that is

(1−α′) λn∗(P)≤ε=12(1−α′) λn∗(P).(1-\alpha')\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)\le\varepsilon=\tfrac{1}{2}(1-\alpha')\,\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P).

Since 0<1−α′0<1-\alpha' and 0<λn∗(P)0<\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P), the left-hand side is a positive real number and the right-hand side is half of it, which is impossible.

Therefore λn∗(P)=0\lambda_{n}^{\ast}(P)=0 for all p≥2p\ge2 and all mm, and by Step 1 the set of those x∈Ex\in E which are not density points of EE is null.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…