TheoremBase

Every solution is continuous, so Gronwall's lemma for bounded measurable functions gives uniqueness, continuous dependence and the a priori bound; existence comes from the contraction mapping theorem for the integral operator on continuous functions with an exponentially weighted uniform distance.

Proof

Throughout, FF is Carathéodory–Lipschitz with constant Λ\Lambda (Carathéodory–Lipschitz Right-Hand Sides (iv)); for a function z:[a,b]→Rnz:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{n}, F(⋅,z)F(\cdot,z) is the function r↦F(r,z(r))r\mapsto F(r,z(r)) of Composition of a Carathéodory–Lipschitz Function with a Measurable Path; a Carathéodory solution with initial value ξ\xi is a Carathéodory solution on [a,b][a,b] of the integral equation with right-hand side FF and initial value ξ\xi; and C=C([a,b],Rn)C=C([a,b],\mathbb{R}^{n}) is the set of functions [a,b]→Rn[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{n} continuous on [a,b][a,b] (The Space of Continuous Maps on a Closed Interval and Its Weighted Uniform Distance (i), with (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) for (Y,dY)(Y,d_{Y})). The triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert (Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (vi)) and dE(u,v)=∥u−v∥d_{E}(u,v)=\lVert u-v\rVert (Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (ii)) are used without further mention. Integrals over [s,t][s,t] of functions in L1([a,b])\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]) or L1([a,b];Rn)\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) are defined (Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (i)), the functions t↦∫[a,t]g dλt\mapsto\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda exist (Functions and Function-Valued Operators Given by Integrals over Subintervals (ii)), and such integrals are monotone in the integrand (Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (iv)); since such an integral is the integral of the restriction to [s,t][s,t] (Integrals over Subintervals of a Closed Interval: Notation (iii)), linearity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion (vii)) applies to it, componentwise for integrands with values in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. A real function continuous on [a,b][a,b] is bounded, measurable and in L1([a,b])\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]) (Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval (iii)); sums, constant multiples and norms of continuous functions are continuous (Continuity of Vector- and Matrix-Valued Maps: the Componentwise Criterion, Norms and Algebraic Operations (iv), Continuity of Vector- and Matrix-Valued Maps: the Componentwise Criterion, Norms and Algebraic Operations (iii), Continuity of Vector- and Matrix-Valued Maps: the Componentwise Criterion, Norms and Algebraic Operations (v)).

Step 1: the difference estimate. Let z1,z2∈Cz_{1},z_{2}\in C and ζ1,ζ2∈Rn\zeta_{1},\zeta_{2}\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and let m:[a,b]→Rm:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} be the continuous function r↦∥z1(r)−z2(r)∥r\mapsto\lVert z_{1}(r)-z_{2}(r)\rVert. By Composition of a Carathéodory–Lipschitz Function with a Measurable Path (iii), F(⋅,z1)F(\cdot,z_{1}) and F(⋅,z2)F(\cdot,z_{2}) lie in L1([a,b];Rn)\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}). We show that for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]

∥(ζ1+∫[a,t]F(r,z1(r)) dr)−(ζ2+∫[a,t]F(r,z2(r)) dr)∥≤∥ζ1−ζ2∥+Λ∫[a,t]m dλ.(1)\Bigl\lVert\Bigl(\zeta_{1}+\int_{[a,t]}F\bigl(r,z_{1}(r)\bigr)\,dr\Bigr)-\Bigl(\zeta_{2}+\int_{[a,t]}F\bigl(r,z_{2}(r)\bigr)\,dr\Bigr)\Bigr\rVert\le\lVert\zeta_{1}-\zeta_{2}\rVert+\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}m\,d\lambda .\qquad(1)

The function g=F(⋅,z1)−F(⋅,z2)g=F(\cdot,z_{1})-F(\cdot,z_{2}) lies in L1([a,b];Rn)\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Rules for Integrals of Vector- and Matrix-Valued Functions (iii)), and by linearity the difference of the two integrals in (1) is ∫[a,t]g dλ\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda. By Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (vii), by Composition of a Carathéodory–Lipschitz Function with a Measurable Path (iv) and monotonicity, and by linearity,

∥∫[a,t]g dλ∥≤∫[a,t]∥g(r)∥ dr≤∫[a,t]Λ m(r) dr=Λ∫[a,t]m dλ,\Bigl\lVert\int_{[a,t]}g\,d\lambda\Bigr\rVert\le\int_{[a,t]}\lVert g(r)\rVert\,dr\le\int_{[a,t]}\Lambda\,m(r)\,dr=\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}m\,d\lambda ,

and (1) follows by the triangle inequality.

Step 2: every solution is continuous. Let ξ∈Rn\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and let xx be a Carathéodory solution with initial value ξ\xi. By Carathéodory Solutions of an Initial Value Problem (i), F(⋅,x)∈L1([a,b];Rn)F(\cdot,x)\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) and x(t)=ξ+∫[a,t]F(r,x(r)) drx(t)=\xi+\int_{[a,t]}F(r,x(r))\,dr for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]. The function t↦∫[a,t]F(r,x(r)) drt\mapsto\int_{[a,t]}F(r,x(r))\,dr is continuous on [a,b][a,b] by Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (ix), and so is its sum xx with the constant ξ\xi. Thus x∈Cx\in C.

Step 3: comparison of two solutions. Let ξ,η∈Rn\xi,\eta\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and let xx and yy be Carathéodory solutions with initial values ξ\xi and η\eta. By Step 2, x,y∈Cx,y\in C, so the function u:t↦∥x(t)−y(t)∥u:t\mapsto\lVert x(t)-y(t)\rVert is continuous on [a,b][a,b], hence bounded and measurable. By the integral equations for xx and yy and by (1) with z1=xz_{1}=x, z2=yz_{2}=y, ζ1=ξ\zeta_{1}=\xi and ζ2=η\zeta_{2}=\eta,

u(t)≤∥ξ−η∥+Λ∫[a,t]u dλ(t∈[a,b]).u(t)\le\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert+\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}u\,d\lambda\qquad\bigl(t\in[a,b]\bigr).

Gronwall's lemma (Gronwall's Lemma for Bounded Measurable Functions (i), with α=∥ξ−η∥\alpha=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert and β=Λ≥0\beta=\Lambda\ge0) gives

∥x(t)−y(t)∥≤∥ξ−η∥exp⁡(Λ(t−a))(t∈[a,b]).(2)\lVert x(t)-y(t)\rVert\le\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert\exp\bigl(\Lambda(t-a)\bigr)\qquad\bigl(t\in[a,b]\bigr).\qquad(2)

Step 4: an exponential weight. Let φ:[a,b]→R\varphi:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R} be the function t↦exp⁡(2Λ(t−a))t\mapsto\exp(2\Lambda(t-a)). By the chain rule and the derivatives of exp⁡\exp and of affine functions (Chain Rule for Real Functions on Intervals (i), Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (vii), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (ii), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (i), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (v), Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (iv)), φ\varphi is differentiable on [a,b][a,b] with φ′(t)=2Λ φ(t)\varphi'(t)=2\Lambda\,\varphi(t); hence it is continuous on [a,b][a,b] (The Increment Form of the Derivative, and Differentiability Implies Continuity (ii)). Moreover φ(a)=1\varphi(a)=1 and φ(t)>0\varphi(t)>0 for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] (Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (i), Basic Properties of the Exponential Function (iii)). The function ψ=12φ\psi=\tfrac12\varphi is differentiable on [a,b][a,b] with derivative Λφ\Lambda\varphi (Derivatives of Constants, the Identity, Sums, Scalar Multiples, Products, Reciprocals, Quotients and Powers (v)), a continuous function. Let t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]. By linearity, by Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (xi) applied to the continuous function Λφ\Lambda\varphi, and by the fundamental theorem of calculus (Rules for Oriented Riemann Integrals of Real-Valued Maps: Sums, Scalar Multiples, Constants, Continuous Maps, Additivity and Evaluation by an Antiderivative (iv), Rules for Oriented Riemann Integrals of Real-Valued Maps: Sums, Scalar Multiples, Constants, Continuous Maps, Additivity and Evaluation by an Antiderivative (vi)),

Λ∫[a,t]φ dλ=∫atΛφ=∫atψ′=ψ(t)−ψ(a)=12(φ(t)−1)≤12 φ(t).(3)\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}\varphi\,d\lambda=\int_{a}^{t}\Lambda\varphi=\int_{a}^{t}\psi'=\psi(t)-\psi(a)=\tfrac12\bigl(\varphi(t)-1\bigr)\le\tfrac12\,\varphi(t).\qquad(3)

Let w=1/φw=1/\varphi; it is continuous on [a,b][a,b] (Continuity of Identity Maps, Compositions and Reciprocals (iii)), w(t)>0w(t)>0 and w(t)φ(t)=1w(t)\varphi(t)=1 for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b]. Let dwd_{w} be the weighted uniform distance on CC with weight ww. Since (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}) is complete (Rn\mathbb{R}^n with the Euclidean Distance Is a Complete Metric Space with Coordinatewise Convergence (iv)), (C,dw)(C,d_{w}) is a nonempty complete metric space (The Weighted Uniform Distance Is a Metric, and Is Complete When the Target Is Complete (i), The Weighted Uniform Distance Is a Metric, and Is Complete When the Target Is Complete (ii), The Weighted Uniform Distance Is a Metric, and Is Complete When the Target Is Complete (iii)).

Step 5: existence by a contraction. Let ξ∈Rn\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. For z∈Cz\in C, let T(z):[a,b]→RnT(z):[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be the function

T(z)(t)=ξ+∫[a,t]F(r,z(r)) dr(t∈[a,b]),T(z)(t)=\xi+\int_{[a,t]}F\bigl(r,z(r)\bigr)\,dr\qquad\bigl(t\in[a,b]\bigr),

defined because F(⋅,z)∈L1([a,b];Rn)F(\cdot,z)\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) (Composition of a Carathéodory–Lipschitz Function with a Measurable Path (iii)), and continuous on [a,b][a,b] by Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (ix). So T(z)∈CT(z)\in C, and T:C→CT:C\to C is a function (formed from the functions of Functions and Function-Valued Operators Given by Integrals over Subintervals (iii) and Functions and Function-Valued Operators Given by Integrals over Subintervals (iv)). If T(z)=zT(z)=z, then zz is a Carathéodory solution with initial value ξ\xi, by Carathéodory Solutions of an Initial Value Problem (i).

TT is a contraction with constant 12\tfrac12. Let z1,z2∈Cz_{1},z_{2}\in C, let δ=dw(z1,z2)\delta=d_{w}(z_{1},z_{2}), which is ≥0\ge0 as dwd_{w} is a metric, and let m(r)=∥z1(r)−z2(r)∥m(r)=\lVert z_{1}(r)-z_{2}(r)\rVert. By The Space of Continuous Maps on a Closed Interval and Its Weighted Uniform Distance (iii), we have w(r) m(r)≤δw(r)\,m(r)\le\delta, that is, m(r)≤δ φ(r)m(r)\le\delta\,\varphi(r), for every r∈[a,b]r\in[a,b]. For t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], (1) with ζ1=ζ2=ξ\zeta_{1}=\zeta_{2}=\xi, monotonicity and linearity, and (3) give

∥T(z1)(t)−T(z2)(t)∥≤Λ∫[a,t]m dλ≤δ Λ∫[a,t]φ dλ≤δ2 φ(t),\lVert T(z_{1})(t)-T(z_{2})(t)\rVert\le\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}m\,d\lambda\le\delta\,\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}\varphi\,d\lambda\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\varphi(t),

so w(t) dE(T(z1)(t),T(z2)(t))≤δ2w(t)\,d_{E}\bigl(T(z_{1})(t),T(z_{2})(t)\bigr)\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}. As dw(T(z1),T(z2))d_{w}(T(z_{1}),T(z_{2})) is the value of the left-hand side at some t0∈[a,b]t_{0}\in[a,b] (The Space of Continuous Maps on a Closed Interval and Its Weighted Uniform Distance (iii)),

dw(T(z1),T(z2))≤12 dw(z1,z2),d_{w}\bigl(T(z_{1}),T(z_{2})\bigr)\le\tfrac12\,d_{w}(z_{1},z_{2}),

and TT is a contraction. By the contraction mapping theorem (Contraction Mapping Theorem on a Nonempty Complete Metric Space (i)), TT has a fixed point, which is a Carathéodory solution with initial value ξ\xi.

Step 6: proof of the clauses. (i). By Carathéodory Solutions of an Initial Value Problem (ii), the elements of Sol(F,ξ)\mathrm{Sol}(F,\xi) are the Carathéodory solutions with initial value ξ\xi. Step 5 gives one. If xx and yy are two, then (2) with η=ξ\eta=\xi gives ∥x(t)−y(t)∥≤0\lVert x(t)-y(t)\rVert\le0, so x(t)=y(t)x(t)=y(t) for every t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b] (Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (iii)), and x=yx=y.

(ii). This is Step 2 for x=xξx=x_{\xi}.

(iv). This is (2) for x=xξx=x_{\xi} and y=xηy=x_{\eta}.

(iii). Let x=xξx=x_{\xi}, let h:r↦∥F(r,0)∥h:r\mapsto\lVert F(r,0)\rVert, a nonnegative function in L1([a,b])\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b]), and let u:t↦∥x(t)∥u:t\mapsto\lVert x(t)\rVert, continuous on [a,b][a,b] by (ii), hence bounded and measurable. For r∈[a,b]r\in[a,b], Composition of a Carathéodory–Lipschitz Function with a Measurable Path (iv) (with the constant function 00 for yy) and the triangle inequality give ∥F(r,x(r))∥≤h(r)+Λu(r)\lVert F(r,x(r))\rVert\le h(r)+\Lambda u(r). For t∈[a,b]t\in[a,b], the integral equation, the triangle inequality, Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (vii), monotonicity and linearity give

u(t)≤∥ξ∥+∫[a,t]∥F(r,x(r))∥ dr≤∥ξ∥+∫[a,t]h dλ+Λ∫[a,t]u dλ≤∥ξ∥+∫[a,b]h dλ+Λ∫[a,t]u dλ,u(t)\le\lVert\xi\rVert+\int_{[a,t]}\bigl\lVert F\bigl(r,x(r)\bigr)\bigr\rVert\,dr\le\lVert\xi\rVert+\int_{[a,t]}h\,d\lambda+\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}u\,d\lambda\le\lVert\xi\rVert+\int_{[a,b]}h\,d\lambda+\Lambda\int_{[a,t]}u\,d\lambda ,

the last step because ∫[a,b]h dλ=∫[a,t]h dλ+∫[t,b]h dλ\int_{[a,b]}h\,d\lambda=\int_{[a,t]}h\,d\lambda+\int_{[t,b]}h\,d\lambda (Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (iii)) and ∫[t,b]h dλ≥0\int_{[t,b]}h\,d\lambda\ge0 by monotonicity, as h≥0h\ge0. Gronwall's lemma (Gronwall's Lemma for Bounded Measurable Functions (i), with α=∥ξ∥+∫[a,b]h dλ\alpha=\lVert\xi\rVert+\int_{[a,b]}h\,d\lambda and β=Λ\beta=\Lambda) gives (iii).

(v). Let x=xξx=x_{\xi} and s,t∈[a,b]s,t\in[a,b]. The function F(⋅,x)∈L1([a,b];Rn)F(\cdot,x)\in\mathcal{L}^{1}([a,b];\mathbb{R}^{n}) satisfies ∥F(r,x(r))∥≤K\lVert F(r,x(r))\rVert\le K for every r∈[a,b]r\in[a,b], and by the integral equation x(t)−x(s)=∫[a,t]F(r,x(r)) dr−∫[a,s]F(r,x(r)) drx(t)-x(s)=\int_{[a,t]}F(r,x(r))\,dr-\int_{[a,s]}F(r,x(r))\,dr; so Indefinite Lebesgue Integrals on a Closed Interval (x) gives ∥x(t)−x(s)∥≤K ∣t−s∣\lVert x(t)-x(s)\rVert\le K\,|t-s|. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…