Proof of Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Wasserstein Space
lemmalem:delta-envelopes-basic-wasserstein-2026aCombines the standard properties of the semicontinuous envelopes with the duality between the upper envelope of a function and the lower envelope of its negative, and obtains the exact form of the envelopes from the upper semicontinuity of the penalised function.
Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, carries the metric and the envelopes are those of The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Relative to a Penalty Pair.
Claim 1. Suppose is bounded above near each point of . By The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Relative to a Penalty Pair §minus the function is bounded above near each point of and is its upper semicontinuous envelope on . By Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §bounds, for every , and by Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §usc, is upper semicontinuous on . If instead is bounded below near each point of , then by The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Relative to a Penalty Pair §plus the function is bounded below near each point of and is its lower semicontinuous envelope; Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §bounds gives and Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §lsc gives the lower semicontinuity.
Claim 2. Suppose first that is bounded above near each point of , and let . By Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §duality, a real number belongs to the set of Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function for if and only if belongs to the set for ; since is nonempty, so is , and is bounded below near each point of by Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function §near-bounds. Hence, by The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Relative to a Penalty Pair §plus applied to , the function is bounded below near each point of and is its lower semicontinuous envelope on .
Write , a function on . For ,
by the distributivity axiom of Ordered Field and claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, so . Applying Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §duality to the function gives , that is , since by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; taking additive inverses, . Therefore
Suppose now that is bounded below near each point of . The same argument with the roles of the two sets exchanged shows that is bounded above near each point; and with one has on and, by Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §duality applied to , , whence on .
Claim 3. Suppose is continuous and is lower semicontinuous on relative to .
Local bounds. Let . By Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, applied with the positive number , there is a positive such that for every with ; by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field such a satisfies , hence also , a strict inequality implying the corresponding weak one in the ordered field . Let , positive and smaller than by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Every with satisfies by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, hence the two bounds above. So and in the notation of Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function, and is bounded above near each point and bounded below near each point of by Upper and Lower Semicontinuous Envelopes of a Real-Valued Function §near-bounds. Both -envelopes are therefore defined.
The envelopes. The restriction of to is continuous on relative to by claim 4 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map, hence both upper and lower semicontinuous on by claim 2 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity. Since , the function is lower semicontinuous on by claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions, and is upper semicontinuous on by claim 1 of Semicontinuity Under Negation and Characterization of Continuity. By claim 1 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions the sum of the restriction of and , which is by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, is upper semicontinuous on ; so on by Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §fixed. Likewise the sum of the restriction of and , namely , is lower semicontinuous on by claim 3 of Sums and Nonnegative Multiples of Semicontinuous Functions, so on by Properties of the Lower Semicontinuous Envelope, by Duality §fixed.
Loading…
Prerequisites
90eb8aaa-610b-4d32-9303-89aec1ad10af