TheoremBase

Measurability is tested on coordinates via the Borel-coordinates lemma for a Hilbert space with an orthonormal basis, and norms and inner products are pointwise limits of measurable partial sums by Parseval's identity; synthesis follows from the Riesz-Fischer criterion. Square-integrability follows from pointwise bounds (triangle and Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities) and Hoelder's inequality, and almost-everywhere equality is handled through the coordinate description of the set where two maps differ.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Preliminaries. Clause 2 of that setting fixes an arbitrary real Hilbert space XX with an arbitrary orthonormal basis (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, its norm distance dd, and clause 4 of the same setting takes B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) to be the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (X,d)(X,d). Hence Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs may be applied with EE in place of XX and (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in place of (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the σ\sigma-algebra B(X)\mathcal{B}(X) there being our B(E)\mathcal{B}(E). Applying Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §measurable so instantiated, with (Ω,F)=(S,S)(\Omega,\mathcal{F})=(S,\mathcal{S}), we obtain the coordinate test: a map u:S→Eu:S\to E is measurable if and only if uku_{k} is measurable for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. A measurable function S→RS\to\mathbb{R} with nonnegative values is also a measurable map into [0,∞][0,\infty], by the agreement of the two readings recorded in Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable; if it is moreover integrable, then by Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral its integral equals its integral as a nonnegative function, because its positive part is itself and its negative part is the zero function, whose integral is 00 by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-integral (with the null set ∅\varnothing, which is null because ∅\varnothing is a measurable set by Sigma-Algebra and Measurable Space and has measure 00 by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure).

Claim 1. Let s∈Ss\in S and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By conditions (b) and (c) of the definition of an inner product, (v+w)k(s)=⟨v(s)+w(s),fk⟩E=vk(s)+wk(s)(v+w)_{k}(s)=\langle v(s)+w(s),f_{k}\rangle_{E}=v_{k}(s)+w_{k}(s) and (tv)k(s)=⟨tv(s),fk⟩E=t vk(s)(tv)_{k}(s)=\langle tv(s),f_{k}\rangle_{E}=t\,v_{k}(s). By the coordinate test the functions vkv_{k} and wkw_{k} are measurable for every kk; hence vk+wkv_{k}+w_{k} and tvktv_{k} are measurable by claim 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and v+wv+w and tvtv are measurable by the coordinate test. Now fix s∈Ss\in S and apply Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §parseval with H=EH=E, the orthonormal basis (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, x=v(s)x=v(s) and y=w(s)y=w(s): the series ∑k=1∞vk(s)2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}v_{k}(s)^{2} converges with sum ∣v(s)∣E2|v(s)|_{E}^{2}, which is the last assertion of the claim, and the series ∑k=1∞vk(s)wk(s)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}v_{k}(s)w_{k}(s) converges with sum ⟨v(s),w(s)⟩E\langle v(s),w(s)\rangle_{E}. Thus the functions σn=∑k=1nvkwk\sigma_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}v_{k}w_{k}, n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, which are measurable by claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, converge at every point of SS to ⟨v,w⟩E\langle v,w\rangle_{E}, so ⟨v,w⟩E\langle v,w\rangle_{E} is measurable by claim 5 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Taking w=vw=v and using ⟨v(s),v(s)⟩E=∣v(s)∣E2\langle v(s),v(s)\rangle_{E}=|v(s)|_{E}^{2} from Real Inner Product Space §norm, the function ∣v∣E2|v|_{E}^{2} is measurable.

Claim 2. Fix s∈Ss\in S. Since ∑k=1∞gk(s)2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(s)^{2} converges, Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §riesz-fischer, applied with H=EH=E, the orthonormal sequence (fk)k∈N(f_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and ck=gk(s)c_{k}=g_{k}(s), shows that the series ∑k=1∞gk(s)fk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}g_{k}(s)f_{k} converges in EE in the sense of Series in a Real Inner Product Space §convergent, which is the sense used in that theorem, and that its sum v(s)v(s) satisfies ⟨v(s),fj⟩E=gj(s)\langle v(s),f_{j}\rangle_{E}=g_{j}(s) for every j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}. Hence vj=gjv_{j}=g_{j} for every j∈Nj\in\mathbb{N}; these functions are measurable by hypothesis, so vv is measurable by the coordinate test.

Claim 3. Put a=∣v∣E2a=|v|_{E}^{2} and b=∣w∣E2b=|w|_{E}^{2}, nonnegative measurable functions by claim 1 with ∫Sa dμ<∞\int_{S}a\,d\mu<\infty and ∫Sb dμ<∞\int_{S}b\,d\mu<\infty. Fix s∈Ss\in S and write α=∣v(s)∣E\alpha=|v(s)|_{E}, β=∣w(s)∣E\beta=|w(s)|_{E}. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle, ∣v(s)+w(s)∣E≤α+β|v(s)+w(s)|_{E}\le\alpha+\beta; both sides being nonnegative, ∣v(s)+w(s)∣E2≤(α+β)2=2α2+2β2−(α−β)2≤2a(s)+2b(s)|v(s)+w(s)|_{E}^{2}\le(\alpha+\beta)^{2}=2\alpha^{2}+2\beta^{2}-(\alpha-\beta)^{2}\le2a(s)+2b(s). By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity, ∣tv(s)∣E2=t2a(s)|tv(s)|_{E}^{2}=t^{2}a(s). Since ∣fk∣E=1|f_{k}|_{E}=1 by Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §orthonormal, The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space gives ∣vk(s)∣≤α|v_{k}(s)|\le\alpha, hence vk(s)2≤a(s)v_{k}(s)^{2}\le a(s), and it also gives ∣⟨v(s),w(s)⟩E∣≤αβ≤12(α2+β2)=12(a(s)+b(s))|\langle v(s),w(s)\rangle_{E}|\le\alpha\beta\le\frac{1}{2}(\alpha^{2}+\beta^{2})=\frac{1}{2}(a(s)+b(s)), using (α−β)2≥0(\alpha-\beta)^{2}\ge0. The maps v+wv+w and tvtv are measurable by claim 1, so ∣v+w∣E2|v+w|_{E}^{2} and ∣tv∣E2|tv|_{E}^{2} are nonnegative measurable functions by claim 1 again, and by the monotonicity, additivity and homogeneity in Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative,

∫S∣v+w∣E2 dμ≤2∫Sa dμ+2∫Sb dμ<∞,∫S∣tv∣E2 dμ=t2∫Sa dμ<∞.\int_{S}|v+w|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu\le2\int_{S}a\,d\mu+2\int_{S}b\,d\mu<\infty,\qquad\int_{S}|tv|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu=t^{2}\int_{S}a\,d\mu<\infty .

The function vkv_{k} is measurable by claim 1, and the map ∣vk∣2|v_{k}|^{2} of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §measurable-power sends ss to (∣vk(s)∣)2(|v_{k}(s)|)^{2}, which equals the natural square ∣vk(s)∣2=vk(s)2|v_{k}(s)|^{2}=v_{k}(s)^{2} by Properties of Real Powers of Nonnegative Real Numbers §agreement; hence ∫S∣vk∣2 dμ≤∫Sa dμ<∞\int_{S}|v_{k}|^{2}\,d\mu\le\int_{S}a\,d\mu<\infty by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, and vkv_{k} is 22-integrable in the sense of Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §space. The function ⟨v,w⟩E\langle v,w\rangle_{E} is measurable by claim 1 and ∣⟨v,w⟩E∣|\langle v,w\rangle_{E}| is measurable by claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, with ∫S∣⟨v,w⟩E∣ dμ≤12(∫Sa dμ+∫Sb dμ)<∞\int_{S}|\langle v,w\rangle_{E}|\,d\mu\le\frac{1}{2}\bigl(\int_{S}a\,d\mu+\int_{S}b\,d\mu\bigr)<\infty by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative; so ⟨v,w⟩E\langle v,w\rangle_{E} is integrable by the criterion recorded in Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. For the inequality, let φ,ψ:S→R\varphi,\psi:S\to\mathbb{R} be φ(s)=∣v(s)∣E\varphi(s)=|v(s)|_{E} and ψ(s)=∣w(s)∣E\psi(s)=|w(s)|_{E}. The norm map E→RE\to\mathbb{R} is Lipschitz from (E,dE)(E,d_{E}) to (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §lipschitz, hence continuous by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous, hence measurable with respect to B(E)\mathcal{B}(E) and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), which is that of the real line, by claims 3 and 2 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; so φ\varphi and ψ\psi, its compositions with vv and ww, are measurable by claim 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. As above, (∣φ(s)∣)2=φ(s)2=a(s)(|\varphi(s)|)^{2}=\varphi(s)^{2}=a(s) and (∣ψ(s)∣)2=b(s)(|\psi(s)|)^{2}=b(s), so φ,ψ\varphi,\psi are 22-integrable with ∥φ∥2=(∫Sa dμ)1/2\lVert\varphi\rVert_{2}=(\int_{S}a\,d\mu)^{1/2} and ∥ψ∥2=(∫Sb dμ)1/2\lVert\psi\rVert_{2}=(\int_{S}b\,d\mu)^{1/2} by Power-Integrable Functions and the p-Seminorm §seminorm. The exponent 22 is conjugate to itself by Conjugate Exponents and Young's Inequality §conjugate, since 12+12=1\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}=1, so Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder gives ∫S∣φψ∣ dμ≤∥φ∥2∥ψ∥2\int_{S}|\varphi\psi|\,d\mu\le\lVert\varphi\rVert_{2}\lVert\psi\rVert_{2}. Since ∣⟨v(s),w(s)⟩E∣≤φ(s)ψ(s)=∣φ(s)ψ(s)∣|\langle v(s),w(s)\rangle_{E}|\le\varphi(s)\psi(s)=|\varphi(s)\psi(s)| for every ss, the bound ∣∫f dμ∣≤∫∣f∣ dμ|\int f\,d\mu|\le\int|f|\,d\mu of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable for f=⟨v,w⟩Ef=\langle v,w\rangle_{E} (there ∫S∣f∣ dμ\int_{S}|f|\,d\mu is the integral of ∣f∣|f| as an integrable function, ∣f∣|f| being integrable by the finiteness shown above and the criterion of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral; by the preliminaries it equals the integral of ∣f∣|f| as a nonnegative function, which is the reading used below) and the monotonicity in Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative give

∣∫S⟨v,w⟩E dμ∣≤∫S∣⟨v,w⟩E∣ dμ≤∫S∣φψ∣ dμ≤(∫S∣v∣E2 dμ)1/2(∫S∣w∣E2 dμ)1/2.\Bigl|\int_{S}\langle v,w\rangle_{E}\,d\mu\Bigr|\le\int_{S}|\langle v,w\rangle_{E}|\,d\mu\le\int_{S}|\varphi\psi|\,d\mu\le\Bigl(\int_{S}|v|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigl(\int_{S}|w|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu\Bigr)^{1/2}.

Claim 4. For measurable u,u′:S→Eu,u':S\to E put D(u,u′)={s∈S:u(s)≠u′(s)}D(u,u')=\{s\in S:u(s)\ne u'(s)\}. For s∈Ss\in S and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear gives ⟨u(s)−u′(s),fk⟩E=uk(s)−uk′(s)\langle u(s)-u'(s),f_{k}\rangle_{E}=u_{k}(s)-u'_{k}(s). If u(s)≠u′(s)u(s)\ne u'(s) then u(s)−u′(s)≠0Eu(s)-u'(s)\ne0_{E} (indeed, if x−y=0Ex-y=0_{E} for x,y∈Ex,y\in E, then by condition 2 of Vector Space over a Field both w=xw=x and w=yw=y satisfy (−y)+w=0E(-y)+w=0_{E}, so x=yx=y by the uniqueness in claim 2 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space), so by Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis there is kk with uk(s)≠uk′(s)u_{k}(s)\ne u'_{k}(s); if u(s)=u′(s)u(s)=u'(s) then uk(s)=uk′(s)u_{k}(s)=u'_{k}(s) for every kk. Hence D(u,u′)=⋃k∈N{s∈S:0<∣uk(s)−uk′(s)∣}D(u,u')=\bigcup_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\{s\in S:0<|u_{k}(s)-u'_{k}(s)|\}. Each function ∣uk−uk′∣|u_{k}-u'_{k}| is measurable by claim 1 and claims 2 and 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, so each set in the union belongs to S\mathcal{S} by the criterion of Measure Spaces and the Lebesgue Integral: Standing Notation §measurable with c=0c=0, and so does the countable union, S\mathcal{S} being a σ\sigma-algebra. We use the following fact (U): if A,B,C∈SA,B,C\in\mathcal{S}, C⊆A∪BC\subseteq A\cup B and μ(A)=μ(B)=0\mu(A)=\mu(B)=0, then μ(C)=0\mu(C)=0; indeed, by Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone and Basic Properties of a Measure §subadditivity applied to the sequence A,B,∅,∅,…A,B,\varnothing,\varnothing,\dots, and μ(∅)=0\mu(\varnothing)=0 from Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure, μ(C)≤μ(A∪B)≤0\mu(C)\le\mu(A\cup B)\le0. Now D(v,v)=∅D(v,v)=\varnothing has measure 00, D(v,v′)=D(v′,v)D(v,v')=D(v',v), and D(v,v′′)⊆D(v,v′)∪D(v′,v′′)D(v,v'')\subseteq D(v,v')\cup D(v',v'') for measurable v,v′,v′′v,v',v'', so ∼μ\sim_{\mu} is reflexive, symmetric and, by (U), transitive. If v∼μv′v\sim_{\mu}v' and w∼μw′w\sim_{\mu}w', then v+w,v′+w′,tv,tv′v+w,v'+w',tv,tv' are measurable by claim 1, D(v+w,v′+w′)⊆D(v,v′)∪D(w,w′)D(v+w,v'+w')\subseteq D(v,v')\cup D(w,w') and D(tv,tv′)⊆D(v,v′)D(tv,tv')\subseteq D(v,v'), so v+w∼μv′+w′v+w\sim_{\mu}v'+w' by (U) and tv∼μtv′tv\sim_{\mu}tv' by Basic Properties of a Measure §monotone. Assume now in addition ∫S∣v∣E2 dμ<∞\int_{S}|v|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty and ∫S∣w∣E2 dμ<∞\int_{S}|w|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty, and let N=D(v,v′)∪D(w,w′)N=D(v,v')\cup D(w,w'); then N∈SN\in\mathcal{S} and μ(N)=0\mu(N)=0 by (U), so every subset of NN is null. For s∈S∖Ns\in S\setminus N we have v′(s)=v(s)v'(s)=v(s) and w′(s)=w(s)w'(s)=w(s), hence ∣v′(s)∣E2=∣v(s)∣E2|v'(s)|_{E}^{2}=|v(s)|_{E}^{2}, ∣w′(s)∣E2=∣w(s)∣E2|w'(s)|_{E}^{2}=|w(s)|_{E}^{2}, ⟨v′(s),w′(s)⟩E=⟨v(s),w(s)⟩E\langle v'(s),w'(s)\rangle_{E}=\langle v(s),w(s)\rangle_{E} and vk′(s)=vk(s)v'_{k}(s)=v_{k}(s) for every kk; each of these equalities therefore holds almost everywhere. The functions involved are measurable by claim 1, so the nonnegative case of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison gives ∫S∣v′∣E2 dμ=∫S∣v∣E2 dμ<∞\int_{S}|v'|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu=\int_{S}|v|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty and ∫S∣w′∣E2 dμ=∫S∣w∣E2 dμ<∞\int_{S}|w'|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu=\int_{S}|w|_{E}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty; and since ⟨v,w⟩E\langle v,w\rangle_{E} is integrable by claim 3, the real case of The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison shows that ⟨v′,w′⟩E\langle v',w'\rangle_{E} is integrable with ∫S⟨v′,w′⟩E dμ=∫S⟨v,w⟩E dμ\int_{S}\langle v',w'\rangle_{E}\,d\mu=\int_{S}\langle v,w\rangle_{E}\,d\mu. Finally, by claim 3 applied to vv and to v′v', both vkv_{k} and vk′v'_{k} are 22-integrable; they agree almost everywhere, so they are related by the equivalence relation of The Lebesgue Space of Power-Integrable Functions §equivalence, and their equivalence classes [vk][v_{k}] and [vk′][v'_{k}] coincide.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…