TheoremBase

The forward direction squeezes the distribution function at a continuity point between the closed-set and open-set bounds of the portmanteau theorem. The converse approximates a bounded Lipschitz test function by a step function on a fine grid of continuity points, which exist densely because a probability measure has fewer than j atoms of mass above 1/j.

Proof

Throughout, μn=PXn\mu_{n}=P_{X_{n}} and μ=PX\mu=P_{X} are the laws, Borel probability measures on (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) (The Law of a Random Element (i)), and Fn=FXnF_{n}=F_{X_{n}}, F=FXF=F_{X}, so that Fn(t)=μn((−∞,t])F_{n}(t)=\mu_{n}((-\infty,t]) and F(t)=μ((−∞,t])F(t)=\mu((-\infty,t]) (Distribution Functions (ii), Distribution Functions (i)). The distance on R\mathbb{R} is dR(x,y)=∣x−y∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(x,y)=|x-y| (The Distance on the Real Numbers Is a Map with Values the Absolute Differences (i)). So continuity of FF at tt (Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces (i)) is the usual ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition with ∣u−t∣<δ|u-t|<\delta; for t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} the ray (−∞,t)(-\infty,t) is open, as it contains the ball BdR(x,t−x)B_{d_{\mathbb{R}}}(x,t-x) about each of its points xx; and (−∞,t](-\infty,t] is closed, its complement (t,∞)(t,\infty) containing BdR(x,x−t)B_{d_{\mathbb{R}}}(x,x-t) about each of its points xx.

Step 1 (proof of (i): upper bound). By Convergence in Distribution of Random Elements of a Metric Space (i), μn⇒μ\mu_{n}\Rightarrow\mu. Let tt be a continuity point of FF. The ray (−∞,t](-\infty,t] is closed, so Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space (iii) (from Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space (i)) gives lim sup⁡nFn(t)≤F(t)\limsup_{n}F_{n}(t)\le F(t).

Step 2 (proof of (i): lower bound). Since μn((−∞,t))≤Fn(t)\mu_{n}((-\infty,t))\le F_{n}(t) for every nn (Basic Properties of a Measure (iii)) and the ray (−∞,t)(-\infty,t) is open, Properties of the Limit Superior and the Limit Inferior: Tail Formula, Order, Comparison, Bounds, Eventual and Frequent Inequalities, Subsequences, Negation and Convergence (iii) and Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space (iv) give

lim inf⁡nFn(t)≥lim inf⁡nμn((−∞,t))≥μ((−∞,t)).\liminf_{n}F_{n}(t)\ge\liminf_{n}\mu_{n}\bigl((-\infty,t)\bigr)\ge\mu\bigl((-\infty,t)\bigr).

We claim that μ((−∞,t))≥F(t)\mu((-\infty,t))\ge F(t). For every s<ts<t the ray (−∞,t)(-\infty,t) contains (−∞,s](-\infty,s], so F(s)≤μ((−∞,t))F(s)\le\mu((-\infty,t)). Suppose μ((−∞,t))<F(t)\mu((-\infty,t))<F(t), and let ε=F(t)−μ((−∞,t))>0\varepsilon=F(t)-\mu((-\infty,t))>0. By continuity of FF at tt there is δ>0\delta>0 with ∣F(u)−F(t)∣<ε|F(u)-F(t)|<\varepsilon whenever ∣u−t∣<δ|u-t|<\delta. For s=t−θs=t-\theta with 0<θ<δ0<\theta<\delta this gives F(s)>F(t)−ε=μ((−∞,t))F(s)>F(t)-\varepsilon=\mu((-\infty,t)), a contradiction. Hence lim inf⁡nFn(t)≥F(t)\liminf_{n}F_{n}(t)\ge F(t), and with Step 1 and Properties of the Limit Superior and the Limit Inferior: Tail Formula, Order, Comparison, Bounds, Eventual and Frequent Inequalities, Subsequences, Negation and Convergence (ii),

F(t)≤lim inf⁡nFn(t)≤lim sup⁡nFn(t)≤F(t),F(t)\le\liminf_{n}F_{n}(t)\le\limsup_{n}F_{n}(t)\le F(t),

so Fn(t)→F(t)F_{n}(t)\to F(t) by Properties of the Limit Superior and the Limit Inferior: Tail Formula, Order, Comparison, Bounds, Eventual and Frequent Inequalities, Subsequences, Negation and Convergence (xi).

Step 3 (null points are dense continuity points). Call t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} a null point if μ({t})=0\mu(\{t\})=0. Let a<ba<b. By A Measurable Real Function Has Null Level Sets at Levels Arbitrarily Close to Any Point, for a Finite Measure (i), applied to the finite measure PP and the measurable function XX, there is tt with a<t<ba<t<b and μ({t})=P(X=t)=0\mu(\{t\})=P(X=t)=0. So every interval (a,b)(a,b) with a<ba<b contains a null point.

Now let tt be a null point; we show that FF is continuous at tt. Since (−∞,t)=(−∞,t]∖{t}(-\infty,t)=(-\infty,t]\setminus\{t\}, we have μ((−∞,t))=F(t)−μ({t})=F(t)\mu((-\infty,t))=F(t)-\mu(\{t\})=F(t) (Basic Properties of a Measure (iv)). To control μ((−∞,s))\mu((-\infty,s)) for ss just below tt, we reflect. The map ϱ:R→R\varrho:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, ϱ(u)=−u\varrho(u)=-u, preserves distances, so it is continuous and hence Borel measurable (Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (iv)), and the image measure ν=μ∘ϱ−1\nu=\mu\circ\varrho^{-1} is a Borel probability measure on R\mathbb{R} (Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables (i)). Its distribution function is

Fν(y)=μ(ϱ−1((−∞,y]))=μ([−y,∞))=1−μ((−∞,−y))(y∈R).F_{\nu}(y)=\mu\bigl(\varrho^{-1}((-\infty,y])\bigr)=\mu\bigl([-y,\infty)\bigr)=1-\mu\bigl((-\infty,-y)\bigr)\qquad(y\in\mathbb{R}).

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. Right-continuity of FνF_{\nu} at −t-t (Properties of Distribution Functions (ii), applied to ν\nu) gives δ1>0\delta_{1}>0 with Fν(y)<Fν(−t)+εF_{\nu}(y)<F_{\nu}(-t)+\varepsilon for −t≤y<−t+δ1-t\le y<-t+\delta_{1}. Writing s=−ys=-y, this says

μ((−∞,s))>μ((−∞,t))−ε=F(t)−ε(t−δ1<s≤t),\mu\bigl((-\infty,s)\bigr)>\mu\bigl((-\infty,t)\bigr)-\varepsilon=F(t)-\varepsilon\qquad(t-\delta_{1}<s\le t),

and since μ((−∞,s))≤F(s)≤F(t)\mu((-\infty,s))\le F(s)\le F(t), we get ∣F(s)−F(t)∣<ε|F(s)-F(t)|<\varepsilon for t−δ1<s≤tt-\delta_{1}<s\le t. Right-continuity of FF at tt (the same lemma, applied to μ\mu) gives δ2>0\delta_{2}>0 with F(t)≤F(y)<F(t)+εF(t)\le F(y)<F(t)+\varepsilon for t≤y<t+δ2t\le y<t+\delta_{2}. Hence ∣F(u)−F(t)∣<ε|F(u)-F(t)|<\varepsilon whenever ∣u−t∣<min⁡(δ1,δ2)|u-t|<\min(\delta_{1},\delta_{2}), and FF is continuous at tt.

Step 4 (proof of (ii): reduction). By Convergence in Distribution of Random Elements of a Metric Space (i), Xn→dXX_{n}\xrightarrow{d}X means μn⇒μ\mu_{n}\Rightarrow\mu, so by Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space (ii) (equivalent to Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space (i)) it suffices to show

∫Rf dμn→∫Rf dμ\int_{\mathbb{R}}f\,d\mu_{n}\to\int_{\mathbb{R}}f\,d\mu

for every bounded Lipschitz function f:R→Rf:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}. Fix such an ff, a bound M≥0M\ge0 with ∣f∣≤M|f|\le M, and a Lipschitz constant L≥0L\ge0, so that ∣f(u)−f(v)∣≤L∣u−v∣|f(u)-f(v)|\le L|u-v|. As ff is continuous, hence measurable (A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous and Continuous (ii), Measurable Maps: Generators, Composition, Continuous Maps, Restrictions, and Criteria for Real- and [0,∞]-Valued Maps (iv)), the functions ff and f1Bf\mathbf{1}_{B}, for Borel sets BB, are bounded and measurable; so they lie in L1(ρ)\mathcal{L}^{1}(\rho) for every Borel probability measure ρ\rho on R\mathbb{R} (Bounded Measurable Functions on a Finite Measure Space Are Integrable (i)), and n↦∫f1B dμnn\mapsto\int f\mathbf{1}_{B}\,d\mu_{n} is a real sequence (The Simple, Nonnegative, Integrable and Signed Integrals Are Predicative in the Measure and the Function, at Any Variable Positions (iii)). Integrals against such a ρ\rho are expectations on the probability space (R,B(R),ρ)(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}),\rho), so they obey Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (i), Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (iii), Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (iv) and Rules for Expectations, Variances and Covariances (v); these rules are used without further mention below.

Step 5 (the choices). Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Properties of Distribution Functions (iii) and Properties of Distribution Functions (iv) there are M1,M2>0M_{1},M_{2}>0 with F(x)<ε/2F(x)<\varepsilon/2 for x≤−M1x\le-M_{1} and F(x)>1−ε/2F(x)>1-\varepsilon/2 for x≥M2x\ge M_{2}, and by Step 3 there are null points a∈(−M1−1,−M1)a\in(-M_{1}-1,-M_{1}) and b∈(M2,M2+1)b\in(M_{2},M_{2}+1). Then a<ba<b and

μ((a,b])=F(b)−F(a)>1−ε\mu\bigl((a,b]\bigr)=F(b)-F(a)>1-\varepsilon

(Basic Properties of a Measure (iv)). With aa and bb fixed, put

h=ε2L+1,κ=εb−a,h=\frac{\varepsilon}{2L+1},\qquad\kappa=\frac{\varepsilon}{b-a},

so that 2Lh<ε2Lh<\varepsilon and κ>0\kappa>0. For c∈[a,b]c\in[a,b] and a Borel probability measure ρ\rho on R\mathbb{R} let Iρ(c)=∫f1(a,c] dρI_{\rho}(c)=\int f\mathbf{1}_{(a,c]}\,d\rho, and let

β(c)=2Lh(F(c)−F(a))+κ(c−a).\beta(c)=2Lh\bigl(F(c)-F(a)\bigr)+\kappa(c-a).

Call c∈[a,b]c\in[a,b] good if cc is a null point and there is N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with

∣Iμn(c)−Iμ(c)∣≤β(c)for all n≥N.\bigl|I_{\mu_{n}}(c)-I_{\mu}(c)\bigr|\le\beta(c)\qquad\text{for all }n\ge N.

The point aa is good: (a,a]=∅(a,a]=\emptyset, so Iμn(a)=Iμ(a)=0=β(a)I_{\mu_{n}}(a)=I_{\mu}(a)=0=\beta(a).

Step 6 (one step to the right). Let cc be good, with NN as above, and let c′c' be a null point with c<c′≤min⁡(c+h,b)c<c'\le\min(c+h,b). We show that c′c' is good. Let ρ\rho be μn\mu_{n} or μ\mu. Since (a,c′](a,c'] is the disjoint union of (a,c](a,c] and (c,c′](c,c'], linearity gives Iρ(c′)=Iρ(c)+∫f1(c,c′] dρI_{\rho}(c')=I_{\rho}(c)+\int f\mathbf{1}_{(c,c']}\,d\rho. For u∈(c,c′]u\in(c,c'] we have ∣u−c′∣≤h|u-c'|\le h, hence ∣f(u)−f(c′)∣≤Lh|f(u)-f(c')|\le Lh, and therefore

∣∫f1(c,c′] dρ−f(c′) ρ((c,c′])∣≤Lh ρ((c,c′]).\Bigl|\int f\mathbf{1}_{(c,c']}\,d\rho-f(c')\,\rho\bigl((c,c']\bigr)\Bigr|\le Lh\,\rho\bigl((c,c']\bigr).

By Step 3, cc and c′c' are continuity points of FF, so Fn(c)→F(c)F_{n}(c)\to F(c) and Fn(c′)→F(c′)F_{n}(c')\to F(c') by hypothesis. Let

η=κ(c′−c)M+Lh+1>0,\eta=\frac{\kappa(c'-c)}{M+Lh+1}>0,

and choose N′≥NN'\ge N with ∣Fn(c)−F(c)∣<η/2|F_{n}(c)-F(c)|<\eta/2 and ∣Fn(c′)−F(c′)∣<η/2|F_{n}(c')-F(c')|<\eta/2 for all n≥N′n\ge N'. As μn((c,c′])=Fn(c′)−Fn(c)\mu_{n}((c,c'])=F_{n}(c')-F_{n}(c) and μ((c,c′])=F(c′)−F(c)\mu((c,c'])=F(c')-F(c) (Basic Properties of a Measure (iv)), this gives ∣μn((c,c′])−μ((c,c′])∣<η|\mu_{n}((c,c'])-\mu((c,c'])|<\eta for n≥N′n\ge N'. Combining these estimates with ∣f(c′)∣≤M|f(c')|\le M, for every n≥N′n\ge N'

∣Iμn(c′)−Iμ(c′)∣≤β(c)+Mη+Lh(μ((c,c′])+η)+Lh μ((c,c′])≤β(c)+2Lh(F(c′)−F(c))+κ(c′−c)=β(c′),\bigl|I_{\mu_{n}}(c')-I_{\mu}(c')\bigr|\le\beta(c)+M\eta+Lh\bigl(\mu((c,c'])+\eta\bigr)+Lh\,\mu\bigl((c,c']\bigr)\le\beta(c)+2Lh\bigl(F(c')-F(c)\bigr)+\kappa(c'-c)=\beta(c'),

since (M+Lh)η≤κ(c′−c)(M+Lh)\eta\le\kappa(c'-c). So c′c' is good.

Step 7 (the supremum of the good points). The set GG of good points contains aa and is bounded above by bb, so it has a supremum s∈[a,b]s\in[a,b] (The Real Numbers Form an Ordered Field in Which Every Nonempty Set Bounded Above Has a Supremum (ii)). As s−h<ss-h<s, the number s−hs-h is not an upper bound of GG, so there is a good point c>s−hc>s-h. Suppose c+h<bc+h<b. Then s<c+hs<c+h, and by Step 3 there is a null point c′c' with s<c′<c+hs<c'<c+h; since c≤s<c′≤c+h<bc\le s<c'\le c+h<b, Step 6 shows that c′c' is good, contradicting c′>sc'>s. Hence b≤c+hb\le c+h. If c=bc=b, then bb is good; otherwise c<b≤c+hc<b\le c+h, and bb, a null point, is good by Step 6. In either case bb is good, and s=bs=b.

Step 8 (passage to the limit). Since bb is good and F(b)−F(a)≤1F(b)-F(a)\le1, there is N0N_{0} with

∣Iμn(b)−Iμ(b)∣≤β(b)≤2Lh+κ(b−a)<2ε(n≥N0).\bigl|I_{\mu_{n}}(b)-I_{\mu}(b)\bigr|\le\beta(b)\le2Lh+\kappa(b-a)<2\varepsilon\qquad(n\ge N_{0}).

For ρ\rho equal to μn\mu_{n} or μ\mu, ∫f dρ=Iρ(b)+∫f1R∖(a,b] dρ\int f\,d\rho=I_{\rho}(b)+\int f\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}\setminus(a,b]}\,d\rho, and

∣∫f1R∖(a,b] dρ∣≤Mρ(R∖(a,b])=M(1−ρ((a,b]))\Bigl|\int f\mathbf{1}_{\mathbb{R}\setminus(a,b]}\,d\rho\Bigr|\le M\rho\bigl(\mathbb{R}\setminus(a,b]\bigr)=M\bigl(1-\rho((a,b])\bigr)

(Basic Properties of a Measure (iv)). As aa and bb are continuity points of FF, choosing N1N_{1} as N′N' was chosen in Step 6, now with η=μ((a,b])−(1−ε)>0\eta=\mu((a,b])-(1-\varepsilon)>0, gives μn((a,b])=Fn(b)−Fn(a)>1−ε\mu_{n}((a,b])=F_{n}(b)-F_{n}(a)>1-\varepsilon for n≥N1n\ge N_{1}. For n≥max⁡(N0,N1)n\ge\max(N_{0},N_{1}) adding the estimates above gives

∣∫f dμn−∫f dμ∣<2ε+Mε+Mε=2(1+M)ε.\Bigl|\int f\,d\mu_{n}-\int f\,d\mu\Bigr|<2\varepsilon+M\varepsilon+M\varepsilon=2(1+M)\varepsilon .

Given ε′>0\varepsilon'>0, Steps 5 to 8 with ε=ε′/(2(1+M))\varepsilon=\varepsilon'/(2(1+M)) yield NN with ∣∫f dμn−∫f dμ∣<ε′|\int f\,d\mu_{n}-\int f\,d\mu|<\varepsilon' for all n≥Nn\ge N. Hence ∫f dμn→∫f dμ\int f\,d\mu_{n}\to\int f\,d\mu, and Step 4 gives Xn→dXX_{n}\xrightarrow{d}X.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…