TheoremBase

A Borwein-Preiss perturbation on a complete sublevel set produces a member of the family touched from above by a nearby test function at a nearby point; its witnesses, transported to the original point by gluing couplings, are witnesses for the supremum.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The symmetry and the triangle inequality of WaW_{a} on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §symmetry, The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §triangle) and the rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding and scaling inequalities are used without further mention. Any two members of Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, equal or not, form a noise-connected ordered pair by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §connected, and Pρa⊆P2(X)\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §moments. For ν,ν0∈Pρa\nu,\nu_{0}\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} and π∈Πa(ν,ν0)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\nu_{0}) we have Wa(ν,ν0)2≤Ia(π)W_{a}(\nu,\nu_{0})^{2}\le I^{a}(\pi) by The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance, hence Wa(ν,ν0)≤Ia(π)W_{a}(\nu,\nu_{0})\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field; and Wa(ν,ν)=0W_{a}(\nu,\nu)=0 by A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §identity. For ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, L2(ν;Xa)L^{2}(\nu;X^{a}) is a real vector space (Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields), in which gradients are added, subtracted and scaled. Each v∈Sv\in\mathcal{S}, being a viscosity subsolution, has penalty-subordinate growth from above (Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution). By Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §lsc the penalty E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D}.

Claim 1. Let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let CC be as in the assumption that S\mathcal{S} is uniformly subordinate from above (The Pointwise Supremum of a Uniformly Subordinate Family of Viscosity Subsolutions on the Noise Wasserstein Space is a Viscosity Subsolution §uniform-growth), for δ\delta. For μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, C+δ E(μ)C+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu) is an upper bound of {v(μ):v∈S}\{v(\mu):v\in\mathcal{S}\}, so u(μ)≤C+δ E(μ)u(\mu)\le C+\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\mu) by Upper Bound and Least Upper Bound. As δ\delta was arbitrary, uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above by Penalty-Subordinate Growth of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §above. For v∈Sv\in\mathcal{S} and μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}, v(μ)v(\mu) lies in the set of which u(μ)u(\mu) is an upper bound, so v(μ)≤u(μ)v(\mu)\le u(\mu). Consequently, for positive δ\delta the functions v−δEv-\delta\mathcal{E} and u−δEu-\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D}, both bounded above near each point of D\mathcal{D} by The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Domain of a Noise Penalty Pair §minus, satisfy v−δE≤u−δEv-\delta\mathcal{E}\le u-\delta\mathcal{E} pointwise, and Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §monotone, in the metric space (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) with S=DS=\mathcal{D}, gives vδ−(ν)≤uδ−(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu) for ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}.

Claim 2. By claim 1, uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above, so its δ\delta-envelopes uδ−u^{-}_{\delta} are defined. Let δ∈R\delta\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<δ<10<\delta<1, as in Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution, let φ\varphi be a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, let μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} be a point at which the function with value uδ−(μ)−φ(μ)u^{-}_{\delta}(\mu)-\varphi(\mu) at μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} has a local maximum relative to D\mathcal{D}, witnessed by a positive radius τ\tau as in Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space, and let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. Write M=uδ−(μ^)−φ(μ^)M=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\varphi(\hat{\mu}). The data below are chosen in the order: β\beta and φ~\tilde{\varphi} (Step 1); the radii θ0,θ1,θ3,θ4\theta_{0},\theta_{1},\theta_{3},\theta_{4}, then CC, then r0,σ,αr_{0},\sigma,\alpha (Step 2); then θα\theta_{\alpha}, ζ\zeta, vv, ℓ\ell, BB, ε′\varepsilon', (ck)k∈N(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, and then ν^\hat{\nu} and (νk)k∈N(\nu_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} (Step 3); then ε′′\varepsilon'' and the witnesses for vv (Step 5).

Step 1: a strict maximum. Put β=ε8\beta=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8} and let ψ0:Pρa→R\psi_{0}:\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\to\mathbb{R} be ψ0(ν)=Wa(ν,μ^)2\psi_{0}(\nu)=W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}. Since D\mathcal{D} has the noise map property and μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}, Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §distance, applied with Q=DQ=\mathcal{D} and μ^\hat{\mu} in the role of its ν0\nu_{0}, shows that ψ0\psi_{0} is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with ∇ψ0(μ^)=2(id−S)\nabla\psi_{0}(\hat{\mu})=2(\mathrm{id}-S) for any noise-optimal map SS from μ^\hat{\mu} to μ^\hat{\mu}. By A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §identity, id\mathrm{id} is such a map and its displacement id−id\mathrm{id}-\mathrm{id} is the zero element 0μ^0_{\hat{\mu}} of L2(μ^;Xa)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};X^{a}); hence ∇ψ0(μ^)=2⋅(−0μ^)=0μ^\nabla\psi_{0}(\hat{\mu})=2\cdot(-0_{\hat{\mu}})=0_{\hat{\mu}}. Let φ~=φ+βψ0\tilde{\varphi}=\varphi+\beta\psi_{0}. By Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §linear, with Q=DQ=\mathcal{D}, φ1=φ\varphi_{1}=\varphi, φ2=ψ0\varphi_{2}=\psi_{0}, s=1s=1 and t=βt=\beta, φ~\tilde{\varphi} is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} with

∇φ~(μ^)=∇φ(μ^)+β 0μ^=∇φ(μ^),φ~(μ^)=φ(μ^),\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})+\beta\,0_{\hat{\mu}}=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}),\qquad\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\varphi(\hat{\mu}),

the last because Wa(μ^,μ^)=0W_{a}(\hat{\mu},\hat{\mu})=0. For ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(ν,μ^)<τW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\tau the local maximum gives uδ−(ν)−φ(ν)≤Mu^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\varphi(\nu)\le M, that is,

uδ−(ν)−φ~(ν)≤M−β Wa(ν,μ^)2.(1)u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)\le M-\beta\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}. \tag{1}

Step 2: radii. Using Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces for φ\varphi and φ~\tilde{\varphi}, which are continuous on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by property (a) of Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §continuity, and Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space for uδ−u^{-}_{\delta}, which is upper semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} by Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity, choose positive radii θ0,θ3,θ4\theta_{0},\theta_{3},\theta_{4} such that for ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}: Wa(ν,μ^)<θ0W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{0} implies ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ^)∣<1|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<1; ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and Wa(ν,μ^)<θ3W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{3} imply uδ−(ν)<uδ−(μ^)+ε4u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)<u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}; Wa(ν,μ^)<θ4W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{4} implies ∣φ~(ν)−φ~(μ^)∣<ε8|\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}.

We also need a radius for the gradients: there is a positive θ1\theta_{1} such that for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and every π∈Πa(ν,μ^)\pi\in\Pi^{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu}) with Ia(π)<θ12I^{a}(\pi)<\theta_{1}^{2} the discrepancy ∫X×X∣∇φ~(ν)(x)−∇φ~(μ^)(y)∣a2 π(dz)\int_{X\times X}|\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)(x)-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz) is less than (ε4)2(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}. Suppose not. Let (hn)n∈N(h_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence of positive reals with limit 00 (Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero); for each nn there are νn∈D\nu_{n}\in\mathcal{D} and πn∈Πa(νn,μ^)\pi_{n}\in\Pi^{a}(\nu_{n},\hat{\mu}) with Ia(πn)<hn2I^{a}(\pi_{n})<h_{n}^{2} and discrepancy Dn≥(ε4)2D_{n}\ge(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}. Since 0≤Ia(πn)<hn20\le I^{a}(\pi_{n})<h_{n}^{2} (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §cost) and (hn2)(h_{n}^{2}) has limit 00 by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §products, (Ia(πn))(I^{a}(\pi_{n})) has limit 00 by claim 2 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, so (πn)n∈N(\pi_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is a sequence of couplings of vanishing noise cost from (νn)n∈N(\nu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} to μ^\hat{\mu} (Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §couplings). Property (c) of φ~\tilde{\varphi} on D\mathcal{D} (Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §gradient-continuity), at the point μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}, then says that (∇φ~(νn))(\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\nu_{n})) converges strongly to ∇φ~(μ^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu}) along (πn)(\pi_{n}), that is (Strong and Weak Convergence of Noise Fields Along Couplings of Vanishing Noise Cost §strong), (Dn)(D_{n}) has limit 00; claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences gives (ε4)2≤0(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}\le0, contradicting Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field §positive-products.

Let CC be as in the assumption that S\mathcal{S} is uniformly subordinate from above, for the positive number δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2} (Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field §halving). Put

r0=12min⁡{τ,θ0},σ=12min⁡{r0,θ1,θ3,θ4,ε},α=min⁡{βσ23,ε24},r_{0}=\tfrac12\min\{\tau,\theta_{0}\},\qquad\sigma=\tfrac12\min\{r_{0},\theta_{1},\theta_{3},\theta_{4},\varepsilon\},\qquad\alpha=\min\Bigl\{\tfrac{\beta\sigma^{2}}{3},\tfrac{\varepsilon}{24}\Bigr\},

all positive by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements (applied repeatedly) and Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field §halving, and let K={ν∈D:Wa(ν,μ^)≤r0}K=\{\nu\in\mathcal{D}:W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\le r_{0}\}. Since r0<τr_{0}<\tau and r0<θ0r_{0}<\theta_{0}, every ν∈K\nu\in K satisfies (1) and ∣φ(ν)−φ(μ^)∣<1|\varphi(\nu)-\varphi(\hat{\mu})|<1.

Step 3: a member of the family and its maximiser. Let θα\theta_{\alpha} be a positive radius with ∣φ~(ν)−φ~(μ^)∣<α|\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})|<\alpha whenever Wa(ν,μ^)<θαW_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<\theta_{\alpha} (continuity of φ~\tilde{\varphi}), and put α′=min⁡{α,12θα,r0}\alpha'=\min\{\alpha,\tfrac12\theta_{\alpha},r_{0}\}. By Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §approximation, applied in (Pρa,Wa)(\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho},W_{a}) to u−δEu-\delta\mathcal{E} on S=DS=\mathcal{D} at μ^\hat{\mu} with α′\alpha', there is ζ∈D\zeta\in\mathcal{D} with Wa(ζ,μ^)≤α′W_{a}(\zeta,\hat{\mu})\le\alpha' and ∣u(ζ)−δ E(ζ)−uδ−(μ^)∣<α′≤α|u(\zeta)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\zeta)-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\alpha'\le\alpha. Then ζ∈K\zeta\in K and ∣φ~(ζ)−φ~(μ^)∣<α|\tilde{\varphi}(\zeta)-\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})|<\alpha. By Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} §epsilon-above there is v∈Sv\in\mathcal{S} with u(ζ)−α<v(ζ)u(\zeta)-\alpha<v(\zeta).

Let g:D→Rg:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} be g(ν)=vδ−(ν)−φ~(ν)g(\nu)=v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu). It is upper semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D}: at ν0∈D\nu_{0}\in\mathcal{D} and for positive ε0\varepsilon_{0}, Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity and Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space give a radius within which vδ−(ν)<vδ−(ν0)+ε02v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)<v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu_{0})+\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2}, continuity of φ~\tilde{\varphi} a radius within which −φ~(ν)<−φ~(ν0)+ε02-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)<-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu_{0})+\tfrac{\varepsilon_{0}}{2} (Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §bounds), and within the lesser radius the two add to g(ν)<g(ν0)+ε0g(\nu)<g(\nu_{0})+\varepsilon_{0}. Since v(ν)≤C+δ2 E(ν)v(\nu)\le C+\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}, 0≤δ2≤δ0\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\le\delta and δ−δ2=δ2\delta-\tfrac{\delta}{2}=\tfrac{\delta}{2}, Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §bound, applied to vv with δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2} in the role of the weight there written η\eta and with the constant CC, gives vδ−(ν)≤C−δ2 E(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D}; and for ν∈K\nu\in K, −φ~(ν)≤−φ(ν)<1−φ(μ^)-\tilde{\varphi}(\nu)\le-\varphi(\nu)<1-\varphi(\hat{\mu}), since βψ0(ν)≥0\beta\psi_{0}(\nu)\ge0. Hence

g(ν)≤(C+1−φ(μ^))−δ2 E(ν)(ν∈K).(3)g(\nu)\le\bigl(C+1-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\qquad(\nu\in K). \tag{3}

On the other hand, for ν∈K\nu\in K we have vδ−(ν)≤uδ−(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu) by claim 1, and ν\nu satisfies (1), so

g(ν)≤M−β Wa(ν,μ^)2≤M(ν∈K).(4)g(\nu)\le M-\beta\,W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})^{2}\le M\qquad(\nu\in K). \tag{4}

By Basic Properties of the Delta-Envelopes on the Noise Wasserstein Space, and the Envelopes of Bounded Functions for a Noise-Closed Penalty Pair §semicontinuity, v(ζ)−δ E(ζ)≤vδ−(ζ)v(\zeta)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\zeta)\le v^{-}_{\delta}(\zeta), so, by the choice of vv, of ζ\zeta and φ~(μ^)=φ(μ^)\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\varphi(\hat{\mu}),

g(ζ)≥v(ζ)−δ E(ζ)−φ~(ζ)>u(ζ)−δ E(ζ)−α−φ~(ζ)>uδ−(μ^)−2α−(φ(μ^)+α)=M−3α.(5)g(\zeta)\ge v(\zeta)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\zeta)-\tilde{\varphi}(\zeta)>u(\zeta)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\zeta)-\alpha-\tilde{\varphi}(\zeta)>u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-2\alpha-\bigl(\varphi(\hat{\mu})+\alpha\bigr)=M-3\alpha . \tag{5}

We perturb gg by a Borwein--Preiss argument on a complete subset of KK. Put

ℓ=max⁡{E(ζ), 2δ(C+1−φ(μ^)−M+3α)}.\ell=\max\Bigl\{\mathcal{E}(\zeta),\ \tfrac{2}{\delta}\bigl(C+1-\varphi(\hat{\mu})-M+3\alpha\bigr)\Bigr\}.

Then E(ζ)≤ℓ\mathcal{E}(\zeta)\le\ell by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, which also gives 2δ(C+1−φ(μ^)−M+3α)≤ℓ\tfrac{2}{\delta}\bigl(C+1-\varphi(\hat{\mu})-M+3\alpha\bigr)\le\ell; so by (3) every ν∈K\nu\in K with E(ν)>ℓ\mathcal{E}(\nu)>\ell satisfies g(ν)<(C+1−φ(μ^))−δ2 ℓ≤M−3αg(\nu)<\bigl(C+1-\varphi(\hat{\mu})\bigr)-\tfrac{\delta}{2}\,\ell\le M-3\alpha, since δ2\tfrac{\delta}{2} is positive; we record this as

g(ν)<M−3αfor ν∈K with E(ν)>ℓ.(6)g(\nu)<M-3\alpha\qquad\text{for }\nu\in K\text{ with }\mathcal{E}(\nu)>\ell. \tag{6}

Write Dℓ={ν∈D:E(ν)≤ℓ}\mathcal{D}_{\ell}=\{\nu\in\mathcal{D}:\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le\ell\}, let B∈RB\in\mathbb{R} be as in Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pairs §bounded for ℓ\ell, so that Wa(ν,ρ)≤BW_{a}(\nu,\rho)\le B for every ν∈Dℓ\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\ell}, and let Kℓ={ν∈Dℓ:Wa(ν,μ^)≤r0}=K∩DℓK_{\ell}=\{\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\ell}:W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})\le r_{0}\}=K\cap\mathcal{D}_{\ell}, which contains ζ\zeta. Since ζ∈Dℓ\zeta\in\mathcal{D}_{\ell}, 0≤Wa(ζ,ρ)≤B0\le W_{a}(\zeta,\rho)\le B, so 0≤B0\le B. By Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §complete, (Dℓ,Wa)(\mathcal{D}_{\ell},W_{a}) is a complete metric space. The restriction of WaW_{a} to Kℓ×KℓK_{\ell}\times K_{\ell}, again written WaW_{a}, is a metric on KℓK_{\ell}, the conditions of Metric Space being inherited from Dℓ\mathcal{D}_{\ell}, and (Kℓ,Wa)(K_{\ell},W_{a}) is complete in the sense of Complete Metric Space: a Cauchy sequence (μn)n∈N(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in (Kℓ,Wa)(K_{\ell},W_{a}) is one in (Dℓ,Wa)(\mathcal{D}_{\ell},W_{a}), the distances being the same, so it converges in (Dℓ,Wa)(\mathcal{D}_{\ell},W_{a}) to some μ∈Dℓ\mu\in\mathcal{D}_{\ell} (Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space); for every positive tt there is nn with Wa(μn,μ)<tW_{a}(\mu_{n},\mu)<t, whence Wa(μ,μ^)≤Wa(μ,μn)+Wa(μn,μ^)<t+r0W_{a}(\mu,\hat{\mu})\le W_{a}(\mu,\mu_{n})+W_{a}(\mu_{n},\hat{\mu})<t+r_{0}; were Wa(μ,μ^)>r0W_{a}(\mu,\hat{\mu})>r_{0}, the choice t=Wa(μ,μ^)−r0t=W_{a}(\mu,\hat{\mu})-r_{0} would give Wa(μ,μ^)<Wa(μ,μ^)W_{a}(\mu,\hat{\mu})<W_{a}(\mu,\hat{\mu}); so Wa(μ,μ^)≤r0W_{a}(\mu,\hat{\mu})\le r_{0}, μ∈Kℓ\mu\in K_{\ell}, and (μn)n∈N(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} converges to μ\mu in (Kℓ,Wa)(K_{\ell},W_{a}).

The restriction of gg to KℓK_{\ell} is upper semicontinuous on KℓK_{\ell}, the radii supplied by the upper semicontinuity of gg on D\mathcal{D} serving at each point of Kℓ⊆DK_{\ell}\subseteq\mathcal{D}, and it is bounded above by MM by (4). Hence {g(ν):ν∈Kℓ}\{g(\nu):\nu\in K_{\ell}\}, nonempty since ζ∈Kℓ\zeta\in K_{\ell}, has a least upper bound (The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §bounds), which is at most MM by Upper Bound and Least Upper Bound, and by (5), g(ζ)>M−3α≥sup⁡ν∈Kℓg(ν)−3αg(\zeta)>M-3\alpha\ge\sup_{\nu\in K_{\ell}}g(\nu)-3\alpha. For ν,ν′∈Kℓ\nu,\nu'\in K_{\ell} let κ(ν,ν′)=Wa(ν,ν′)2\kappa(\nu,\nu')=W_{a}(\nu,\nu')^{2}. Then κ(ν,ν)=0\kappa(\nu,\nu)=0, and 0≤Wa(ν,ν′)≤2B0\le W_{a}(\nu,\nu')\le2B by Basic Properties of a Noise-Closed Noise Penalty Pair: Lower Bound, Lower Semicontinuity, Complete Sublevel Sets and Bounded Distances §diameter, applied with ℓ\ell and BB, so 0≤κ(ν,ν′)≤4B20\le\kappa(\nu,\nu')\le4B^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. For ν′∈Kℓ\nu'\in K_{\ell} the function κ(⋅,ν′)\kappa(\cdot,\nu') is the restriction to KℓK_{\ell} of the function with value Wa(ν,ν′)2W_{a}(\nu,\nu')^{2} at ν∈Pρa\nu\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}, which is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D} by Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §distance (with Q=DQ=\mathcal{D} and ν′\nu' as its ν0\nu_{0}) and so continuous on Pρa\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} (Noise Intrinsic Test Functions on the Noise Wasserstein Space §continuity); by Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces and Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §bounds it is therefore lower semicontinuous on KℓK_{\ell} in the sense of Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space. For every positive tt, the positive number t24\tfrac{t^{2}}{4} has the property that κ(ν,ν′)≤t24\kappa(\nu,\nu')\le\tfrac{t^{2}}{4} implies Wa(ν,ν′)2<t2W_{a}(\nu,\nu')^{2}<t^{2} and hence Wa(ν,ν′)<tW_{a}(\nu,\nu')<t, by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Put

ε′=ε32(1+r0),ck=ε′(12)k(k∈N),\varepsilon'=\frac{\varepsilon}{32(1+r_{0})},\qquad c_{k}=\varepsilon'\bigl(\tfrac12\bigr)^{k}\quad(k\in\mathbb{N}),

all positive; by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §geometric and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity the series ∑k=1∞ck\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k} converges, with sum ε′\varepsilon'.

We apply A Smooth Variational Principle of Borwein-Preiss Type with a Gauge on a Complete Metric Space to the nonempty complete metric space (Kℓ,Wa)(K_{\ell},W_{a}), the restriction of gg to KℓK_{\ell} in the role of the function there written ff, the gauge κ\kappa in the role of the function there written gg, the bound 4B24B^{2} in the role of its GG, the weights (ck)k∈N(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the tolerance 3α3\alpha in the role of its ε\varepsilon, and the point ζ\zeta in the role of its x1x_{1}. It provides ν^∈Kℓ\hat{\nu}\in K_{\ell} and a sequence (νk)k∈N(\nu_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in KℓK_{\ell} with ν1=ζ\nu_{1}=\zeta. Since Wa(νk,ρ)≤BW_{a}(\nu_{k},\rho)\le B for every kk and 0≤B0\le B, Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §series-convergence, with BB, (νk)k∈N(\nu_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (ck)k∈N(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in the roles of its BB, (μk)k∈N(\mu_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (βk)k∈N(\beta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, shows that ψ:Pρa→R\psi:\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}\to\mathbb{R}, ψ(ν)=∑k=1∞ck Wa(ν,νk)2\psi(\nu)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}\,W_{a}(\nu,\nu_{k})^{2}, is well defined, and that ∑k=1∞ck Wa(ν,νk)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}\,W_{a}(\nu,\nu_{k}) converges for every ν\nu; and ψ(ν)≥0\psi(\nu)\ge0 for every ν\nu, its partial sums being nonnegative (Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates). The function of the theorem is g−ψg-\psi on KℓK_{\ell}, and by its clauses A Smooth Variational Principle of Borwein-Preiss Type with a Gauge on a Complete Metric Space §value and A Smooth Variational Principle of Borwein-Preiss Type with a Gauge on a Complete Metric Space §maximum,

g(ν^)−ψ(ν^)≥g(ζ)>M−3α,g(ν)−ψ(ν)<g(ν^)−ψ(ν^)for ν∈Kℓ with ν≠ν^,(7)g(\hat{\nu})-\psi(\hat{\nu})\ge g(\zeta)>M-3\alpha,\qquad g(\nu)-\psi(\nu)<g(\hat{\nu})-\psi(\hat{\nu})\quad\text{for }\nu\in K_{\ell}\text{ with }\nu\ne\hat{\nu}, \tag{7}

the first by (5).

By Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §series-test, with Q=DQ=\mathcal{D}, ψ\psi is a noise intrinsic test function on D\mathcal{D}, so by Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §linear with s=t=1s=t=1 so is φ^=φ~+ψ\hat{\varphi}=\tilde{\varphi}+\psi, with ∇φ^(ν^)=∇φ~(ν^)+∇ψ(ν^)\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})=\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})+\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu}). For each kk, since ν^∈D\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D} and D\mathcal{D} has the noise map property, the ordered pair (ν^,νk)(\hat{\nu},\nu_{k}) is uniquely noise-mapped (The Noise Map Property of a Set of Probability Measures §map-property), so there is a noise-optimal map SkS_{k} from ν^\hat{\nu} to νk\nu_{k} (Noise-Optimal Maps and Uniquely Noise-Mapped Pairs §uniquely-mapped). Since ν^,νk∈K\hat{\nu},\nu_{k}\in K, Wa(ν^,νk)≤Wa(ν^,μ^)+Wa(μ^,νk)≤2r0W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\nu_{k})\le W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})+W_{a}(\hat{\mu},\nu_{k})\le2r_{0}, so by Squared Noise Wasserstein Distances, Their Convergent Series and Linear Combinations are Noise Intrinsic Test Functions §series-gradient (with these SkS_{k}), Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §order and Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity,

∥∇ψ(ν^)∥ν^≤2∑k=1∞ck Wa(ν^,νk)≤4r0 ε′=r0 ε8(1+r0)<ε8.(8)\lVert\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})\rVert_{\hat{\nu}}\le2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}\,W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\nu_{k})\le4r_{0}\,\varepsilon'=\frac{r_{0}\,\varepsilon}{8(1+r_{0})}<\frac{\varepsilon}{8}. \tag{8}

Step 4: the maximiser is close to μ^\hat{\mu}. By (7) and ψ(ν^)≥0\psi(\hat{\nu})\ge0, g(ν^)≥g(ν^)−ψ(ν^)>M−3αg(\hat{\nu})\ge g(\hat{\nu})-\psi(\hat{\nu})>M-3\alpha; on the other hand ν^∈Kℓ⊆K\hat{\nu}\in K_{\ell}\subseteq K, so (4) gives g(ν^)≤M−β Wa(ν^,μ^)2g(\hat{\nu})\le M-\beta\,W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}. Therefore β Wa(ν^,μ^)2<3α≤βσ2\beta\,W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}<3\alpha\le\beta\sigma^{2}, whence Wa(ν^,μ^)2<σ2W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}<\sigma^{2} and Wa(ν^,μ^)<σW_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<\sigma by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. In particular Wa(ν^,μ^)W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) is less than each of r0,θ1,θ3,θ4r_{0},\theta_{1},\theta_{3},\theta_{4} and ε\varepsilon, each of which is at least 2σ2\sigma. Consequently

uδ−(μ^)−ε4<vδ−(ν^)<uδ−(μ^)+ε4:(2)u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})<u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}: \tag{2}

the right inequality from vδ−(ν^)≤uδ−(ν^)v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})\le u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu}) and the choice of θ3\theta_{3}; the left from vδ−(ν^)=g(ν^)+φ~(ν^)>M−3α+φ~(μ^)−ε8=uδ−(μ^)−3α−ε8v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})=g(\hat{\nu})+\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})>M-3\alpha+\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}=u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-3\alpha-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}, the choice of θ4\theta_{4} and 3α≤ε83\alpha\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}.

Step 5: the witnesses for vv. The function D→R\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{R} with value vδ−(ν)−φ^(ν)=g(ν)−ψ(ν)v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)-\hat{\varphi}(\nu)=g(\nu)-\psi(\nu) has a local maximum at ν^\hat{\nu} relative to D\mathcal{D}, with radius r0−Wa(ν^,μ^)r_{0}-W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}), positive since Wa(ν^,μ^)<r0W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<r_{0}: if ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and Wa(ν^,ν)<r0−Wa(ν^,μ^)W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\nu)<r_{0}-W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) then Wa(ν,μ^)<r0W_{a}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<r_{0}, so ν∈K\nu\in K; if E(ν)≤ℓ\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le\ell, then ν∈Kℓ\nu\in K_{\ell} and g(ν)−ψ(ν)≤g(ν^)−ψ(ν^)g(\nu)-\psi(\nu)\le g(\hat{\nu})-\psi(\hat{\nu}) by (7), with equality when ν=ν^\nu=\hat{\nu}; if E(ν)>ℓ\mathcal{E}(\nu)>\ell, then by ψ(ν)≥0\psi(\nu)\ge0, (6) and (7), g(ν)−ψ(ν)≤g(ν)<M−3α<g(ν^)−ψ(ν^)g(\nu)-\psi(\nu)\le g(\nu)<M-3\alpha<g(\hat{\nu})-\psi(\hat{\nu}). Put ε′′=min⁡{ε8,σ}\varepsilon''=\min\{\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8},\sigma\}. Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution to the viscosity subsolution vv, with the same δ\delta, which satisfies 0<δ<10<\delta<1, the noise intrinsic test function φ^\hat{\varphi} on D\mathcal{D}, the point ν^\hat{\nu} and the tolerance ε′′\varepsilon'', we obtain ν′∈DΣ\nu'\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma}, π′∈Πa(ν′,ν^)\pi'\in\Pi^{a}(\nu',\hat{\nu}), s∈Rs\in\mathbb{R} and q∈L2(ν′;Xa)q\in L^{2}(\nu';X^{a}) with

Ia(π′)<ε′′2,∣vδ−(ν′)−vδ−(ν^)∣<ε′′,∣s−vδ−(ν^)∣<ε′′,I^{a}(\pi')<\varepsilon''^{2},\quad|v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')-v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|<\varepsilon'',\quad|s-v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|<\varepsilon'', ∫X×X∣q(x)−∇φ^(ν^)(y)∣a2 π′(dz)<ε′′2,Fδ−(ν′,s,q)≤ε′′.\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi'(dz)<\varepsilon''^{2},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(\nu',s,q)\le\varepsilon'' .

We next replace π′\pi' by a coupling along which qq is compared with ∇φ~(ν^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}). Let Δ=(id,id)#ν^\Delta=(\mathrm{id},\mathrm{id})_{\#}\hat{\nu}; by A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §diagonal, applied with ν^\hat{\nu} as its ν\nu, Δ∈Πa(ν^,ν^)\Delta\in\Pi^{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\nu}) and Ia(Δ)=0I^{a}(\Delta)=0. All of ν′,ν^,μ^\nu',\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu} lie in P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X). Let ς′\varsigma' be a gluing of π′\pi' and Δ\Delta (Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued, with ν′,ν^,ν^\nu',\hat{\nu},\hat{\nu} in place of its μ,λ,ν\mu,\lambda,\nu) and π′′=(q1,q3)#ς′\pi''=(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\varsigma', which by Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §noise-triangle belongs to Πa(ν′,ν^)\Pi^{a}(\nu',\hat{\nu}) with Ia(π′′)≤Ia(π′)+Ia(Δ)=Ia(π′)<ε′′\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi'')}\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi')}+\sqrt{I^{a}(\Delta)}=\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi')}<\varepsilon'', the last by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. By A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §discrepancy-gluing, applied with ν′,ν^,ν^\nu',\hat{\nu},\hat{\nu} as its ν,λ,μ\nu,\lambda,\mu, with π′\pi', Δ\Delta and ς′\varsigma' as its π12\pi_{12}, π23\pi_{23} and σ\sigma, and with qq, ∇φ^(ν^)\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}) and ∇φ~(ν^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}) as its qq, η\eta and θ\theta; by A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §diagonal, which gives ∫X×X∣∇φ^(ν^)(x)−∇φ~(ν^)(y)∣a2 Δ(dz)=∥∇φ^(ν^)−∇φ~(ν^)∥ν^2\int_{X\times X}|\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})(x)-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\Delta(dz)=\lVert\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})\rVert_{\hat{\nu}}^{2}, whose nonnegative square root is ∥∇φ^(ν^)−∇φ~(ν^)∥ν^\lVert\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})\rVert_{\hat{\nu}} (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root); by ∇φ^(ν^)−∇φ~(ν^)=∇ψ(ν^)\nabla\hat{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})=\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu}) (Step 3); by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field and by (8),

∫X×X∣q(x)−∇φ~(ν^)(y)∣a2 π′′(dz)<ε′′+∥∇ψ(ν^)∥ν^<ε′′+ε8.(10)\sqrt{\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi''(dz)}<\varepsilon''+\lVert\nabla\psi(\hat{\nu})\rVert_{\hat{\nu}}<\varepsilon''+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}. \tag{10}

Step 6: transport to μ^\hat{\mu}. By The Noise Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure: Existence of Noise-Optimal Couplings, Comparison with the Quadratic Wasserstein Distance and Lower Semicontinuity §optimal there is a noise-optimal coupling γ∈Πa(ν^,μ^)\gamma\in\Pi^{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}), so Ia(γ)=Wa(ν^,μ^)2I^{a}(\gamma)=W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2} (Noise-Optimal Couplings §optimal) and Ia(γ)=Wa(ν^,μ^)\sqrt{I^{a}(\gamma)}=W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root). Let ς\varsigma be a gluing of π′′\pi'' and γ\gamma (Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §glued, with ν′,ν^,μ^\nu',\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu} in place of its μ,λ,ν\mu,\lambda,\nu) and π=(q1,q3)#ς\pi=(q_{1},q_{3})_{\#}\varsigma, which by Gluing Two Couplings on a Hilbert Space over a Common Middle Marginal, and the Triangle Inequalities for the Quadratic and Noise Costs §noise-triangle belongs to Πa(ν′,μ^)\Pi^{a}(\nu',\hat{\mu}) with Ia(π)≤Ia(π′′)+Ia(γ)<ε′′+Wa(ν^,μ^)<2σ\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi'')}+\sqrt{I^{a}(\gamma)}<\varepsilon''+W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})<2\sigma. We check the five conditions of Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution for uu at μ^\hat{\mu} with φ\varphi and tolerance ε\varepsilon, with witnesses ν′\nu', π\pi, ss, qq.

First, Ia(π)<2σ≤ε\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}<2\sigma\le\varepsilon, so Ia(π)<ε2I^{a}(\pi)<\varepsilon^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Secondly, ν′∈D\nu'\in\mathcal{D} and Wa(ν′,μ^)≤Ia(π)<2σ≤θ3W_{a}(\nu',\hat{\mu})\le\sqrt{I^{a}(\pi)}<2\sigma\le\theta_{3}, so uδ−(ν′)<uδ−(μ^)+ε4u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')<u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}; and by claim 1 and (2), uδ−(ν′)≥vδ−(ν′)>vδ−(ν^)−ε′′>uδ−(μ^)−ε4−ε8u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')\ge v^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')>v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-\varepsilon''>u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}-\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}. So ∣uδ−(ν′)−uδ−(μ^)∣<ε|u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu')-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\varepsilon by Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §strict-two-sided.

Thirdly, by Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §triangle and (2), ∣s−uδ−(μ^)∣≤∣s−vδ−(ν^)∣+∣vδ−(ν^)−uδ−(μ^)∣<ε8+ε4<ε|s-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|\le|s-v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})|+|v^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\nu})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{\mu})|<\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<\varepsilon.

Fourthly, since ν^∈D\hat{\nu}\in\mathcal{D}, γ∈Πa(ν^,μ^)\gamma\in\Pi^{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu}) and Ia(γ)=Wa(ν^,μ^)2<θ12I^{a}(\gamma)=W_{a}(\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu})^{2}<\theta_{1}^{2} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), the choice of θ1\theta_{1} bounds the discrepancy of ∇φ~(ν^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}) and ∇φ~(μ^)=∇φ(μ^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\mu})=\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) along γ\gamma by (ε4)2(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4})^{2}, so its square root is less than ε4\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field). By A Toolkit for Penalised Comparison on the Noise Wasserstein Space: Constant Test Functions and Linear Combinations of Test Functions, the Identity as a Unique Noise-Optimal Map, and Discrepancies Along the Push-Forward Under (id, id) and Along Glued Couplings §discrepancy-gluing, applied with ν′,ν^,μ^\nu',\hat{\nu},\hat{\mu} as its ν,λ,μ\nu,\lambda,\mu, with π′′\pi'', γ\gamma and ς\varsigma as its π12\pi_{12}, π23\pi_{23} and σ\sigma, and with qq, ∇φ~(ν^)\nabla\tilde{\varphi}(\hat{\nu}) and ∇φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) as its qq, η\eta and θ\theta, and by (10),

∫X×X∣q(x)−∇φ(μ^)(y)∣a2 π(dz)<ε′′+ε8+ε4<ε,\sqrt{\int_{X\times X}|q(x)-\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu})(y)|_{a}^{2}\,\pi(dz)}<\varepsilon''+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{8}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{4}<\varepsilon ,

so the discrepancy of qq and ∇φ(μ^)\nabla\varphi(\hat{\mu}) along π\pi is less than ε2\varepsilon^{2} by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field.

Finally, Fδ−(ν′,s,q)≤ε′′≤εF^{-}_{\delta}(\nu',s,q)\le\varepsilon''\le\varepsilon.

As δ\delta, φ\varphi, μ^\hat{\mu} and ε\varepsilon were arbitrary and uu has penalty-subordinate growth from above, uu is a viscosity subsolution of FF relative to the noise penalty pair by Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a First-Order Equation on the Noise Wasserstein Space Relative to a Noise Penalty Pair §subsolution.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…