TheoremBase

Each claim is proved by rescaling an arbitrary argument into the small ball where the hypothesis applies, using homogeneity of the inner product and of the form, and then letting the slack tend to zero.

Proof

Throughout we use the following facts without further comment: products and multiplicative inverses of positive real numbers are positive (claims 5 and 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); ∣x∣|x| is positive for x≠0Ex\ne 0_{E} (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii)); and 0≤∥b∥0\le\lVert b\rVert for every b∈Sym(E)b\in\mathrm{Sym}(E), because by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (ii) the number ∥b∥\lVert b\rVert is the greatest lower bound of a set of nonnegative real numbers, of which 00 is therefore a lower bound.

Claim 1. If p=0Ep=0_{E} there is nothing to prove, so suppose p≠0Ep\ne 0_{E}; then 0<∣p∣0<|p|. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let δ\delta be a radius as in the hypothesis for this ε\varepsilon. Put

t=(δ⋅2−1) ∣p∣−1,z=t p.t=\bigl(\delta\cdot 2^{-1}\bigr)\,|p|^{-1},\qquad z=t\,p .

Here δ⋅2−1\delta\cdot 2^{-1} is positive and smaller than δ\delta by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so tt is positive. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv) and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣z∣=∣t∣ ∣p∣=t ∣p∣=δ⋅2−1<δ|z|=|t|\,|p|=t\,|p|=\delta\cdot 2^{-1}<\delta, so the hypothesis applies to zz. Since ⟨p,z⟩=t ⟨p,p⟩=t ∣p∣2\langle p,z\rangle=t\,\langle p,p\rangle=t\,|p|^{2} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) and Real Inner Product Spaces (ii), and t∣p∣2t|p|^{2} is nonnegative, claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

t ∣p∣2=∣⟨p,z⟩∣≤ε ∣z∣=ε t ∣p∣.t\,|p|^{2}=\bigl|\langle p,z\rangle\bigr|\le\varepsilon\,|z|=\varepsilon\,t\,|p| .

Multiplying both sides by the nonnegative number t−1∣p∣−1t^{-1}|p|^{-1} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) yields ∣p∣≤ε|p|\le\varepsilon. As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number and 0≤∣p∣0\le|p|, claim 3 of Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack gives ∣p∣=0|p|=0 and hence p=0Ep=0_{E} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii), contradicting p≠0Ep\ne 0_{E}. Therefore p=0Ep=0_{E}.

Claim 2. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let δ\delta be a radius as in the hypothesis. We first show that

∣b(x,x)∣≤ε ∣x∣2for every x∈E.\bigl|b(x,x)\bigr|\le\varepsilon\,|x|^{2}\qquad\text{for every }x\in E .

If x=0Ex=0_{E}, then 0E=0⋅0E0_{E}=0\cdot 0_{E} by claim 3 of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, so homogeneity in the first argument (Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (i)) gives b(0E,0E)=0⋅b(0E,0E)=0b(0_{E},0_{E})=0\cdot b(0_{E},0_{E})=0, while ∣x∣=0|x|=0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii); both sides are then 00. If x≠0Ex\ne 0_{E}, put s=(δ⋅2−1)∣x∣−1s=(\delta\cdot 2^{-1})|x|^{-1}, a positive real number, and z=s xz=s\,x; exactly as in claim 1, ∣z∣=s ∣x∣=δ⋅2−1<δ|z|=s\,|x|=\delta\cdot 2^{-1}<\delta. By the homogeneity and symmetry of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (i), b(z,z)=b(sx,sx)=s b(x,sx)=s b(sx,x)=s2 b(x,x)b(z,z)=b(sx,sx)=s\,b(x,sx)=s\,b(sx,x)=s^{2}\,b(x,x), and ∣z∣2=s2∣x∣2|z|^{2}=s^{2}|x|^{2} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv). Since 0≤s20\le s^{2}, claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field give ∣b(z,z)∣=s2∣b(x,x)∣|b(z,z)|=s^{2}|b(x,x)|, so the hypothesis reads

s2 ∣b(x,x)∣≤ε s2 ∣x∣2,s^{2}\,\bigl|b(x,x)\bigr|\le\varepsilon\,s^{2}\,|x|^{2},

and multiplying by the nonnegative number (s2)−1(s^{2})^{-1} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives the asserted bound.

Since 0≤ε0\le\varepsilon, Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (v) now yields ∥b∥≤ε\lVert b\rVert\le\varepsilon. As ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number and 0≤∥b∥0\le\lVert b\rVert, claim 3 of Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack gives ∥b∥=0\lVert b\rVert=0, hence b=0Symb=0_{\mathrm{Sym}} by Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (iii).

Claim 3. Let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let δ\delta be a radius as in the hypothesis of this claim. Taking y=wy=w there shows that every z∈Ez\in E with ∣z∣<δ|z|<\delta satisfies ∣b(z,z)∣≤ε ∣z∣ ∣z∣=ε ∣z∣2|b(z,z)|\le\varepsilon\,|z|\,|z|=\varepsilon\,|z|^{2}. Since ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, this is precisely the hypothesis of claim 2, which therefore gives b=0Symb=0_{\mathrm{Sym}}.

Claim 4. Write c=∥b∥⋅2−1c=\lVert b\rVert\cdot 2^{-1}, which is nonnegative by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied to 0≤∥b∥0\le\lVert b\rVert with the nonnegative multiplier 2−12^{-1}, and put M=c+1M=c+1; then 1≤M1\le M by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 0<M0<M by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and claim 2 there.

Let δ1\delta_{1} be a radius as in the hypothesis for the positive number 11. For z∈Ez\in E with ∣z∣<δ1|z|<\delta_{1}, claims 2 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field together with Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (ii) give

∣⟨p,z⟩∣≤∣⟨p,z⟩+12b(z,z)∣+∣12b(z,z)∣≤∣z∣2+c ∣z∣2=M ∣z∣2.\bigl|\langle p,z\rangle\bigr|\le\Bigl|\langle p,z\rangle+\tfrac{1}{2}b(z,z)\Bigr|+\Bigl|\tfrac{1}{2}b(z,z)\Bigr|\le|z|^{2}+c\,|z|^{2}=M\,|z|^{2} .

Now let ε∈R\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and let δ\delta be the lesser of δ1\delta_{1} and εM−1\varepsilon M^{-1} (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), which is positive because it is one of them. For zz with ∣z∣<δ|z|<\delta we have ∣z∣≤δ|z|\le\delta and δ≤εM−1\delta\le\varepsilon M^{-1}, so two applications of claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, with the nonnegative multipliers MM and ∣z∣|z|, give

M ∣z∣2=(M ∣z∣) ∣z∣≤(M δ) ∣z∣≤ε ∣z∣,M\,|z|^{2}=(M\,|z|)\,|z|\le(M\,\delta)\,|z|\le\varepsilon\,|z| ,

whence ∣⟨p,z⟩∣≤ε∣z∣|\langle p,z\rangle|\le\varepsilon|z|. Since ε\varepsilon was an arbitrary positive real number, claim 1 gives p=0Ep=0_{E}.

With p=0Ep=0_{E} we have ⟨p,z⟩=0\langle p,z\rangle=0 for every zz by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii), so the hypothesis reads: for every positive ε\varepsilon there is a positive δ\delta with ∣12b(z,z)∣≤ε∣z∣2|\tfrac{1}{2}b(z,z)|\le\varepsilon|z|^{2} whenever ∣z∣<δ|z|<\delta. Let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} be positive and apply this with ε=η⋅2−1\varepsilon=\eta\cdot 2^{-1}, positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, obtaining a positive δ\delta with 2−1∣b(z,z)∣≤η⋅2−1∣z∣22^{-1}|b(z,z)|\le\eta\cdot 2^{-1}|z|^{2} for ∣z∣<δ|z|<\delta, by claims 1 and 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Multiplying by the nonnegative number 22 gives ∣b(z,z)∣≤η∣z∣2|b(z,z)|\le\eta|z|^{2} for every such zz. As η\eta was arbitrary, claim 2 gives b=0Symb=0_{\mathrm{Sym}}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…