TheoremBase

Proof

Write s=dX(x1,x2)s=d_X(x_1,x_2) and t=dY(y1,y2)t=d_Y(y_1,y_2), so that dXΓ—Y(p,q)=max⁑{s,t}d_{X\times Y}(p,q)=\max\{s,t\} by the definition of the product metric. Points of the Cartesian product XΓ—YX\times Y are ordered pairs, so (x1,y1)=(x2,y2)(x_1,y_1)=(x_2,y_2) holds if and only if x1=x2x_1=x_2 and y1=y2y_1=y_2. We use the numbering of the conditions in the definition of a metric, the properties of the maximum recorded in Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements, and the order arithmetic of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. We also use repeatedly that if a≀ba\le b and c≀ec\le e then a+c≀b+ea+c\le b+e; this follows from claims 2 and 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field together with the associativity and commutativity of addition in the underlying field.

Claim 2. This is claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements applied to ss and tt.

Claim 3. Suppose max⁑{s,t}<r\max\{s,t\}<r. By claim 2 we have s≀max⁑{s,t}s\le\max\{s,t\} and t≀max⁑{s,t}t\le\max\{s,t\}, so claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives s<rs<r and t<rt<r. Conversely, suppose s<rs<r and t<rt<r. By claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements the element max⁑{s,t}\max\{s,t\} equals ss or tt, and in either case max⁑{s,t}<r\max\{s,t\}<r.

Claim 1. We verify the four conditions in the definition of a metric.

Condition 1. Condition 1 for dXd_X gives 0≀s0\le s, and claim 2 of the present theorem gives s≀dXΓ—Y(p,q)s\le d_{X\times Y}(p,q); transitivity of ≀\le gives 0≀dXΓ—Y(p,q)0\le d_{X\times Y}(p,q).

Condition 2. Suppose dXΓ—Y(p,q)=0d_{X\times Y}(p,q)=0. By claim 2 of the present theorem, s≀0s\le 0 and t≀0t\le 0; condition 1 for dXd_X and dYd_Y gives 0≀s0\le s and 0≀t0\le t, so antisymmetry gives s=0s=0 and t=0t=0. Condition 2 for dXd_X and dYd_Y then gives x1=x2x_1=x_2 and y1=y2y_1=y_2, that is p=qp=q. Conversely, suppose p=qp=q. Then s=dX(x1,x1)=0s=d_X(x_1,x_1)=0 and t=dY(y1,y1)=0t=d_Y(y_1,y_1)=0 by condition 2 for dXd_X and dYd_Y, and max⁑{0,0}=0\max\{0,0\}=0 because 0≀00\le 0 by reflexivity, so dXΓ—Y(p,q)=0d_{X\times Y}(p,q)=0.

Condition 3. Condition 3 for dXd_X and dYd_Y gives dX(x2,x1)=sd_X(x_2,x_1)=s and dY(y2,y1)=td_Y(y_2,y_1)=t, so dXΓ—Y(q,p)=max⁑{s,t}=dXΓ—Y(p,q)d_{X\times Y}(q,p)=\max\{s,t\}=d_{X\times Y}(p,q).

Condition 4. Let w=(x3,y3)∈XΓ—Yw=(x_3,y_3)\in X\times Y. Condition 4 for dXd_X gives

dX(x1,x3)≀dX(x1,x2)+dX(x2,x3),d_X(x_1,x_3)\le d_X(x_1,x_2)+d_X(x_2,x_3),

and claim 2 of the present theorem, applied to the pairs p,qp,q and q,wq,w, gives dX(x1,x2)≀dXΓ—Y(p,q)d_X(x_1,x_2)\le d_{X\times Y}(p,q) and dX(x2,x3)≀dXΓ—Y(q,w)d_X(x_2,x_3)\le d_{X\times Y}(q,w). Adding these two inequalities and using transitivity,

dX(x1,x3)≀dXΓ—Y(p,q)+dXΓ—Y(q,w).d_X(x_1,x_3)\le d_{X\times Y}(p,q)+d_{X\times Y}(q,w).

The same argument with dYd_Y gives dY(y1,y3)≀dXΓ—Y(p,q)+dXΓ—Y(q,w)d_Y(y_1,y_3)\le d_{X\times Y}(p,q)+d_{X\times Y}(q,w). By claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements,

dXΓ—Y(p,w)=max⁑{dX(x1,x3),dY(y1,y3)}≀dXΓ—Y(p,q)+dXΓ—Y(q,w).d_{X\times Y}(p,w)=\max\{d_X(x_1,x_3),d_Y(y_1,y_3)\}\le d_{X\times Y}(p,q)+d_{X\times Y}(q,w).

Hence dXΓ—Yd_{X\times Y} satisfies all four conditions and is a metric on XΓ—YX\times Y.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…