TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval II of the real numbers R\mathbb{R} is called continuous on II when it is continuous relative to II, both II and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of the real line, and every closed interval [c,d]⊆R[c,d]\subseteq\mathbb{R} with c≤dc\le d is compact in the topology of that metric by Closed Interval [a,b][a,b] is Compact in R\mathbb{R}. Throughout, ∥⋅∥2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{2}, the triangle inequality, and Cauchy-Schwarz are from Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product and Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm; uniqueness of mean-square limits (if ∥Zn−V∥2→0\lVert Z_n-V\rVert_2\to0 and ∥Zn−V′∥2→0\lVert Z_n-V'\rVert_2\to0 then V=V′V=V' almost surely) follows from these and the null-equivalence of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product. Bilinearity of the covariance in each argument follows from its formula Cov⁡(X,Y)=E[XY]−E[X]E[Y]\operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)=\mathbb{E}[XY]-\mathbb{E}[X]\mathbb{E}[Y] there together with the bilinearity of the mean-square inner product recorded in Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product; for centered random variables, Cov⁡(X,Y)=E[XY]\operatorname{Cov}(X,Y)=\mathbb{E}[XY]. Fix t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T]; for t=0t=0 every asserted identity reads 0=00=0 by the degenerate-interval conventions of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables, so assume t>0t>0. For n≥1n\ge1 put xi=it/nx_i=it/n (0≤i≤n0\le i\le n), and let ωn\omega_n be a bound for ∣f(u)−f(v)∣|f(u)-f(v)| over u,v∈[0,T]u,v\in[0,T] with ∣u−v∣≤t/n|u-v|\le t/n; by Heine-Cantor Theorem: Continuity on a Compact Subset Implies Uniform Continuity we may choose ωn→0\omega_n\to0. Both parts rest on the Abel summation identity: for any random variables Ux0,Ux1,…,UxnU_{x_0},U_{x_1},\dots,U_{x_n},

∑i=1nf(xi−1) (Uxi−Uxi−1)+∑i=1n(f(xi)−f(xi−1))Uxi=f(t)Uxn−f(0)Ux0,\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(x_{i-1})\,(U_{x_i}-U_{x_{i-1}})+\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl(f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})\bigr)U_{x_i}=f(t)U_{x_n}-f(0)U_{x_0},

which holds pointwise on Ω\Omega because the left-hand side telescopes to ∑i(f(xi)Uxi−f(xi−1)Uxi−1)\sum_i\bigl(f(x_i)U_{x_i}-f(x_{i-1})U_{x_{i-1}}\bigr).

Part 1. All the random variables below lie in the centered jointly Gaussian family of claims 2 and 3 of Wiener Integrals of Continuous Functions are Jointly Gaussian (Wiener integrals and values of BB; expectations vanish and covariances are given by claim 2 there), so all second moments of their linear combinations are computed by bilinearity of the covariance from those covariance formulas, together with Additivity of the Riemann Integral on Adjacent Intervals for splitting Riemann integrals over adjacent intervals.

Mean-square continuity of VV. For 0≤s≤s′≤T0\le s\le s'\le T: E[(Vs′−Vs)2]=∫0s′k2−2∫0sk2+∫0sk2=∫ss′k(u)2 du≤(s′−s)max⁡[0,T]k2\mathbb{E}[(V_{s'}-V_s)^2]=\int_0^{s'}k^2-2\int_0^{s}k^2+\int_0^{s}k^2=\int_s^{s'}k(u)^2\,du\le(s'-s)\max_{[0,T]}k^2 (the maximum exists by Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval; monotonicity of the integral via claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral). This also covers s=0s=0 since V0=0V_0=0, and degenerate cases by the conventions of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables. Mean-square continuity follows; the existence assertions in the statement then follow from claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral and Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral for Mean-Square Continuous Families, as indicated there.

Step (a). Let Dn=∑i=1nf(xi−1)(Vxi−Vxi−1)−∫0tf(u)k(u) dBuD_n=\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(x_{i-1})(V_{x_i}-V_{x_{i-1}})-\int_0^t f(u)k(u)\,dB_u. Expanding E[Dn2]\mathbb{E}[D_n^2] by bilinearity and the covariance formulas: for i≠ji\ne j the increments are uncorrelated, Cov⁡(Vxi−Vxi−1,Vxj−Vxj−1)=0\operatorname{Cov}(V_{x_i}-V_{x_{i-1}},V_{x_j}-V_{x_{j-1}})=0 (evaluate the four min⁡\min terms); Cov⁡(Vxi−Vxi−1,Vxi−Vxi−1)=∫xi−1xik2\operatorname{Cov}(V_{x_i}-V_{x_{i-1}},V_{x_i}-V_{x_{i-1}})=\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}k^2; and Cov⁡(Vxi−Vxi−1,∫0tfk dB)=∫0xifk2−∫0xi−1fk2=∫xi−1xifk2\operatorname{Cov}\bigl(V_{x_i}-V_{x_{i-1}},\int_0^tfk\,dB\bigr)=\int_0^{x_i}fk^2-\int_0^{x_{i-1}}fk^2=\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}fk^2. Hence

E[Dn2]=∑i=1n(f(xi−1)2∫xi−1xik2−2f(xi−1)∫xi−1xifk2)+∫0tf2k2=∑i=1n∫xi−1xi(f(xi−1)−f(u))2k(u)2 du≤ωn2∫0tk2→0.\mathbb{E}[D_n^2]=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\Bigl(f(x_{i-1})^2\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}k^2-2f(x_{i-1})\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}fk^2\Bigr)+\int_0^tf^2k^2=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}\bigl(f(x_{i-1})-f(u)\bigr)^2k(u)^2\,du\le\omega_n^2\int_0^tk^2\to0 .

Step (b). We show ∥∑i=1n(f(xi)−f(xi−1))Vxi−∫0tg(u)Vu du∥2→0\bigl\lVert\sum_{i=1}^{n}(f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1}))V_{x_i}-\int_0^tg(u)V_u\,du\bigr\rVert_2\to0. Using f(xi)−f(xi−1)=∫xi−1xig(u) duf(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})=\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}g(u)\,du (hypothesis on f,gf,g and Additivity of the Riemann Integral on Adjacent Intervals) and claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral, the ii-th summand equals ∫xi−1xig(u)Vxi du\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}g(u)V_{x_i}\,du (a mean-square Riemann integral of the family (g(u)Vxi)u(g(u)V_{x_i})_{u}), while claim 5 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral, applied inductively over the division points x1,…,xn−1x_1,\dots,x_{n-1}, splits ∫0tg(u)Vu du=∑i∫xi−1xig(u)Vu du\int_0^tg(u)V_u\,du=\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}g(u)V_u\,du. By linearity (claim 1 there; the family (g(u)(Vxi−Vu))u(g(u)(V_{x_i}-V_u))_u is mean-square continuous by claims 1 and 2 there) the difference is ∑i∫xi−1xig(u)(Vxi−Vu) du\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}g(u)(V_{x_i}-V_u)\,du, and by the norm bound (claim 4 there),

∥∑i∫xi−1xig(u)(Vxi−Vu) du∥2≤∑i∫xi−1xi∣g(u)∣ ∥Vxi−Vu∥2 du≤t (max⁡[0,T]∣g∣) ω~n,\Bigl\lVert\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}g(u)(V_{x_i}-V_u)\,du\Bigr\rVert_2\le\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}|g(u)|\,\lVert V_{x_i}-V_u\rVert_2\,du\le t\,\Bigl(\max_{[0,T]}|g|\Bigr)\,\widetilde{\omega}_n,

where max⁡[0,T]∣g∣\max_{[0,T]}|g| exists by Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and

ω~n=max⁡1≤i≤n sup⁡u∈[xi−1,xi]∥Vxi−Vu∥2≤((t/n)max⁡[0,T]k2)1/2→0\widetilde{\omega}_n=\max_{1\le i\le n}\ \sup_{u\in[x_{i-1},x_i]}\lVert V_{x_i}-V_u\rVert_2\le\Bigl((t/n)\max_{[0,T]}k^2\Bigr)^{1/2}\to0

by the mean-square continuity estimate above.

By the Abel identity with U=VU=V (note Vx0=V0=0V_{x_0}=V_0=0), ∑if(xi−1)(Vxi−Vxi−1)=f(t)Vt−∑i(f(xi)−f(xi−1))Vxi\sum_if(x_{i-1})(V_{x_i}-V_{x_{i-1}})=f(t)V_t-\sum_i(f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1}))V_{x_i}. The left side converges in mean square to ∫0tfk dB\int_0^tfk\,dB by step (a); the right side converges to f(t)Vt−∫0tgVu duf(t)V_t-\int_0^tgV_u\,du by step (b). Uniqueness of mean-square limits gives the identity of part 1, for every version of the integrals involved (each version is a limit of the same sequences). The special case k≡1k\equiv1 follows since Vt=BtV_t=B_t almost surely by claim 1 of Wiener Integrals of Continuous Functions are Jointly Gaussian for t>0t>0 and by property (i) of Standard Brownian Motion (B0=0B_0=0 almost surely) for t=0t=0; covariances and mean-square limits are unaffected by almost-sure replacement.

Part 2. (Yt)(Y_t) is mean-square continuous by claim 6 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral, and the product families in the statement are mean-square continuous by claim 2 there. By the Abel identity with U=YU=Y (Y0=0Y_0=0):

∑i=1nf(xi−1)(Yxi−Yxi−1)+∑i=1n(f(xi)−f(xi−1))Yxi=f(t)Yt.\sum_{i=1}^{n}f(x_{i-1})(Y_{x_i}-Y_{x_{i-1}})+\sum_{i=1}^{n}(f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1}))Y_{x_i}=f(t)Y_t .

First sum. By claim 5 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral (applied on [0,xi][0,x_i] with intermediate point xi−1x_{i-1}), Yxi−Yxi−1=∫xi−1xiHu duY_{x_i}-Y_{x_{i-1}}=\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}H_u\,du almost surely, so by claims 1 and 2 there the first sum equals ∑i∫xi−1xif(xi−1)Hu du\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}f(x_{i-1})H_u\,du almost surely, and

∥∑i∫xi−1xif(xi−1)Hu du−∫0tf(u)Hu du∥2=∥∑i∫xi−1xi(f(xi−1)−f(u))Hu du∥2≤ωn∫0t∥Hu∥2 du→0,\Bigl\lVert\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}f(x_{i-1})H_u\,du-\int_0^tf(u)H_u\,du\Bigr\rVert_2=\Bigl\lVert\sum_i\int_{x_{i-1}}^{x_i}\bigl(f(x_{i-1})-f(u)\bigr)H_u\,du\Bigr\rVert_2\le\omega_n\int_0^t\lVert H_u\rVert_2\,du\to0,

using claim 4 and the inductive application of claim 5 there. Second sum. Exactly as step (b) of part 1, with YY in place of VV and, in place of the explicit modulus, the uniform mean-square continuity of (Yu)(Y_u) from Uniform Mean-Square Continuity on a Compact Interval: the second sum converges in mean square to ∫0tg(u)Yu du\int_0^tg(u)Y_u\,du. Passing to the mean-square limit in the displayed identity and using uniqueness of mean-square limits yields ∫0tf(u)Hu du+∫0tg(u)Yu du=f(t)Yt\int_0^tf(u)H_u\,du+\int_0^tg(u)Y_u\,du=f(t)Y_t almost surely, for every choice of versions. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…