TheoremBase

Proof of The Trace, the Conjugation and the Right Action of a Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebra

lemmalem:cyclic-tracial-conjugation-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 8,882 chars · 19 deps · depth 16 Reason: V-A1: proof of the conjugation and right-action lemma.

The trace identities follow from the definition and traciality, and separation follows from the equality criterion on the dense subspace of vectors S applied to the cyclic vector. The conjugation sends S applied to the cyclic vector to its adjoint applied to the cyclic vector and is extended by continuity; the right action is computed on the same dense subspace.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. The following facts are used throughout.

(Alg) By Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §star-algebra, A⊆L(H)\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathcal{L}(H) contains II and is closed under sums, scalar multiples, products and adjoints.

(Adj) Let S,T∈L(H)S,T\in\mathcal{L}(H) and c∈Cc\in\mathbb{C}. By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint, SS has an adjoint S∗∈L(H)S^{*}\in\mathcal{L}(H), with ⟨S∗η,ξ⟩=⟨η,Sξ⟩\langle S^{*}\eta,\xi\rangle=\langle\eta,S\xi\rangle (Adjoint of a Linear Map between Complex Inner Product Spaces §adjoint). By Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-calculus and Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §adjoint-unique, (S∗)∗=S(S^{*})^{*}=S, so ⟨Sη,ξ⟩=⟨η,S∗ξ⟩\langle S\eta,\xi\rangle=\langle\eta,S^{*}\xi\rangle; moreover (S+T)∗=S∗+T∗(S+T)^{*}=S^{*}+T^{*}, (cS)∗=c‾ S∗(cS)^{*}=\overline{c}\,S^{*}, (ST)∗=T∗S∗(ST)^{*}=T^{*}S^{*}, I∗=II^{*}=I, and ⟨ξ,S∗Sξ⟩=∥Sξ∥2\langle\xi,S^{*}S\xi\rangle=\lVert S\xi\rVert^{2}.

(Dense) Put D=AΩD=\mathcal{A}\Omega. We have SΩ+TΩ=(S+T)ΩS\Omega+T\Omega=(S+T)\Omega, c(SΩ)=(cS)Ωc(S\Omega)=(cS)\Omega and 0=(0I)Ω0=(0I)\Omega. By (Alg), DD is therefore a linear subspace of HH, and it is dense in HH by Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §cyclic.

Proof of clause 1 (Trace). Recall τ(S)=⟨Ω,SΩ⟩\tau(S)=\langle\Omega,S\Omega\rangle (Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §trace). Linearity of τ\tau follows from conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space: τ(S+T)=⟨Ω,SΩ+TΩ⟩=τ(S)+τ(T)\tau(S+T)=\langle\Omega,S\Omega+T\Omega\rangle=\tau(S)+\tau(T) and τ(cS)=c τ(S)\tau(cS)=c\,\tau(S). Next, τ(I)=⟨Ω,Ω⟩=∥Ω∥2=1\tau(I)=\langle\Omega,\Omega\rangle=\lVert\Omega\rVert^{2}=1 by Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §cyclic. The identity τ(ST)=τ(TS)\tau(ST)=\tau(TS) is Cyclic Tracial Operator Algebras and Their Traces §tracial. By condition 1 of Complex Inner Product Space and (Adj), τ(S∗)=⟨Ω,S∗Ω⟩=⟨S∗Ω,Ω⟩‾=⟨Ω,SΩ⟩‾=τ(S)‾\tau(S^{*})=\langle\Omega,S^{*}\Omega\rangle=\overline{\langle S^{*}\Omega,\Omega\rangle}=\overline{\langle\Omega,S\Omega\rangle}=\overline{\tau(S)}. By (Adj), τ(S∗S)=⟨Ω,S∗SΩ⟩=∥SΩ∥2\tau(S^{*}S)=\langle\Omega,S^{*}S\Omega\rangle=\lVert S\Omega\rVert^{2}. Since S∗∈AS^{*}\in\mathcal{A}, the last identity applied to S∗S^{*}, together with (S∗)∗=S(S^{*})^{*}=S and traciality, gives

∥S∗Ω∥2=τ(SS∗)=τ(S∗S)=∥SΩ∥2.\lVert S^{*}\Omega\rVert^{2}=\tau(SS^{*})=\tau(S^{*}S)=\lVert S\Omega\rVert^{2}.

Both norms are nonnegative, so ∥S∗Ω∥=∥SΩ∥\lVert S^{*}\Omega\rVert=\lVert S\Omega\rVert by Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root.

Proof of clause 2 (Separation). Let S∈AS\in\mathcal{A} with SΩ=0S\Omega=0, and let T,U∈AT,U\in\mathcal{A}. By (Adj), (Alg) and traciality,

⟨UΩ,S(TΩ)⟩=⟨Ω,U∗STΩ⟩=τ((U∗S)T)=τ(T(U∗S))=⟨Ω,TU∗(SΩ)⟩=0,\langle U\Omega,S(T\Omega)\rangle=\langle\Omega,U^{*}ST\Omega\rangle=\tau\bigl((U^{*}S)T\bigr)=\tau\bigl(T(U^{*}S)\bigr)=\langle\Omega,TU^{*}(S\Omega)\rangle=0,

since the linear map TU∗TU^{*} sends 00 to 00. Thus ⟨η,Sξ⟩=⟨η,0ξ⟩\langle\eta,S\xi\rangle=\langle\eta,0\xi\rangle for all ξ,η\xi,\eta in the dense linear subspace DD. By Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely §equality, applied with K=HK=H and E=DE=D, S=0S=0.

Now let T∈A′T\in\mathcal{A}' with TΩ=0T\Omega=0. For S∈AS\in\mathcal{A}, T(SΩ)=S(TΩ)=S0=0T(S\Omega)=S(T\Omega)=S0=0 by The Commutant of a Set of Bounded Operators on a Complex Hilbert Space §commutant. So TT and 00, both in L(H)\mathcal{L}(H), agree on DD, and T=0T=0 by the final sentence of Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely §equality.

Finally, if S∈AS\in\mathcal{A} and τ(S∗S)=0\tau(S^{*}S)=0, then ∥SΩ∥2=0\lVert S\Omega\rVert^{2}=0 by clause 1. Hence SΩ=0S\Omega=0 by condition 4 of Complex Inner Product Space, and S=0S=0 by the first part.

Proof of clause 3 (Conjugation). The map on DD. Define J0:D→HJ_0:D\to H by J0(SΩ)=S∗ΩJ_0(S\Omega)=S^{*}\Omega for S∈AS\in\mathcal{A}. This is well defined. If S,S′∈AS,S'\in\mathcal{A} satisfy SΩ=S′ΩS\Omega=S'\Omega, then (S−S′)Ω=0(S-S')\Omega=0 with S−S′∈AS-S'\in\mathcal{A}, so clause 1 gives ∥(S−S′)∗Ω∥=∥(S−S′)Ω∥=0\lVert(S-S')^{*}\Omega\rVert=\lVert(S-S')\Omega\rVert=0. By (Adj), (S−S′)∗=S∗−S′∗(S-S')^{*}=S^{*}-S'^{*}, hence S∗Ω=S′∗ΩS^{*}\Omega=S'^{*}\Omega. For S,T∈AS,T\in\mathcal{A} and c∈Cc\in\mathbb{C}, (Adj) gives

J0(SΩ+TΩ)=(S+T)∗Ω=J0(SΩ)+J0(TΩ),J0(c SΩ)=(cS)∗Ω=c‾ J0(SΩ),J_0(S\Omega+T\Omega)=(S+T)^{*}\Omega=J_0(S\Omega)+J_0(T\Omega),\qquad J_0(c\,S\Omega)=(cS)^{*}\Omega=\overline{c}\,J_0(S\Omega),

and ∥J0(SΩ)∥=∥SΩ∥\lVert J_0(S\Omega)\rVert=\lVert S\Omega\rVert by clause 1. By Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely §conjugate-linear, applied with K=HK=H and C=1C=1, there is a unique continuous J:H→HJ:H\to H extending J0J_0. It is additive, satisfies J(cξ)=c‾ JξJ(c\xi)=\overline{c}\,J\xi, and satisfies ∥Jξ∥=∥ξ∥\lVert J\xi\rVert=\lVert\xi\rVert for all ξ∈H\xi\in H. By construction J(SΩ)=S∗ΩJ(S\Omega)=S^{*}\Omega for S∈AS\in\mathcal{A}.

Involution. For ξ,η∈H\xi,\eta\in H and c∈Cc\in\mathbb{C}, J(J(ξ+η))=J(Jξ+Jη)=J(Jξ)+J(Jη)J(J(\xi+\eta))=J(J\xi+J\eta)=J(J\xi)+J(J\eta) and J(J(cξ))=J(c‾ Jξ)=c J(Jξ)J(J(c\xi))=J(\overline{c}\,J\xi)=c\,J(J\xi), by claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Also ∥J(Jξ)∥=∥ξ∥\lVert J(J\xi)\rVert=\lVert\xi\rVert. So J∘JJ\circ J is linear with bound 11 and lies in L(H)\mathcal{L}(H) (Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Normed Spaces and the Operator Norm §bounded). For S∈AS\in\mathcal{A} we have S∗∈AS^{*}\in\mathcal{A}, so J(J(SΩ))=J(S∗Ω)=(S∗)∗Ω=SΩJ(J(S\Omega))=J(S^{*}\Omega)=(S^{*})^{*}\Omega=S\Omega. So J∘JJ\circ J and II agree on DD, and J∘J=IJ\circ J=I by Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely §equality.

The inner product identity. For S,T∈AS,T\in\mathcal{A}, (Adj), (Alg) and traciality give

⟨J(SΩ),J(TΩ)⟩=⟨S∗Ω,T∗Ω⟩=⟨Ω,ST∗Ω⟩=τ(ST∗)=τ(T∗S)=⟨TΩ,SΩ⟩.\langle J(S\Omega),J(T\Omega)\rangle=\langle S^{*}\Omega,T^{*}\Omega\rangle=\langle\Omega,ST^{*}\Omega\rangle=\tau(ST^{*})=\tau(T^{*}S)=\langle T\Omega,S\Omega\rangle .

We extend this identity to all of HH by continuity. First, if ak→aa_k\to a and bk→bb_k\to b in HH, then ⟨ak,bk⟩→⟨a,b⟩\langle a_k,b_k\rangle\to\langle a,b\rangle in C\mathbb{C}. Indeed, sesquilinearity (conditions 2 and 3 of Complex Inner Product Space, claims 1 and 2 of Elementary Properties of a Complex Inner Product) gives ⟨ak,bk⟩−⟨a,b⟩=⟨ak−a,bk−b⟩+⟨ak−a,b⟩+⟨a,bk−b⟩\langle a_k,b_k\rangle-\langle a,b\rangle=\langle a_k-a,b_k-b\rangle+\langle a_k-a,b\rangle+\langle a,b_k-b\rangle. So by claim 1 of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric and claim 7 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus,

∣⟨ak,bk⟩−⟨a,b⟩∣≤∥ak−a∥ ∥bk−b∥+∥ak−a∥ ∥b∥+∥a∥ ∥bk−b∥.|\langle a_k,b_k\rangle-\langle a,b\rangle|\le\lVert a_k-a\rVert\,\lVert b_k-b\rVert+\lVert a_k-a\rVert\,\lVert b\rVert+\lVert a\rVert\,\lVert b_k-b\rVert .

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, put M=∥a∥+∥b∥+1M=\lVert a\rVert+\lVert b\rVert+1. Once ∥ak−a∥\lVert a_k-a\rVert and ∥bk−b∥\lVert b_k-b\rVert are below both 11 and ε/(3M)\varepsilon/(3M), each term is below ε/3\varepsilon/3.

Now let ξ,η∈H\xi,\eta\in H, and use (Dense), Dense Subset of a Topological Space and Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space to choose sequences (ξk),(ηk)(\xi_k),(\eta_k) in DD converging to ξ,η\xi,\eta. Then ∥Jξk−Jξ∥=∥J(ξk−ξ)∥=∥ξk−ξ∥\lVert J\xi_k-J\xi\rVert=\lVert J(\xi_k-\xi)\rVert=\lVert\xi_k-\xi\rVert, so Jξk→JξJ\xi_k\to J\xi, and likewise Jηk→JηJ\eta_k\to J\eta. By the continuity just shown, ⟨Jξk,Jηk⟩→⟨Jξ,Jη⟩\langle J\xi_k,J\eta_k\rangle\to\langle J\xi,J\eta\rangle and ⟨ηk,ξk⟩→⟨η,ξ⟩\langle\eta_k,\xi_k\rangle\to\langle\eta,\xi\rangle. These are the same sequence by the identity on DD. So ⟨Jξ,Jη⟩=⟨η,ξ⟩\langle J\xi,J\eta\rangle=\langle\eta,\xi\rangle by Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space. Hence JJ is a conjugation of HH (Conjugation of a Complex Hilbert Space §conjugation) with J(SΩ)=S∗ΩJ(S\Omega)=S^{*}\Omega for S∈AS\in\mathcal{A}.

Uniqueness. Let J′J' be any conjugation of HH with J′(SΩ)=S∗ΩJ'(S\Omega)=S^{*}\Omega for S∈AS\in\mathcal{A}. Then ∥J′ξ∥2=⟨J′ξ,J′ξ⟩=⟨ξ,ξ⟩=∥ξ∥2\lVert J'\xi\rVert^{2}=\langle J'\xi,J'\xi\rangle=\langle\xi,\xi\rangle=\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}, so ∥J′ξ∥=∥ξ∥\lVert J'\xi\rVert=\lVert\xi\rVert (Norm Induced by a Complex Inner Product). Additivity and conjugate homogeneity with −1‾=−1\overline{-1}=-1 give J′ξ−J′η=J′(ξ−η)J'\xi-J'\eta=J'(\xi-\eta), hence ∥J′ξ−J′η∥=∥ξ−η∥\lVert J'\xi-J'\eta\rVert=\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert. So δ=ε\delta=\varepsilon meets Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, and J′J' is continuous on HH. It extends J0J_0, so J′=JJ'=J by the uniqueness in Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely §conjugate-linear. Finally JΩ=J(IΩ)=I∗Ω=ΩJ\Omega=J(I\Omega)=I^{*}\Omega=\Omega by (Adj).

Proof of clause 4 (Right action). Let S∈AS\in\mathcal{A}. Since S∈L(H)S\in\mathcal{L}(H) and JJ is a conjugation, JSJ∈L(H)JSJ\in\mathcal{L}(H) by Basic Properties of Commutants: Unital Algebras Closed under Weak Limits, Order Reversal, the Triple Commutant, and Conjugation §conjugation. For T∈AT\in\mathcal{A} we have T∗,ST∗∈AT^{*},ST^{*}\in\mathcal{A} by (Alg), so clause 3 and (Adj) give

JSJ(TΩ)=J(S(T∗Ω))=J((ST∗)Ω)=(ST∗)∗Ω=(T∗)∗S∗Ω=TS∗Ω.JSJ(T\Omega)=J\bigl(S(T^{*}\Omega)\bigr)=J\bigl((ST^{*})\Omega\bigr)=(ST^{*})^{*}\Omega=(T^{*})^{*}S^{*}\Omega=TS^{*}\Omega .

Now let U∈AU\in\mathcal{A}. For every T∈AT\in\mathcal{A}, UT∈AUT\in\mathcal{A}, so by the formula just proved

(JSJ)U(TΩ)=JSJ((UT)Ω)=UTS∗Ω=U(JSJ(TΩ)).(JSJ)U(T\Omega)=JSJ\bigl((UT)\Omega\bigr)=UTS^{*}\Omega=U\bigl(JSJ(T\Omega)\bigr).

Thus (JSJ)U(JSJ)U and U(JSJ)U(JSJ), both in L(H)\mathcal{L}(H) by Bounded Linear Maps between Complex Inner Product Spaces: the Least Bound, Operations, the Underlying Real Structure, Adjoints, Completeness and the Quadratic-Form Bound §operations, agree on DD. By Bounded Linear and Conjugate-Linear Maps on a Dense Subspace of a Complex Hilbert Space Extend Uniquely §equality, (JSJ)U=U(JSJ)(JSJ)U=U(JSJ). As U∈AU\in\mathcal{A} was arbitrary, JSJ∈A′JSJ\in\mathcal{A}' by The Commutant of a Set of Bounded Operators on a Complex Hilbert Space §commutant.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…