The operation and the relation on the quotient are built by class abstraction from representatives and shown well defined by compatibility and the criterion that two classes are equal exactly when their representatives are related; the induced map is obtained by factoring the projection composed with F through the quotient. Uniqueness follows because every element of the quotient is a class of some element.
Throughout, is the equivalence class of , and means as in Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §relation. We use three facts repeatedly. First, by The Quotient of a Set by an Equivalence Relation and the Canonical Projection §quotient and Class Abstraction: the Class of All Sets Satisfying a Predicative Formula §abstraction, a set lies in if and only if for some . Second, by Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §equal, for all we have if and only if . Third, by The Cartesian Product of Two Classes §product and Class Abstraction: the Class of All Sets Satisfying a Predicative Formula §abstraction, a set lies in if and only if for some , that is, by the first fact, if and only if for some . By Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §quotient-set, is a set.
Proof of the clause operation above. Construction. For the value exists and lies in by Binary Operations on a Set §notation, so is defined. Let
formed by class abstraction with the parameters , and ; its formula quantifies over set variables only, the ordered pair, , , and being defined set symbols used under the hypotheses and , so it is predicative as Class Theory NBG: the Axioms, Standing Conventions and Basic Notation §comprehension requires. By Class Abstraction: the Class of All Sets Satisfying a Predicative Formula §abstraction and The Characteristic Property of Ordered Pairs and Nested Tuples of Sets §characteristic, for all sets and ,
Function. Every element of is an ordered pair, so is a relation by Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §relation. Let and . By (1) there are with , and . By The Characteristic Property of Ordered Pairs and Nested Tuples of Sets §characteristic, and , so and by Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §equal. By the hypothesis on , ; as and lie in , Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §equal gives , that is, . Hence is a function by Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §function.
Domain. By Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §domain and (1), a set lies in if and only if there are a set and with and ; since exists for all , this holds if and only if for some , that is, by the third fact above, if and only if . By Class Theory NBG: the Axioms, Standing Conventions and Basic Notation §extensionality, .
Range. Let . By Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §range and (1), for some ; since , by the first fact above. Thus , so by Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §map, and is a binary operation on the set by Binary Operations on a Set §operation.
Values. Let . Then , and by (1), so by Binary Operations on a Set §notation and Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §value, .
Uniqueness. Let be a binary operation on with for all . By Binary Operations on a Set §operation and Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §map, . Let ; by the third fact above, for some , and then, by Binary Operations on a Set §notation, . By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §equality, .
Proof of the clause map above. Construction. By Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §projection, the canonical projection is a map with for every . By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §composition, applied to and , the composition is a map with for every , using by Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §map. Let with . By the hypothesis on , , and since , Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §equal gives , that is, . As is a set, A Map Constant on Equivalence Classes Factors Uniquely through the Quotient §factorization, applied with and the map , gives exactly one map with .
Function, domain and range. is a map from to , so by Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §map it is a function with and .
Values. Let . By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §composition, applied to and , .
Uniqueness. Let be a map with for every . By Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §composition, is a map with for every . Both and have domain by Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another §map, so by Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction §equality. By the uniqueness in A Map Constant on Equivalence Classes Factors Uniquely through the Quotient §factorization, .
Proof of the clause relation above. Construction. Let
formed by class abstraction with the parameters , and ; its formula quantifies over set variables only, the ordered pair, and being defined set symbols used under the hypotheses and , so it is predicative as Class Theory NBG: the Axioms, Standing Conventions and Basic Notation §comprehension requires. By Class Abstraction: the Class of All Sets Satisfying a Predicative Formula §abstraction and The Characteristic Property of Ordered Pairs and Nested Tuples of Sets §characteristic, for all sets and ,
Relation on . Every element of is an ordered pair, so is a relation by Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §relation. Let ; then with and for some , so by the first fact above, and by Membership in a Cartesian Product, and the Cartesian Product of Two Sets Is a Set §membership. Thus is a subclass of by Subclasses and Subsets §subclass, and is a relation on by Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §on.
Characterization. Let . If , then by (2). Conversely, let . By (2) there are with , and . By Equivalence Classes Partition the Set: Cover, Disjointness and Representatives; the Quotient Is a Set and the Canonical Projection Is a Surjection §equal, and , so the hypothesis on gives if and only if ; hence .
Uniqueness. Let and be relations on such that, for all , if and only if , and likewise for . Let . Since by Relations, Domain, Range, Inverse and Composition §on, the third fact above gives for some ; then , so . By symmetry every element of lies in , so by Class Theory NBG: the Axioms, Standing Conventions and Basic Notation §extensionality. Applied with , this shows that is the only relation on with the stated property.
Loading…