TheoremBase

Proof

Write λ=λ[0,T]\lambda=\lambda_{[0,T]}, B=B[0,T]\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]} and PT=T−1λP_{T}=T^{-1}\lambda, so that ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) is a probability space and, by claim 7 of the inner-product lemma, a map w:[0,T]→Rdw:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{d} lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) exactly when each component wiw^{i} is a square-integrable random variable on that probability space, in which case

∥[w]∥L22=T∑i=1d∥wi∥22.(†)\lVert[w]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert w^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2}. \tag{$\dagger$}

Claim 1. Let (ξn)n∈N(\xi_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a Cauchy sequence in (L2([0,T];Rd),dL2)\bigl(L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}),d_{L^{2}}\bigr), and for each nn choose a representative un∈L2([0,T];Rd)u_{n}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) with ξn=[un]\xi_{n}=[u_{n}].

Fix i∈{1,…,d}i\in\{1,\dots,d\}. Since (un−um)i=uni−umi(u_{n}-u_{m})^{i}=u_{n}^{i}-u_{m}^{i}, identity (†)(\dagger) applied to un−umu_{n}-u_{m} gives

T ∥uni−umi∥22≤T∑i′=1d∥uni′−umi′∥22=dL2(ξn,ξm)2,T\,\lVert u_{n}^{i}-u_{m}^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2}\le T\sum_{i'=1}^{d}\lVert u_{n}^{i'}-u_{m}^{i'}\rVert_{2}^{2}=d_{L^{2}}(\xi_{n},\xi_{m})^{2},

all terms of the sum being nonnegative. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choosing NN with dL2(ξn,ξm)<εTd_{L^{2}}(\xi_{n},\xi_{m})<\varepsilon\sqrt{T} for n,m≥Nn,m\ge N therefore yields ∥uni−umi∥2<ε\lVert u_{n}^{i}-u_{m}^{i}\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon for n,m≥Nn,m\ge N; that is, (uni)n(u_{n}^{i})_{n} is Cauchy in mean square. By mean-square completeness, applied on ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) with the sub-σ\sigma-algebra taken to be B\mathcal{B} itself, there is a square-integrable random variable XiX^{i} on that space with ∥uni−Xi∥2→0\lVert u_{n}^{i}-X^{i}\rVert_{2}\to0.

Define u:[0,T]→Rdu:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{d} by u(t)=(X1(t),…,Xd(t))u(t)=\bigl(X^{1}(t),\dots,X^{d}(t)\bigr). Its components are the square-integrable random variables XiX^{i}, so u∈L2([0,T];Rd)u\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by (†)(\dagger). Applying (†)(\dagger) to un−uu_{n}-u,

dL2(ξn,[u])2=∥[un]−[u]∥L22=T∑i=1d∥uni−Xi∥22,d_{L^{2}}(\xi_{n},[u])^{2}=\lVert[u_{n}]-[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert u_{n}^{i}-X^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2},

a finite sum of dd real sequences each with limit 00, hence with limit 00. So ξn→[u]\xi_{n}\to[u] in (L2([0,T];Rd),dL2)\bigl(L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}),d_{L^{2}}\bigr). Every Cauchy sequence converges, so the space is complete.

Claim 2. Put wn=un−uw_{n}=u_{n}-u, which lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by claim 2 of the inner-product lemma, and εn=∥[wn]∥L2\varepsilon_{n}=\lVert[w_{n}]\rVert_{L^{2}}, so εn→0\varepsilon_{n}\to0 by hypothesis.

Choice of subsequence. Construct n1<n2<…n_{1}<n_{2}<\dots recursively: having chosen n1<⋯<nj−1n_{1}<\dots<n_{j-1} (with no constraint when j=1j=1), use εn→0\varepsilon_{n}\to0 to pick nj>nj−1n_{j}>n_{j-1} with εnj≤4−j\varepsilon_{n_{j}}\le4^{-j}.

A Chebyshev bound. For each jj the function ∣wnj∣2|w_{n_{j}}|^{2} is B\mathcal{B}-measurable by claim 1 of the inner-product lemma, so

Aj={t∈[0,T]:∣wnj(t)∣2>4−j}A_{j}=\bigl\{t\in[0,T]:|w_{n_{j}}(t)|^{2}>4^{-j}\bigr\}

belongs to B\mathcal{B}. Pointwise 4−j1Aj≤∣wnj∣24^{-j}\mathbf{1}_{A_{j}}\le|w_{n_{j}}|^{2}, where 1Aj\mathbf{1}_{A_{j}} is the indicator of AjA_{j}; so by the integral of a simple function and monotonicity,

4−jλ(Aj)≤∫[0,T]∣wnj∣2 dλ=εnj2≤16−j,4^{-j}\lambda(A_{j})\le\int_{[0,T]}|w_{n_{j}}|^{2}\,d\lambda=\varepsilon_{n_{j}}^{2}\le16^{-j},

whence λ(Aj)≤4−j\lambda(A_{j})\le4^{-j}.

Countable subadditivity. If E1,E2,⋯∈BE_{1},E_{2},\dots\in\mathcal{B}, put Fj=Ej∖⋃i<jEi∈BF_{j}=E_{j}\setminus\bigcup_{i<j}E_{i}\in\mathcal{B}; these are pairwise disjoint with ⋃jFj=⋃jEj\bigcup_{j}F_{j}=\bigcup_{j}E_{j} and Fj⊆EjF_{j}\subseteq E_{j}. Since λ\lambda is a measure, additivity applied to Ej=Fj∪(Ej∖Fj)E_{j}=F_{j}\cup(E_{j}\setminus F_{j}) gives λ(Fj)≤λ(Ej)\lambda(F_{j})\le\lambda(E_{j}), and countable additivity gives λ(⋃jEj)=∑jλ(Fj)\lambda\bigl(\bigcup_{j}E_{j}\bigr)=\sum_{j}\lambda(F_{j}).

The exceptional set. Let N=⋂J≥1⋃j≥JAjN=\bigcap_{J\ge1}\bigcup_{j\ge J}A_{j}, a member of B\mathcal{B}. Fix J≥1J\ge1. By the previous paragraph, λ(⋃j≥JAj)\lambda\bigl(\bigcup_{j\ge J}A_{j}\bigr) is the sum of the nonnegative series ∑j≥Jλ(Fj)\sum_{j\ge J}\lambda(F_{j}) whose partial sums satisfy, for every K≥JK\ge J,

∑j=JKλ(Fj)≤∑j=JK4−j=4−J 1−4−(K−J+1)1−4−1≤43 4−J;\sum_{j=J}^{K}\lambda(F_{j})\le\sum_{j=J}^{K}4^{-j}=4^{-J}\,\frac{1-4^{-(K-J+1)}}{1-4^{-1}}\le\tfrac{4}{3}\,4^{-J};

hence the sum itself is at most 434−J\tfrac{4}{3}4^{-J}. Since N⊆⋃j≥JAjN\subseteq\bigcup_{j\ge J}A_{j}, monotonicity of λ\lambda gives λ(N)≤434−J\lambda(N)\le\tfrac{4}{3}4^{-J} for every J≥1J\ge1. As 4−J4^{-J} has limit 00, λ(N)=0\lambda(N)=0.

Convergence off NN. Let t∈[0,T]∖Nt\in[0,T]\setminus N. By the definition of NN there is JJ with t∉Ajt\notin A_{j} for every j≥Jj\ge J, that is ∣wnj(t)∣2≤4−j|w_{n_{j}}(t)|^{2}\le4^{-j}, so ∣unj(t)−u(t)∣=∣wnj(t)∣≤2−j|u_{n_{j}}(t)-u(t)|=|w_{n_{j}}(t)|\le2^{-j} for all j≥Jj\ge J. Given a real η>0\eta>0, choose j0≥Jj_{0}\ge J with 2−j0<η2^{-j_{0}}<\eta; then ∣unj(t)−u(t)∣≤2−j≤2−j0<η|u_{n_{j}}(t)-u(t)|\le2^{-j}\le2^{-j_{0}}<\eta for every j≥j0j\ge j_{0}. Hence (unj(t))j\bigl(u_{n_{j}}(t)\bigr)_{j} converges to u(t)u(t) in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…