TheoremBase

Proof of Completeness of the Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Vector-Valued Functions

lemmalem:l2-interval-complete-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published proof of lem:l2-interval-complete-2026a.

Proof

Write λ=λ[0,T]\lambda=\lambda_{[0,T]}, B=B[0,T]\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]} and PT=T1λP_{T}=T^{-1}\lambda, so that ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) is a probability space and, by claim 7 of the inner-product lemma, a map w:[0,T]Rdw:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{d} lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) exactly when each component wiw^{i} is a square-integrable random variable on that probability space, in which case

[w]L22=Ti=1dwi22.()\lVert[w]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert w^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2}. \tag{$\dagger$}

Claim 1. Let (ξn)nN(\xi_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} be a Cauchy sequence in (L2([0,T];Rd),dL2)\bigl(L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}),d_{L^{2}}\bigr), and for each nn choose a representative unL2([0,T];Rd)u_{n}\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) with ξn=[un]\xi_{n}=[u_{n}].

Fix i{1,,d}i\in\{1,\dots,d\}. Since (unum)i=uniumi(u_{n}-u_{m})^{i}=u_{n}^{i}-u_{m}^{i}, identity ()(\dagger) applied to unumu_{n}-u_{m} gives

Tuniumi22Ti=1duniumi22=dL2(ξn,ξm)2,T\,\lVert u_{n}^{i}-u_{m}^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2}\le T\sum_{i'=1}^{d}\lVert u_{n}^{i'}-u_{m}^{i'}\rVert_{2}^{2}=d_{L^{2}}(\xi_{n},\xi_{m})^{2},

all terms of the sum being nonnegative. Given a real ε>0\varepsilon>0, choosing NN with dL2(ξn,ξm)<εTd_{L^{2}}(\xi_{n},\xi_{m})<\varepsilon\sqrt{T} for n,mNn,m\ge N therefore yields uniumi2<ε\lVert u_{n}^{i}-u_{m}^{i}\rVert_{2}<\varepsilon for n,mNn,m\ge N; that is, (uni)n(u_{n}^{i})_{n} is Cauchy in mean square. By mean-square completeness, applied on ([0,T],B,PT)([0,T],\mathcal{B},P_{T}) with the sub-σ\sigma-algebra taken to be B\mathcal{B} itself, there is a square-integrable random variable XiX^{i} on that space with uniXi20\lVert u_{n}^{i}-X^{i}\rVert_{2}\to0.

Define u:[0,T]Rdu:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^{d} by u(t)=(X1(t),,Xd(t))u(t)=\bigl(X^{1}(t),\dots,X^{d}(t)\bigr). Its components are the square-integrable random variables XiX^{i}, so uL2([0,T];Rd)u\in\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by ()(\dagger). Applying ()(\dagger) to unuu_{n}-u,

dL2(ξn,[u])2=[un][u]L22=Ti=1duniXi22,d_{L^{2}}(\xi_{n},[u])^{2}=\lVert[u_{n}]-[u]\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=T\sum_{i=1}^{d}\lVert u_{n}^{i}-X^{i}\rVert_{2}^{2},

a finite sum of dd real sequences each with limit 00, hence with limit 00. So ξn[u]\xi_{n}\to[u] in (L2([0,T];Rd),dL2)\bigl(L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}),d_{L^{2}}\bigr). Every Cauchy sequence converges, so the space is complete.

Claim 2. Put wn=unuw_{n}=u_{n}-u, which lies in L2([0,T];Rd)\mathcal{L}^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{d}) by claim 2 of the inner-product lemma, and εn=[wn]L2\varepsilon_{n}=\lVert[w_{n}]\rVert_{L^{2}}, so εn0\varepsilon_{n}\to0 by hypothesis.

Choice of subsequence. Construct n1<n2<n_{1}<n_{2}<\dots recursively: having chosen n1<<nj1n_{1}<\dots<n_{j-1} (with no constraint when j=1j=1), use εn0\varepsilon_{n}\to0 to pick nj>nj1n_{j}>n_{j-1} with εnj4j\varepsilon_{n_{j}}\le4^{-j}.

A Chebyshev bound. For each jj the function wnj2|w_{n_{j}}|^{2} is B\mathcal{B}-measurable by claim 1 of the inner-product lemma, so

Aj={t[0,T]:wnj(t)2>4j}A_{j}=\bigl\{t\in[0,T]:|w_{n_{j}}(t)|^{2}>4^{-j}\bigr\}

belongs to B\mathcal{B}. Pointwise 4j1Ajwnj24^{-j}\mathbf{1}_{A_{j}}\le|w_{n_{j}}|^{2}, where 1Aj\mathbf{1}_{A_{j}} is the indicator of AjA_{j}; so by the integral of a simple function and monotonicity,

4jλ(Aj)[0,T]wnj2dλ=εnj216j,4^{-j}\lambda(A_{j})\le\int_{[0,T]}|w_{n_{j}}|^{2}\,d\lambda=\varepsilon_{n_{j}}^{2}\le16^{-j},

whence λ(Aj)4j\lambda(A_{j})\le4^{-j}.

Countable subadditivity. If E1,E2,BE_{1},E_{2},\dots\in\mathcal{B}, put Fj=Eji<jEiBF_{j}=E_{j}\setminus\bigcup_{i<j}E_{i}\in\mathcal{B}; these are pairwise disjoint with jFj=jEj\bigcup_{j}F_{j}=\bigcup_{j}E_{j} and FjEjF_{j}\subseteq E_{j}. Since λ\lambda is a measure, additivity applied to Ej=Fj(EjFj)E_{j}=F_{j}\cup(E_{j}\setminus F_{j}) gives λ(Fj)λ(Ej)\lambda(F_{j})\le\lambda(E_{j}), and countable additivity gives λ(jEj)=jλ(Fj)\lambda\bigl(\bigcup_{j}E_{j}\bigr)=\sum_{j}\lambda(F_{j}).

The exceptional set. Let N=J1jJAjN=\bigcap_{J\ge1}\bigcup_{j\ge J}A_{j}, a member of B\mathcal{B}. Fix J1J\ge1. By the previous paragraph, λ(jJAj)\lambda\bigl(\bigcup_{j\ge J}A_{j}\bigr) is the sum of the nonnegative series jJλ(Fj)\sum_{j\ge J}\lambda(F_{j}) whose partial sums satisfy, for every KJK\ge J,

j=JKλ(Fj)j=JK4j=4J14(KJ+1)141434J;\sum_{j=J}^{K}\lambda(F_{j})\le\sum_{j=J}^{K}4^{-j}=4^{-J}\,\frac{1-4^{-(K-J+1)}}{1-4^{-1}}\le\tfrac{4}{3}\,4^{-J};

hence the sum itself is at most 434J\tfrac{4}{3}4^{-J}. Since NjJAjN\subseteq\bigcup_{j\ge J}A_{j}, monotonicity of λ\lambda gives λ(N)434J\lambda(N)\le\tfrac{4}{3}4^{-J} for every J1J\ge1. As 4J4^{-J} has limit 00, λ(N)=0\lambda(N)=0.

Convergence off NN. Let t[0,T]Nt\in[0,T]\setminus N. By the definition of NN there is JJ with tAjt\notin A_{j} for every jJj\ge J, that is wnj(t)24j|w_{n_{j}}(t)|^{2}\le4^{-j}, so unj(t)u(t)=wnj(t)2j|u_{n_{j}}(t)-u(t)|=|w_{n_{j}}(t)|\le2^{-j} for all jJj\ge J. Given a real η>0\eta>0, choose j0Jj_{0}\ge J with 2j0<η2^{-j_{0}}<\eta; then unj(t)u(t)2j2j0<η|u_{n_{j}}(t)-u(t)|\le2^{-j}\le2^{-j_{0}}<\eta for every jj0j\ge j_{0}. Hence (unj(t))j\bigl(u_{n_{j}}(t)\bigr)_{j} converges to u(t)u(t) in Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…