Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We work in the settings of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background and Real Hilbert Spaces: Series, Products, Orthonormal Bases and Differential Calculus, and we adopt The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background, which carries the elementary arithmetic, order and absolute-value facts of R and the manipulations of finite sums (termwise comparison, splitting the index set into disjoint parts, factoring out constants) by the finite-sum results in force by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background.
Step 0 (Notation and the norm of V). For y∈H and k∈N write yk=⟨y,ek⟩H; for the given sequence write xj,k=⟨xj,ek⟩H. By the standing hypotheses of The Diagonal Hilbert Triple Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights, under which the triple of The Diagonal Hilbert Triple Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights §triple is formed, 1≤λk for every k, and V with ⟨⋅,⋅⟩V is the weighted coefficient subspace of The Weighted Coefficient Subspace Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights: V is the set of those y∈H for which the series ∑k=1∞λkyk2 converges, and ⟨y,z⟩V=∑k=1∞λkykzk for y,z∈V. By Real Inner Product Space §norm, every y∈V satisfies 0≤∣y∣V and
∣y∣V2=⟨y,y⟩V=k=1∑∞λkyk2.
The terms λkyk2 are nonnegative, so Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates gives
k=1∑nλkyk2≤∣y∣V2for every y∈V and n∈N.(0.1)
If moreover ∣y∣V≤R, then ∣y∣V2≤R2 by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, both numbers being nonnegative. Finally, for y,z∈H we have (y−z)k=yk−zk by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear, and ∣ek∣H=1 for every k by Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §orthonormal, since an orthonormal basis is in particular an orthonormal sequence by Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis.
Step 1 (Bounded coordinates). Let j,k∈N. By The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, ∣xj,k∣≤∣xj∣H∣ek∣H=∣xj∣H, and by The Weighted Coefficient Subspace Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights §subspace, ∣xj∣H≤∣xj∣V≤R. Hence ∣xj,k∣≤R for all j,k∈N.
Step 2 (A coordinatewise convergent subsequence). Apply The Diagonal Subsequence Lemma for Bounded Real Arrays to the map a:N×N→R, am,k=xm,k, with Rk=R for every k, which is admissible by Step 1. It gives a strictly increasing sequence (ji)i∈N in N, so that j1<j2<j3<⋯, such that for every k∈N the sequence (xji,k)i∈N converges; call its limit ck. Write y(i)=xji, so that y(i)∈V, ∣y(i)∣V≤R, and (yk(i))i∈N converges to ck for every k.
Step 3 (Tail estimate). Let M be a positive real number and k0∈N with M<λk for every k≥k0. For n∈N with n≥k0 put Fn={k∈[n]:k0≤k}, which is nonempty since n∈Fn. We show that for all y,z∈V with ∣y∣V≤R and ∣z∣V≤R,
k∈Fn∑(yk−zk)2≤M4R2.(3.1)
For k∈Fn, Products and Sums of Weighted Square-Summable Sequences of Real Numbers §pointwise, applied with s=yk and t=−zk, gives (yk−zk)2≤2yk2+2zk2; and since 0<M<λk and 0≤yk2, we have yk2≤M1λkyk2, and likewise for z. Hence (yk−zk)2≤M2(λkyk2+λkzk2) for k∈Fn. Summing over Fn, and using that the omitted terms λkyk2 with k∈[n], k<k0, are nonnegative, we get ∑k∈Fnλkyk2≤∑k=1nλkyk2≤R2 by (0.1) and Step 0, and likewise for z. Therefore the left side of (3.1) is at most M2(R2+R2)=M4R2.
Step 4 (The subsequence is Cauchy in H). Fix a real ε>0. The choices below are made in this order: M, then k0, then τ, then I.
First put M=ε216R2+1, which is positive and satisfies 16R2≤ε2M, hence M4R2≤4ε2. Second, the hypothesis on the weights gives k′∈N with M<λk for every k≥k′; put k0=k′+1, so that k0≥2 and M<λk for every k≥k0, and let E=[k0−1], the nonempty set of k∈N with k<k0. Third, put θ=4k0ε2>0 and τ=min{1,θ}, so that 0<τ≤1 and hence τ2≤τ≤θ. Fourth, for each k∈E the sequence (yk(i))i∈N converges to ck, so by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers there is Ik∈N with ∣yk(i)−ck∣<2τ for every i≥Ik; put I=∑k=1k0−1Ik, a natural number with I≥Ik for every k∈E.
Now let i,l∈N with i≥I and l≥I, put w=y(i)−y(l)∈H, so that wk=yk(i)−yk(l) by Step 0, and let sn=∑k=1nwk2. For k∈E we have ∣wk∣≤∣yk(i)−ck∣+∣ck−yk(l)∣<τ, so wk2=∣wk∣2<τ2≤θ by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. If n<k0, then [n]⊆E and sn≤nθ≤k0θ=4ε2. If n≥k0, then [n] is the disjoint union of E and Fn, and by (3.1), applied to y=y(i) and z=y(l),
sn=k∈E∑wk2+k∈Fn∑wk2≤(k0−1)θ+M4R2≤4ε2+4ε2=2ε2.
Thus sn≤2ε2 for every n∈N. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §parseval, applied to w, the series ∑k=1∞wk2 converges with sum ∣w∣H2, and by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion this sum is sup{sn:n∈N}, which is at most 2ε2<ε2. Since 0≤∣w∣H and 0<ε, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣w∣H<ε, and by Real Inner Product Space §distance, dH(y(i),y(l))=∣w∣H<ε. As ε was arbitrary, (y(i))i∈N is a Cauchy sequence in (H,dH).
Step 5 (The limit in H). Since H is a real Hilbert space, the metric space (H,dH) is complete by Real Hilbert Space §hilbert. Hence there is x∈H such that (y(i))i∈N=(xji)i∈N converges to x in (H,dH).
Step 6 (x∈V and ∣x∣V≤R). For k∈N write ξk=⟨x,ek⟩H, the coordinate of the limit x in the notation of Step 0. Fix k∈N. By Step 0, The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space and Real Inner Product Space §distance,
∣yk(i)−ξk∣=∣⟨y(i)−x,ek⟩H∣≤∣y(i)−x∣H∣ek∣H=dH(y(i),x).
Given η>0, Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space gives I′∈N with dH(y(i),x)<η for every i≥I′, so by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers the sequence (yk(i))i∈N converges to ξk. By Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §products and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar, (λk(yk(i))2)i∈N converges to λkξk2 for every k.
Now fix n∈N. By Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §sums and induction on n, the sequence (∑k=1nλk(yk(i))2)i∈N converges to ∑k=1nλkξk2. By (0.1) and Step 0, ∑k=1nλk(yk(i))2≤∣y(i)∣V2≤R2 for every i, and the constant sequence with value R2 converges to R2 by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers. Claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences therefore gives ∑k=1nλkξk2≤R2.
The terms λkξk2 are nonnegative and the partial sums of ∑k=1∞λkξk2 are bounded above by R2, so by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion the series converges and its sum, the supremum of the partial sums, is at most R2. Hence x∈V by the definition of V in The Weighted Coefficient Subspace Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights, and by Step 0, ∣x∣V2=∑k=1∞λkξk2≤R2. Since 0≤∣x∣V and 0≤R, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣x∣V≤R.
Conclusion. The natural numbers j1<j2<j3<⋯ of Step 2 and the point x∈V with ∣x∣V≤R satisfy the requirement that (xji)i∈N converges to x in (H,dH), by Step 5.