TheoremBase

Coordinates against the basis are bounded by R, so the diagonal subsequence lemma yields a subsequence converging coordinatewise; Parseval's identity, with finitely many convergent coordinates and a tail bounded by 4R^2/M where the weights exceed M, shows it is Cauchy in H, hence convergent by completeness. Passing to the limit in the partial sums of the weighted series shows the limit lies in V with V-norm at most R.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. We work in the settings of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background and Real Hilbert Spaces: Series, Products, Orthonormal Bases and Differential Calculus, and we adopt The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background, which carries the elementary arithmetic, order and absolute-value facts of R\mathbb{R} and the manipulations of finite sums (termwise comparison, splitting the index set into disjoint parts, factoring out constants) by the finite-sum results in force by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background.

Step 0 (Notation and the norm of VV). For y∈Hy\in H and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} write yk=⟨y,ek⟩Hy_{k}=\langle y,e_{k}\rangle_{H}; for the given sequence write xj,k=⟨xj,ek⟩Hx_{j,k}=\langle x_{j},e_{k}\rangle_{H}. By the standing hypotheses of The Diagonal Hilbert Triple Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights, under which the triple of The Diagonal Hilbert Triple Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights §triple is formed, 1≤λk1\le\lambda_{k} for every kk, and VV with ⟨⋅,⋅⟩V\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{V} is the weighted coefficient subspace of The Weighted Coefficient Subspace Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights: VV is the set of those y∈Hy\in H for which the series ∑k=1∞λkyk2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2} converges, and ⟨y,z⟩V=∑k=1∞λkykzk\langle y,z\rangle_{V}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{k}y_{k}z_{k} for y,z∈Vy,z\in V. By Real Inner Product Space §norm, every y∈Vy\in V satisfies 0≤∣y∣V0\le|y|_{V} and

∣y∣V2=⟨y,y⟩V=∑k=1∞λkyk2.|y|_{V}^{2}=\langle y,y\rangle_{V}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2}.

The terms λkyk2\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2} are nonnegative, so Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates gives

∑k=1nλkyk2≤∣y∣V2for every y∈V and n∈N.(0.1)\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2}\le|y|_{V}^{2}\qquad\text{for every }y\in V\text{ and }n\in\mathbb{N}. \tag{0.1}

If moreover ∣y∣V≤R|y|_{V}\le R, then ∣y∣V2≤R2|y|_{V}^{2}\le R^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, both numbers being nonnegative. Finally, for y,z∈Hy,z\in H we have (y−z)k=yk−zk(y-z)_{k}=y_{k}-z_{k} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear, and ∣ek∣H=1|e_{k}|_{H}=1 for every kk by Orthogonality, Orthogonal Complement and Orthonormal Families in a Real Inner Product Space §orthonormal, since an orthonormal basis is in particular an orthonormal sequence by Orthonormal Basis of a Real Hilbert Space §basis.

Step 1 (Bounded coordinates). Let j,k∈Nj,k\in\mathbb{N}. By The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, ∣xj,k∣≤∣xj∣H ∣ek∣H=∣xj∣H|x_{j,k}|\le|x_{j}|_{H}\,|e_{k}|_{H}=|x_{j}|_{H}, and by The Weighted Coefficient Subspace Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights §subspace, ∣xj∣H≤∣xj∣V≤R|x_{j}|_{H}\le|x_{j}|_{V}\le R. Hence ∣xj,k∣≤R|x_{j,k}|\le R for all j,k∈Nj,k\in\mathbb{N}.

Step 2 (A coordinatewise convergent subsequence). Apply The Diagonal Subsequence Lemma for Bounded Real Arrays to the map a:N×N→Ra:\mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}, am,k=xm,ka_{m,k}=x_{m,k}, with Rk=RR_{k}=R for every kk, which is admissible by Step 1. It gives a strictly increasing sequence (ji)i∈N(j_{i})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N}, so that j1<j2<j3<⋯j_{1}<j_{2}<j_{3}<\cdots, such that for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} the sequence (xji,k)i∈N(x_{j_{i},k})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges; call its limit ckc_{k}. Write y(i)=xjiy^{(i)}=x_{j_{i}}, so that y(i)∈Vy^{(i)}\in V, ∣y(i)∣V≤R|y^{(i)}|_{V}\le R, and (yk(i))i∈N(y^{(i)}_{k})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ckc_{k} for every kk.

Step 3 (Tail estimate). Let MM be a positive real number and k0∈Nk_{0}\in\mathbb{N} with M<λkM<\lambda_{k} for every k≥k0k\ge k_{0}. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} with n≥k0n\ge k_{0} put Fn={k∈[n]:k0≤k}F_{n}=\{k\in[n]:k_{0}\le k\}, which is nonempty since n∈Fnn\in F_{n}. We show that for all y,z∈Vy,z\in V with ∣y∣V≤R|y|_{V}\le R and ∣z∣V≤R|z|_{V}\le R,

∑k∈Fn(yk−zk)2≤4R2M.(3.1)\sum_{k\in F_{n}}(y_{k}-z_{k})^{2}\le\frac{4R^{2}}{M}. \tag{3.1}

For k∈Fnk\in F_{n}, Products and Sums of Weighted Square-Summable Sequences of Real Numbers §pointwise, applied with s=yks=y_{k} and t=−zkt=-z_{k}, gives (yk−zk)2≤2yk2+2zk2(y_{k}-z_{k})^{2}\le2y_{k}^{2}+2z_{k}^{2}; and since 0<M<λk0<M<\lambda_{k} and 0≤yk20\le y_{k}^{2}, we have yk2≤1Mλkyk2y_{k}^{2}\le\tfrac{1}{M}\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2}, and likewise for zz. Hence (yk−zk)2≤2M(λkyk2+λkzk2)(y_{k}-z_{k})^{2}\le\tfrac{2}{M}\bigl(\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2}+\lambda_{k}z_{k}^{2}\bigr) for k∈Fnk\in F_{n}. Summing over FnF_{n}, and using that the omitted terms λkyk2\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2} with k∈[n]k\in[n], k<k0k<k_{0}, are nonnegative, we get ∑k∈Fnλkyk2≤∑k=1nλkyk2≤R2\sum_{k\in F_{n}}\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}y_{k}^{2}\le R^{2} by (0.1) and Step 0, and likewise for zz. Therefore the left side of (3.1) is at most 2M(R2+R2)=4R2M\tfrac{2}{M}(R^{2}+R^{2})=\tfrac{4R^{2}}{M}.

Step 4 (The subsequence is Cauchy in HH). Fix a real ε>0\varepsilon>0. The choices below are made in this order: MM, then k0k_{0}, then τ\tau, then II.

First put M=16R2ε2+1M=\tfrac{16R^{2}}{\varepsilon^{2}}+1, which is positive and satisfies 16R2≤ε2M16R^{2}\le\varepsilon^{2}M, hence 4R2M≤ε24\tfrac{4R^{2}}{M}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}. Second, the hypothesis on the weights gives k′∈Nk'\in\mathbb{N} with M<λkM<\lambda_{k} for every k≥k′k\ge k'; put k0=k′+1k_{0}=k'+1, so that k0≥2k_{0}\ge2 and M<λkM<\lambda_{k} for every k≥k0k\ge k_{0}, and let E=[k0−1]E=[k_{0}-1], the nonempty set of k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with k<k0k<k_{0}. Third, put θ=ε24k0>0\theta=\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4k_{0}}>0 and τ=min⁡{1,θ}\tau=\min\{1,\theta\}, so that 0<τ≤10<\tau\le1 and hence τ2≤τ≤θ\tau^{2}\le\tau\le\theta. Fourth, for each k∈Ek\in E the sequence (yk(i))i∈N(y^{(i)}_{k})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ckc_{k}, so by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers there is Ik∈NI_{k}\in\mathbb{N} with ∣yk(i)−ck∣<τ2|y^{(i)}_{k}-c_{k}|<\tfrac{\tau}{2} for every i≥Iki\ge I_{k}; put I=∑k=1k0−1IkI=\sum_{k=1}^{k_{0}-1}I_{k}, a natural number with I≥IkI\ge I_{k} for every k∈Ek\in E.

Now let i,l∈Ni,l\in\mathbb{N} with i≥Ii\ge I and l≥Il\ge I, put w=y(i)−y(l)∈Hw=y^{(i)}-y^{(l)}\in H, so that wk=yk(i)−yk(l)w_{k}=y^{(i)}_{k}-y^{(l)}_{k} by Step 0, and let sn=∑k=1nwk2s_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}w_{k}^{2}. For k∈Ek\in E we have ∣wk∣≤∣yk(i)−ck∣+∣ck−yk(l)∣<τ|w_{k}|\le|y^{(i)}_{k}-c_{k}|+|c_{k}-y^{(l)}_{k}|<\tau, so wk2=∣wk∣2<τ2≤θw_{k}^{2}=|w_{k}|^{2}<\tau^{2}\le\theta by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. If n<k0n<k_{0}, then [n]⊆E[n]\subseteq E and sn≤nθ≤k0θ=ε24s_{n}\le n\theta\le k_{0}\theta=\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}. If n≥k0n\ge k_{0}, then [n][n] is the disjoint union of EE and FnF_{n}, and by (3.1), applied to y=y(i)y=y^{(i)} and z=y(l)z=y^{(l)},

sn=∑k∈Ewk2+∑k∈Fnwk2≤(k0−1)θ+4R2M≤ε24+ε24=ε22.s_{n}=\sum_{k\in E}w_{k}^{2}+\sum_{k\in F_{n}}w_{k}^{2}\le(k_{0}-1)\theta+\frac{4R^{2}}{M}\le\frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}+\frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{4}=\frac{\varepsilon^{2}}{2}.

Thus sn≤ε22s_{n}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{2} for every n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Orthonormal Expansions in a Real Hilbert Space §parseval, applied to ww, the series ∑k=1∞wk2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}w_{k}^{2} converges with sum ∣w∣H2|w|_{H}^{2}, and by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion this sum is sup⁡{sn:n∈N}\sup\{s_{n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}, which is at most ε22<ε2\tfrac{\varepsilon^{2}}{2}<\varepsilon^{2}. Since 0≤∣w∣H0\le|w|_{H} and 0<ε0<\varepsilon, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣w∣H<ε|w|_{H}<\varepsilon, and by Real Inner Product Space §distance, dH(y(i),y(l))=∣w∣H<εd_{H}(y^{(i)},y^{(l)})=|w|_{H}<\varepsilon. As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, (y(i))i∈N(y^{(i)})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} is a Cauchy sequence in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}).

Step 5 (The limit in HH). Since HH is a real Hilbert space, the metric space (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) is complete by Real Hilbert Space §hilbert. Hence there is x∈Hx\in H such that (y(i))i∈N=(xji)i∈N(y^{(i)})_{i\in\mathbb{N}}=(x_{j_{i}})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}).

Step 6 (x∈Vx\in V and ∣x∣V≤R|x|_{V}\le R). For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} write ξk=⟨x,ek⟩H\xi_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle_{H}, the coordinate of the limit xx in the notation of Step 0. Fix k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. By Step 0, The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space and Real Inner Product Space §distance,

∣yk(i)−ξk∣=∣⟨y(i)−x,ek⟩H∣≤∣y(i)−x∣H ∣ek∣H=dH(y(i),x).|y^{(i)}_{k}-\xi_{k}|=|\langle y^{(i)}-x,e_{k}\rangle_{H}|\le|y^{(i)}-x|_{H}\,|e_{k}|_{H}=d_{H}(y^{(i)},x).

Given η>0\eta>0, Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space gives I′∈NI'\in\mathbb{N} with dH(y(i),x)<ηd_{H}(y^{(i)},x)<\eta for every i≥I′i\ge I', so by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers the sequence (yk(i))i∈N(y^{(i)}_{k})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ξk\xi_{k}. By Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §products and Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §scalar, (λk(yk(i))2)i∈N(\lambda_{k}(y^{(i)}_{k})^{2})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to λkξk2\lambda_{k}\xi_{k}^{2} for every kk.

Now fix n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. By Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences §sums and induction on nn, the sequence (∑k=1nλk(yk(i))2)i∈N\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}(y^{(i)}_{k})^{2}\bigr)_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ∑k=1nλkξk2\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}\xi_{k}^{2}. By (0.1) and Step 0, ∑k=1nλk(yk(i))2≤∣y(i)∣V2≤R2\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}(y^{(i)}_{k})^{2}\le|y^{(i)}|_{V}^{2}\le R^{2} for every ii, and the constant sequence with value R2R^{2} converges to R2R^{2} by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers. Claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences therefore gives ∑k=1nλkξk2≤R2\sum_{k=1}^{n}\lambda_{k}\xi_{k}^{2}\le R^{2}.

The terms λkξk2\lambda_{k}\xi_{k}^{2} are nonnegative and the partial sums of ∑k=1∞λkξk2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{k}\xi_{k}^{2} are bounded above by R2R^{2}, so by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §criterion the series converges and its sum, the supremum of the partial sums, is at most R2R^{2}. Hence x∈Vx\in V by the definition of VV in The Weighted Coefficient Subspace Determined by an Orthonormal Basis and a Sequence of Weights, and by Step 0, ∣x∣V2=∑k=1∞λkξk2≤R2|x|_{V}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{k}\xi_{k}^{2}\le R^{2}. Since 0≤∣x∣V0\le|x|_{V} and 0≤R0\le R, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣x∣V≤R|x|_{V}\le R.

Conclusion. The natural numbers j1<j2<j3<⋯j_{1}<j_{2}<j_{3}<\cdots of Step 2 and the point x∈Vx\in V with ∣x∣V≤R|x|_{V}\le R satisfy the requirement that (xji)i∈N(x_{j_{i}})_{i\in\mathbb{N}} converges to xx in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), by Step 5.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…