TheoremBase

Proof of The Second-Order Test-Datum Estimate at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of the Doubled Function

lemmalem:second-order-doubled-test-estimate-hilbert-triple-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 21,904 chars · 30 deps · depth 26 Reason: Proof: the linear perturbations are absorbed into the two envelopes, the doubling lemma is applied at each truncation of the basis, the sub- and supersolution properties convert the approximable test data into admissible test data, shift-continuity moves them onto the forms of the doubling lemma, tail-insensitivity removes the tail term along the truncations, and the second-order structure condition and properness close the estimate.

For each truncation of the basis the doubling lemma supplies second-order test data for the two envelopes; the sub- and supersolution properties convert them into admissible test data, shift-continuity moves the data onto the forms of the lemma, tail-insensitivity removes the tail term along the truncations, and the second-order structure condition and properness then give the estimate.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write Θ:V×VR\Theta:V\times V\to\mathbb{R} for the function in the hypothesis, so that Θ\Theta attains a sequentially strict maximum on V×VV\times V at (x^,y^)(\hat{x},\hat{y}), and put pˉ=α(x^y^)H\bar{p}=\alpha(\hat{x}-\hat{y})\in H. Local maxima and minima relative to VV are those of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §local-extrema for the subset VV of the metric space (H,dH)(H,d_{H}), which is the notion used both in Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space with E=HE=H and A=VA=V and in Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple with U=HU=H, since VH=VV\cap H=V.

The order of choice. The data δ,α,σ,ε,B,G,R\delta,\alpha,\sigma,\varepsilon,B,G,R, the vectors p,qp,q, the point (x^,y^)(\hat{x},\hat{y}), the basis (ek)kN(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the constant λ\lambda, the pair (ω1,ω2)(\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) and the modulus ω\omega are given by hypothesis. We fix next the two positive real numbers

ε1=ε3,ρ=ε6,\varepsilon_{1}=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3},\qquad \rho=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{6},

and then construct, for every mNm\in\mathbb{N} and in terms of the data already fixed alone, a family of test data indexed by mm (Steps 2 to 6). Only afterwards is the tail-insensitivity hypothesis applied to the resulting sequences, yielding an index mm at which the conclusion is read off (Steps 7 to 9). Nothing entering the construction of the mm-th datum depends on that final index, so the choices are not circular.

Step 1 (two auxiliary functions). Let u~,v~:VR\tilde{u},\tilde{v}:V\to\mathbb{R} be given by

u~(x)=uδ(x)x,pH,v~(y)=vδ+(y)+y,qH,\tilde{u}(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\langle x,p\rangle_{H},\qquad \tilde{v}(y)=v^{+}_{\delta}(y)+\langle y,q\rangle_{H},

which agree with uδ(x)p,xHu^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\langle p,x\rangle_{H} and vδ+(y)+q,yHv^{+}_{\delta}(y)+\langle q,y\rangle_{H} by the symmetry of the inner product in Real Inner Product Space §inner-product, and let v~:VR-\tilde{v}:V\to\mathbb{R} have value v~(y)-\tilde{v}(y) at yy. For all x,yVx,y\in V,

u~(x)v~(y)α2xyH2=Θ(x,y).\tilde{u}(x)-\tilde{v}(y)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}|x-y|_{H}^{2}=\Theta(x,y).

Bounds. By Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §bound, uδ(x)Cδ2xH2u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2} and vδ+(y)Cδ2yH2-v^{+}_{\delta}(y)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|y|_{H}^{2} for x,yVx,y\in V. By The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space and pHσ1|p|_{H}\le\sigma\le1 we have x,pHxHpHxH-\langle x,p\rangle_{H}\le|x|_{H}|p|_{H}\le|x|_{H}, and likewise y,qHyH-\langle y,q\rangle_{H}\le|y|_{H}. For every real tt the inequality 0δ2(t1δ)20\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\bigl(t-\tfrac{1}{\delta}\bigr)^{2} expands to tδ2t2+12δt\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}t^{2}+\tfrac{1}{2\delta}, so

u~(x)Cδ2xH2+xHC+12δ,v~(y)Cδ2yH2+yHC+12δ\tilde{u}(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}+|x|_{H}\le C+\tfrac{1}{2\delta},\qquad -\tilde{v}(y)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|y|_{H}^{2}+|y|_{H}\le C+\tfrac{1}{2\delta}

for all x,yVx,y\in V. Hence the sets of values of u~\tilde{u} and of v~-\tilde{v} are bounded above.

Closed superlevel sets. By Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §closed-superlevel, applied with U=HU=H, the functions uδu^{-}_{\delta} and vδ+-v^{+}_{\delta} on VV have closed superlevel sets in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}). The maps xx,pHx\mapsto\langle x,p\rangle_{H} and yy,qHy\mapsto\langle y,q\rangle_{H} from HH to R\mathbb{R} are Lipschitz by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §lipschitz, hence continuous on HH by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous. Since u~\tilde{u} is uδu^{-}_{\delta} minus the first of these and v~-\tilde{v} is vδ+-v^{+}_{\delta} minus the second, Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits §perturbation shows that u~\tilde{u} and v~-\tilde{v} have closed superlevel sets in (H,dH)(H,d_{H}).

Step 2 (the doubling lemma at each truncation). Let mNm\in\mathbb{N}, let e(m)Hme^{(m)}\in H^{m} be the mm-tuple with components e1,,eme_{1},\dots,e_{m} and let NmSym(H)N_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) be its tail form, as in The Tail-Insensitivity Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §tail-forms; thus e(m)e^{(m)} is orthonormal and all its components lie in VV, which is a linear subspace of HH by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §triple. By Step 1 the functions u~\tilde{u} and v~-\tilde{v} are bounded above and have closed superlevel sets in HH, and Θ\Theta attains a sequentially strict maximum on V×VV\times V at (x^,y^)(\hat{x},\hat{y}). Hence Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference applies with the space HH, the subspace VV, the tuple e(m)e^{(m)}, the functions u~\tilde{u} and v~\tilde{v} and the positive number α\alpha, and provides Xm,YmSym(H)X_{m},Y_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) with the following properties.

By Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §test-data, the quadruple (x^,u~(x^),pˉ,Xm+2αNm)\bigl(\hat{x},\tilde{u}(\hat{x}),\bar{p},X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\bigr) is approximable by test data from above for u~\tilde{u} on VV, and the quadruple (y^,v~(y^),pˉ,Ym2αNm)\bigl(\hat{y},\tilde{v}(\hat{y}),\bar{p},Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}\bigr) is approximable by test data from below for v~\tilde{v} on VV.

By Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §quadratic-bound, Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §ordering and Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §norm-bound, the pair (Xm,Ym)(X_{m},Y_{m}) satisfies XmYmX_{m}\preceq Y_{m}, Xm6α\lVert X_{m}\rVert\le6\alpha, Ym6α\lVert Y_{m}\rVert\le6\alpha and 3α(zH2+wH2)Xm(z,z)Ym(w,w)3αzwH2-3\alpha(|z|_{H}^{2}+|w|_{H}^{2})\le X_{m}(z,z)-Y_{m}(w,w)\le3\alpha|z-w|_{H}^{2} for all z,wHz,w\in H; that is, (Xm,Ym)(X_{m},Y_{m}) is admitted at α\alpha.

Finally Nm1\lVert N_{m}\rVert\le1 by Coordinate Maps of a Finite Orthonormal Tuple: Forms, the Tail Form, and Quadratic Test Functions §tail, so by the triangle inequality and the homogeneity of the norm in Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §norm-axioms,

Xm+2αNmXm+2αNm6α+2α=8α,\lVert X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le\lVert X_{m}\rVert+2\alpha\lVert N_{m}\rVert\le6\alpha+2\alpha=8\alpha,

and in the same way Ym2αNm8α\lVert Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le8\alpha.

Step 3 (test functions and test data at the index mm). Let εm\varepsilon_{m} be the least of the two positive real numbers ε1\varepsilon_{1} and 1m\tfrac{1}{m}, which exists by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; then 0<εm0<\varepsilon_{m}, εmε1=ε313\varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon_{1}=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}\le\tfrac{1}{3} and εm1m\varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac{1}{m}.

By Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §above, applied to the first quadruple of Step 2 with the tolerance εm\varepsilon_{m}, there are zmVz_{m}\in V and φmC2(H)\varphi_{m}\in C^{2}(H) such that the function on VV with value u~(x)φm(x)\tilde{u}(x)-\varphi_{m}(x) at xx has a local maximum relative to VV at zmz_{m} and

zmx^H<εm,u~(zm)u~(x^)<εm,Dφm(zm)pˉH<εm,D2φm(zm)(Xm+2αNm)<εm.|z_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |\tilde{u}(z_{m})-\tilde{u}(\hat{x})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-\bar{p}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert D^{2}\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-(X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m}.

Let φm:HR\varphi'_{m}:H\to\mathbb{R} be given by φm(x)=φm(x)+x,pH\varphi'_{m}(x)=\varphi_{m}(x)+\langle x,p\rangle_{H}. The second summand belongs to C2(H)C^{2}(H) with gradient pp and Hessian 0Sym0_{\mathrm{Sym}} at every point of HH by Affine and Quadratic Functions on a Real Hilbert Space are of Class C2C^2 §affine, so φmC2(H)\varphi'_{m}\in C^{2}(H) with Dφm(zm)=Dφm(zm)+pD\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})=D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})+p and D2φm(zm)=D2φm(zm)D^{2}\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})=D^{2}\varphi_{m}(z_{m}) by Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §sum. Since u~(x)φm(x)=uδ(x)φm(x)\tilde{u}(x)-\varphi_{m}(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi'_{m}(x) for every xVx\in V, the function on VV with value uδ(x)φm(x)u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi'_{m}(x) at xx has a local maximum relative to VV at zmz_{m}.

Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §subsolution with δ\delta, the test function φm\varphi'_{m}, the point zmz_{m} and the number εm\varepsilon_{m} yields amD(A)a_{m}\in D(A), smRs_{m}\in\mathbb{R}, πmH\pi_{m}\in H and ZmSym(H)Z_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) with

amzmH<εm,uδ(am)uδ(zm)<εm,smuδ(zm)<εm,|a_{m}-z_{m}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m}, πmDφm(zm)H<εm,ZmD2φm(zm)<εm,Fδ(am,sm,πm,Zm)εm.|\pi_{m}-D\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert Z_{m}-D^{2}\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m},s_{m},\pi_{m},Z_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}.

Symmetrically, Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §below, applied to the second quadruple of Step 2 with the tolerance εm\varepsilon_{m}, gives wmVw_{m}\in V and ψmC2(H)\psi_{m}\in C^{2}(H) such that the function with value v~(y)ψm(y)\tilde{v}(y)-\psi_{m}(y) at yy has a local minimum relative to VV at wmw_{m} and

wmy^H<εm,v~(wm)v~(y^)<εm,Dψm(wm)pˉH<εm,D2ψm(wm)(Ym2αNm)<εm.|w_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |\tilde{v}(w_{m})-\tilde{v}(\hat{y})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |D\psi_{m}(w_{m})-\bar{p}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert D^{2}\psi_{m}(w_{m})-(Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m}.

With ψm(y)=ψm(y)y,qH\psi'_{m}(y)=\psi_{m}(y)-\langle y,q\rangle_{H} we obtain, by the same two lemmas on differences (Affine and Quadratic Functions on a Real Hilbert Space are of Class C2C^2 §affine and Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §difference), that ψmC2(H)\psi'_{m}\in C^{2}(H) with Dψm(wm)=Dψm(wm)qD\psi'_{m}(w_{m})=D\psi_{m}(w_{m})-q and D2ψm(wm)=D2ψm(wm)D^{2}\psi'_{m}(w_{m})=D^{2}\psi_{m}(w_{m}); and v~(y)ψm(y)=vδ+(y)ψm(y)\tilde{v}(y)-\psi_{m}(y)=v^{+}_{\delta}(y)-\psi'_{m}(y) for yVy\in V, so the function with value vδ+(y)ψm(y)v^{+}_{\delta}(y)-\psi'_{m}(y) at yy has a local minimum relative to VV at wmw_{m}. Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §supersolution with δ\delta, ψm\psi'_{m}, wmw_{m} and εm\varepsilon_{m} yields bmD(A)b_{m}\in D(A), tmRt_{m}\in\mathbb{R}, κmH\kappa_{m}\in H and WmSym(H)W_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) with

bmwmH<εm,vδ+(bm)vδ+(wm)<εm,tmvδ+(wm)<εm,|b_{m}-w_{m}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m})-v^{+}_{\delta}(w_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(w_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m}, κmDψm(wm)H<εm,WmD2ψm(wm)<εm,εmFδ+(bm,tm,κm,Wm).|\kappa_{m}-D\psi'_{m}(w_{m})|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert W_{m}-D^{2}\psi'_{m}(w_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m},\quad -\varepsilon_{m}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m},t_{m},\kappa_{m},W_{m}).

Step 4 (elementary consequences at the index mm). Fix mNm\in\mathbb{N} and write ε=εm\varepsilon'=\varepsilon_{m}. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle,

amx^HamzmH+zmx^H<2ε,bmy^H<2ε.|a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}\le|a_{m}-z_{m}|_{H}+|z_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}<2\varepsilon',\qquad |b_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}<2\varepsilon' .

Since uδ(zm)uδ(x^)=(u~(zm)u~(x^))+zmx^,pHu^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})=\bigl(\tilde{u}(z_{m})-\tilde{u}(\hat{x})\bigr)+\langle z_{m}-\hat{x},p\rangle_{H} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear, and zmx^,pHzmx^HpHεσε|\langle z_{m}-\hat{x},p\rangle_{H}|\le|z_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}|p|_{H}\le\varepsilon'\sigma\le\varepsilon' by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space, we get uδ(zm)uδ(x^)<2ε|u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<2\varepsilon' and therefore

uδ(am)uδ(x^)<3ε,smuδ(x^)<3ε;|u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon',\qquad |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon' ;

symmetrically vδ+(bm)vδ+(y^)<3ε|v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon' and tmvδ+(y^)<3ε|t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon'. Since Dφm(zm)(pˉ+p)=Dφm(zm)pˉD\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})-(\bar{p}+p)=D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-\bar{p},

πm(pˉ+p)HπmDφm(zm)H+Dφm(zm)pˉH<2ε,|\pi_{m}-(\bar{p}+p)|_{H}\le|\pi_{m}-D\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})|_{H}+|D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-\bar{p}|_{H}<2\varepsilon' ,

and symmetrically κm(pˉq)H<2ε|\kappa_{m}-(\bar{p}-q)|_{H}<2\varepsilon'. Finally D2φm(zm)=D2φm(zm)D^{2}\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})=D^{2}\varphi_{m}(z_{m}) gives

Zm(Xm+2αNm)<2ε,Wm(Ym2αNm)<2ε.\lVert Z_{m}-(X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<2\varepsilon',\qquad \lVert W_{m}-(Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<2\varepsilon' .

As 3ε3ε1=ε3\varepsilon'\le3\varepsilon_{1}=\varepsilon, the four quantities amx^H|a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}, bmy^H|b_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}, uδ(am)uδ(x^)|u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})| and vδ+(bm)vδ+(y^)|v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})| are all less than ε\varepsilon.

Step 5 (the data are RR-bounded, and two of them admissible). Keep mm fixed, write ε=εm\varepsilon'=\varepsilon_{m}, and put Pm=α(ambm)HP_{m}=\alpha(a_{m}-b_{m})\in H.

By Basic Properties of the δ\delta-Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §bound, uδ(am)Cδh(am)u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})\le C-\delta h(a_{m}), so, using CBC\le B, uδ(x^)B-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})\le B and 3εε13\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon\le1,

δh(am)Cuδ(am)Cuδ(x^)+3ε2B+1,\delta h(a_{m})\le C-u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})\le C-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})+3\varepsilon'\le2B+1 ,

whence h(am)2B+1δ<Rh(a_{m})\le\tfrac{2B+1}{\delta}<R. By the same claim C+δh(bm)vδ+(bm)-C+\delta h(b_{m})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m}), so δh(bm)vδ+(y^)+3ε+C2B+1\delta h(b_{m})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})+3\varepsilon'+C\le2B+1 and h(bm)<Rh(b_{m})<R. Next smuδ(x^)+3εB+1<R|s_{m}|\le|u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|+3\varepsilon'\le B+1<R and tmB+1<R|t_{m}|\le B+1<R, because B+13B+2<RB+1\le3B+2<R and 0B0\le B.

For the gradient arguments, pˉH=αx^y^HG|\bar{p}|_{H}=\alpha|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}\le G by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity, so, using ε13\varepsilon'\le\tfrac{1}{3}, σ1\sigma\le1 and 1<α1<\alpha,

πmHpˉH+pH+2εG+1+23G+2α<R,|\pi_{m}|_{H}\le|\bar{p}|_{H}+|p|_{H}+2\varepsilon'\le G+1+\tfrac{2}{3}\le G+2\alpha<R ,

and likewise κmH<R|\kappa_{m}|_{H}<R. Also, by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle and Step 4,

PmHα(amx^H+x^y^H+y^bmH)G+4αεG+4α3<G+2α<R.|P_{m}|_{H}\le\alpha\bigl(|a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}+|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}+|\hat{y}-b_{m}|_{H}\bigr)\le G+4\alpha\varepsilon'\le G+\tfrac{4\alpha}{3}<G+2\alpha<R .

For the form arguments, Step 2 and Step 4 give ZmXm+2αNm+2ε8α+1<8α+2<R\lVert Z_{m}\rVert\le\lVert X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\rVert+2\varepsilon'\le8\alpha+1<8\alpha+2<R and likewise Wm<R\lVert W_{m}\rVert<R, while Xm+2αNm8α<R\lVert X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le8\alpha<R and Ym2αNm8α<R\lVert Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le8\alpha<R.

Therefore, by Test Data for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple and the Admissible Sets §bounded, each of the four test data

ξm=(am,sm,πm,Zm),ηm=(bm,tm,κm,Wm),ζm=(am,sm,Pm,Xm+2αNm),ϑm=(bm,tm,Pm,Ym2αNm)\xi_{m}=(a_{m},s_{m},\pi_{m},Z_{m}),\quad \eta_{m}=(b_{m},t_{m},\kappa_{m},W_{m}),\quad \zeta_{m}=(a_{m},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}),\quad \vartheta_{m}=(b_{m},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})

is RR-bounded. Moreover, by the last inequalities of Step 3,

Fδ(ξm)Fδ+(ηm)εm+εm2<8α+2<R,F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{m})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}+\varepsilon_{m}\le2<8\alpha+2<R ,

so ξmSδ,R\xi_{m}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R} and ηmSδ,R+\eta_{m}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R} by Test Data for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple and the Admissible Sets §admissible, each of the two data serving as the witness required for the other.

Step 6 (moving onto the forms of the doubling lemma). Put

τ1(m)=PmπmH+(Xm+2αNm)Zm,τ2(m)=PmκmH+(Ym2αNm)Wm,\tau^{(m)}_{1}=|P_{m}-\pi_{m}|_{H}+\bigl\lVert (X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})-Z_{m}\bigr\rVert ,\qquad \tau^{(m)}_{2}=|P_{m}-\kappa_{m}|_{H}+\bigl\lVert (Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})-W_{m}\bigr\rVert ,

which are nonnegative. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle and Step 4,

PmπmHα(ambm)(x^y^)H+pˉ+pπmH+pH4αεm+2εm+σ,|P_{m}-\pi_{m}|_{H}\le\alpha\bigl|(a_{m}-b_{m})-(\hat{x}-\hat{y})\bigr|_{H}+\bigl|\bar{p}+p-\pi_{m}\bigr|_{H}+|p|_{H}\le4\alpha\varepsilon_{m}+2\varepsilon_{m}+\sigma ,

and the second summand of τ1(m)\tau^{(m)}_{1} is at most 2εm2\varepsilon_{m}, so, using εmε3\varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3} and 12α1\le2\alpha,

τ1(m)(4α+4)εm+σ4α+43ε+σ(2α+1)ε+σ,\tau^{(m)}_{1}\le(4\alpha+4)\varepsilon_{m}+\sigma\le\tfrac{4\alpha+4}{3}\,\varepsilon+\sigma\le(2\alpha+1)\varepsilon+\sigma ,

the last step because 4α+46α+34\alpha+4\le6\alpha+3. The same bound holds for τ2(m)\tau^{(m)}_{2}, since κm(pˉq)H<2εm|\kappa_{m}-(\bar{p}-q)|_{H}<2\varepsilon_{m} and qHσ|q|_{H}\le\sigma.

Applying the first condition of The Shift-Continuity Condition on Admissible Test Data §modulus to ξmSδ,R\xi_{m}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R} with the perturbations PmπmHP_{m}-\pi_{m}\in H and (Xm+2αNm)ZmSym(H)(X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})-Z_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H), whose norms sum to τ1(m)\tau^{(m)}_{1}, gives

Fδ(ζm)  Fδ(ξm)+ω(τ1(m))  εm+ω(τ1(m)),F^{-}_{\delta}(\zeta_{m})\ \le\ F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{m})+\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{1}\bigr)\ \le\ \varepsilon_{m}+\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{1}\bigr),

and applying the second condition to ηmSδ,R+\eta_{m}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R} with the perturbations PmκmP_{m}-\kappa_{m} and (Ym2αNm)Wm(Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})-W_{m} gives

εmω(τ2(m))  Fδ+(ηm)ω(τ2(m))  Fδ+(ϑm).-\varepsilon_{m}-\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{2}\bigr)\ \le\ F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{m})-\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{2}\bigr)\ \le\ F^{+}_{\delta}(\vartheta_{m}).

Step 7 (removing the tail). Each of the estimates

amx^H<2εm,bmy^H<2εm,smuδ(x^)<3εm,tmvδ+(y^)<3εm,PmpˉH4αεm|a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}<2\varepsilon_{m},\quad |b_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}<2\varepsilon_{m},\quad |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon_{m},\quad |t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon_{m},\quad |P_{m}-\bar{p}|_{H}\le4\alpha\varepsilon_{m}

of Steps 4 and 6 is of the form DmKmD_{m}\le\tfrac{K}{m} for a nonnegative real KK not depending on mm, because εm1m\varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac{1}{m}. Given a positive real ϵ\epsilon, Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero, applied with the positive real ϵK+1\tfrac{\epsilon}{K+1}, provides mNm_{\ast}\in\mathbb{N} with 1m<ϵK+1\tfrac{1}{m_{\ast}}<\tfrac{\epsilon}{K+1}, and then KmK+1mK+1m<ϵ\tfrac{K}{m}\le\tfrac{K+1}{m}\le\tfrac{K+1}{m_{\ast}}<\epsilon for every mNm\in\mathbb{N} with mmm_{\ast}\le m. By Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space the sequence (am)mN(a_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} therefore converges in HH to x^\hat{x}, the sequence (bm)mN(b_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges in HH to y^\hat{y}, the sequences (sm)mN(s_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} and (tm)mN(t_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converge in R\mathbb{R} to uδ(x^)u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x}) and to vδ+(y^)v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y}), and (Pm)mN(P_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges in HH to pˉ\bar{p}. All the ama_{m} and bmb_{m} lie in D(A)=WD(A)=W.

By Step 5 the test datum ζm\zeta_{m} is RR-bounded for every mNm\in\mathbb{N}. Hence The Tail-Insensitivity Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §lower, applied with the positive numbers β=2α\beta=2\alpha, RR and ρ\rho, with δ\delta, and with the sequences (am)(a_{m}), (sm)(s_{m}), (Pm)(P_{m}) and (Xm)(X_{m}), provides m1Nm_{1}\in\mathbb{N} such that every mNm\in\mathbb{N} with m1mm_{1}\le m satisfies

Fδ(am,sm,Pm,Xm)  Fδ(ζm)+ρ.F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(a_{m},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr)\ \le\ F^{-}_{\delta}(\zeta_{m})+\rho .

Likewise ϑm\vartheta_{m} is RR-bounded for every mm, so The Tail-Insensitivity Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §upper, applied with the same β\beta, RR, ρ\rho and δ\delta and with the sequences (bm)(b_{m}), (tm)(t_{m}), (Pm)(P_{m}) and (Ym)(Y_{m}), provides m2Nm_{2}\in\mathbb{N} such that every mNm\in\mathbb{N} with m2mm_{2}\le m satisfies

Fδ+(ϑm)ρ  Fδ+(bm,tm,Pm,Ym).F^{+}_{\delta}(\vartheta_{m})-\rho\ \le\ F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(b_{m},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr).

Fix from now on an mNm\in\mathbb{N} with m1mm_{1}\le m and m2mm_{2}\le m, and set x1=amx_{1}=a_{m}, y1=bmy_{1}=b_{m}, τ1=τ1(m)\tau_{1}=\tau^{(m)}_{1} and τ2=τ2(m)\tau_{2}=\tau^{(m)}_{2}. Combining the last two displays with Step 6,

Fδ(x1,sm,Pm,Xm)εm+ω(τ1)+ρ,εmω(τ2)ρFδ+(y1,tm,Pm,Ym).F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr)\le\varepsilon_{m}+\omega(\tau_{1})+\rho,\qquad -\varepsilon_{m}-\omega(\tau_{2})-\rho\le F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(y_{1},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr).

Step 8 (the structure condition). We have x1,y1D(A)=Wx_{1},y_{1}\in D(A)=W, tmB+13B+2|t_{m}|\le B+1\le3B+2, 1<α1<\alpha, 0<δ<10<\delta<1 and Pm=α(x1y1)P_{m}=\alpha(x_{1}-y_{1}), and the pair (Xm,Ym)(X_{m},Y_{m}) is admitted at α\alpha by Step 2. Hence The Second-Order Structure Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §pair, applied to the second-order structure pair (ω1,ω2)(\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) at 3B+23B+2 with the value argument tmt_{m} and the form arguments XmX_{m} and YmY_{m}, gives

Fδ+(y1,tm,Pm,Ym)Ω  Fδ(x1,tm,Pm,Xm),F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(y_{1},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr)-\Omega\ \le\ F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},t_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr),

where

Ω=ω1(αx1y1H2+1α)+ω2(δ(h(x1)+h(y1)+1),α),\Omega=\omega_{1}\Bigl(\alpha|x_{1}-y_{1}|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}\Bigr)+\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta\,(h(x_{1})+h(y_{1})+1),\,\alpha\bigr),

a nonnegative number because ω1\omega_{1} and the function tω2(t,α)t\mapsto\omega_{2}(t,\alpha) are moduli of continuity, whose values are nonnegative by clause 1 of Modulus of Continuity.

Step 9 (properness and conclusion). Since smuδ(x^)<3εmε|s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon and tmvδ+(y^)<3εmε|t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon,

uδ(x^)vδ+(y^)(sm+ε)(tmε)=smtm+2ε.()u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})\le(s_{m}+\varepsilon)-(t_{m}-\varepsilon)=s_{m}-t_{m}+2\varepsilon . \tag{$*$}

Suppose first that tmsmt_{m}\le s_{m}. By Step 5 we have 0δh(x1)2B+10\le\delta h(x_{1})\le2B+1, smB+1|s_{m}|\le B+1 and tmB+1|t_{m}|\le B+1, so both sm+δh(x1)s_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}) and tm+δh(x1)t_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}) lie between (3B+2)-(3B+2) and 3B+23B+2, and tm+δh(x1)sm+δh(x1)t_{m}+\delta h(x_{1})\le s_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}). Applying Locally Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §constant at the level 3B+23B+2, with the point x1x_{1}, the gradient argument Pm+δAx1HP_{m}+\delta Ax_{1}\in H and the form argument XmV+δIVSym(V)X_{m}|_{V}+\delta I_{V}\in\mathrm{Sym}(V), and reading the two resulting values of FF through Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ\delta-Shifts §shifted, we obtain

λ(smtm)=λ((sm+δh(x1))(tm+δh(x1)))Fδ(x1,sm,Pm,Xm)Fδ(x1,tm,Pm,Xm).\lambda(s_{m}-t_{m})=\lambda\bigl((s_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}))-(t_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}))\bigr)\le F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr)-F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},t_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr).

Combining this with Step 8 and the two inequalities at the end of Step 7,

λ(smtm)εm+ω(τ1)+ρFδ+(y1,tm,Pm,Ym)+Ω  2εm+2ρ+ω(τ1)+ω(τ2)+Ω.\lambda(s_{m}-t_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}+\omega(\tau_{1})+\rho-F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(y_{1},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr)+\Omega\ \le\ 2\varepsilon_{m}+2\rho+\omega(\tau_{1})+\omega(\tau_{2})+\Omega .

Since εmε1=ε3\varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon_{1}=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3} and ρ=ε6\rho=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{6}, we have 2εm+2ρ2ε3+ε3=ε2\varepsilon_{m}+2\rho\le\tfrac{2\varepsilon}{3}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}=\varepsilon. Multiplying ()(*) by the positive number λ\lambda and adding 2λε2\lambda\varepsilon to the previous display gives

λ(uδ(x^)vδ+(y^))2λε+2ε+ω(τ1)+ω(τ2)+Ω,\lambda\bigl(u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})\bigr)\le2\lambda\varepsilon+2\varepsilon+\omega(\tau_{1})+\omega(\tau_{2})+\Omega ,

which is the asserted estimate.

Suppose now that sm<tms_{m}<t_{m}. Then ()(*) gives uδ(x^)vδ+(y^)<2εu^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})<2\varepsilon, so λ(uδ(x^)vδ+(y^))<2λε\lambda\bigl(u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})\bigr)<2\lambda\varepsilon, and the asserted estimate holds because its remaining right-hand terms are nonnegative: the values of the modulus of continuity ω\omega are nonnegative by clause 1 of Modulus of Continuity, Ω\Omega is nonnegative by Step 8, and 0<2ε0<2\varepsilon.

In both cases x1,y1D(A)x_{1},y_{1}\in D(A) satisfy x1x^H<ε|x_{1}-\hat{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon, y1y^H<ε|y_{1}-\hat{y}|_{H}<\varepsilon, uδ(x1)uδ(x^)<ε|u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{1})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<\varepsilon and vδ+(y1)vδ+(y^)<ε|v^{+}_{\delta}(y_{1})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<\varepsilon by Step 4, and τ1,τ2\tau_{1},\tau_{2} are nonnegative and at most (2α+1)ε+σ(2\alpha+1)\varepsilon+\sigma by Step 6.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…