Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write Θ : V × V → R \Theta:V\times V\to\mathbb{R} Θ : V × V → R for the function in the hypothesis, so that Θ \Theta Θ attains a sequentially strict maximum on V × V V\times V V × V at ( x ^ , y ^ ) (\hat{x},\hat{y}) ( x ^ , y ^ ) , and put p ˉ = α ( x ^ − y ^ ) ∈ H \bar{p}=\alpha(\hat{x}-\hat{y})\in H p ˉ = α ( x ^ − y ^ ) ∈ H . Local maxima and minima relative to V V V are those of Real Hilbert Spaces: Standing Notation and Background §local-extrema for the subset V V V of the metric space ( H , d H ) (H,d_{H}) ( H , d H ) , which is the notion used both in Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space with E = H E=H E = H and A = V A=V A = V and in Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple with U = H U=H U = H , since V ∩ H = V V\cap H=V V ∩ H = V .
The order of choice. The data δ , α , σ , ε , B , G , R \delta,\alpha,\sigma,\varepsilon,B,G,R δ , α , σ , ε , B , G , R , the vectors p , q p,q p , q , the point ( x ^ , y ^ ) (\hat{x},\hat{y}) ( x ^ , y ^ ) , the basis ( e k ) k ∈ N (e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} ( e k ) k ∈ N , the constant λ \lambda λ , the pair ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) (\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) and the modulus ω \omega ω are given by hypothesis. We fix next the two positive real numbers
ε 1 = ε 3 , ρ = ε 6 , \varepsilon_{1}=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3},\qquad \rho=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{6}, ε 1 = 3 ε , ρ = 6 ε ,
and then construct, for every m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N and in terms of the data already fixed alone, a family of test data indexed by m m m (Steps 2 to 6). Only afterwards is the tail-insensitivity hypothesis applied to the resulting sequences, yielding an index m m m at which the conclusion is read off (Steps 7 to 9). Nothing entering the construction of the m m m -th datum depends on that final index, so the choices are not circular.
Step 1 (two auxiliary functions). Let u ~ , v ~ : V → R \tilde{u},\tilde{v}:V\to\mathbb{R} u ~ , v ~ : V → R be given by
u ~ ( x ) = u δ − ( x ) − ⟨ x , p ⟩ H , v ~ ( y ) = v δ + ( y ) + ⟨ y , q ⟩ H , \tilde{u}(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\langle x,p\rangle_{H},\qquad \tilde{v}(y)=v^{+}_{\delta}(y)+\langle y,q\rangle_{H}, u ~ ( x ) = u δ − ( x ) − ⟨ x , p ⟩ H , v ~ ( y ) = v δ + ( y ) + ⟨ y , q ⟩ H ,
which agree with u δ − ( x ) − ⟨ p , x ⟩ H u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\langle p,x\rangle_{H} u δ − ( x ) − ⟨ p , x ⟩ H and v δ + ( y ) + ⟨ q , y ⟩ H v^{+}_{\delta}(y)+\langle q,y\rangle_{H} v δ + ( y ) + ⟨ q , y ⟩ H by the symmetry of the inner product in Real Inner Product Space §inner-product , and let − v ~ : V → R -\tilde{v}:V\to\mathbb{R} − v ~ : V → R have value − v ~ ( y ) -\tilde{v}(y) − v ~ ( y ) at y y y . For all x , y ∈ V x,y\in V x , y ∈ V ,
u ~ ( x ) − v ~ ( y ) − α 2 ∣ x − y ∣ H 2 = Θ ( x , y ) . \tilde{u}(x)-\tilde{v}(y)-\tfrac{\alpha}{2}|x-y|_{H}^{2}=\Theta(x,y). u ~ ( x ) − v ~ ( y ) − 2 α ∣ x − y ∣ H 2 = Θ ( x , y ) .
Bounds. By Basic Properties of the δ \delta δ -Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §bound , u δ − ( x ) ≤ C − δ 2 ∣ x ∣ H 2 u^{-}_{\delta}(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2} u δ − ( x ) ≤ C − 2 δ ∣ x ∣ H 2 and − v δ + ( y ) ≤ C − δ 2 ∣ y ∣ H 2 -v^{+}_{\delta}(y)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|y|_{H}^{2} − v δ + ( y ) ≤ C − 2 δ ∣ y ∣ H 2 for x , y ∈ V x,y\in V x , y ∈ V . By The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space and ∣ p ∣ H ≤ σ ≤ 1 |p|_{H}\le\sigma\le1 ∣ p ∣ H ≤ σ ≤ 1 we have − ⟨ x , p ⟩ H ≤ ∣ x ∣ H ∣ p ∣ H ≤ ∣ x ∣ H -\langle x,p\rangle_{H}\le|x|_{H}|p|_{H}\le|x|_{H} − ⟨ x , p ⟩ H ≤ ∣ x ∣ H ∣ p ∣ H ≤ ∣ x ∣ H , and likewise − ⟨ y , q ⟩ H ≤ ∣ y ∣ H -\langle y,q\rangle_{H}\le|y|_{H} − ⟨ y , q ⟩ H ≤ ∣ y ∣ H . For every real t t t the inequality 0 ≤ δ 2 ( t − 1 δ ) 2 0\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}\bigl(t-\tfrac{1}{\delta}\bigr)^{2} 0 ≤ 2 δ ( t − δ 1 ) 2 expands to t ≤ δ 2 t 2 + 1 2 δ t\le\tfrac{\delta}{2}t^{2}+\tfrac{1}{2\delta} t ≤ 2 δ t 2 + 2 δ 1 , so
u ~ ( x ) ≤ C − δ 2 ∣ x ∣ H 2 + ∣ x ∣ H ≤ C + 1 2 δ , − v ~ ( y ) ≤ C − δ 2 ∣ y ∣ H 2 + ∣ y ∣ H ≤ C + 1 2 δ \tilde{u}(x)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|x|_{H}^{2}+|x|_{H}\le C+\tfrac{1}{2\delta},\qquad -\tilde{v}(y)\le C-\tfrac{\delta}{2}|y|_{H}^{2}+|y|_{H}\le C+\tfrac{1}{2\delta} u ~ ( x ) ≤ C − 2 δ ∣ x ∣ H 2 + ∣ x ∣ H ≤ C + 2 δ 1 , − v ~ ( y ) ≤ C − 2 δ ∣ y ∣ H 2 + ∣ y ∣ H ≤ C + 2 δ 1
for all x , y ∈ V x,y\in V x , y ∈ V . Hence the sets of values of u ~ \tilde{u} u ~ and of − v ~ -\tilde{v} − v ~ are bounded above .
Closed superlevel sets. By Basic Properties of the δ \delta δ -Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §closed-superlevel , applied with U = H U=H U = H , the functions u δ − u^{-}_{\delta} u δ − and − v δ + -v^{+}_{\delta} − v δ + on V V V have closed superlevel sets in ( H , d H ) (H,d_{H}) ( H , d H ) . The maps x ↦ ⟨ x , p ⟩ H x\mapsto\langle x,p\rangle_{H} x ↦ ⟨ x , p ⟩ H and y ↦ ⟨ y , q ⟩ H y\mapsto\langle y,q\rangle_{H} y ↦ ⟨ y , q ⟩ H from H H H to R \mathbb{R} R are Lipschitz by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §lipschitz , hence continuous on H H H by A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous . Since u ~ \tilde{u} u ~ is u δ − u^{-}_{\delta} u δ − minus the first of these and − v ~ -\tilde{v} − v ~ is − v δ + -v^{+}_{\delta} − v δ + minus the second, Functions with Closed Superlevel Sets: Sequential Characterisation, Semicontinuity, Perturbation and Limits §perturbation shows that u ~ \tilde{u} u ~ and − v ~ -\tilde{v} − v ~ have closed superlevel sets in ( H , d H ) (H,d_{H}) ( H , d H ) .
Step 2 (the doubling lemma at each truncation). Let m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N , let e ( m ) ∈ H m e^{(m)}\in H^{m} e ( m ) ∈ H m be the m m m -tuple with components e 1 , … , e m e_{1},\dots,e_{m} e 1 , … , e m and let N m ∈ S y m ( H ) N_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) N m ∈ Sym ( H ) be its tail form, as in The Tail-Insensitivity Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §tail-forms ; thus e ( m ) e^{(m)} e ( m ) is orthonormal and all its components lie in V V V , which is a linear subspace of H H H by Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §triple . By Step 1 the functions u ~ \tilde{u} u ~ and − v ~ -\tilde{v} − v ~ are bounded above and have closed superlevel sets in H H H , and Θ \Theta Θ attains a sequentially strict maximum on V × V V\times V V × V at ( x ^ , y ^ ) (\hat{x},\hat{y}) ( x ^ , y ^ ) . Hence Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference applies with the space H H H , the subspace V V V , the tuple e ( m ) e^{(m)} e ( m ) , the functions u ~ \tilde{u} u ~ and v ~ \tilde{v} v ~ and the positive number α \alpha α , and provides X m , Y m ∈ S y m ( H ) X_{m},Y_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) X m , Y m ∈ Sym ( H ) with the following properties.
By Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §test-data , the quadruple ( x ^ , u ~ ( x ^ ) , p ˉ , X m + 2 α N m ) \bigl(\hat{x},\tilde{u}(\hat{x}),\bar{p},X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\bigr) ( x ^ , u ~ ( x ^ ) , p ˉ , X m + 2 α N m ) is approximable by test data from above for u ~ \tilde{u} u ~ on V V V , and the quadruple ( y ^ , v ~ ( y ^ ) , p ˉ , Y m − 2 α N m ) \bigl(\hat{y},\tilde{v}(\hat{y}),\bar{p},Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}\bigr) ( y ^ , v ~ ( y ^ ) , p ˉ , Y m − 2 α N m ) is approximable by test data from below for v ~ \tilde{v} v ~ on V V V .
By Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §quadratic-bound , Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §ordering and Lions' Lemma on a Hilbert Space: Test Data and Form Bounds at a Sequentially Strict Maximum of a Quadratically Penalised Difference §norm-bound , the pair ( X m , Y m ) (X_{m},Y_{m}) ( X m , Y m ) satisfies X m ⪯ Y m X_{m}\preceq Y_{m} X m ⪯ Y m , ∥ X m ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert X_{m}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ X m ∥ ≤ 6 α , ∥ Y m ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert Y_{m}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ Y m ∥ ≤ 6 α and − 3 α ( ∣ z ∣ H 2 + ∣ w ∣ H 2 ) ≤ X m ( z , z ) − Y m ( w , w ) ≤ 3 α ∣ z − w ∣ H 2 -3\alpha(|z|_{H}^{2}+|w|_{H}^{2})\le X_{m}(z,z)-Y_{m}(w,w)\le3\alpha|z-w|_{H}^{2} − 3 α ( ∣ z ∣ H 2 + ∣ w ∣ H 2 ) ≤ X m ( z , z ) − Y m ( w , w ) ≤ 3 α ∣ z − w ∣ H 2 for all z , w ∈ H z,w\in H z , w ∈ H ; that is, ( X m , Y m ) (X_{m},Y_{m}) ( X m , Y m ) is admitted at α \alpha α .
Finally ∥ N m ∥ ≤ 1 \lVert N_{m}\rVert\le1 ∥ N m ∥ ≤ 1 by Coordinate Maps of a Finite Orthonormal Tuple: Forms, the Tail Form, and Quadratic Test Functions §tail , so by the triangle inequality and the homogeneity of the norm in Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §norm-axioms ,
∥ X m + 2 α N m ∥ ≤ ∥ X m ∥ + 2 α ∥ N m ∥ ≤ 6 α + 2 α = 8 α , \lVert X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le\lVert X_{m}\rVert+2\alpha\lVert N_{m}\rVert\le6\alpha+2\alpha=8\alpha, ∥ X m + 2 α N m ∥ ≤ ∥ X m ∥ + 2 α ∥ N m ∥ ≤ 6 α + 2 α = 8 α ,
and in the same way ∥ Y m − 2 α N m ∥ ≤ 8 α \lVert Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le8\alpha ∥ Y m − 2 α N m ∥ ≤ 8 α .
Step 3 (test functions and test data at the index m m m ). Let ε m \varepsilon_{m} ε m be the least of the two positive real numbers ε 1 \varepsilon_{1} ε 1 and 1 m \tfrac{1}{m} m 1 , which exists by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ; then 0 < ε m 0<\varepsilon_{m} 0 < ε m , ε m ≤ ε 1 = ε 3 ≤ 1 3 \varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon_{1}=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}\le\tfrac{1}{3} ε m ≤ ε 1 = 3 ε ≤ 3 1 and ε m ≤ 1 m \varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac{1}{m} ε m ≤ m 1 .
By Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §above , applied to the first quadruple of Step 2 with the tolerance ε m \varepsilon_{m} ε m , there are z m ∈ V z_{m}\in V z m ∈ V and φ m ∈ C 2 ( H ) \varphi_{m}\in C^{2}(H) φ m ∈ C 2 ( H ) such that the function on V V V with value u ~ ( x ) − φ m ( x ) \tilde{u}(x)-\varphi_{m}(x) u ~ ( x ) − φ m ( x ) at x x x has a local maximum relative to V V V at z m z_{m} z m and
∣ z m − x ^ ∣ H < ε m , ∣ u ~ ( z m ) − u ~ ( x ^ ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ D φ m ( z m ) − p ˉ ∣ H < ε m , ∥ D 2 φ m ( z m ) − ( X m + 2 α N m ) ∥ < ε m . |z_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |\tilde{u}(z_{m})-\tilde{u}(\hat{x})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-\bar{p}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert D^{2}\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-(X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m}. ∣ z m − x ^ ∣ H < ε m , ∣ u ~ ( z m ) − u ~ ( x ^ ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ D φ m ( z m ) − p ˉ ∣ H < ε m , ∥ D 2 φ m ( z m ) − ( X m + 2 α N m )∥ < ε m .
Let φ m ′ : H → R \varphi'_{m}:H\to\mathbb{R} φ m ′ : H → R be given by φ m ′ ( x ) = φ m ( x ) + ⟨ x , p ⟩ H \varphi'_{m}(x)=\varphi_{m}(x)+\langle x,p\rangle_{H} φ m ′ ( x ) = φ m ( x ) + ⟨ x , p ⟩ H . The second summand belongs to C 2 ( H ) C^{2}(H) C 2 ( H ) with gradient p p p and Hessian 0 S y m 0_{\mathrm{Sym}} 0 Sym at every point of H H H by Affine and Quadratic Functions on a Real Hilbert Space are of Class C 2 C^2 C 2 §affine , so φ m ′ ∈ C 2 ( H ) \varphi'_{m}\in C^{2}(H) φ m ′ ∈ C 2 ( H ) with D φ m ′ ( z m ) = D φ m ( z m ) + p D\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})=D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})+p D φ m ′ ( z m ) = D φ m ( z m ) + p and D 2 φ m ′ ( z m ) = D 2 φ m ( z m ) D^{2}\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})=D^{2}\varphi_{m}(z_{m}) D 2 φ m ′ ( z m ) = D 2 φ m ( z m ) by Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §sum . Since u ~ ( x ) − φ m ( x ) = u δ − ( x ) − φ m ′ ( x ) \tilde{u}(x)-\varphi_{m}(x)=u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi'_{m}(x) u ~ ( x ) − φ m ( x ) = u δ − ( x ) − φ m ′ ( x ) for every x ∈ V x\in V x ∈ V , the function on V V V with value u δ − ( x ) − φ m ′ ( x ) u^{-}_{\delta}(x)-\varphi'_{m}(x) u δ − ( x ) − φ m ′ ( x ) at x x x has a local maximum relative to V V V at z m z_{m} z m .
Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §subsolution with δ \delta δ , the test function φ m ′ \varphi'_{m} φ m ′ , the point z m z_{m} z m and the number ε m \varepsilon_{m} ε m yields a m ∈ D ( A ) a_{m}\in D(A) a m ∈ D ( A ) , s m ∈ R s_{m}\in\mathbb{R} s m ∈ R , π m ∈ H \pi_{m}\in H π m ∈ H and Z m ∈ S y m ( H ) Z_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) Z m ∈ Sym ( H ) with
∣ a m − z m ∣ H < ε m , ∣ u δ − ( a m ) − u δ − ( z m ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ s m − u δ − ( z m ) ∣ < ε m , |a_{m}-z_{m}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m}, ∣ a m − z m ∣ H < ε m , ∣ u δ − ( a m ) − u δ − ( z m ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ s m − u δ − ( z m ) ∣ < ε m ,
∣ π m − D φ m ′ ( z m ) ∣ H < ε m , ∥ Z m − D 2 φ m ′ ( z m ) ∥ < ε m , F δ − ( a m , s m , π m , Z m ) ≤ ε m . |\pi_{m}-D\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert Z_{m}-D^{2}\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m},\quad F^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m},s_{m},\pi_{m},Z_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}. ∣ π m − D φ m ′ ( z m ) ∣ H < ε m , ∥ Z m − D 2 φ m ′ ( z m )∥ < ε m , F δ − ( a m , s m , π m , Z m ) ≤ ε m .
Symmetrically, Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §below , applied to the second quadruple of Step 2 with the tolerance ε m \varepsilon_{m} ε m , gives w m ∈ V w_{m}\in V w m ∈ V and ψ m ∈ C 2 ( H ) \psi_{m}\in C^{2}(H) ψ m ∈ C 2 ( H ) such that the function with value v ~ ( y ) − ψ m ( y ) \tilde{v}(y)-\psi_{m}(y) v ~ ( y ) − ψ m ( y ) at y y y has a local minimum relative to V V V at w m w_{m} w m and
∣ w m − y ^ ∣ H < ε m , ∣ v ~ ( w m ) − v ~ ( y ^ ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ D ψ m ( w m ) − p ˉ ∣ H < ε m , ∥ D 2 ψ m ( w m ) − ( Y m − 2 α N m ) ∥ < ε m . |w_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |\tilde{v}(w_{m})-\tilde{v}(\hat{y})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |D\psi_{m}(w_{m})-\bar{p}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert D^{2}\psi_{m}(w_{m})-(Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m}. ∣ w m − y ^ ∣ H < ε m , ∣ v ~ ( w m ) − v ~ ( y ^ ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ D ψ m ( w m ) − p ˉ ∣ H < ε m , ∥ D 2 ψ m ( w m ) − ( Y m − 2 α N m )∥ < ε m .
With ψ m ′ ( y ) = ψ m ( y ) − ⟨ y , q ⟩ H \psi'_{m}(y)=\psi_{m}(y)-\langle y,q\rangle_{H} ψ m ′ ( y ) = ψ m ( y ) − ⟨ y , q ⟩ H we obtain, by the same two lemmas on differences (Affine and Quadratic Functions on a Real Hilbert Space are of Class C 2 C^2 C 2 §affine and Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §difference ), that ψ m ′ ∈ C 2 ( H ) \psi'_{m}\in C^{2}(H) ψ m ′ ∈ C 2 ( H ) with D ψ m ′ ( w m ) = D ψ m ( w m ) − q D\psi'_{m}(w_{m})=D\psi_{m}(w_{m})-q D ψ m ′ ( w m ) = D ψ m ( w m ) − q and D 2 ψ m ′ ( w m ) = D 2 ψ m ( w m ) D^{2}\psi'_{m}(w_{m})=D^{2}\psi_{m}(w_{m}) D 2 ψ m ′ ( w m ) = D 2 ψ m ( w m ) ; and v ~ ( y ) − ψ m ( y ) = v δ + ( y ) − ψ m ′ ( y ) \tilde{v}(y)-\psi_{m}(y)=v^{+}_{\delta}(y)-\psi'_{m}(y) v ~ ( y ) − ψ m ( y ) = v δ + ( y ) − ψ m ′ ( y ) for y ∈ V y\in V y ∈ V , so the function with value v δ + ( y ) − ψ m ′ ( y ) v^{+}_{\delta}(y)-\psi'_{m}(y) v δ + ( y ) − ψ m ′ ( y ) at y y y has a local minimum relative to V V V at w m w_{m} w m . Applying Viscosity Subsolution, Supersolution and Solution of a Second-Order Equation on a Hilbert Triple §supersolution with δ \delta δ , ψ m ′ \psi'_{m} ψ m ′ , w m w_{m} w m and ε m \varepsilon_{m} ε m yields b m ∈ D ( A ) b_{m}\in D(A) b m ∈ D ( A ) , t m ∈ R t_{m}\in\mathbb{R} t m ∈ R , κ m ∈ H \kappa_{m}\in H κ m ∈ H and W m ∈ S y m ( H ) W_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) W m ∈ Sym ( H ) with
∣ b m − w m ∣ H < ε m , ∣ v δ + ( b m ) − v δ + ( w m ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ t m − v δ + ( w m ) ∣ < ε m , |b_{m}-w_{m}|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m})-v^{+}_{\delta}(w_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m},\quad |t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(w_{m})|<\varepsilon_{m}, ∣ b m − w m ∣ H < ε m , ∣ v δ + ( b m ) − v δ + ( w m ) ∣ < ε m , ∣ t m − v δ + ( w m ) ∣ < ε m ,
∣ κ m − D ψ m ′ ( w m ) ∣ H < ε m , ∥ W m − D 2 ψ m ′ ( w m ) ∥ < ε m , − ε m ≤ F δ + ( b m , t m , κ m , W m ) . |\kappa_{m}-D\psi'_{m}(w_{m})|_{H}<\varepsilon_{m},\quad \lVert W_{m}-D^{2}\psi'_{m}(w_{m})\rVert<\varepsilon_{m},\quad -\varepsilon_{m}\le F^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m},t_{m},\kappa_{m},W_{m}). ∣ κ m − D ψ m ′ ( w m ) ∣ H < ε m , ∥ W m − D 2 ψ m ′ ( w m )∥ < ε m , − ε m ≤ F δ + ( b m , t m , κ m , W m ) .
Step 4 (elementary consequences at the index m m m ). Fix m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N and write ε ′ = ε m \varepsilon'=\varepsilon_{m} ε ′ = ε m . By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle ,
∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H ≤ ∣ a m − z m ∣ H + ∣ z m − x ^ ∣ H < 2 ε ′ , ∣ b m − y ^ ∣ H < 2 ε ′ . |a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}\le|a_{m}-z_{m}|_{H}+|z_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}<2\varepsilon',\qquad |b_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}<2\varepsilon' . ∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H ≤ ∣ a m − z m ∣ H + ∣ z m − x ^ ∣ H < 2 ε ′ , ∣ b m − y ^ ∣ H < 2 ε ′ .
Since u δ − ( z m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) = ( u ~ ( z m ) − u ~ ( x ^ ) ) + ⟨ z m − x ^ , p ⟩ H u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})=\bigl(\tilde{u}(z_{m})-\tilde{u}(\hat{x})\bigr)+\langle z_{m}-\hat{x},p\rangle_{H} u δ − ( z m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) = ( u ~ ( z m ) − u ~ ( x ^ ) ) + ⟨ z m − x ^ , p ⟩ H by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear , and ∣ ⟨ z m − x ^ , p ⟩ H ∣ ≤ ∣ z m − x ^ ∣ H ∣ p ∣ H ≤ ε ′ σ ≤ ε ′ |\langle z_{m}-\hat{x},p\rangle_{H}|\le|z_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}|p|_{H}\le\varepsilon'\sigma\le\varepsilon' ∣ ⟨ z m − x ^ , p ⟩ H ∣ ≤ ∣ z m − x ^ ∣ H ∣ p ∣ H ≤ ε ′ σ ≤ ε ′ by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space , we get ∣ u δ − ( z m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 2 ε ′ |u^{-}_{\delta}(z_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<2\varepsilon' ∣ u δ − ( z m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 2 ε ′ and therefore
∣ u δ − ( a m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ , ∣ s m − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ ; |u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon',\qquad |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon' ; ∣ u δ − ( a m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ , ∣ s m − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ ;
symmetrically ∣ v δ + ( b m ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ |v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon' ∣ v δ + ( b m ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ and ∣ t m − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ |t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon' ∣ t m − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε ′ . Since D φ m ′ ( z m ) − ( p ˉ + p ) = D φ m ( z m ) − p ˉ D\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})-(\bar{p}+p)=D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-\bar{p} D φ m ′ ( z m ) − ( p ˉ + p ) = D φ m ( z m ) − p ˉ ,
∣ π m − ( p ˉ + p ) ∣ H ≤ ∣ π m − D φ m ′ ( z m ) ∣ H + ∣ D φ m ( z m ) − p ˉ ∣ H < 2 ε ′ , |\pi_{m}-(\bar{p}+p)|_{H}\le|\pi_{m}-D\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})|_{H}+|D\varphi_{m}(z_{m})-\bar{p}|_{H}<2\varepsilon' , ∣ π m − ( p ˉ + p ) ∣ H ≤ ∣ π m − D φ m ′ ( z m ) ∣ H + ∣ D φ m ( z m ) − p ˉ ∣ H < 2 ε ′ ,
and symmetrically ∣ κ m − ( p ˉ − q ) ∣ H < 2 ε ′ |\kappa_{m}-(\bar{p}-q)|_{H}<2\varepsilon' ∣ κ m − ( p ˉ − q ) ∣ H < 2 ε ′ . Finally D 2 φ m ′ ( z m ) = D 2 φ m ( z m ) D^{2}\varphi'_{m}(z_{m})=D^{2}\varphi_{m}(z_{m}) D 2 φ m ′ ( z m ) = D 2 φ m ( z m ) gives
∥ Z m − ( X m + 2 α N m ) ∥ < 2 ε ′ , ∥ W m − ( Y m − 2 α N m ) ∥ < 2 ε ′ . \lVert Z_{m}-(X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<2\varepsilon',\qquad \lVert W_{m}-(Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})\rVert<2\varepsilon' . ∥ Z m − ( X m + 2 α N m )∥ < 2 ε ′ , ∥ W m − ( Y m − 2 α N m )∥ < 2 ε ′ .
As 3 ε ′ ≤ 3 ε 1 = ε 3\varepsilon'\le3\varepsilon_{1}=\varepsilon 3 ε ′ ≤ 3 ε 1 = ε , the four quantities ∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H |a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H} ∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H , ∣ b m − y ^ ∣ H |b_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H} ∣ b m − y ^ ∣ H , ∣ u δ − ( a m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ |u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})| ∣ u δ − ( a m ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ and ∣ v δ + ( b m ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ |v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})| ∣ v δ + ( b m ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ are all less than ε \varepsilon ε .
Step 5 (the data are R R R -bounded, and two of them admissible). Keep m m m fixed, write ε ′ = ε m \varepsilon'=\varepsilon_{m} ε ′ = ε m , and put P m = α ( a m − b m ) ∈ H P_{m}=\alpha(a_{m}-b_{m})\in H P m = α ( a m − b m ) ∈ H .
By Basic Properties of the δ \delta δ -Envelopes: Semicontinuity, Duality, Closed Superlevel Sets, Bounds and Monotonicity §bound , u δ − ( a m ) ≤ C − δ h ( a m ) u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})\le C-\delta h(a_{m}) u δ − ( a m ) ≤ C − δ h ( a m ) , so, using C ≤ B C\le B C ≤ B , − u δ − ( x ^ ) ≤ B -u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})\le B − u δ − ( x ^ ) ≤ B and 3 ε ′ ≤ ε ≤ 1 3\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon\le1 3 ε ′ ≤ ε ≤ 1 ,
δ h ( a m ) ≤ C − u δ − ( a m ) ≤ C − u δ − ( x ^ ) + 3 ε ′ ≤ 2 B + 1 , \delta h(a_{m})\le C-u^{-}_{\delta}(a_{m})\le C-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})+3\varepsilon'\le2B+1 , δ h ( a m ) ≤ C − u δ − ( a m ) ≤ C − u δ − ( x ^ ) + 3 ε ′ ≤ 2 B + 1 ,
whence h ( a m ) ≤ 2 B + 1 δ < R h(a_{m})\le\tfrac{2B+1}{\delta}<R h ( a m ) ≤ δ 2 B + 1 < R . By the same claim − C + δ h ( b m ) ≤ v δ + ( b m ) -C+\delta h(b_{m})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(b_{m}) − C + δ h ( b m ) ≤ v δ + ( b m ) , so δ h ( b m ) ≤ v δ + ( y ^ ) + 3 ε ′ + C ≤ 2 B + 1 \delta h(b_{m})\le v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})+3\varepsilon'+C\le2B+1 δ h ( b m ) ≤ v δ + ( y ^ ) + 3 ε ′ + C ≤ 2 B + 1 and h ( b m ) < R h(b_{m})<R h ( b m ) < R . Next ∣ s m ∣ ≤ ∣ u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ + 3 ε ′ ≤ B + 1 < R |s_{m}|\le|u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|+3\varepsilon'\le B+1<R ∣ s m ∣ ≤ ∣ u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ + 3 ε ′ ≤ B + 1 < R and ∣ t m ∣ ≤ B + 1 < R |t_{m}|\le B+1<R ∣ t m ∣ ≤ B + 1 < R , because B + 1 ≤ 3 B + 2 < R B+1\le3B+2<R B + 1 ≤ 3 B + 2 < R and 0 ≤ B 0\le B 0 ≤ B .
For the gradient arguments, ∣ p ˉ ∣ H = α ∣ x ^ − y ^ ∣ H ≤ G |\bar{p}|_{H}=\alpha|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}\le G ∣ p ˉ ∣ H = α ∣ x ^ − y ^ ∣ H ≤ G by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity , so, using ε ′ ≤ 1 3 \varepsilon'\le\tfrac{1}{3} ε ′ ≤ 3 1 , σ ≤ 1 \sigma\le1 σ ≤ 1 and 1 < α 1<\alpha 1 < α ,
∣ π m ∣ H ≤ ∣ p ˉ ∣ H + ∣ p ∣ H + 2 ε ′ ≤ G + 1 + 2 3 ≤ G + 2 α < R , |\pi_{m}|_{H}\le|\bar{p}|_{H}+|p|_{H}+2\varepsilon'\le G+1+\tfrac{2}{3}\le G+2\alpha<R , ∣ π m ∣ H ≤ ∣ p ˉ ∣ H + ∣ p ∣ H + 2 ε ′ ≤ G + 1 + 3 2 ≤ G + 2 α < R ,
and likewise ∣ κ m ∣ H < R |\kappa_{m}|_{H}<R ∣ κ m ∣ H < R . Also, by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle and Step 4,
∣ P m ∣ H ≤ α ( ∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H + ∣ x ^ − y ^ ∣ H + ∣ y ^ − b m ∣ H ) ≤ G + 4 α ε ′ ≤ G + 4 α 3 < G + 2 α < R . |P_{m}|_{H}\le\alpha\bigl(|a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}+|\hat{x}-\hat{y}|_{H}+|\hat{y}-b_{m}|_{H}\bigr)\le G+4\alpha\varepsilon'\le G+\tfrac{4\alpha}{3}<G+2\alpha<R . ∣ P m ∣ H ≤ α ( ∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H + ∣ x ^ − y ^ ∣ H + ∣ y ^ − b m ∣ H ) ≤ G + 4 α ε ′ ≤ G + 3 4 α < G + 2 α < R .
For the form arguments, Step 2 and Step 4 give ∥ Z m ∥ ≤ ∥ X m + 2 α N m ∥ + 2 ε ′ ≤ 8 α + 1 < 8 α + 2 < R \lVert Z_{m}\rVert\le\lVert X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\rVert+2\varepsilon'\le8\alpha+1<8\alpha+2<R ∥ Z m ∥ ≤ ∥ X m + 2 α N m ∥ + 2 ε ′ ≤ 8 α + 1 < 8 α + 2 < R and likewise ∥ W m ∥ < R \lVert W_{m}\rVert<R ∥ W m ∥ < R , while ∥ X m + 2 α N m ∥ ≤ 8 α < R \lVert X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le8\alpha<R ∥ X m + 2 α N m ∥ ≤ 8 α < R and ∥ Y m − 2 α N m ∥ ≤ 8 α < R \lVert Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}\rVert\le8\alpha<R ∥ Y m − 2 α N m ∥ ≤ 8 α < R .
Therefore, by Test Data for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple and the Admissible Sets §bounded , each of the four test data
ξ m = ( a m , s m , π m , Z m ) , η m = ( b m , t m , κ m , W m ) , ζ m = ( a m , s m , P m , X m + 2 α N m ) , ϑ m = ( b m , t m , P m , Y m − 2 α N m ) \xi_{m}=(a_{m},s_{m},\pi_{m},Z_{m}),\quad \eta_{m}=(b_{m},t_{m},\kappa_{m},W_{m}),\quad \zeta_{m}=(a_{m},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m}),\quad \vartheta_{m}=(b_{m},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m}) ξ m = ( a m , s m , π m , Z m ) , η m = ( b m , t m , κ m , W m ) , ζ m = ( a m , s m , P m , X m + 2 α N m ) , ϑ m = ( b m , t m , P m , Y m − 2 α N m )
is R R R -bounded. Moreover, by the last inequalities of Step 3,
F δ − ( ξ m ) − F δ + ( η m ) ≤ ε m + ε m ≤ 2 < 8 α + 2 < R , F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{m})-F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}+\varepsilon_{m}\le2<8\alpha+2<R , F δ − ( ξ m ) − F δ + ( η m ) ≤ ε m + ε m ≤ 2 < 8 α + 2 < R ,
so ξ m ∈ S δ , R − \xi_{m}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R} ξ m ∈ S δ , R − and η m ∈ S δ , R + \eta_{m}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R} η m ∈ S δ , R + by Test Data for a Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple and the Admissible Sets §admissible , each of the two data serving as the witness required for the other.
Step 6 (moving onto the forms of the doubling lemma). Put
τ 1 ( m ) = ∣ P m − π m ∣ H + ∥ ( X m + 2 α N m ) − Z m ∥ , τ 2 ( m ) = ∣ P m − κ m ∣ H + ∥ ( Y m − 2 α N m ) − W m ∥ , \tau^{(m)}_{1}=|P_{m}-\pi_{m}|_{H}+\bigl\lVert (X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})-Z_{m}\bigr\rVert ,\qquad \tau^{(m)}_{2}=|P_{m}-\kappa_{m}|_{H}+\bigl\lVert (Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})-W_{m}\bigr\rVert , τ 1 ( m ) = ∣ P m − π m ∣ H + ( X m + 2 α N m ) − Z m , τ 2 ( m ) = ∣ P m − κ m ∣ H + ( Y m − 2 α N m ) − W m ,
which are nonnegative. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle and Step 4,
∣ P m − π m ∣ H ≤ α ∣ ( a m − b m ) − ( x ^ − y ^ ) ∣ H + ∣ p ˉ + p − π m ∣ H + ∣ p ∣ H ≤ 4 α ε m + 2 ε m + σ , |P_{m}-\pi_{m}|_{H}\le\alpha\bigl|(a_{m}-b_{m})-(\hat{x}-\hat{y})\bigr|_{H}+\bigl|\bar{p}+p-\pi_{m}\bigr|_{H}+|p|_{H}\le4\alpha\varepsilon_{m}+2\varepsilon_{m}+\sigma , ∣ P m − π m ∣ H ≤ α ( a m − b m ) − ( x ^ − y ^ ) H + p ˉ + p − π m H + ∣ p ∣ H ≤ 4 α ε m + 2 ε m + σ ,
and the second summand of τ 1 ( m ) \tau^{(m)}_{1} τ 1 ( m ) is at most 2 ε m 2\varepsilon_{m} 2 ε m , so, using ε m ≤ ε 3 \varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3} ε m ≤ 3 ε and 1 ≤ 2 α 1\le2\alpha 1 ≤ 2 α ,
τ 1 ( m ) ≤ ( 4 α + 4 ) ε m + σ ≤ 4 α + 4 3 ε + σ ≤ ( 2 α + 1 ) ε + σ , \tau^{(m)}_{1}\le(4\alpha+4)\varepsilon_{m}+\sigma\le\tfrac{4\alpha+4}{3}\,\varepsilon+\sigma\le(2\alpha+1)\varepsilon+\sigma , τ 1 ( m ) ≤ ( 4 α + 4 ) ε m + σ ≤ 3 4 α + 4 ε + σ ≤ ( 2 α + 1 ) ε + σ ,
the last step because 4 α + 4 ≤ 6 α + 3 4\alpha+4\le6\alpha+3 4 α + 4 ≤ 6 α + 3 . The same bound holds for τ 2 ( m ) \tau^{(m)}_{2} τ 2 ( m ) , since ∣ κ m − ( p ˉ − q ) ∣ H < 2 ε m |\kappa_{m}-(\bar{p}-q)|_{H}<2\varepsilon_{m} ∣ κ m − ( p ˉ − q ) ∣ H < 2 ε m and ∣ q ∣ H ≤ σ |q|_{H}\le\sigma ∣ q ∣ H ≤ σ .
Applying the first condition of The Shift-Continuity Condition on Admissible Test Data §modulus to ξ m ∈ S δ , R − \xi_{m}\in S^{-}_{\delta,R} ξ m ∈ S δ , R − with the perturbations P m − π m ∈ H P_{m}-\pi_{m}\in H P m − π m ∈ H and ( X m + 2 α N m ) − Z m ∈ S y m ( H ) (X_{m}+2\alpha N_{m})-Z_{m}\in\mathrm{Sym}(H) ( X m + 2 α N m ) − Z m ∈ Sym ( H ) , whose norms sum to τ 1 ( m ) \tau^{(m)}_{1} τ 1 ( m ) , gives
F δ − ( ζ m ) ≤ F δ − ( ξ m ) + ω ( τ 1 ( m ) ) ≤ ε m + ω ( τ 1 ( m ) ) , F^{-}_{\delta}(\zeta_{m})\ \le\ F^{-}_{\delta}(\xi_{m})+\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{1}\bigr)\ \le\ \varepsilon_{m}+\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{1}\bigr), F δ − ( ζ m ) ≤ F δ − ( ξ m ) + ω ( τ 1 ( m ) ) ≤ ε m + ω ( τ 1 ( m ) ) ,
and applying the second condition to η m ∈ S δ , R + \eta_{m}\in S^{+}_{\delta,R} η m ∈ S δ , R + with the perturbations P m − κ m P_{m}-\kappa_{m} P m − κ m and ( Y m − 2 α N m ) − W m (Y_{m}-2\alpha N_{m})-W_{m} ( Y m − 2 α N m ) − W m gives
− ε m − ω ( τ 2 ( m ) ) ≤ F δ + ( η m ) − ω ( τ 2 ( m ) ) ≤ F δ + ( ϑ m ) . -\varepsilon_{m}-\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{2}\bigr)\ \le\ F^{+}_{\delta}(\eta_{m})-\omega\bigl(\tau^{(m)}_{2}\bigr)\ \le\ F^{+}_{\delta}(\vartheta_{m}). − ε m − ω ( τ 2 ( m ) ) ≤ F δ + ( η m ) − ω ( τ 2 ( m ) ) ≤ F δ + ( ϑ m ) .
Step 7 (removing the tail). Each of the estimates
∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H < 2 ε m , ∣ b m − y ^ ∣ H < 2 ε m , ∣ s m − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m , ∣ t m − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m , ∣ P m − p ˉ ∣ H ≤ 4 α ε m |a_{m}-\hat{x}|_{H}<2\varepsilon_{m},\quad |b_{m}-\hat{y}|_{H}<2\varepsilon_{m},\quad |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon_{m},\quad |t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon_{m},\quad |P_{m}-\bar{p}|_{H}\le4\alpha\varepsilon_{m} ∣ a m − x ^ ∣ H < 2 ε m , ∣ b m − y ^ ∣ H < 2 ε m , ∣ s m − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m , ∣ t m − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m , ∣ P m − p ˉ ∣ H ≤ 4 α ε m
of Steps 4 and 6 is of the form D m ≤ K m D_{m}\le\tfrac{K}{m} D m ≤ m K for a nonnegative real K K K not depending on m m m , because ε m ≤ 1 m \varepsilon_{m}\le\tfrac{1}{m} ε m ≤ m 1 . Given a positive real ϵ \epsilon ϵ , Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero , applied with the positive real ϵ K + 1 \tfrac{\epsilon}{K+1} K + 1 ϵ , provides m ∗ ∈ N m_{\ast}\in\mathbb{N} m ∗ ∈ N with 1 m ∗ < ϵ K + 1 \tfrac{1}{m_{\ast}}<\tfrac{\epsilon}{K+1} m ∗ 1 < K + 1 ϵ , and then K m ≤ K + 1 m ≤ K + 1 m ∗ < ϵ \tfrac{K}{m}\le\tfrac{K+1}{m}\le\tfrac{K+1}{m_{\ast}}<\epsilon m K ≤ m K + 1 ≤ m ∗ K + 1 < ϵ for every m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with m ∗ ≤ m m_{\ast}\le m m ∗ ≤ m . By Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space the sequence ( a m ) m ∈ N (a_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( a m ) m ∈ N therefore converges in H H H to x ^ \hat{x} x ^ , the sequence ( b m ) m ∈ N (b_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( b m ) m ∈ N converges in H H H to y ^ \hat{y} y ^ , the sequences ( s m ) m ∈ N (s_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( s m ) m ∈ N and ( t m ) m ∈ N (t_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( t m ) m ∈ N converge in R \mathbb{R} R to u δ − ( x ^ ) u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x}) u δ − ( x ^ ) and to v δ + ( y ^ ) v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y}) v δ + ( y ^ ) , and ( P m ) m ∈ N (P_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} ( P m ) m ∈ N converges in H H H to p ˉ \bar{p} p ˉ . All the a m a_{m} a m and b m b_{m} b m lie in D ( A ) = W D(A)=W D ( A ) = W .
By Step 5 the test datum ζ m \zeta_{m} ζ m is R R R -bounded for every m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N . Hence The Tail-Insensitivity Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §lower , applied with the positive numbers β = 2 α \beta=2\alpha β = 2 α , R R R and ρ \rho ρ , with δ \delta δ , and with the sequences ( a m ) (a_{m}) ( a m ) , ( s m ) (s_{m}) ( s m ) , ( P m ) (P_{m}) ( P m ) and ( X m ) (X_{m}) ( X m ) , provides m 1 ∈ N m_{1}\in\mathbb{N} m 1 ∈ N such that every m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with m 1 ≤ m m_{1}\le m m 1 ≤ m satisfies
F δ − ( a m , s m , P m , X m ) ≤ F δ − ( ζ m ) + ρ . F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(a_{m},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr)\ \le\ F^{-}_{\delta}(\zeta_{m})+\rho . F δ − ( a m , s m , P m , X m ) ≤ F δ − ( ζ m ) + ρ .
Likewise ϑ m \vartheta_{m} ϑ m is R R R -bounded for every m m m , so The Tail-Insensitivity Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §upper , applied with the same β \beta β , R R R , ρ \rho ρ and δ \delta δ and with the sequences ( b m ) (b_{m}) ( b m ) , ( t m ) (t_{m}) ( t m ) , ( P m ) (P_{m}) ( P m ) and ( Y m ) (Y_{m}) ( Y m ) , provides m 2 ∈ N m_{2}\in\mathbb{N} m 2 ∈ N such that every m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with m 2 ≤ m m_{2}\le m m 2 ≤ m satisfies
F δ + ( ϑ m ) − ρ ≤ F δ + ( b m , t m , P m , Y m ) . F^{+}_{\delta}(\vartheta_{m})-\rho\ \le\ F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(b_{m},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr). F δ + ( ϑ m ) − ρ ≤ F δ + ( b m , t m , P m , Y m ) .
Fix from now on an m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N with m 1 ≤ m m_{1}\le m m 1 ≤ m and m 2 ≤ m m_{2}\le m m 2 ≤ m , and set x 1 = a m x_{1}=a_{m} x 1 = a m , y 1 = b m y_{1}=b_{m} y 1 = b m , τ 1 = τ 1 ( m ) \tau_{1}=\tau^{(m)}_{1} τ 1 = τ 1 ( m ) and τ 2 = τ 2 ( m ) \tau_{2}=\tau^{(m)}_{2} τ 2 = τ 2 ( m ) . Combining the last two displays with Step 6,
F δ − ( x 1 , s m , P m , X m ) ≤ ε m + ω ( τ 1 ) + ρ , − ε m − ω ( τ 2 ) − ρ ≤ F δ + ( y 1 , t m , P m , Y m ) . F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr)\le\varepsilon_{m}+\omega(\tau_{1})+\rho,\qquad -\varepsilon_{m}-\omega(\tau_{2})-\rho\le F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(y_{1},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr). F δ − ( x 1 , s m , P m , X m ) ≤ ε m + ω ( τ 1 ) + ρ , − ε m − ω ( τ 2 ) − ρ ≤ F δ + ( y 1 , t m , P m , Y m ) .
Step 8 (the structure condition). We have x 1 , y 1 ∈ D ( A ) = W x_{1},y_{1}\in D(A)=W x 1 , y 1 ∈ D ( A ) = W , ∣ t m ∣ ≤ B + 1 ≤ 3 B + 2 |t_{m}|\le B+1\le3B+2 ∣ t m ∣ ≤ B + 1 ≤ 3 B + 2 , 1 < α 1<\alpha 1 < α , 0 < δ < 1 0<\delta<1 0 < δ < 1 and P m = α ( x 1 − y 1 ) P_{m}=\alpha(x_{1}-y_{1}) P m = α ( x 1 − y 1 ) , and the pair ( X m , Y m ) (X_{m},Y_{m}) ( X m , Y m ) is admitted at α \alpha α by Step 2. Hence The Second-Order Structure Condition for an Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §pair , applied to the second-order structure pair ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) (\omega_{1},\omega_{2}) ( ω 1 , ω 2 ) at 3 B + 2 3B+2 3 B + 2 with the value argument t m t_{m} t m and the form arguments X m X_{m} X m and Y m Y_{m} Y m , gives
F δ + ( y 1 , t m , P m , Y m ) − Ω ≤ F δ − ( x 1 , t m , P m , X m ) , F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(y_{1},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr)-\Omega\ \le\ F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},t_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr), F δ + ( y 1 , t m , P m , Y m ) − Ω ≤ F δ − ( x 1 , t m , P m , X m ) ,
where
Ω = ω 1 ( α ∣ x 1 − y 1 ∣ H 2 + 1 α ) + ω 2 ( δ ( h ( x 1 ) + h ( y 1 ) + 1 ) , α ) , \Omega=\omega_{1}\Bigl(\alpha|x_{1}-y_{1}|_{H}^{2}+\tfrac{1}{\alpha}\Bigr)+\omega_{2}\bigl(\delta\,(h(x_{1})+h(y_{1})+1),\,\alpha\bigr), Ω = ω 1 ( α ∣ x 1 − y 1 ∣ H 2 + α 1 ) + ω 2 ( δ ( h ( x 1 ) + h ( y 1 ) + 1 ) , α ) ,
a nonnegative number because ω 1 \omega_{1} ω 1 and the function t ↦ ω 2 ( t , α ) t\mapsto\omega_{2}(t,\alpha) t ↦ ω 2 ( t , α ) are moduli of continuity, whose values are nonnegative by clause 1 of Modulus of Continuity .
Step 9 (properness and conclusion). Since ∣ s m − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m ≤ ε |s_{m}-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<3\varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon ∣ s m − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m ≤ ε and ∣ t m − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m ≤ ε |t_{m}-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<3\varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon ∣ t m − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < 3 ε m ≤ ε ,
u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ≤ ( s m + ε ) − ( t m − ε ) = s m − t m + 2 ε . ( ∗ ) u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})\le(s_{m}+\varepsilon)-(t_{m}-\varepsilon)=s_{m}-t_{m}+2\varepsilon . \tag{$*$} u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ≤ ( s m + ε ) − ( t m − ε ) = s m − t m + 2 ε . ( ∗ )
Suppose first that t m ≤ s m t_{m}\le s_{m} t m ≤ s m . By Step 5 we have 0 ≤ δ h ( x 1 ) ≤ 2 B + 1 0\le\delta h(x_{1})\le2B+1 0 ≤ δ h ( x 1 ) ≤ 2 B + 1 , ∣ s m ∣ ≤ B + 1 |s_{m}|\le B+1 ∣ s m ∣ ≤ B + 1 and ∣ t m ∣ ≤ B + 1 |t_{m}|\le B+1 ∣ t m ∣ ≤ B + 1 , so both s m + δ h ( x 1 ) s_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}) s m + δ h ( x 1 ) and t m + δ h ( x 1 ) t_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}) t m + δ h ( x 1 ) lie between − ( 3 B + 2 ) -(3B+2) − ( 3 B + 2 ) and 3 B + 2 3B+2 3 B + 2 , and t m + δ h ( x 1 ) ≤ s m + δ h ( x 1 ) t_{m}+\delta h(x_{1})\le s_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}) t m + δ h ( x 1 ) ≤ s m + δ h ( x 1 ) . Applying Locally Strictly Proper Second-Order Equation Operator on a Hilbert Triple §constant at the level 3 B + 2 3B+2 3 B + 2 , with the point x 1 x_{1} x 1 , the gradient argument P m + δ A x 1 ∈ H P_{m}+\delta Ax_{1}\in H P m + δ A x 1 ∈ H and the form argument X m ∣ V + δ I V ∈ S y m ( V ) X_{m}|_{V}+\delta I_{V}\in\mathrm{Sym}(V) X m ∣ V + δ I V ∈ Sym ( V ) , and reading the two resulting values of F F F through Second-Order Equation Operator on an Open Subset of a Hilbert Triple and Its δ \delta δ -Shifts §shifted , we obtain
λ ( s m − t m ) = λ ( ( s m + δ h ( x 1 ) ) − ( t m + δ h ( x 1 ) ) ) ≤ F δ − ( x 1 , s m , P m , X m ) − F δ − ( x 1 , t m , P m , X m ) . \lambda(s_{m}-t_{m})=\lambda\bigl((s_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}))-(t_{m}+\delta h(x_{1}))\bigr)\le F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},s_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr)-F^{-}_{\delta}\bigl(x_{1},t_{m},P_{m},X_{m}\bigr). λ ( s m − t m ) = λ ( ( s m + δ h ( x 1 )) − ( t m + δ h ( x 1 )) ) ≤ F δ − ( x 1 , s m , P m , X m ) − F δ − ( x 1 , t m , P m , X m ) .
Combining this with Step 8 and the two inequalities at the end of Step 7,
λ ( s m − t m ) ≤ ε m + ω ( τ 1 ) + ρ − F δ + ( y 1 , t m , P m , Y m ) + Ω ≤ 2 ε m + 2 ρ + ω ( τ 1 ) + ω ( τ 2 ) + Ω . \lambda(s_{m}-t_{m})\le\varepsilon_{m}+\omega(\tau_{1})+\rho-F^{+}_{\delta}\bigl(y_{1},t_{m},P_{m},Y_{m}\bigr)+\Omega\ \le\ 2\varepsilon_{m}+2\rho+\omega(\tau_{1})+\omega(\tau_{2})+\Omega . λ ( s m − t m ) ≤ ε m + ω ( τ 1 ) + ρ − F δ + ( y 1 , t m , P m , Y m ) + Ω ≤ 2 ε m + 2 ρ + ω ( τ 1 ) + ω ( τ 2 ) + Ω.
Since ε m ≤ ε 1 = ε 3 \varepsilon_{m}\le\varepsilon_{1}=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3} ε m ≤ ε 1 = 3 ε and ρ = ε 6 \rho=\tfrac{\varepsilon}{6} ρ = 6 ε , we have 2 ε m + 2 ρ ≤ 2 ε 3 + ε 3 = ε 2\varepsilon_{m}+2\rho\le\tfrac{2\varepsilon}{3}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}=\varepsilon 2 ε m + 2 ρ ≤ 3 2 ε + 3 ε = ε . Multiplying ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) by the positive number λ \lambda λ and adding 2 λ ε 2\lambda\varepsilon 2 λ ε to the previous display gives
λ ( u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ) ≤ 2 λ ε + 2 ε + ω ( τ 1 ) + ω ( τ 2 ) + Ω , \lambda\bigl(u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})\bigr)\le2\lambda\varepsilon+2\varepsilon+\omega(\tau_{1})+\omega(\tau_{2})+\Omega , λ ( u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ) ≤ 2 λ ε + 2 ε + ω ( τ 1 ) + ω ( τ 2 ) + Ω ,
which is the asserted estimate.
Suppose now that s m < t m s_{m}<t_{m} s m < t m . Then ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) gives u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) < 2 ε u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})<2\varepsilon u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) < 2 ε , so λ ( u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ) < 2 λ ε \lambda\bigl(u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})\bigr)<2\lambda\varepsilon λ ( u δ − ( x ^ ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ) < 2 λ ε , and the asserted estimate holds because its remaining right-hand terms are nonnegative: the values of the modulus of continuity ω \omega ω are nonnegative by clause 1 of Modulus of Continuity , Ω \Omega Ω is nonnegative by Step 8, and 0 < 2 ε 0<2\varepsilon 0 < 2 ε .
In both cases x 1 , y 1 ∈ D ( A ) x_{1},y_{1}\in D(A) x 1 , y 1 ∈ D ( A ) satisfy ∣ x 1 − x ^ ∣ H < ε |x_{1}-\hat{x}|_{H}<\varepsilon ∣ x 1 − x ^ ∣ H < ε , ∣ y 1 − y ^ ∣ H < ε |y_{1}-\hat{y}|_{H}<\varepsilon ∣ y 1 − y ^ ∣ H < ε , ∣ u δ − ( x 1 ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < ε |u^{-}_{\delta}(x_{1})-u^{-}_{\delta}(\hat{x})|<\varepsilon ∣ u δ − ( x 1 ) − u δ − ( x ^ ) ∣ < ε and ∣ v δ + ( y 1 ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < ε |v^{+}_{\delta}(y_{1})-v^{+}_{\delta}(\hat{y})|<\varepsilon ∣ v δ + ( y 1 ) − v δ + ( y ^ ) ∣ < ε by Step 4, and τ 1 , τ 2 \tau_{1},\tau_{2} τ 1 , τ 2 are nonnegative and at most ( 2 α + 1 ) ε + σ (2\alpha+1)\varepsilon+\sigma ( 2 α + 1 ) ε + σ by Step 6.