TheoremBase

Proof of The Discrete Dyson Energy per Particle: Bounds, Compactness with a Lower Limit, and Recovery Configurations with Separated Particles

lemmalem:dyson-discrete-energy-limits-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 17,761 chars · 29 deps · depth 45 Reason: Proof of bounds, the Gamma-liminf and recovery with separated particles for the discrete Dyson energy.

The uniform lower bound on the particle potential gives the bounds and a superquadratic moment bound, hence Wasserstein compactness; truncated interaction kernels pass to the limit along weakly convergent squares of empirical measures. Recovery configurations are block means of a truncated measure, spread by a small linear ramp, with Jensen-type tangent bounds for the logarithm and the potential.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here.

Conventions. By The N-Particle Dyson Game and its Mean-Field Limit: Standing Data and Equations §particles, The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability is in force; let c1,C1c_{1},C_{1} be the constants of The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §lower and a0,b0a_{0},b_{0} those of The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses. VV and V′V' are continuous and Borel by A Confining Potential and Its Derivative are Continuous and Borel §continuous and A Confining Potential and Its Derivative are Continuous and Borel §borel. ℓ\ell is the logarithmic kernel, Borel by The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure §borel, with diagonal Δ\Delta; we write (s,t)(s,t) for the point ι(s,t)\iota(s,t) of R2\mathbb{R}^{2} given by the concatenation map of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets, and A×BA\times B for ι(A×B)\iota(A\times B). For ρ,ρ′∈P(R)\rho,\rho'\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) we use the following fact (F): for every Borel F:R2→[0,∞]F:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to[0,\infty]

∫F d(ρ⊠ρ′)=∫R(∫RF(s,t) ρ′(dt))ρ(ds)=∫R(∫RF(s,t) ρ(ds))ρ′(dt),\int F\,d(\rho\boxtimes\rho')=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}F(s,t)\,\rho'(dt)\Bigr)\rho(ds)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}F(s,t)\,\rho(ds)\Bigr)\rho'(dt),

and the same identities hold for ρ⊠ρ′\rho\boxtimes\rho'-integrable Borel F:R2→RF:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R}, the inner integrals being defined off null sets. This is Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product combined with the Tonelli and Fubini parts of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables. In particular (ρ⊠ρ′)(A×B)=ρ(A)ρ′(B)(\rho\boxtimes\rho')(A\times B)=\rho(A)\rho'(B), the marginals of ρ⊠ρ′\rho\boxtimes\rho' are ρ\rho and ρ′\rho', and, as ℓ(s,t)=ℓ(t,s)\ell(s,t)=\ell(t,s), ∫A×Bℓ d(ρ⊠ρ)=∫B×Aℓ d(ρ⊠ρ)\int_{A\times B}\ell\,d(\rho\boxtimes\rho)=\int_{B\times A}\ell\,d(\rho\boxtimes\rho) for Borel A,BA,B whenever ℓ\ell is ρ⊠ρ\rho\boxtimes\rho-integrable. For x∈RNx\in\mathbb{R}^{N}, (F) and Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §integral (with q=1q=1), used twice, give (E): ∫F d(μxN⊠μxN)=N−2∑i,j=1NF(xi,xj)\int F\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})=N^{-2}\sum_{i,j=1}^{N}F(x_{i},x_{j}) for every Borel FF bounded below.

For x∈WNx\in W_{N} and i<ji<j we have xi−xj=∣xi−xj∣>0x_{i}-x_{j}=|x_{i}-x_{j}|>0 by The Weyl Chamber of Ordered Points in Euclidean Space, so by The Logarithmic Energy of N Ordered Particles on the Weyl Chamber §energy and the symmetry of ℓ\ell, HbN(x)=bN∑i<jℓ(xi,xj)=bN2∑i≠jℓ(xi,xj)H_{b_{N}}(x)=b_{N}\sum_{i<j}\ell(x_{i},x_{j})=\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}\ell(x_{i},x_{j}). With bN=β/(2(N−1))b_{N}=\beta/(2(N-1)) and Sx=N−2∑i≠jℓ(xi,xj)S_{x}=N^{-2}\sum_{i\ne j}\ell(x_{i},x_{j}) this reads

PN(x)N=β4 NN−1 Sx+1N∑k=1NV(xk).(P)\frac{P_{N}(x)}{N}=\frac{\beta}{4}\,\frac{N}{N-1}\,S_{x}+\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^{N}V(x_{k}).\qquad(\mathrm{P})

Step 1 (Bounds). By Confining Potentials on the Real Line §superquadratic with M=1M=1 there is a positive KK with t2≤V(t)t^{2}\le V(t) for ∣t∣≥K|t|\ge K, and by The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses, V(t)≥a0∣t∣−b0≥−∣b0∣V(t)\ge a_{0}|t|-b_{0}\ge-|b_{0}| for every tt. Put KV=K2+∣b0∣K_{V}=K^{2}+|b_{0}|. Then

V(t)≥t2−KVandV(t)≥−KVfor every t∈R,(1)V(t)\ge t^{2}-K_{V}\quad\text{and}\quad V(t)\ge-K_{V}\qquad\text{for every }t\in\mathbb{R},\qquad(1)

the first for ∣t∣<K|t|<K because t2−KV≤−∣b0∣t^{2}-K_{V}\le-|b_{0}| there. Let e∗=−(c1KV+C1)e_{*}=-(c_{1}K_{V}+C_{1}) and A0=1/c1>0A_{0}=1/c_{1}>0. For N≥2N\ge2 and x∈WNx\in W_{N}, The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §lower and (1) give PN(x)≥c1∑kV(xk)−C1N≥−c1KVN−C1N=e∗NP_{N}(x)\ge c_{1}\sum_{k}V(x_{k})-C_{1}N\ge-c_{1}K_{V}N-C_{1}N=e_{*}N, and

∥x∥2=∑k=1Nxk2≤∑k=1NV(xk)+KVN≤PN(x)+C1Nc1+KVN=A0(PN(x)−e∗N)≤A0(N+PN(x)−e∗N).\lVert x\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{N}x_{k}^{2}\le\sum_{k=1}^{N}V(x_{k})+K_{V}N\le\frac{P_{N}(x)+C_{1}N}{c_{1}}+K_{V}N=A_{0}\bigl(P_{N}(x)-e_{*}N\bigr)\le A_{0}\bigl(N+P_{N}(x)-e_{*}N\bigr).

This is claim The Discrete Dyson Energy per Particle: Bounds, Compactness with a Lower Limit, and Recovery Configurations with Separated Particles §bounds.

Step 2 (Compactness and lower limit). Let (Nk)(N_{k}), (xk)(x^{k}) and cc be as in claim The Discrete Dyson Energy per Particle: Bounds, Compactness with a Lower Limit, and Recovery Configurations with Separated Particles §liminf, write μk=μxkNk\mu_{k}=\mu^{N_{k}}_{x^{k}} and ak=PNk(xk)/Nka_{k}=P_{N_{k}}(x^{k})/N_{k}, so that e∗≤ak≤ce_{*}\le a_{k}\le c by Step 1.

(2a) Compactness. By Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §moment and Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §integral, μk∈P2(R)\mu_{k}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}), VV is μk\mu_{k}-integrable, and by The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §lower

∫V dμk=1Nk∑iV(xik)≤ak+C1c1≤c+C1c1.\int V\,d\mu_{k}=\frac{1}{N_{k}}\sum_{i}V(x^{k}_{i})\le\frac{a_{k}+C_{1}}{c_{1}}\le\frac{c+C_{1}}{c_{1}} .

VV is Borel, bounded below by (1), and superquadratic in the sense of Wasserstein Convergence from Weak Convergence with Uniformly Integrable Second Moments, and Wasserstein Compactness under a Superquadratic Moment Bound §compactness (with m=1m=1) by Confining Potentials on the Real Line §superquadratic. That clause gives ν∈P2(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and a strictly increasing (kj)(k_{j}) with W2(μkj,ν)→0W_{2}(\mu_{k_{j}},\nu)\to0. Write μj′=μkj\mu_{j}'=\mu_{k_{j}}, Nj′=NkjN_{j}'=N_{k_{j}}, aj′=akja_{j}'=a_{k_{j}} and ℓ∗=lim inf⁡jaj′\ell_{*}=\liminf_{j}a_{j}', the limit inferior of a sequence in [e∗,c][e_{*},c]; note Nj′≥jN_{j}'\ge j, so Nj′→∞N_{j}'\to\infty.

(2b) The squares converge weakly. Let f:R2→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and Lipschitz with constant LL. For each ss, t↦f(s,t)t\mapsto f(s,t) and t↦f(t,s)t\mapsto f(t,s) are bounded and Lipschitz with constant LL on R\mathbb{R}, since ∥(s,t)−(s,t′)∥=∣t−t′∣\lVert(s,t)-(s,t')\rVert=|t-t'|. For every π∈Π(μj′,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu_{j}',\nu), finite in cost by Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §cost-finite, Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz bounds ∣∫f(s,t)μj′(dt)−∫f(s,t)ν(dt)∣|\int f(s,t)\mu_{j}'(dt)-\int f(s,t)\nu(dt)| by LI(π)L\sqrt{I(\pi)}; taking the infimum over π\pi as in The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance, the bound L W2(μj′,ν)L\,W_{2}(\mu_{j}',\nu) follows, and likewise in the other variable. By (F), inserting μj′⊠ν\mu_{j}'\boxtimes\nu,

∣∫f d(μj′⊠μj′)−∫f d(ν⊠ν)∣≤2L W2(μj′,ν)→0.\Bigl|\int f\,d(\mu_{j}'\boxtimes\mu_{j}')-\int f\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\Bigr|\le2L\,W_{2}(\mu_{j}',\nu)\to0 .

By claim 1 of Portmanteau Theorem on a Metric Space on R2\mathbb{R}^{2}, μj′⊠μj′\mu_{j}'\boxtimes\mu_{j}' converges weakly to ν⊠ν\nu\boxtimes\nu.

(2c) Truncated kernels. For a natural number M≥1M\ge1 let ℓM(s,t)=min⁡{ℓ(s,t),M}\ell_{M}(s,t)=\min\{\ell(s,t),M\} for s≠ts\ne t and ℓM(s,s)=M\ell_{M}(s,s)=M. On the open set {∣s−t∣<e−M}\{|s-t|<e^{-M}\}, which contains Δ\Delta, ℓM≡M\ell_{M}\equiv M; on the open set {s≠t}\{s\ne t\}, ℓM=min⁡{−log⁡∣s−t∣,M}\ell_{M}=\min\{-\log|s-t|,M\} is continuous; so ℓM\ell_{M} is continuous. By The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure §lower-bound and M>0M>0, ℓM(s,t)≥−∣s∣−∣t∣\ell_{M}(s,t)\ge-|s|-|t|. Put κ=KV+β2/16\kappa=K_{V}+\beta^{2}/16 and

kM(s,t)=β4ℓM(s,t)+12(V(s)+V(t)),k(s,t)=β4ℓ(s,t)+12(V(s)+V(t)),k_{M}(s,t)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\ell_{M}(s,t)+\tfrac12\bigl(V(s)+V(t)\bigr),\qquad k(s,t)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\ell(s,t)+\tfrac12\bigl(V(s)+V(t)\bigr),

continuous, respectively Borel. Since β4∣s∣≤s22+β232\frac{\beta}{4}|s|\le\frac{s^{2}}{2}+\frac{\beta^{2}}{32}, (1) and the two lower bounds for ℓ\ell and ℓM\ell_{M} give kM≥−κk_{M}\ge-\kappa and k≥−κk\ge-\kappa off Δ\Delta; on Δ\Delta, kM(s,s)≥V(s)≥−κk_{M}(s,s)\ge V(s)\ge-\kappa and k(s,s)=V(s)≥−κk(s,s)=V(s)\ge-\kappa. Moreover kM≤kM+1k_{M}\le k_{M+1}, and sup⁡MkM=k\sup_{M}k_{M}=k off Δ\Delta, =+∞=+\infty on Δ\Delta.

(2d) Empirical bound. Let N≥2N\ge2, x∈WNx\in W_{N} with PN(x)≤cNP_{N}(x)\le cN, and μ=μxN\mu=\mu^{N}_{x}. By (E), ℓM≤ℓ\ell_{M}\le\ell off Δ\Delta and ∑i≠j12(V(xi)+V(xj))=(N−1)∑iV(xi)\sum_{i\ne j}\tfrac12(V(x_{i})+V(x_{j}))=(N-1)\sum_{i}V(x_{i}),

∫kM d(μ⊠μ)≤β4Sx+1N∑iV(xi)+β4 MN.\int k_{M}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\le\frac{\beta}{4}S_{x}+\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i}V(x_{i})+\frac{\beta}{4}\,\frac{M}{N}.

By The Logarithmic Kernel on the Real Line: Borel Measurability, a Linear Lower Bound, and the Null Diagonal of an Atomless Measure §lower-bound, ∣xi∣≤12(1+xi2)|x_{i}|\le\frac12(1+x_{i}^{2}) and Step 1, Sx≥−2N∑i∣xi∣≥−(1+∥x∥2/N)≥−s0S_{x}\ge-\frac{2}{N}\sum_{i}|x_{i}|\ge-\bigl(1+\lVert x\rVert^{2}/N\bigr)\ge-s_{0} with s0=1+A0(1+c−e∗)s_{0}=1+A_{0}(1+c-e_{*}). Hence NN−1Sx≥Sx−s0N−1\frac{N}{N-1}S_{x}\ge S_{x}-\frac{s_{0}}{N-1} (trivially if Sx≥0S_{x}\ge0), and with (P)

∫kM d(μxN⊠μxN)≤PN(x)N+εN,M,εN,M=β4(s0N−1+MN).(2)\int k_{M}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\le\frac{P_{N}(x)}{N}+\varepsilon_{N,M},\qquad\varepsilon_{N,M}=\frac{\beta}{4}\Bigl(\frac{s_{0}}{N-1}+\frac{M}{N}\Bigr).\qquad(2)

(2e) Passage to the limit. Fix MM, and a natural number L≥1L\ge1. The function min⁡{kM,L}+κ\min\{k_{M},L\}+\kappa is continuous, with values in [0,L+κ][0,L+\kappa], so by (2b) and Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space, its integrals GjG_{j} against μj′⊠μj′\mu_{j}'\boxtimes\mu_{j}' converge to its integral GG against ν⊠ν\nu\boxtimes\nu; by (2), Gj≤aj′+εNj′,M+κG_{j}\le a_{j}'+\varepsilon_{N_{j}',M}+\kappa. Given η>0\eta>0, choose jj so large that Gj>G−ηG_{j}>G-\eta, εNj′,M<η\varepsilon_{N_{j}',M}<\eta and aj′<ℓ∗+ηa_{j}'<\ell_{*}+\eta (possible by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Limit Inferior and Limit Superior of a Bounded Real Sequence); then G<ℓ∗+κ+3ηG<\ell_{*}+\kappa+3\eta. Hence G≤ℓ∗+κG\le\ell_{*}+\kappa. Letting L→∞L\to\infty, Monotone Convergence Theorem gives ∫(kM+κ) d(ν⊠ν)≤ℓ∗+κ\int(k_{M}+\kappa)\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\le\ell_{*}+\kappa; letting then M→∞M\to\infty, again by Monotone Convergence Theorem and (2c),

∫sup⁡M(kM+κ) d(ν⊠ν)≤ℓ∗+κ<∞.\int\sup_{M}(k_{M}+\kappa)\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\le\ell_{*}+\kappa<\infty .

As sup⁡M(kM+κ)=+∞\sup_{M}(k_{M}+\kappa)=+\infty on Δ\Delta, (ν⊠ν)(Δ)=0(\nu\boxtimes\nu)(\Delta)=0; so k+κ=sup⁡M(kM+κ)k+\kappa=\sup_{M}(k_{M}+\kappa) almost everywhere and ∫(k+κ) d(ν⊠ν)≤ℓ∗+κ\int(k+\kappa)\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\le\ell_{*}+\kappa.

(2f) ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} and the lower limit. For a∈Ra\in\mathbb{R}, ν({a})2=(ν⊠ν)({a}×{a})≤(ν⊠ν)(Δ)=0\nu(\{a\})^{2}=(\nu\boxtimes\nu)(\{a\}\times\{a\})\le(\nu\boxtimes\nu)(\Delta)=0, so ν\nu is atomless. Let g(s,t)=12(V(s)+V(t))+KV≥0g(s,t)=\frac12(V(s)+V(t))+K_{V}\ge0. From k=β4ℓ+g−KVk=\frac{\beta}{4}\ell+g-K_{V} and ℓ≥−∣s∣−∣t∣\ell\ge-|s|-|t| we get 0≤g≤(k+κ)+β4(∣s∣+∣t∣)+KV0\le g\le(k+\kappa)+\frac{\beta}{4}(|s|+|t|)+K_{V}, which is integrable because ν∈P2(R)\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) and ∣s∣≤12(1+s2)|s|\le\frac12(1+s^{2}); by (F), ∫g d(ν⊠ν)=∫(V+KV) dν\int g\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)=\int(V+K_{V})\,d\nu, so VV is ν\nu-integrable. Then ℓ=4β(k−g+KV)\ell=\frac{4}{\beta}(k-g+K_{V}) is ν⊠ν\nu\boxtimes\nu-integrable. By The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy, ν∈Dlog⁡\nu\in\mathcal{D}_{\log}, and by The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair, ν∈D\nu\in\mathcal{D} with, by (F) for gg,

E(ν)=β4∫ℓ d(ν⊠ν)+∫V dν=∫k d(ν⊠ν)≤ℓ∗.\mathcal{E}(\nu)=\tfrac{\beta}{4}\int\ell\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)+\int V\,d\nu=\int k\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\le\ell_{*}.

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Limit Inferior and Limit Superior of a Bounded Real Sequence gives j0j_{0} with ℓ∗−ε<aj′\ell_{*}-\varepsilon<a_{j}' for j≥j0j\ge j_{0}, so E(ν)≤PNkj(xkj)/Nkj+ε\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le P_{N_{k_{j}}}(x^{k_{j}})/N_{k_{j}}+\varepsilon for j≥j0j\ge j_{0}. This proves claim The Discrete Dyson Energy per Particle: Bounds, Compactness with a Lower Limit, and Recovery Configurations with Separated Particles §liminf.

Step 3 (Recovery). Let μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D} and ε>0\varepsilon>0; thus μ\mu is atomless, ℓ\ell is μ⊠μ\mu\boxtimes\mu-integrable and VV is μ\mu-integrable.

(3a) Truncation. For a natural number n≥1n\ge1 let In=[−n,n]I_{n}=[-n,n] and pn=μ(In)p_{n}=\mu(I_{n}). Since 1In↑1\mathbf{1}_{I_{n}}\uparrow1 pointwise, pn→1p_{n}\to1 by Monotone Convergence Theorem; fix n0n_{0} with pn≥12p_{n}\ge\frac12 for n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. For such nn let μn\mu_{n} be the measure with density pn−11Inp_{n}^{-1}\mathbf{1}_{I_{n}} with respect to μ\mu (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables): a probability measure with μn(R∖In)=0\mu_{n}(\mathbb{R}\setminus I_{n})=0, ∫h dμn=pn−1∫h1In dμ\int h\,d\mu_{n}=p_{n}^{-1}\int h\mathbf{1}_{I_{n}}\,d\mu for Borel h≥0h\ge0 and for μ\mu-integrable hh, and μn({a})≤2μ({a})=0\mu_{n}(\{a\})\le2\mu(\{a\})=0. Hence μn∈P2(R)\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}), and by (F) applied twice, ∫F d(μn⊠μn)=pn−2∫F 1In×In d(μ⊠μ)\int F\,d(\mu_{n}\boxtimes\mu_{n})=p_{n}^{-2}\int F\,\mathbf{1}_{I_{n}\times I_{n}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu) for Borel F≥0F\ge0, hence for F=ℓ±F=\ell^{\pm}. So ℓ\ell is μn⊠μn\mu_{n}\boxtimes\mu_{n}-integrable, VV is μn\mu_{n}-integrable, μn∈D\mu_{n}\in\mathcal{D}, and by Dominated Convergence Theorem (dominating functions ∣ℓ∣|\ell| and ∣V∣|V|) and pn→1p_{n}\to1,

Elog⁡(μn)=pn−2∫ℓ 1In×In d(μ⊠μ)→Elog⁡(μ),∫V dμn→∫V dμ,\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu_{n})=p_{n}^{-2}\int\ell\,\mathbf{1}_{I_{n}\times I_{n}}\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)\to\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\mu),\qquad\int V\,d\mu_{n}\to\int V\,d\mu,

so E(μn)→E(μ)\mathcal{E}(\mu_{n})\to\mathcal{E}(\mu). Moreover W2(μn,μ)→0W_{2}(\mu_{n},\mu)\to0 by Wasserstein Convergence from Weak Convergence with Uniformly Integrable Second Moments, and Wasserstein Compactness under a Superquadratic Moment Bound §convergence applied to (μn)n≥n0(\mu_{n})_{n\ge n_{0}}: for bounded continuous ff, ∫f dμn=pn−1∫f1In dμ→∫f dμ\int f\,d\mu_{n}=p_{n}^{-1}\int f\mathbf{1}_{I_{n}}\,d\mu\to\int f\,d\mu by Dominated Convergence Theorem, which is weak convergence; and given η>0\eta>0, Dominated Convergence Theorem applied to s21{∣s∣>K}s^{2}\mathbf{1}_{\{|s|>K\}} (dominated by s2s^{2}) gives KK with ∫{∣s∣>K}s2 dμ<η/2\int_{\{|s|>K\}}s^{2}\,d\mu<\eta/2, whence ∫{∣s∣>K}s2 dμn≤2∫{∣s∣>K}s2 dμ<η\int_{\{|s|>K\}}s^{2}\,d\mu_{n}\le2\int_{\{|s|>K\}}s^{2}\,d\mu<\eta for every n≥n0n\ge n_{0}. Fix R=n≥n0R=n\ge n_{0} with

W2(μR,μ)<ε/3,E(μR)<E(μ)+ε/3,(3)W_{2}(\mu_{R},\mu)<\varepsilon/3,\qquad\mathcal{E}(\mu_{R})<\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\varepsilon/3,\qquad(3)

and write μ^=μR\hat{\mu}=\mu_{R}, I=IRI=I_{R}: an atomless member of D⊆P2(R)\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) with μ^(R∖I)=0\hat{\mu}(\mathbb{R}\setminus I)=0, hence (μ^⊠μ^)(R2∖I×I)=0(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})(\mathbb{R}^{2}\setminus I\times I)=0 by (F).

(3b) Block means. Fix N≥2N\ge2 and let B1,…,BNB_{1},\dots,B_{N} be the quantile blocks of μ^\hat{\mu} at level NN from Quantile Blocks of an Atomless Measure on the Line: Block Maps, Distances to Ordered Empirical Measures, and the Block Test Function; by Quantile Blocks of an Atomless Measure on the Line: Block Maps, Distances to Ordered Empirical Measures, and the Block Test Function §blocks they partition R\mathbb{R} into Borel sets of mass 1N\frac1N, and t<st<s whenever s∈Bis\in B_{i}, t∈Bjt\in B_{j}, i<ji<j. Put yi=N∫Bis μ^(ds)y_{i}=N\int_{B_{i}}s\,\hat{\mu}(ds) (the block average mim_{i} of the lemma; id\mathrm{id} is μ^\hat{\mu}-integrable as ∣s∣≤R|s|\le R a.e.). Then ∣yi∣≤N∫Bi∣s∣ dμ^≤R|y_{i}|\le N\int_{B_{i}}|s|\,d\hat{\mu}\le R. For i<ji<j, (F) gives

yi−yj=N2∫Bi×Bj(s−t) (μ^⊠μ^)(ds,dt)>0,(4)y_{i}-y_{j}=N^{2}\int_{B_{i}\times B_{j}}(s-t)\,(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})(ds,dt)>0,\qquad(4)

the integrand being positive on Bi×BjB_{i}\times B_{j}, a set of measure N−2>0N^{-2}>0. So yy is ordered, indeed strictly decreasing.

(3c) Distance. Let Ji=Bi∩IJ_{i}=B_{i}\cap I, nonempty as μ^(Ji)=1N\hat{\mu}(J_{i})=\frac1N, with ai=inf⁡Jia_{i}=\inf J_{i}, bi=sup⁡Jib_{i}=\sup J_{i} and wi=bi−ai≥0w_{i}=b_{i}-a_{i}\ge0. As yi=N∫Jis dμ^y_{i}=N\int_{J_{i}}s\,d\hat{\mu} is an average of points of [ai,bi][a_{i},b_{i}], ∣yi−s∣≤wi|y_{i}-s|\le w_{i} for s∈Jis\in J_{i}, while μ^(Bi∖Ji)=0\hat{\mu}(B_{i}\setminus J_{i})=0. By the ordering of blocks, bi+1≤aib_{i+1}\le a_{i}, so ∑iwi≤b1−aN≤2R\sum_{i}w_{i}\le b_{1}-a_{N}\le2R. By Quantile Blocks of an Atomless Measure on the Line: Block Maps, Distances to Ordered Empirical Measures, and the Block Test Function §optimal,

W2(μyN,μ^)2=∑i=1N∫Bi(yi−s)2 μ^(ds)≤1N∑iwi2≤1N(∑iwi)2≤4R2N.(5)W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{y},\hat{\mu})^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{N}\int_{B_{i}}(y_{i}-s)^{2}\,\hat{\mu}(ds)\le\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i}w_{i}^{2}\le\frac{1}{N}\Bigl(\sum_{i}w_{i}\Bigr)^{2}\le\frac{4R^{2}}{N}.\qquad(5)

(3d) Energy of the block means. (i) For u,m>0u,m>0, −log⁡u≥−log⁡m−u−mm-\log u\ge-\log m-\frac{u-m}{m}: with z=u/mz=u/m and log⁡u−log⁡m=log⁡z\log u-\log m=\log z (The Natural Logarithm), for z≠1z\ne1 Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval on the interval with endpoints 1,z1,z gives log⁡z=(z−1)/ξ\log z=(z-1)/\xi with ξ\xi strictly between 11 and zz, and (z−1)/ξ<z−1(z-1)/\xi<z-1 in both cases z>1z>1 and z<1z<1. Let i<ji<j and m=yi−yj>0m=y_{i}-y_{j}>0. On Bi×BjB_{i}\times B_{j}, ℓ(s,t)=−log⁡(s−t)≥−log⁡m−(s−t)−mm\ell(s,t)=-\log(s-t)\ge-\log m-\frac{(s-t)-m}{m}; integrating against μ^⊠μ^\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu} (ℓ\ell being integrable) and using (4),

−log⁡(yi−yj)≤N2∫Bi×Bjℓ d(μ^⊠μ^).-\log(y_{i}-y_{j})\le N^{2}\int_{B_{i}\times B_{j}}\ell\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu}).

(ii) Let λR=max⁡{log⁡(2R),0}\lambda_{R}=\max\{\log(2R),0\}. On I×II\times I, ℓ≥−λR\ell\ge-\lambda_{R} (off Δ\Delta, ∣s−t∣≤2R|s-t|\le2R and log⁡\log is increasing; on Δ\Delta, ℓ=0\ell=0), so ∫Bi×Biℓ d(μ^⊠μ^)≥−λRN−2\int_{B_{i}\times B_{i}}\ell\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})\ge-\lambda_{R}N^{-2}. (iii) The sets Bi×BjB_{i}\times B_{j} partition R2\mathbb{R}^{2}, so by the symmetry recorded in (F),

Elog⁡(μ^)=2∑i<j∫Bi×Bjℓ d(μ^⊠μ^)+∑i∫Bi×Biℓ d(μ^⊠μ^),hence∑i<j−log⁡(yi−yj)≤N22(Elog⁡(μ^)+λRN).(6)\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\hat{\mu})=2\sum_{i<j}\int_{B_{i}\times B_{j}}\ell\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})+\sum_{i}\int_{B_{i}\times B_{i}}\ell\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu}),\quad\text{hence}\quad\sum_{i<j}-\log(y_{i}-y_{j})\le\frac{N^{2}}{2}\Bigl(\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\hat{\mu})+\frac{\lambda_{R}}{N}\Bigr).\qquad(6)

(iv) Tangent inequality: for u,u′∈Ru,u'\in\mathbb{R}, V(u′)≥V(u)+V′(u)(u′−u)V(u')\ge V(u)+V'(u)(u'-u). Indeed, by convexity, for 0<θ≤10<\theta\le1, V(u+θ(u′−u))−V(u)≤θ(V(u′)−V(u))V(u+\theta(u'-u))-V(u)\le\theta(V(u')-V(u)); for u′≠uu'\ne u divide by θ\theta and let θ→0\theta\to0, the left side tending to V′(u)(u′−u)V'(u)(u'-u) by Derivative at an Interior Point. Applied with u=yiu=y_{i} and integrated against Nμ^N\hat{\mu} over BiB_{i} (VV being μ^\hat{\mu}-integrable), it gives V(yi)≤N∫BiV dμ^V(y_{i})\le N\int_{B_{i}}V\,d\hat{\mu}, so ∑iV(yi)≤N∫V dμ^\sum_{i}V(y_{i})\le N\int V\,d\hat{\mu}.

(3e) Spreading and choice of constants. By Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval applied to the continuous ∣V′∣|V'| on [−R−1,R+1][-R-1,R+1] there is LR≥0L_{R}\ge0 bounding ∣V′∣|V'| there; by the tangent inequality at uu, V(u)−V(u′)≤LR∣u−u′∣V(u)-V(u')\le L_{R}|u-u'| for u,u′∈[−R−1,R+1]u,u'\in[-R-1,R+1]. Let

c=δ=min⁡{1,ε3(LR+1)},R′=R+1,yi′=yi+δ N−iN(i∈[N]).c=\delta=\min\Bigl\{1,\frac{\varepsilon}{3(L_{R}+1)}\Bigr\},\qquad R'=R+1,\qquad y'_{i}=y_{i}+\delta\,\frac{N-i}{N}\quad(i\in[N]).

Then yi′−yi+1′=yi−yi+1+δN≥cN>0y'_{i}-y'_{i+1}=y_{i}-y_{i+1}+\frac{\delta}{N}\ge\frac{c}{N}>0, so y′∈WNy'\in W_{N}; ∣yi′∣≤R+δ≤R′|y'_{i}|\le R+\delta\le R'; ∣yi′−yi∣≤δ|y'_{i}-y_{i}|\le\delta, so W2(μy′N,μyN)≤δ≤ε/3W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{y'},\mu^{N}_{y})\le\delta\le\varepsilon/3 by Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §lipschitz; V(yi′)≤V(yi)+LRδV(y'_{i})\le V(y_{i})+L_{R}\delta with LRδ<ε/3L_{R}\delta<\varepsilon/3; and for i<ji<j, yi′−yj′≥yi−yj>0y'_{i}-y'_{j}\ge y_{i}-y_{j}>0, so −log⁡(yi′−yj′)≤−log⁡(yi−yj)-\log(y'_{i}-y'_{j})\le-\log(y_{i}-y_{j}). By The Logarithmic Energy of N Ordered Particles on the Weyl Chamber §energy, (6), (3d)(iv) and bNN2/(2N)=β4NN−1b_{N}N^{2}/(2N)=\frac{\beta}{4}\frac{N}{N-1}, with eN=Elog⁡(μ^)+λR/Ne_{N}=\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\hat{\mu})+\lambda_{R}/N and NN−1eN≤eN+∣eN∣N−1\frac{N}{N-1}e_{N}\le e_{N}+\frac{|e_{N}|}{N-1},

PN(y′)N≤β4 NN−1 eN+∫V dμ^+LRδ≤E(μ^)+β4 ∣Elog⁡(μ^)∣+2λRN−1+LRδ.\frac{P_{N}(y')}{N}\le\frac{\beta}{4}\,\frac{N}{N-1}\,e_{N}+\int V\,d\hat{\mu}+L_{R}\delta\le\mathcal{E}(\hat{\mu})+\frac{\beta}{4}\,\frac{|\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\hat{\mu})|+2\lambda_{R}}{N-1}+L_{R}\delta .

Choose N1≥2N_{1}\ge2 with 2R/N≤ε/32R/\sqrt{N}\le\varepsilon/3 and β4(∣Elog⁡(μ^)∣+2λR)/(N−1)≤ε/3\frac{\beta}{4}(|\mathcal{E}_{\log}(\hat{\mu})|+2\lambda_{R})/(N-1)\le\varepsilon/3 for all N≥N1N\ge N_{1}. For such NN and y′y' as above, (3) gives PN(y′)<N(E(μ)+ε)P_{N}(y')<N(\mathcal{E}(\mu)+\varepsilon), and (5), (3) and the triangle inequality of The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle give

W2(μy′N,μ)≤W2(μy′N,μyN)+W2(μyN,μ^)+W2(μ^,μ)<ε3+ε3+ε3=ε.W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{y'},\mu)\le W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{y'},\mu^{N}_{y})+W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{y},\hat{\mu})+W_{2}(\hat{\mu},\mu)<\frac{\varepsilon}{3}+\frac{\varepsilon}{3}+\frac{\varepsilon}{3}=\varepsilon .

With y′y' in place of yy and the positive constants cc and R′R' in place of cc and RR, this is claim The Discrete Dyson Energy per Particle: Bounds, Compactness with a Lower Limit, and Recovery Configurations with Separated Particles §recovery.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…