Reason: Proof of lem:derivative-arithmetic-1d-2026a: direct difference-quotient estimates; product rule via the T1+T2+T3 decomposition and continuity at the point.
Proof
Throughout, ∣⋅∣ is the absolute value on R, and h always denotes a real number with x0+h∈I. Recall from Derivative at an Interior Point that a real number L is the derivative of a function u:I→R at x0 precisely when for every real ε>0 there is a real δ>0 such that every such h with 0<∣h∣<δ satisfies hu(x0+h)−u(x0)−L<ε.
Claim 1. Let u be the function with constant value b. For every h as above with h=0, hu(x0+h)−u(x0)=hb−b=0, so hu(x0+h)−u(x0)−0=0<ε for every real ε>0, with δ=1 say. Hence u is differentiable at x0 with derivative 0.
Claim 2. Write A=f′(x0) and B=g′(x0).
Sum. Let ε>0 be real. Choose δf>0 for f and ε/2, and δg>0 for g and ε/2, and set δ=min{δf,δg}>0. For 0<∣h∣<δ,
so by the triangle inequality the left side has absolute value less than ε/2+ε/2=ε.
Constant multiple. If c=0 then cf is the constant function 0, which by claim 1 is differentiable at x0 with derivative 0=cA. If c=0, let ε>0 be real and choose δ>0 for f and ε/∣c∣, which is positive. For 0<∣h∣<δ,
as one checks by expanding: f(x0+h)hg(x0+h)−g(x0)+g(x0)hf(x0+h)−f(x0) equals the left-hand difference quotient, and the remaining terms cancel.
Let ε>0 be real. Set M=∣f(x0)∣+1, so M≥1>0. By the continuity just noted, applied with the positive real min{1,ε/(3(∣B∣+1))}, there is δa>0 such that every h with ∣h∣<δa satisfies
f(x0+h)−f(x0)<min{1,3(∣B∣+1)ε},
and hence also ∣f(x0+h)∣≤∣f(x0)∣+∣f(x0+h)−f(x0)∣<M. Choose δb>0 for g and the positive real ε/(3M), and δc>0 for f and the positive real ε/(3(∣g(x0)∣+1)). Put δ=min{δa,δb,δc}>0 and let 0<∣h∣<δ. Then
so by the triangle inequality the displayed difference has absolute value less than ε. As ε>0 was arbitrary, fg is differentiable at x0 with derivative Ag(x0)+f(x0)B. ■